980 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Provides combined DPIA and AI Act conformity assessment template with integrated risk scoring matrix. Covers GDPR Art. 35 DPIA elements, AI Act high-risk system requirements, mitigation measures, and human oversight assessment. Keywords: DPIA template, conformity assessment, risk scoring, AI Act, combined assessment, high-risk AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ESM2 protein language model for sequence scoring, embeddings, and plausibility checks. Use this skill when: (1) Computing pseudo-log-likelihood (PLL) scores, (2) Getting protein embeddings for clustering, (3) Filtering designs by sequence plausibility, (4) Zero-shot variant effect prediction, (5) Analyzing sequence-function relationships. For structure prediction, use chai1-structure-prediction or boltz-structure-prediction. For QC thresholds, use protein-design-qc.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when scoring leads, qualifying prospects, prioritizing pipeline, deciding which accounts to pursue, or building a lead scoring model. Triggers: 'score this lead', 'qualify this prospect', 'is this a good lead', 'lead scoring', 'prioritize my pipeline', 'qualification framework'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Gate resumption of any multi-day LLM batch-scoring campaign that calls an unpinned model alias (deepseek-chat, gpt-*-latest, gemini-*-preview, any provider alias without a pinned version). Use when: (1) resuming a paused or credit-exhausted scoring run days after its last chunk, (2) topping up credits to finish a campaign, (3) extending a cached scoring pipeline with new items. Prevents silently splicing two model versions or serving revisions into one measure. Verified 2026-07-16: for $0.30 caught a serving-revision drift WITHIN DeepSeek v4-flash (same alias, same family, litigation scores systematically shifted across a 2-day gap) before an $83 resume spend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infer transcription factor regulons from single-cell RNA-seq with pySCENIC by combining GRNBoost2 co-expression, cisTarget motif-enrichment pruning, and AUCell per-cell activity scoring. Covers the motif-pruning-as-directionality principle, regulon specificity scoring, run-to-run stability, and database/species matching. Use when identifying TF regulons, scoring TF activity per cell, finding master regulators of cell identity, or comparing regulon activity across conditions. For enhancer-driven multiomic GRNs see multiomics-grn; for bulk inference and VIPER protein-activity see grn-inference.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hybrid ML + physics binding affinity prediction. Empirical scoring, MM/GBSA rescoring, multi-method consensus, and batch virtual screening for protein-ligand complexes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
スコアリング / ML のドメイン正しさのレビュー。SCORE_WEIGHTS の単一定義と合計1.0・ドキュメント追随、スコアリングと ML の10要素の一致（手書きで並ぶ全箇所の同時更新）、未来情報リーク（as-of カットオフを通していない取得経路の新設）、値域0〜100とゼロ除算、データ欠損時の既定値、学習・予測の決定性と再現性、JRA 枠番割当規則、バックテスト指標（1位的中率・上位3頭精度・順位相関・ROI）の計算を検証。Use when user says 'スコアリングレビュー', 'review scoring', 'ML レビュー', 'スコア計算チェック', '特徴量チェック', or 'バックテスト検証'.
