「process safety」の検索結果

Meta's 86M prompt injection and jailbreak detector. Filters malicious prompts and third-party data for LLM apps. 99%+ TPR, <1% FPR. Fast (<2ms GPU). Multilingual (8 languages). Deploy with HuggingFace or batch processing for RAG security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrate multiple AI agents for construction workflows: estimator, scheduler, document, QA and safety agents coordinated by a supervisor agent, with human checkpoints. Use when automating end-to-end project processes with agentic AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building batch jobs, ETL pipelines, scheduled imports/exports, or any chunk-oriented bulk processing with Spring Batch. Covers the Spring Batch 5 / Boot 3 builder API, restartability and idempotent job parameters, reader/writer thread-safety, fault tolerance, and chunk transaction boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building batch jobs, ETL pipelines, scheduled imports/exports, or any chunk-oriented bulk processing with Spring Batch. Covers the Spring Batch 6 / Boot 4 builder API, resourceless vs JDBC job repositories, restartability and idempotent job parameters, reader/writer thread-safety, fault tolerance, and chunk transaction boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, remix, edit, inpaint, reframe, background-process, describe, layerize, and upscale images with the Ideogram Developer API. Use when Codex must integrate Ideogram 4.0 or 3.0, render reliable typography or structured layouts, use style or character references, build synchronous or webhook workflows, migrate legacy Ideogram endpoints, or reason about Ideogram API pricing, safety, privacy, and production QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing Craft CMS 5 plugins and modules with Pest — test isolation, database safety, and the markhuot/craft-pest-core harness. ALWAYS load when writing, running, fixing, or reviewing tests for a Craft plugin or module, and whenever a suite touches a real Craft install. Covers why rollback is opt-in, tests/Pest.php + tests/bootstrap.php wiring, phpunit.xml.dist <env> pins (force DB name + table prefix, default connection coordinates, pin CRAFT_ENVIRONMENT against server-scoped locks), why --configuration= defeats DB isolation, throwing fail-closed DB guards, installing the plugin under test, process-timezone pinning, per-test site fixtures, idempotent Install migrations, stale service caches when components get swapped, muting audit sinks, queue stubs, factories, HTTP/DB assertions, CI jobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create robust Python automation with full logging and safety checks. Use when tasks need complex data processing, authenticated API work, conditional file operations, or error handling beyond simple shell commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews game audio code for Wwise/FMOD integration safety, custom DSP plugin correctness, and audio middleware usage. Use when the user asks to review a Wwise plugin, check an FMOD DSP effect, audit game audio middleware integration, or asks "is my game audio code safe?". Trigger on phrases like "review my Wwise plugin", "check FMOD DSP effect", "is my game audio code safe", "review my audio middleware integration", or when you see AkPluginInfo, FMOD_DSP_DESCRIPTION, IMetaSoundSource, or Execute/process callbacks in game audio code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Yuzu C++ source changes for resource ownership, RAII, borrowed lifetimes, C ABI contexts, casts, process/syscall boundaries, callbacks, threads, and sanitizer coverage. Use for any governance Gate 3 review when C++ files change, paired with cpp-expert.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides agents to interactively discover customer requirements for live, bidirectional multi-agent AI systems that process continuous streams of multimodal data for real-time technical guidance and safety monitoring. Generates a custom Google Cloud solution that uses opinionated best practices and architecture guidance. Use when users need agentic assistance to design and create a multi-product solution in the cloud for live bidirectional multimodal streaming workloads. Don't use for simple text-based chat applications or workloads without real-time streaming requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks async races, thread safety, TOCTOU, deadlocks, blocking I/O, resource contention, cross-process races. Two-layer detection: grep + agent reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing .NET concurrency patterns for async I/O, queues, pipelines, or thread safety. Keywords: async/await, channels, dataflow, Rx, lock contention, producer consumer, parallel processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NIST Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems (SP 1500-201/202/203, v1.0, 2017). Use for engineering and analyzing cyber-physical systems (CPS) and IoT: the CPS Framework's aspect × facet grid (nine aspects of concern examined through conceptualization, realization, and assurance facets), cross-property trustworthiness risk management (safety/security/privacy/reliability/resilience together), data interoperability (syntactical/semantic/contextual, canonical models, identifiers, provenance), the timing aspect (time-interval classes, time domains, time-aware networking) and secure/resilient time (GNSS jamming/spoofing, PTP/NTP attacks, holdover, the clock-error model and Allan/MTIE metrics), plus the use-case requirements method. Bridges IT and OT under a clock. Scope limits: a 2017 living/draft document, thin on post-2017 standards and on detailed control catalogs; it names but does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 and 15288 process text or permission-licensed third-party figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from FAA-HDBK-006D (2020), the FAA's System Reliability, Maintainability, and Availability (RMA) Handbook for National Airspace System (NAS) hardware and software. Use for RMA figures of merit (MTBF, MTBO, MTTR, the availability variants), the bathtub curve and probability distributions, the four-stage RMA lifecycle mapped to the FAA Acquisition Management System (AMS), the six-task RMA technical-management/acquisition process, service-thread criticality and the NAS-RD severity-to-target table, the RMA analysis toolbox (RBD, FMEA/FMECA, FTA, Ishikawa, Monte Carlo, Bayesian, FRACAS, ALT, reliability-growth/recovery tests), software reliability (early prediction + reliability growth), and tailorable example RMA requirements for a Program Requirements Document. Scope limits: it is FAA/NAS-specific guidance (not a requirement, by its own statement), centred on hardware-plus-software availability — it brackets out human/service/facility/communications availability, names but does not reproduce the math derivations or external standards (MIL-STDs, IEEE 1633, RTCA DO-178C/DO-278A, SAE JA1011), is thin on detailed worked numerical examples and on safety-case method, and predates any current revision beyond 006D.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advise on defensive security for industrial control systems you operate. Safety first. No process-disruption guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about getting/maintaining motor carrier operating authority — USDOT number, MC number, BOC-3 process agent, insurance filing (MCS-90, BMC-91/91X), Unified Carrier Registration (UCR), International Registration Plan (IRP), International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA), state-level permits (NY HUT, KY weight distance, OR weight-mile, NM weight distance), new entrant safety audit, intra vs interstate, for-hire vs private. Cite 49 CFR 365, 387, 390.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks anything that touches US Department of Transportation (DOT) or Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulation for commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) — including who's regulated, MC vs DOT number differences, operating authority, BOC-3 process agents, MCS-150 biennial updates, intrastate vs interstate distinctions, exemptions, or pointing to the right CFR section. Cite the actual regulation when answering. Don't guess; if you're not sure which Part applies, ask the user to clarify the operation type (for-hire vs private, passenger vs property, intra vs interstate, hazmat, gross weight rating).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。