This skill should be used when the user asks to "evaluate LLM output quality", "set up LLM-as-judge", "build an eval rubric", "compare model outputs pairwise", or "measure agent quality".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
254 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
This skill should be used when the user asks to "evaluate LLM output quality", "set up LLM-as-judge", "build an eval rubric", "compare model outputs pairwise", or "measure agent quality".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a legal question, a set of draft questions, or source material such as a statute, jury instruction, rubric, contract checklist, or coding manual into a battery of narrow questions that TypeSafe's Jev, a fast classifier that returns probabilities rather than prose, can answer reliably across many documents. The skill breaks conclusions such as negligence, felony murder, or standing into element-level questions, writes the governing rule into each question, and delivers the questions alone, in Jev's request format or in plain English. Built for legal work that asks the same questions of many texts: coding statutes across jurisdictions, coding opinions or case files for empirical research, checking contracts against a review checklist, screening intake narratives, and grading student work against a rubric. Use when asked to write Jev questions, build a classifier for legal documents, or turn a legal test into yes-or-no questions. Running the questions requires Jev access; writing them does not.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes between five assessment pathways — formative, rubric/criteria, authentic/performance, peer/self, and diagnostic — with validity and equity checks. Use when a teacher needs help choosing how to assess.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operational rubric that turns "don't make AI slop" into observable properties, severity levels, evidence requirements, and repair actions for interface design. Use as the reference rubric when building or reviewing marketing sites, product interfaces, dashboards, portfolios, or e-commerce pages, especially alongside frontend-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
출간 ready 직전 read-only critic. 8-item rubric 강제. 'looks good' rubber-stamp 금지. 라인 ref 필수. 2-round revision hard cap. '최종 QA', '출간 검수', 'rubric으로 평가' 류 트리거.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes, triages, flags and rates a piece of text with a probability for every option: which department or queue a ticket goes to, which intent a message expresses, whether a yes/no condition holds (is this tool call grounded, should the agent ask first, is the customer angry), and how severe or urgent it is on a rubric, each with a calibrated confidence. Runs Claude Haiku in the request and response shapes of OpenAI's Decisions API, for when no purpose-built decision model is at hand. Use for "route this ticket", "triage these", "classify with a confidence", "give me a probability that", "rate the severity", "score against this rubric", guardrail checks before a tool call, or "a Decisions API without OpenAI".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes between five assessment pathways — formative, rubric/criteria, authentic/performance, peer/self, and diagnostic — with validity and equity checks. Use when a teacher needs help choosing how to assess.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You launched an ambassador program. 3 applications. One ghosted after week 2. Should you lower the bar? Offer more perks? Spam influencers? This gives you the complete community & ambassador operations SOP — from pre-launch checklist to recruitment to tiered management to retention to governance. Built from Notion (20M users, real ambassador interviews), AFFiNE (60K stars), Asana, and ClickUp programs. By @WeiYipei. What's inside: • Pre-launch readiness checklist (6 conditions that must be true before starting) • 6-step community setup SOP (platform selection → rules → admin standards → monitoring → wiki → metrics) • Ambassador recruitment system (A+B qualification, application form design, scoring rubric) • 4-tier progression system (Bronze → Silver → Gold → Platinum with point thresholds) • 5-pillar incentive framework (Product quality → Beta access → Founder access → KOL path → Full engagement) • Churn early-warning system + retention playbook • Event operations SOP (6 event types × full lifecycle) • Health metrics dashboard (6 core KPIs + 5 ambassador-specific indicators) • Governance & risk control (behavior code, escalation matrix) • Real templates: recruitment post, welcome email, annual calendar 🇨🇳 你搞了个大使计划。