404 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Autonomous multi-round research review loop. Repeatedly reviews using a secondary Codex agent, implements fixes, and re-reviews until positive assessment or max rounds reached. Use when user says "auto review loop", "review until it passes", or wants autonomous iterative improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and review autonomous or semi-autonomous agent loops — systems where an agent prompts itself, runs on a schedule or event, and iterates toward a goal without a human at the keyboard. Use this whenever the user wants to build, design, harden, or audit any kind of self-running agent, agentic workflow, control loop, background worker, cron/heartbeat/webhook-driven agent, "Ralph loop", auto-PR-fixer, monitoring agent, or any long-running task that should keep going on its own until done. Trigger this even when the user says "agentic workflow", "automation that runs itself", "an agent that keeps trying until X", or "make my agent stop running away / burning tokens" without using the word "loop". Also use it to review an existing loop's stopping conditions, guardrails, verification, and escalation paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete operational workflow for implementer agents (Codex, Gemini, etc.) making code changes and writing tests. Defines the Code Change Loop, Test Writing Loop, and Issue Filing process with circuit breakers, severity levels, and escalation rules. Includes bundled scripts for specialist-review (code review) and test-review-request (test audit) that delegate to Claude CLI. Use this skill when starting any implementation task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a single Copilot review check-fix cycle on a PR using gh CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: check and fix Copilot review comments, request a Copilot code review on a PR, or iterate on PR feedback. Trigger on phrases like 'copilot review', 'fix PR comments', 'iterate on PR', 're-review', or when the user mentions 'gh pr' with 'copilot'. Combine with /loop for automated repeated cycles, e.g. '/loop 2m /copilot-review'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
他の開発者のGitHub PRを下読みしてレビューコメント案を作り、人間が承認した内容だけを保留(PENDING)レビュー経由で投稿する。自作PRの修正ループには codex-pr-review-loop / claude-pr-review-loop を使う。
Run the full implement-review-fix loop using implementer and reviewer personas. Supports effort-based multi-reviewer scaling (1-5 reviewers) with automatic specialization selection. Includes memory-based feedback loop that learns from past review patterns. Loops until all reviewers find 0 issues of any severity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when previewing files with nuxt-ui-tools as a package consumer. Covers mounting UiFilePreviewProvider, opening one file or a gallery with useFilePreview() or useNuxtApp().$filePreview, file descriptors (URL, File/Blob, or a function that returns a signed URL), options (index, mode, gallery, loop, pdf page, callbacks), the returned handle, the built-in renderers (image, video, audio, PDF, text/JSON, CSV, Markdown, Office and archive fallbacks), renditions, download and custom header actions, the markdown render hook, custom renderers with defineFilePreviewRenderer and UiFilePreviewTools, theming tokens, and how the upload field uses the preview.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, and design repeatable AI-agent loops with explicit triggers, actions, verification, stopping conditions, guardrails, and handoffs. Use when a user asks to analyze a codebase for potential loops, mine coding-thread history for work done more than once, turn repeated engineering work into a loop, find or recommend a published loop, create a recurring agent workflow or automation cadence, turn an outcome into a bounded copy-ready loop, or review an existing loop for weak checks, unsafe authority, unbounded repetition, stale state, or unclear stopping behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-round research review loop using MiniMax API. Use when you want to use MiniMax instead of Codex MCP for external review. Trigger with "auto review loop minimax" or "minimax review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs an autonomous review-and-fix improvement loop over any code target — a skill, plugin, module, or directory — using a reviewer the user names: any installed skill or agent. Keeps a cross-round findings ledger, escalates when fixes stop converging, and guards scope mechanically. Use when asked to 'improve this code until review passes', 'run an improvement loop with <reviewer>', or to iterate review-and-fix with a specific reviewer. For skills prefer the skill-improver entry; for a branch prefer pr-improver.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SUPERSEDED by /claudex-loop (formerly /crucible; adds a Phase 0 research/recon pass + rebuilt interview) — prefer that skill unless you explicitly want this one. Two-act plan hardening. ACT 1 (you ↔ Claude) — Claude interviews you relentlessly about a plan or design, one question at a time, recommending an answer for each and exploring the codebase when it can answer itself, until every branch of the decision tree is resolved. ACT 2 (Claude ↔ Codex) — Claude writes the locked plan to PLAN.md and OpenAI Codex adversarially reviews it in a read-only sandbox (VERDICT:APPROVED/REVISE), Claude revises and re-submits to the SAME Codex session until APPROVED or a MAX_ROUNDS cap, then you sign off before any code. Use when the user says "/grill-me-codex", "grill me then have codex review", "grill me and stress-test the plan", "interview me about this plan then get a second model on it", or is about to build something high-stakes (auth, schema, concurrency, migrations, payments) and wants both alignment AND a cross-model sanity check before implementation. Builds on Matt Pocock's grill-me (MIT). For the docs-aware variant use /grill-with-docs-codex; if you already have a plan and want only the Codex review use /codex-review. NOT for reviewing already-written code (use /codex:review) and NOT for trivial changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a Duck Critic producer-critic loop: you (main) keep producing the plan/code/tests and gate your own work at checkpoints with a different-model critic, revising until it passes. Use when asked for rubber duck, ラバーダック, 別モデルレビュー, second opinion, critic, or a different-model code review, design review, plan critique, or review by another model/agent harness. Not for readability refactoring or code cleanup alone.