Infer transcription factor regulons from single-cell RNA-seq with pySCENIC by combining GRNBoost2 co-expression, cisTarget motif-enrichment pruning, and AUCell per-cell activity scoring. Covers the motif-pruning-as-directionality principle, regulon specificity scoring, run-to-run stability, and database/species matching. Use when identifying TF regulons, scoring TF activity per cell, finding master regulators of cell identity, or comparing regulon activity across conditions. For enhancer-driven multiomic GRNs see multiomics-grn; for bulk inference and VIPER protein-activity see grn-inference.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design structured evaluation rubrics for scoring LLM and agent outputs — defining quality dimensions, scoring scales, hard gates, score descriptions, and edge cases. Load when the user asks to create an eval rubric, define evaluation criteria, design scoring dimensions, write an eval spec, or says "what should I evaluate", "design a rubric", "create eval criteria", "define quality dimensions", "evaluation rubric for", "how do I measure quality of". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infer transcription factor regulons from single-cell RNA-seq with pySCENIC by combining GRNBoost2 co-expression, cisTarget motif-enrichment pruning, and AUCell per-cell activity scoring. Covers the motif-pruning-as-directionality principle, regulon specificity scoring, run-to-run stability, and database/species matching. Use when identifying TF regulons, scoring TF activity per cell, finding master regulators of cell identity, or comparing regulon activity across conditions. For enhancer-driven multiomic GRNs see multiomics-grn; for bulk inference and VIPER protein-activity see grn-inference.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
絞り込んだ競合を九つの観点で採点し、根拠付きの比較カードと戦略の二軸図に整理するスキル。各社の強みや、自社が狙う領域の競合を確認します。
ユーザーや状況に合う上位候補を選ぶ推薦・ランキング処理を、候補取得から採点、選択、記録までの6段階で設計し、動くコードのひな形にするスキル。
電子カルテに組み込む臨床判断支援を設計し、薬の相互作用や用量の検証、臨床スコアの計算、警告の重要度に応じた画面制御とテストを実装するスキル。
公開サイトやAPIから求人・価格・ニュースなどを定期収集する仕組みを作ります。AIによる要約・分類・採点、保存先との連携、利用者の評価を次回に反映する設計も扱います。
競合のブランド表現やサービス、実績などを共通の基準で採点し、根拠付きの比較カードと戦略上の二軸図にまとめ、自社が狙う位置の競合を把握するスキル。
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ranks any list of impediments and their countermeasures using a value-stream scoring model (ROI, Cost to Implement, Ease of Deployment, Risk Factor) and a fixed prioritization formula. Use when someone asks to prioritize, rank, sequence, or triage impediments, countermeasures, remediation items, risks, findings, gaps, action items, or backlog entries; or mentions value-stream prioritization, A3 / lean countermeasure ranking, ROI vs. effort scoring, or building a remediation / improvement backlog. Works with GHQR findings, audit results, retrospective action items, risk registers, architecture review gaps, or any free-form `{impediment, countermeasure}` list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds end-to-end hiring packets — job post, structured interview guide with scoring rubric, and offer letter template — from a hiring brief. Triggers on: "help me hire", "we're hiring for", "write a job post", "job description", "JD", "open role", "create a job ad", "interview questions", "scoring rubric", "draft an offer letter", "send an offer", "make a hiring packet", or any request to recruit for a position. When in doubt, trigger — covers the full hiring workflow from job post through DocuSign envelope creation via browser. Does NOT screen or rank applicants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monitors customer health, predicts churn risk, and identifies expansion opportunities using weighted scoring models for SaaS customer success. Use when analyzing customer accounts, reviewing retention metrics, scoring at-risk customers, or when the user mentions churn, customer health scores, upsell opportunities, expansion revenue, retention analysis, or customer analytics. Runs three Python CLI tools to produce deterministic health scores, churn risk tiers, and prioritized expansion recommendations across Enterprise, Mid-Market, and SMB segments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runbook for scoring and routing a new HubSpot lead to the right rep for {{projectName}} — territory matching, segment specialists, the stateless round-robin pool, intent scoring, HubSpot property writes, Slack notifications, and when to escalate an ambiguous lead to a human instead of guessing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used for advanced LLM evaluation: LLM-as-judge systems, direct scoring, pairwise comparison, rubric calibration, evaluator bias mitigation, confidence scoring, and automated quality assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunter mindset, recon setup, and target scoring for Web3 bug bounty. Use at the START of any new protocol hunt - scoring targets, setting up environment, understanding architecture.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on Agent-Native Research Artifacts, scoring six dimensions (evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, methodological rigor) and producing a constructive, severity-ranked report with a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation. Use after Level 1 structural validation passes, when an ARA needs an objective epistemic critique before publication or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。