「scorecard」の検索結果

Evaluate any agent skill against a merged framework — Anthropic's Claude Code best practices plus Matt Pocock's writing-great-skills methodology — across 4 axes (Trigger, Structure, Steering, Pruning). Produces an evidence-cited scorecard (0–100), a weighted overall score, and diagnosed failure modes with prioritized fixes. Use when the user asks to evaluate, rate, or audit a skill ("evaluate this skill", "skill scorecard", "review SKILL.md"), or to compare two skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly marketing audit and operating review. Pulls the last 7 days of source-backed marketing, analytics, content, paid media, lead, watcher, and audit data; compares it to the prior 7 days; flags urgent issues; and produces a weekly scorecard plus action list. Use when "weekly audit", "weekly marketing review", "weekly check-in", "weekly scorecard", "what changed this week", "Friday marketing review", or any request for a recurring 7-day marketing audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive audit of a user's entire Claude environment — combines Project audit (six-dimension Project Scorecard, seven anti-patterns) with Global audit (six-dimension Global Layer Scorecard) plus Cross-Layer Alignment Check across all nine layers and Evolutionary Recommendations across four pathways. Produces a unified action plan. Use when user says "full audit of everything," "audit my entire Claude setup," "full stack audit," "comprehensive review of my project and preferences," "check everything," or wants the complete health check of both a specific Project AND their global configuration. Also use when a project audit reveals cross-layer issues that require full-stack visibility. Do NOT use for auditing only a Project (use rootnode-project-audit if available) or only global layers (use rootnode-global-audit if available). Do NOT use for single prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate strategy into a balanced scorecard, strategy map, OKR bridge, and executive initiative portfolio with clear measures, targets, and owners. Use when leadership needs strategic alignment, portfolio prioritization, or a management dashboard tied to outcomes. Do not use for ad-hoc brainstorming with no strategic horizon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KPI体系設計とOKR策定支援スキル。ビジネス目標に整合したKPI設計、バランススコアカード、OKRフレームワーク、 ダッシュボード設計を提供。SMART原則、リーディング/ラギング指標の選定を支援。 Use when designing KPI frameworks, implementing OKR methodology, or creating performance measurement systems. Triggers: "KPI design", "OKR", "performance metrics", "balanced scorecard", "dashboard design", "measurement framework".

Scores inbound leads against the qualification rubric the user supplies (criteria, scale, weights, thresholds and disqualifiers as given): one DRAFT scorecard per lead with the evidence quoted per criterion, UNKNOWN wherever the lead's information is missing, totals shown with and without the UNKNOWN criteria, a ranked list and a suggested next step such as a qualification call, a request for missing details, nurture or a courteous decline. Use when the user asks to "score these inbound leads", "qualify this lead against our rubric", "run the web form submissions through our lead criteria", "which of these leads should sales call first" or "build a lead scorecard". Do not use for preparing the first call with a lead, use discovery-call-prep instead; for an existing account's growth plan use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a DRAFT job description from a role brief, team context and the organisation's own template, in inclusive plain language, with every requirement traced to its source, unconfirmed fields marked TBC and a numbered list of items the hiring manager must confirm before posting. Use when the user asks to "write a job description", "draft the job ad", "refresh this role profile", "tidy up this vacancy notice" or "turn these notes into a job posting" from a brief, notes or an old job description. Do not use for interview questions or a scorecard from the finished job description, use interview-scorecard-builder instead; for the new hire's first 90 days, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a DRAFT 30-60-90 day onboarding plan for a new hire from the role, the team context and the systems list: phase outcomes traced to the role, activities with a named owner and due window, an access and equipment request table, learning items, manager checkpoints and the items the manager must confirm. Use when the user asks to "build an onboarding plan for our new hire", "draft the induction plan for this role", "write a first 90 days plan", "put together a new starter plan with owners", "create a ramp plan from this job description" or "plan the integration of an internal mover". Do not use for writing the job description itself, use job-description-drafter instead; for interview questions or a scorecard, use interview-scorecard-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate deliverable quality — scorecard, outcome tracking, regression checklist, and aggregate stats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