Phase 4 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-review has posted a sandbox review comment — it reads the outstanding checkbox items, applies fixes, then watches CI until green (or exits cleanly so you can retry). Trigger phrases: "address review items", "fix review feedback", "resolve review checklist", "watch CI", "poll CI", "check if CI is green", "iterate on PR", "fp-iterate", "Phase 4", "after review comment", "fix the review issues and watch CI". Always bounded — max 10 poll rounds, never loops forever. Exits with a clear status: green (hands off to /fp-drift), still-pending (re-invoke), or failed (diagnose before touching anything).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative manuscript improvement workflow where a reviewer agent critiques, an author agent revises, a verifier checks the revision, and the loop repeats until acceptance or a human-pause condition is reached. Use for virtual peer review, reviewer-author revision loops, rebuttal preparation, resubmission polishing, journal paper improvement, response-to-reviewers drafting, and deciding when additional data, experiments, theory, modeling, or author judgment is required before further revision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Senior engineering analyst for code review, plan review, and automation review. Four-lens review covering architecture, code quality, reliability, and performance, each scored 1-10. Delivers APPROVE, REVISE, or REJECT verdicts. Use when you need a code review, plan review, quality check, or want to verify work before shipping. Part of the architect-system loop. Reads from system/blueprints/ and source code. Outputs to system/reviews/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
公開前の文章やコードを二つの独立したエージェントが同じ基準で審査し、両方の合格まで修正と再審査を繰り返し、上限を超えたら人へ判断を引き継ぐスキル。
When the user wants to set up a recurring, self-running marketing workflow — a repeatable loop an AI agent runs on a cadence (weekly, daily, on a trigger) rather than a one-off task. Also use when the user mentions 'marketing loop,' 'recurring marketing workflow,' 'automate my marketing,' 'marketing on autopilot,' 'weekly marketing review,' 'ad fatigue check,' 'content refresh loop,' 'churn watch,' 'ranking drop alert,' 'run my SEO,' 'SEO operator,' 'daily SEO agent,' 'run my outbound,' 'AI SDR,' 'reply triage,' 'always-on marketing,' 'marketing automation workflow,' or 'run this every week.' Use this to pick, adapt, and schedule an ongoing marketing loop that orchestrates the other marketing skills. For one-off marketing ideas, see marketing-ideas. For the experimentation loop specifically, see ab-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates a GitHub PR review loop by delegating triage and implementation to dedicated sub-agents, then repeating until actionable review items are cleared. Use when the user says “address PR review”, “triage review comments”, or “iterate until review is clean”.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous research review loop using any OpenAI-compatible LLM API. Configure via llm-chat MCP server or environment variables. Trigger with "auto review loop llm" or "llm review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Have Codex independently review an existing implementation plan while Claude coordinates a bounded revision loop. For automatic reviewer selection from either host, use claudex-loop with mode=review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to set up a recurring, self-running marketing workflow — a repeatable loop an AI agent runs on a cadence (weekly, daily, on a trigger) rather than a one-off task. Also use when the user mentions 'marketing loop,' 'recurring marketing workflow,' 'automate my marketing,' 'marketing on autopilot,' 'weekly marketing review,' 'ad fatigue check,' 'content refresh loop,' 'churn watch,' 'ranking drop alert,' 'always-on marketing,' 'marketing automation workflow,' or 'run this every week.' Use this to pick, adapt, and schedule an ongoing marketing loop that orchestrates the other marketing skills. For one-off marketing ideas, see marketing-ideas. For the experimentation loop specifically, see ab-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a one-line description of a repetitive task into a reusable, self-guarding slash command. loop-forge diagnoses the task into one of 5 loop shapes (Batch / Pipeline / Refine / Watch / Explore), interviews for the blanks, and auto-injects two safety devices the user didn't know they needed — an independent verifier (maker ≠ checker) and a hardstop (a budget/count/cooldown ceiling) — then previews the result and stamps it as a `/command` they can run forever. Use when the user says "/loop", "/loop-forge", "/make-it-loop", "automate this", "make this repeatable", "turn this into a command", "do this for all 100 items", "do X every time Y happens", "generate several and pick the best", or otherwise wants to capture a recurring task as a reusable slash command instead of re-typing the prompt by hand. Works in any language: it interviews the user and writes the stamped command in the user's own language. Non-goal — it does not schedule unattended runs (launchd/cron) or publish externally on its own; it stamps the reusable command and stops there.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the adversarial verification loop — implement, then hand the change to a fresh checker that did not write it, fix what it finds, and re-dispatch until APPROVE. Use before claiming any behavioural change is done, and on requests like "review loop", "adversarial review", "independent review", "get this verified", "is this actually done", "maker checker", "second pair of eyes on this change". Not for prose, docs or typo edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Restructure existing code without changing its behavior, through a test-gated refactoring loop: a named target, a green suite over that target before any edit, a planned sequence of small named refactorings, and the full suite re-run after every step. Use when the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, simplify, or improve the design of existing code, or to apply refactoring recommendations from a code-review or architectural-analysis report. This skill changes code; it does not review code (use code-review), assess architecture (use architectural-analysis), plan a multi-module restructure before executing it (use plan-a-change), map domain boundaries before restructuring along them (use ddd-analysis), or build new behavior test-first (use tdd). Do not use it on code inside an active tdd loop; the refactor step of tdd owns that cleanup. Runs its planned sequence to completion without pausing for review; to review each named refactoring as it lands, use pairing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。