「questionnaire」の検索結果

Application security testing (AppSec) across a whole product with Strix — decide which asset needs which test (source code, running web app, API, CI pipeline), run it, and turn the results into a ranked remediation plan. Autonomous agents exploit and prove each issue instead of emitting static-analysis alerts, so the plan is ordered by what is actually reachable. Use when the user asks for an application security review or audit, an appsec assessment, vulnerability scanning across their stack, a security review before a launch or a customer security questionnaire, or does not yet know which kind of security test they need.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to create fillable Word forms (.docx) with real Content Controls (SDT) + legacy FormField checkboxes + MERGEFIELD mail-merge placeholders + document protection. Trigger on: 'fillable form', 'form fields', 'content controls', 'SDT', 'word form', 'fill in', 'only editable fields', 'protect document', 'onboarding form', 'HR intake', 'survey template', 'contract / SOW template', 'mail-merge template', 'compliance checklist', 'medical intake questionnaire'. Output is a single .docx where specific fields are editable and the rest is locked. This skill is INDEPENDENT, not a scene layer on docx — payload is `w:sdt` + `w:ffData` + `w:fldChar` + `documentProtection`, none of which docx base skill covers. Do NOT trigger for regular reports, letters, memos, academic papers, pitch decks, or any document with no user-fillable fields — route those to officecli-docx or its scene layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fresh-session RFP and proposal-questionnaire response for {{projectName}}. Parses a new inbound RFP from {{rfp_label}} in Gmail and its attached document in Google Drive, matches each question to our vetted past-answers library and product docs, drafts the full response in a new Google Doc inside {{drafts_folder}}, flags anything it can't answer confidently, and leaves an unsent Gmail draft linking it — holding the completed response for a human to review and submit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a repo agent harness (AGENTS.md, rules, skills, skill refs) for broken paths/commands, redundant instructions, and usefulness using a stack-agnostic dual-judge protocol with planted traps. HIGH PRIORITY questionnaires at top: Q1 optional docs, Q2 B/C budget before Track A (certainty/tokens). A always runs after Q2; B/C opt-in. ADRs/RFCs excluded from T2. Mixed apply uses 11-mixed-apply.md (KEEP/CUT). Use when the user says harness eval, harness-eval, harness debug, audit AGENTS.md, audit skills/rules, instruction audit, redundancy of agent instructions, usefulness of skills, Ship/Review/Hold/Slim/Keep-core for harness, or wants Track A/B/C harness evaluation. Do NOT use for harness setup or init, feature spec-driven work (tlc-spec-driven), or applying Ship/Slim trims unless the user explicitly asks after the report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry skill for Jetson / IGX BSP customization. Asks one core click-to-select setup questionnaire and passes prefilled answers to downstream setup skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans for operating through disruption — impact analysis, recovery objectives, continuity plans, and the exercises that prove they work. Use this to run a business impact analysis, set RTO and RPO, write or test a continuity plan, prepare for a supplier or site failure, or answer a customer's resilience questionnaire.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tencent Survey (wj.qq.com) online survey platform skill. Supports survey creation, question management, answer collection, and data export. Use when user mentions surveys, questionnaires, forms, polls, exams, or assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to create fillable Word forms (.docx) with real Content Controls (SDT) + legacy FormField checkboxes + MERGEFIELD mail-merge placeholders + document protection. Trigger on: 'fillable form', 'form fields', 'content controls', 'SDT', 'word form', 'fill in', 'only editable fields', 'protect document', 'onboarding form', 'HR intake', 'survey template', 'contract / SOW template', 'mail-merge template', 'compliance checklist', 'medical intake questionnaire'. Output is a single .docx where specific fields are editable and the rest is locked. This skill is INDEPENDENT, not a scene layer on docx — payload is `<w:sdt>` + `<w:ffData>` + `<w:fldChar>` + `documentProtection`, none of which docx base skill covers. Do NOT trigger for regular reports, letters, memos, academic papers, pitch decks, or any document with no user-fillable fields — route those to officecli-docx or its scene layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methodology for clause-by-clause review of a contract against a structured deviation policy ("playbook"). Covers how to walk a playbook, locate the matching provision in the contract, apply rule types (max-value, must-be-present, must-be-absent, acceptable-set, must-have-feature), classify the result (ok / risk / reject), choose the prescribed action, and ground each finding in a verbatim excerpt. Use whenever reviewing any contract — NDA, MSA, vendor DD questionnaire, lease, DPA — against a structured rules-based playbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses whether and how an existing mobile product should migrate to React Native. Use when auditing one or more product repositories for migration readiness, including products whose iOS, Android, and other clients live in separate directories or repositories; choosing brownfield, greenfield, or a checkpoint-based path; defining a representative trial; or preparing a baseline and ROI decision before implementation. When product scope or material evidence is unavailable, grills the stakeholder with exactly one question per turn instead of sending a questionnaire.