「root」の検索結果

Builds complete, optimized Claude prompts and Project scaffolds from task descriptions. Use when building, designing, creating, or structuring a Claude prompt or system prompt. Trigger on: "build me a prompt," "compile a prompt for," "create a system prompt," "write a Claude prompt," "design a prompt for," "help me write a prompt," "scaffold a Claude Project," "design a Project for." Uses a four-stage methodology (Parse, Select, Construct, Validate) and a tested 5-layer architecture (Identity, Objective, Context, Reasoning, Output + Quality Control). In Project Mode, the Compiler is global-layer-aware — checks User Preferences, installed Skills, and MCP Connectors to avoid redundancy and flag gaps. Do NOT use for auditing existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or diagnosing existing Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized prompt-building methodology for content and communications tasks. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for writing, editing, content strategy, copywriting, audience analysis, editorial evaluation, cross-channel adaptation, and persuasion design. Use when building a Claude prompt or system prompt for content creation, editorial workflows, or communications tasks. Trigger on: "build a prompt for writing," "prompt for content strategy," "prompt for copywriting," "prompt for blog posts," "prompt for email sequences," "system prompt for editorial," "prompt for messaging framework," "content brief prompt," "prompt for audience analysis," "prompt that produces better content." Do NOT use for writing content directly — this Skill builds prompts that produce better content. Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for general prompt compilation — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized research and analysis prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for data analysis, policy research, systematic evidence review, investigative research, and research-specific deliverables. Use when building prompts for quantitative data interpretation, evidence-based policy recommendations, literature reviews, causal analysis, hypothesis-driven investigation, or briefing documents. Trigger on: "prompt for data analysis," "research prompt," "policy brief prompt," "literature review prompt," "prompt for investigating," "systematic review prompt," "build a prompt for evidence synthesis," "causal analysis prompt," "briefing document prompt." Also use when user describes a research or analytical task and needs a structured Claude prompt for it. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update an EXISTING Tip in the ai-product-dev-tips repository — edit its README, add or fix code, refresh outdated information, fix mistakes — while keeping the repo's format conventions and syncing the root README link. Use this whenever the user wants to update, edit, fix, revise, refresh, correct, or complete an existing Tip in this repo — e.g. "nlp_processing/29 の README を更新して", "〇〇の Tip を最新仕様に直して", "image_processing/11 の説明を修正して", "あの Tip のリンク切れを直して", "この Tip を完成版にして". It locates the target Tip, studies the current format conventions (shared with the ai-product-dev-tips-create skill), applies consistent edits, verifies the content with web research (no fabrication), and syncs the root README link (title text / [In-progress]). This is for UPDATING existing Tips, not creating new ones — to add a brand-new Tip use the ai-product-dev-tips-create skill instead. Trigger this even if the user doesn't say "skill".

Scaffold a new Tip in the ai-product-dev-tips repository following the existing directory/format conventions, and register its link in the root README.md. Use this whenever the user wants to add, create, or write a new Tip in this repo — e.g. "nlp_processing に〜の Tip を追加して", "新しい Tips を作って", "〜の解説 Tip を書いて", "this repo に〜のネタを追加". It picks the right category and next sequential number, matches the README format of nearby Tips, generates code scaffolding (Dockerfile / requirements.txt / *_cpu.sh / *_gpu.sh / *.py) only when the Tip needs runnable code, and inserts the link into the correct <details> section of the root README. Trigger this even if the user doesn't say the word "skill" — any request to add a new entry to this Tips collection should use it.

Analyzes bootkit and rootkit samples by identifying boot-process tampering (MBR/VBR/ UEFI), kernel-mode components, and stealth hooking techniques from static indicators. Activates for requests to analyze a bootkit or rootkit, examine MBR/UEFI tampering, or identify kernel-mode stealth components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the root cause of a problem, not just symptoms. Use when the user says "root cause", "why does this keep happening", "5 whys", "fishbone diagram", "cause analysis", "problem investigation", "defect analysis", "incident analysis", "A3 problem solving", "what's causing this", "ishikawa" - even if they don't explicitly say "root cause analysis".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve a verified cluster of Rembric issues from causal root to evidence-gated closure. Use after systemic triage identifies a shared root, or when the user asks to attack issues at the root, create a mechanism map, plan a deletion-first fix, or close a fixed/stale issue cluster. Use `diagnose` for a single defect whose reproduction is not yet established.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects rootkit presence on compromised systems by identifying hidden processes, hooked system calls, modified kernel structures, hidden files, and covert network connections using memory forensics, cross-view detection, and integrity checking techniques. Activates for requests involving rootkit detection, hidden process discovery, kernel integrity checking, or system call hook analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware that infects the Master Boot Record (MBR), Volume Boot Record (VBR), or UEFI firmware to gain persistence below the operating system. Covers boot sector analysis, UEFI module inspection, and anti-rootkit detection techniques. Activates for requests involving bootkit analysis, MBR malware investigation, UEFI persistence analysis, or pre-OS malware detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

システムログを分析してエラーの根本原因を特定し、段階的に深堀りしていくデバッグ専門家スキル。 アプリケーションログ、システムログ、クラウドサービスログなど様々な形式に対応。 5 Whys、タイムライン分析、Fishbone分析などのRCA（根本原因分析）手法を用いて 問題の本質を突き止め、再発防止策まで提案する。 Use when analyzing system logs to find error root causes, debugging application issues, or performing technical post-mortem analysis with log data. For organizational incident management processes (post-incident review, corrective action plans, incident reports without log data), use incident-rca-specialist instead. Triggers: "analyze this log", "find the root cause", "debug this error", "why is this failing", "log analysis", "what caused this crash", "troubleshoot this issue"

