「scd」の検索結果

Scaffolds or audits a social-science replication package and evaluates the manuscript and archived research objects against FAIR principles. Scaffold mode writes the folder structure, README, master.R, figure-table crosswalk, codebook, LICENSE placeholder, and .gitignore; audit mode grades the package against a pre-release checklist and audits data, code, materials, identifiers, licenses, access restrictions, and availability statements. Use when setting up or repairing a package, checking one before submission, auditing FAIR compliance, or drafting availability statements. Adapted from Yusaku Horiuchi’s replication-package-guide.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a multi-model orchestration workflow led by the session's Fable or Claude Opus model. Sends menial tool-calling work to Haiku subagents, judgment work to Opus subagents at an effort matched to each task, and high-stakes or fresh-perspective questions to a GPT-6 Astra Codex peer. Detects the lead from session context; `--lead fable` or `--lead opus` overrides. Use to orchestrate, delegate, fan out, get a decorrelated Codex opinion, run a blind Opus-Codex cross-check, or act as tech lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds or audits a research-project repository organized around its source library (original PDFs, tracked Markdown conversions, drop zone, bibliography, intake pipeline) plus the analysis, manuscript, and review folders the project type needs. Use when starting, structuring, or auditing a research repo or its sources folder. Single-PDF intake goes to process-source, replication packages to replication-package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organizes an author’s response to peer review. Extracts every referee and editor point, tags severity and type, orders the revision by dependency, flags defensible pushbacks as questions, and builds a numbered comment → response → location letter whose substantive answers the author writes. Use when the user has referee reports, a revise-and-resubmit decision, or an editor’s letter and wants to plan the revision, draft the response letter, or check that every point was addressed. The reviewer-side twin is journal-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operates or audits a live Qualtrics survey through the v3 APIs without disrupting fielding. Covers publish gating, quotas, flow routing, embedded data, panel-vendor redirects, read-back verification, and a read-only pre-fielding audit. Use when publishing or patching a fielding instrument, when a quota counts without blocking, when configuring panel-vendor redirects or flow gates, or when auditing a survey before launch for consent gates, force-response completeness, quotas and redirects, anti-bot instrumentation, and language-arm symmetry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launches and configures the standalone presubmit CLI, an API-driven adversarial peer-review pipeline with 30-plus stages, including Red Team finders, Blue Team defence, verification cascade, legal pass, and copyedit, producing one consolidated report on disk. Verifies installation and API key, chooses the output location and smoke, standard, or custom mode, launches the run, and reports the result path. Use when the user asks to run presubmit, wants a deep unattended pre-submission audit, or needs a math or replication-code audit. Everyday self-audits go to paper-review-lite, and external refereeing to journal-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs survey instruments, covering question wording, scale construction and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting and soft launches, respondent burden with attention and speeding rules, sensitive questions and social-desirability bias, and treatment delivery. Use when the user writes or revises survey questions, chooses a scale, orders blocks, plans a pilot, or worries respondents will not answer honestly. Indirect measurement goes to list-experiment, multi-country instruments to cross-national-design, and live-survey operations to qualtrics-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs publication tables for social-science manuscripts. Covers whether a result belongs in a table at all, column order, row grouping and panels, decimal precision, standard-error and confidence-interval conventions, self-contained titles and notes, and code-generated output. Use when building or revising a regression, balance, descriptive, or robustness table, or when working with modelsummary, stargazer, gt, esttab, or booktabs. Finished tables go to figure-table-audit for end-stage QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs publication figures for social-science manuscripts. Covers chart choice, axes and scales, color and accessibility, legend order, captions that carry the title, and script-based reproducibility. Use when making, revising, or critiquing a figure for a paper, such as a coefficient plot, small multiples, a distribution, a trend, a map, or a network. Finished figure sets go to figure-table-audit for end-stage QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes or reviews a pre-analysis plan before data collection — registry choice (OSF, AEA RCT Registry, AsPredicted, registered reports), PAP structure, models and decision rules locked in advance, analysis code run on simulated data, contingencies for attrition, failed manipulations, and exclusions, deviation records, and timeline. Operationalizes the pre-data-collection side of DA-RT. Use when the user asks to draft or audit a pre-registration or PAP, choose a registry, decide what to lock versus leave exploratory, or handle a later deviation. Hypotheses and estimands come from hypothesis-building, post-hoc reporting from methods-reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and diagnoses list experiments (the item count technique), covering whether indirect measurement is warranted, control-list construction against floor and ceiling effects, design variants, estimators and assumption tests in the list package, and power planning for the precision penalty. Use when the user measures a sensitive attitude or behavior and asks about list experiments, item count, unmatched count, or veiled questioning, or has an implausible prevalence estimate. Deciding whether sensitivity bias exists at all goes to survey-design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up and validating topic models for survey and experimental text. Covers the discovery-versus-measurement question, choosing STM, LDA, or BERTopic, preprocessing consequences, prevalence and content formulas, topic-count selection across coherence, exclusivity and FREX, held-out likelihood, and residuals, validation of topics against human judgment, robustness, and DA-RT-compliant reporting. Use when the user has open-ended responses or another corpus and asks what topics are present, how many topics to use, about STM, searchK, coherence, or FREX, or wants topic prevalence compared across treatment arms or countries. Fixed-codebook coding goes to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a referee report for a journal editor. Produces a recommendation, claim-and-design summary, three to six decision-driving concerns, additional concerns, and a revision plan through five parallel adversarial finders, Breaker, Butcher, Shredder, Void, Situator, a Blue Team error filter, Chief Reviewer synthesis, Tone Guard legal pass, and optional confidential editor note. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript. Self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, and author responses go to referee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits fielded survey-response data for registered elements, data quality, bot and AI-automation screening, and sample integrity, and produces an appendix-ready quality report. Use at soft launch before full field, after fielding before outcomes are analyzed, or when asked what a study did about bots and AI respondents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether each claim in a manuscript is supported by the source it cites, reading the project's per-source Markdown knowledge base. Flags contradicted, unsupported, overclaimed, out-of-scope, and misattributed claims with verbatim source quotes. Runs citation-check first, and stops at a pre-flight gate when the knowledge base is missing, incomplete, or holds unconverted PDFs. Use to verify that a draft's claims match the sources it cites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs end-stage QA on a finished figure and table set. Checks callouts, numbering, and cross-references, whether numbers in the text match the exhibits, self-contained captions and statistical notes, accessibility and production quality, and links to the SI and replication package. Values that could only be read off an image are marked for author verification rather than estimated. Use when preparing a submission. Design guidance during drafting belongs to figures and tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads or converts documents in a research workflow, including PDF, Word, PowerPoint, Excel, OpenDocument, RTF, EPUB, and CSV. Chooses direct reading or conversion, selects a converter from document structure, and decides whether the Markdown is tracked or temporary. Use when a document must be read, quoted, summarized, searched, extracted, or added to a source library. Scanned documents go to vlm-ocr and bulk intake to research-repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a theory into falsifiable, pre-registerable hypotheses, covering the DGP and DAG, identification, SATE versus PATE, counterfactual and directional framing, named estimands, justified SESOIs, the choice among NHST, equivalence, interval, and minimum-effect tests, scope conditions, and primary, secondary, and exploratory tiers. Use when the user asks to turn a research question or theory into hypotheses, whether a prediction is falsifiable, what the estimand is, or how to predict a null. Framing goes to narrative-building, the plan to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds or audits a literature review, producing an evidence map, the closest prior work, source clusters, a gap verdict, and a synthesis plan for the introduction. Use when the user asks whether a contribution is novel, who has studied a question, what the literature establishes, or how to organize a review, or wants a reading list, Zotero export, or pile of papers turned into one. For systematic reviews or meta-analyses it produces the protocol scaffold and routes registration (PROSPERO or OSF) and screening to dedicated tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads model uncertainty from token log-probabilities. Covers collecting logprobs and aggregating multi-token labels, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration assessment with ECE, Brier scores, and reliability diagrams against human labels, responsible downstream use of confidence, and reproducibility archives. Use when the user asks about classifier confidence by item, logprobs, top-k tokens, calibration, ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams, or routing low-confidence cases to human review. Codebook and validation design go to text-classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advises on setting up LLM-based text classification as a validated measurement design. Covers codebook construction, learning-regime and model choice, prompt construction, validation against human coding with kappa and F1, hybrid human-LLM review, downstream measurement error, and reporting, plus a short resumable batch pattern with a rule-based baseline for repeated free text against a closed codebook. Use when the user wants to classify, code, or label text at scale. Category discovery goes to topic-modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits a methods section against a 45-item reporting checklist synthesized from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT, covering pre-registration, recruitment, randomization and treatments, sample flow and attrition, sample-size justification, three-tier results labeling, conjoint reporting, validity, and open-science infrastructure. Use when checking whether a methods section reports enough, preparing a submission or replication archive, asking what CONSORT, JARS, or DA-RT require, or documenting a deviation from a pre-analysis plan. Writing that plan before data collection goes to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a deliberative two-model committee of GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus under a selectable chair, Fable by default, with `/model-committee-astra`, `/model-committee-opus`, and `/model-committee-sol` selecting the others. Use when a consequential decision has several defensible options and two model families should propose, critique, revise, and cross-rank them against a predeclared rubric before converging, as in research design, interpretation, architecture, manuscript strategy, or evaluation design. Not for factual lookups, independent-coder reliability, brainstorming, routine implementation, or final professional judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。