「security-review」の検索結果

在添加身份验证、处理用户输入、处理机密信息、创建API端点或实现支付/敏感功能时使用此技能。提供全面的安全检查清单和模式。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在添加身份验证、处理用户输入、操作机密信息（Secrets）、创建 API 端点以及实现支付/敏感功能时使用此技能。提供全面的安全检查清单和模式。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在添加身份验证、处理用户输入、操作机密信息、创建 API 接口或实现支付/敏感功能时使用此技能。提供全面的安全自查清单和模式。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security vulnerability assessment identifying OWASP risks, injection vectors, authentication issues, and data exposure with severity classification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI DevKit · Review code, skills, and prompts for security vulnerabilities — OWASP Top 10, prompt injection, business logic flaws, and insecure defaults. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing modules, reviewing AI skills/prompts, or preparing for release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Format specifications and data contracts for the security reviewer orchestrator and its subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security code review for vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "security review", "find vulnerabilities", "check for security issues", "audit security", "OWASP review", or review code for injection, XSS, authentication, authorization, cryptography issues. Provides systematic review with confidence-based reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Actions security review for workflow exploitation vulnerabilities. Use when asked to "review GitHub Actions", "audit workflows", "check CI security", "GHA security", "workflow security review", or review .github/workflows/ for pwn requests, expression injection, credential theft, and supply chain attacks. Exploitation-focused with concrete PoC scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a guided, end-to-end security review of a Power Pages site and consolidates every finding into one HTML report covering source code and dependencies, the live site, browser headers, firewall, authentication, and role-based permissions. Use when the user wants a full security review, a release-readiness check before publishing, a code-and-config check during development, live site monitoring, or asks open-ended questions like "review my site security", "is my site safe to ship", "do a security check", "monitor my site" — even if they do not name the individual checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies security vulnerabilities, generates structured audit reports with severity ratings, and provides actionable remediation guidance for SAST, DevSecOps, and compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security-review a diff against the OWASP Top 10. Use before merging anything that touches auth, input handling, queries, or external calls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

High-density security audit persona. Enforces OWASP Top 10, Vibe Security, trust gating, and runtime hardening for code and agentic review flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures redacted, provenance-aware cybersecurity observations with shared status fields, independent ground truth, and honest limitations. Use when recording exercise evidence, findings, validation results, or security-review handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adjudicates authorized exercise outcomes against independently held ground truth, redacted evidence, and explicit status boundaries. Use when comparing observations, resolving discrepancies, or preparing evidence-led security-review handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run CodeQL database creation and security queries, add data-extension models, or process CodeQL SARIF. Use when CodeQL is explicitly requested; use security-review for a broader manual security review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging. This is NOT a general code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Semgrep static analysis across a codebase, optionally using Semgrep Pro for cross-file taint analysis. Use when Semgrep or a static-analysis scan is requested; use security-review for a manual audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a focused STRIDE-based security review using Bug Hunter-native artifacts. Use whenever the user asks for a full security audit, repository security review, weekly security scan, PR security review with deeper validation, or wants dependency CVEs and threat-model context combined into one workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides security review capability for TypeScript/Node.js applications, validates code against XSS, injection, CSRF, JWT/OAuth2 flaws, dependency CVEs, and secrets exposure. Use when performing security audits, before deployment, reviewing authentication/authorization implementations, or ensuring OWASP compliance for Express, NestJS, and Next.js. Triggers on "security review", "check for security issues", "TypeScript security audit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user needs a security assessment — threat modeling, vulnerability review, auth flow audit, dependency scanning, or says "is this secure", "review for vulnerabilities", "threat model", "security audit", "pen test prep".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security review checklist for construction software systems. Use when building integrations, APIs, data pipelines, or dashboards for construction projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for security vulnerabilities. Use when the user says 'security review', 'security audit', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'pentest the code', 'OWASP check', or any variation of wanting a security assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。