Detects rootkit presence on compromised systems by identifying hidden processes, hooked system calls, modified kernel structures, hidden files, and covert network connections using memory forensics, cross-view detection, and integrity checking techniques. Activates for requests involving rootkit detection, hidden process discovery, kernel integrity checking, or system call hook analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware that infects the Master Boot Record (MBR), Volume Boot Record (VBR), or UEFI firmware to gain persistence below the operating system. Covers boot sector analysis, UEFI module inspection, and anti-rootkit detection techniques. Activates for requests involving bootkit analysis, MBR malware investigation, UEFI persistence analysis, or pre-OS malware detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects rootkit presence on compromised systems by identifying hidden processes, hooked system calls, modified kernel structures, hidden files, and covert network connections using memory forensics, cross-view detection, and integrity checking techniques. Activates for requests involving rootkit detection, hidden process discovery, kernel integrity checking, or system call hook analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware that infects the Master Boot Record (MBR), Volume Boot Record (VBR), or UEFI firmware to gain persistence below the operating system. Covers boot sector analysis, UEFI module inspection, and anti-rootkit detection techniques. Activates for requests involving bootkit analysis, MBR malware investigation, UEFI persistence analysis, or pre-OS malware detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

複雑な作業や失敗から、根本原因、次回の行動、問題を見分ける兆候を抽出し、再利用できる学習記録にまとめます。同じ原因の既存記録との重複も整理します。

• 複雑な作業後に学びを残したいとき
• 障害調査の原因と教訓の記録
• 同じ原因の学習記録を統合したいとき

Forensic root cause analyzer for Antigravity sessions. Classifies scope deltas, rework patterns, root causes, hotspots, and auto-improves prompts/health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect kernel-level rootkits in Linux memory dumps using Volatility3 linux plugins (check_syscall, lsmod, hidden_modules), rkhunter system scanning, and /proc vs /sys discrepancy analysis to identify hooked syscalls, hidden kernel modules, and tampered system structures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured incident investigation using Five Whys, Fishbone, blameless Postmortem, Fault Tree, Kepner-Tregoe, and FMEA — traces failures to systemic root causes rather than blaming humans. USE WHEN root cause, RCA, 5 whys, fishbone, postmortem, incident analysis, fault tree, why does this keep failing, blameless, recurring bug. NOT FOR systemic loops (use SystemsThinking).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Linux privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a low-privilege shell to root: SUID/SGID binary abuse via GTFOBins, Linux capabilities exploitation (cap_setuid, cap_dac_override, cap_dac_read_search), sudo misconfigurations including NOPASSWD rules and Baron Samedit (CVE-2021-3156), cron job abuse through writable scripts, PATH hijacking, and wildcard injection with tar/rsync/chown. Includes writable /etc/passwd attacks, NFS no_root_squash exploitation, kernel exploits (DirtyPipe CVE-2022-0847, DirtyCow CVE-2016-5195, PwnKit CVE-2021-4034), Docker group container escapes, LD_PRELOAD and LD_LIBRARY_PATH hijacking for shared library injection, systemd service misconfigurations, and sensitive file enumeration for credential harvesting. Integrates automated enumeration with LinPEAS, linux-exploit-suggester, pspy for process monitoring, and GTFOBins for binary exploitation. Each technique includes detection signatures and defender-side visibility to support purple team operations. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1548 (Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism) and related sub-techniques. Designed for authorized penetration testing, red team engagements, and CTF competitions where you hold a low-privilege shell and need to escalate to root.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs systematic root cause analysis to identify the true source of bugs, errors, and unexpected behavior through structured investigation phases — not just treating symptoms. Use when a user reports a bug, crash, error, or broken behavior and needs to debug, troubleshoot, or investigate why something is not working; especially for complex or intermittent issues across multiple components. Applies the Five Whys method, hypothesis-driven testing, stack trace analysis, git blame/log evidence gathering, and causal chain documentation to isolate and confirm root causes before applying any fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinates parallel investigation threads to simultaneously explore multiple hypotheses or root causes across different system areas. Use when debugging production incidents, slow API performance, multi-system integration failures, or complex bugs where the root cause is unclear and multiple plausible theories exist; when serial troubleshooting is too slow; or when multiple investigators can divide root-cause analysis work. Provides structured phases for problem decomposition, thread assignment, sync points with Continue/Pivot/Converge decisions, and final report synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic root-cause debugging. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause investigation first. Four phases: Root Cause Investigation, Pattern Analysis (6 known patterns), Hypothesis Testing (3-strike rule), Implementation. Structured debug report output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes substantive ML, AI, data, scientific-computing, and software-engineering requests to the smallest useful set of managed repository skills. Invoke proactively when a request names or implies a package, framework, model family, dataset, modality, workflow, backend, deployment target, evaluation method, or implementation approach that may benefit from repository guidance, even if no repository is named. Narrow progressively from area to family to repository root: inspect only the one or two most likely area pages; compare candidates by capability, task surface, model/data format, training versus inference versus evaluation intent, runtime constraints, and root-skill description; then open only the selected root and relevant sub-skills, references, or scripts. Select multiple repositories only when each adds a distinct capability. Do not load the whole collection, treat dependencies or incidental integrations as capabilities, choose by name alone, or force a match when no exact taxonomy family applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。