来了3个申请。一个第二周就消失了。该降门槛?加福利?群发KOL?这份SOP给你从启动前置条件到招募到留存到治理的完整社区/大使运营方法论。基于 Notion(2000万用户,大使真实访谈)、AFFiNE(60K stars)、Asana、ClickUp 实战案例。 🇯🇵 アンバサダープログラムを立ち上げた。応募3件。1人は2週間で消えた。基準を下げる?特典を増やす?このSOPは、事前チェックリストから採用、段階管理、リテンション、ガバナンスまでの完全なコミュニティ&アンバサダー運営フレームワークを提供します。Notion(2000万ユーザー)、AFFiNE(60K stars)の実例から構築。 🇰🇷 앰배서더 프로그램을 시작했습니다. 지원 3건. 하나는 2주 만에 사라졌습니다. 기준을 낮출까요? 이 SOP는 사전 체크리스트부터 모집, 단계별 관리, 리텐션, 거버넌스까지 완전한 커뮤니티 & 앰배서더 운영 프레임워크를 제공합니다. Notion(2000만 사용자), AFFiNE(60K stars) 실전 사례에서 구축. Triggers: "ambassador program" | "community building" | "community management" | "DevRel" | "developer relations" | "community growth" | "大使计划" | "社区运营" | "社区搭建" | "コミュニティ運営" | "アンバサダー" | "커뮤니티 운영" | "앰배서더" | "open source community" | "user retention"
Design an LLM eval — task schema, scoring rubric, dataset composition, and pass/fail thresholds. Use when asked to "design an LLM eval", "write a scoring rubric", or "how do we measure this model".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design pattern for converting rule-following, checklist, or rubric skills into a fan-out map-reduce ensemble of parallel rigid sub-agents with corroboration-weighted merge; worker model tier and diversity are knobs matched to inference load and stakes, not fixed values. Apply when creating or refactoring a skill or agent that applies 10+ independent criteria in a single pass. Triggers on: 'review against a checklist', 'fan out', 'map reduce review', 'ensemble', 'split the rules', 'apply rubric', or any large ruleset being applied by one agent in one pass. NOT for tight single-pass transforms or rulesets under 5 criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM-as-judge evaluation framework with 5-dimension rubric (accuracy, groundedness, coherence, completeness, helpfulness) for scoring AI-generated content quality with weighted composite scores and evidence citations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Loads, lists, composes, or validates graded evaluation rubrics: PASS/WARN/FAIL grading with weighted criteria and balanced anchor examples for evaluator-style review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when negotiating a file-based sprint contract between the generator (developer) and evaluator before code is written. Translates a product-level spec into testable acceptance criteria with rubric tie-ins. Triggers on /mk:sprint-contract, "draft a sprint contract", "negotiate scope for sprint", or before any harness-driven sprint kicks off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental behavioral evaluator. Drives a running artifact via browser/curl/CLI and records rubric evidence; the runner is not yet a fully implemented automated evaluation system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
从对标账号导入 script + 数据 → 拆 pattern + 派生 base rubric 信号 → 写到 benchmark.md / script_patterns.md / rubric_notes.md。**这是工具最早期信号的来源**——cold-start 用户没自己历史时全靠对标,发过历史的用户也建议至少 1 个对标做 sanity check。触发词:"学这个账号"/"拆这几个对标视频"/"learn from"/"导入对标账号"/"找对标"。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
INTERNAL sub-agent, not a user-facing skill. Performs context-isolated nine-dimension rubric scoring for cheat-score, cheat-predict, and cheat-bump. Accepts only script and rubric-note paths, returns strict JSON, and refuses post-publish evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
从复盘评论数据派生 / 刷新账号的受众画像,写入 audience.md。这是和 rubric 平行的第二个派生物——rubric 答"怎么打分",persona 答"谁在看"。cheat-seed 选题 / 写稿时读它。**audience.md 含实绩信号,cheat-score-blind 硬禁读**。触发词:"构造受众画像"/"更新 persona"/"我的观众是谁"/"build persona"/"刷新受众画像"/"看看我的受众画像"。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
governanceの登録・rubric合成を実行したいとき、再評価・rollback automationを安全に選択したいときに使う。
skill・agent・pluginのgovernance lintを選択したいとき、rubricを含む検査をfail-closedで実行したいときに使う。
生成済みSKILL.mdを評価したいとき、rubric準拠を確認したいときに使う。
Weekly read-only repository audit. Grades one rotating rubric from .claude/audit-rubrics/, files between zero and five GitHub issues for what it finds, and changes no files. Use when the user asks to audit the repo, or when the audit-weekly workflow invokes it. It never edits, commits, branches, or opens pull requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author or expand browser-agent benchmark tasks in data/real_world_bench.json (Odysseys schema, per-rubric graded). Use when creating, adding, or expanding real-world browser tasks, writing rubrics, or picking bot-friendly sites — every task MUST be verified runnable through ego-browser before it is written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。