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build traceable internal-review proposal, RFI, RFP, tender, bid, and questionnaire responses from supplied questions and approved sources. Use to analyze questions, contribute business or product evidence, or draft qualified responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to create fillable Word forms (.docx) with real Content Controls (SDT) + legacy FormField checkboxes + MERGEFIELD mail-merge placeholders + document protection. Trigger on: 'fillable form', 'form fields', 'content controls', 'SDT', 'word form', 'fill in', 'only editable fields', 'protect document', 'onboarding form', 'HR intake', 'survey template', 'contract / SOW template', 'mail-merge template', 'compliance checklist', 'medical intake questionnaire'. Output is a single .docx where specific fields are editable and the rest is locked. This skill is INDEPENDENT, not a scene layer on docx — payload is `<w:sdt>` + `<w:ffData>` + `<w:fldChar>` + `documentProtection`, none of which docx base skill covers. Do NOT trigger for regular reports, letters, memos, academic papers, pitch decks, or any document with no user-fillable fields — route those to officecli-docx or its scene layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a user research questionnaire, or turn collected responses into evidence-linked input for a PRD, with the AI Product Development Toolkit's research prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-assisted generation of MCQs (multiple-choice questionnaires) with export to Moodle (GIFT, XML), Wooclap (Excel), Kahoot!, and Word. Supports light MCQs (gamified) and in-depth MCQs (evaluative), with single-answer and multiple-answer formats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a client instruction schedule — a plain-English, Scott Schedule-style Word table that gathers a struggling client's evidence and instructions issue by issue, with a one-page covering note. Use whenever the user asks for a "client instruction schedule", "instruction schedule", "client questionnaire", "schedule of questions for the client", "get instructions from the client on the papers", or says the client is overwhelmed and needs the case broken into manageable questions. Also trigger when asked to turn case papers into a structured request for client input. Do NOT use for court-facing Scott Schedules, pleadings, witness statements, or advice letters — this skill produces a client-facing working document only. Output is always a .docx draft for solicitor review, never a final document.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dung khi agency hoac freelancer nhan khach moi va can CHINH KHACH DIEN thong tin dau vao — form 11 phan ve san pham, muc tieu, ngan sach, kenh dang chay, doi thu, tai san san co, kem 20 ban toi uu theo tung nganh. Kich hoat khi user nhac 'brief khach hang', 'client intake', 'form khach dien', 'nhan khach moi', 'hoi khach nhung gi', 'chua biet gi ve khach', 'onboard khach hang moi', 'questionnaire cho khach'. Khong dung cho — tao file context noi bo cho san pham cua chinh minh thi dung skill product-marketing-context; dao sau insight khach hang cuoi thi dung skill 09-insight-khach-hang; brief NGUOC ra cho agency hoac vendor lam thi dung skill 67-agency-vendor-brief.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agency or freelancer takes on a NEW client and needs everything up front — an 11-section intake covering business overview, audience, current marketing, goals, budget, timeline, brand assets, approval process, and success criteria, written for the client to fill in and return. Trigger on 'client intake', 'agency brief', 'onboard a new client', 'discovery call template', 'what should I ask a new client', 'kickoff questionnaire'. Also use when the user just signed someone and does not know where to begin. Not for — the internal context file the skills read, see `product-marketing-context-global`; the plan built from the answers, see `00-marketing-plan-global`; briefing an outside vendor, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to profile how they work, adapt assistant responses to them, or refresh an existing developer profile. Generates USER-PROFILE.md from session analysis or a questionnaire.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch and continue the Volcengine AI Research survey workflow for concept testing, audience design, questionnaire drafting, interview guide generation, execution confirmation, progress checks, and result queries. Use this skill when the user wants to create, revise, confirm, execute, or follow up on a real AI research survey task in ABCompass instead of doing generic brainstorming, copywriting, translation, summarization, or broad market discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

将你无法完全回答的决策转化为供他人填写的问卷。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-contract vendor privacy due diligence per GDPR Article 28(1). Covers risk questionnaires, technical controls assessment, certification review, data flow analysis, and documented sufficiency decisions for processor engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the Privacy Threshold Analysis screening process to determine whether a full DPIA is required. Provides a quick-screen questionnaire, threshold criteria based on WP248rev.01, escalation triggers, and documentation requirements. Activate when evaluating new processing activities, system changes, or procurement decisions. Keywords: PTA, privacy threshold analysis, DPIA screening, quick-screen, threshold criteria, WP248, escalation triggers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。