運送会社の選定、運賃交渉、入札、実績評価、貨物の割り当てを支援します。米国の輸送実務を基に、費用・配送品質・輸送力を踏まえた契約や更新の判断を整理します。

• 新しい運送会社の審査
• 輸送業務の入札準備
• 運賃や燃料割増を交渉したいとき

Retrieve probabilistic forecasts and their scorecard context. Use when the user asks what World Monitor is forecasting, how probabilities shifted, or how calibrated the forecasts are.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and run evaluation suites, watch live benchmark progress, view scorecards, compare model performance, and integrate eval runs with CI workflows from the CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

5-dimension harness readiness scorecard from `metaharness score {path}`. Returns harnessFit / compileConfidence / taskCoverage / toolSafety / memoryUsefulness + estCostPerRunUsd + scaffoldReady. Pure-read; subprocess invocation; degrades gracefully when MetaHarness is absent (ADR-150 architectural constraint).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this for a dashboard, metrics page, KPI tracker, scorecard, data visualization or recurring report: a page or scroll story of charts, numbers and tables of data, whatever the data and wherever it comes from. Read it when creating, filling, refreshing or revising one. You write datasets (a live query on a connector, or an attached CSV/TSV/JSON file), then the page as plain HTML, in the dashboard's own store.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive REST API design review with automated linting, breaking-change detection, and design scorecards. Catches inconsistent conventions, missing versioning, and design smells before APIs ship. Use when reviewing a PR that adds or changes API endpoints, auditing an existing API for v2 migration, or establishing API standards for a team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing a specific inbound deal before close — when sales has asked for a discount that exceeds AE authority, when the customer has redlined the MSA, when per-deal economics (margin after discount, multi-year payment shape, indemnity exposure) need to be quantified, or when discount approval needs to be routed to a named human approver (Sales Director, VP Sales, CFO, CRO, General Counsel). Covers deal review, discount approval routing, per-deal margin scoring, deal exception handling, MSA redline triage, contract landmine detection (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA), and named-approver chain assembly. NEVER auto-approves — every output is a numeric scorecard plus a routing recommendation to a named human.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide the user through an independent iFixAi audit of their own agent, checking whether it does the job it is supposed to do given their business rules and org structure. Prefer pointing it at the user's REAL deployed agent over its HTTP endpoint (its actual tools, retrieval, and governance) with `--provider http --endpoint <url>`; only when no endpoint is reachable, fall back to replicating the model beneath as a bare stand-in (Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Azure, Bedrock, etc.). Graded by the judge(s) of their choice (the same model, one independent judge, or a cross-vendor panel). You are the operator who walks them through it and explains the scorecard, running the SAME `ifixai run` engine as the guided CLI. Use when the user asks to run iFixAi or to audit an agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a human-facing visual report — a chart, dashboard, scorecard, or styled summary — that renders as a live page in the screenpipe viewer instead of plain text. Use when the task asks for a visual/graphical output rather than a plain note; do NOT use for plain text or raw data (prefer a markdown note for those).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare KPI readouts, scorecards, WBR/MBR/QBR updates, and executive summaries from quantitative business or product metrics; use when the task is to report status, compare against targets, explain validated drivers, and state operating implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build source-backed dashboards for monitoring performance, exploring drivers, or acting on product and business metrics. Use when the task needs a dashboard, scorecard, or monitoring view with clear metrics, filters, source definitions, and QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score work out of 10 against a clear rubric, then improve it round by round until every item reaches the target score the user named (for example "get it to 8 out of 10", "bring everything under 6 up to 6+"). Covers anchored rubrics, measurable criteria, independent or blind judging, before/after scorecards, and honest reporting of anything still short. Use whenever the user asks to score, rate, grade or judge something out of 10, names a target score, or asks "what would make this a 9?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit economic analysis outputs (fiscal briefings, macro briefings, market research, longlists, and other quantitative economic documents) against methodology standards, academic literature, and common errors. Runs structured checks across core categories including counterfactual, additionality, discounting, double counting, distributional analysis, Aqua Book RIGOUR, and Flyvbjerg-style strategic misrepresentation detection. Returns a RAG scorecard with issues ranked by severity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。