validate
無料Freshly judge whether a finished change and its claims meet original acceptance: PASS, FAIL or NOT_PROVEN. Use when: asked for a go/no-go, sign-off or independent verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
67 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Freshly judge whether a finished change and its claims meet original acceptance: PASS, FAIL or NOT_PROVEN. Use when: asked for a go/no-go, sign-off or independent verdict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides privacy audit report writing including executive summary drafting, findings classification (critical, high, medium, low), evidence referencing, root cause analysis documentation, recommendation formulation, management response tracking, and report distribution protocols. Covers report structure from scope definition through appendices and sign-off. Keywords: audit report, findings documentation, executive summary, recommendations, report structure, privacy audit deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstrap a Claude-assisted on-call for this channel/repo: discover the available connectors, mine incident history into draft triage playbooks, interview the human for policy, validate against held-out incidents, and install the scheduled routines. Use when the user wants to "set up on-call", "bootstrap the on-call kit", "onboard this channel", or has just installed the oncall-kit plugin. Five gated phases — never run more than one phase per turn, and never activate anything before Phase 4 sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an agent needs to make a HyperFrames video of a Strudel live-coding track, where the code itself is the picture and every token lights up on the note it plays. Trigger on: "strudel video", "live coding video", "show my code playing", "make a video of this track with the code", "prod by claude". Covers composing the track, recording it offline from pinned Strudel, and building the 1080x1080 video (typed opener, parts powering on, real Strudel theme switches, graffiti ASCII drops, typed sign-off).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keeps private and unapproved material out of a public build. Scans the built output (HTML, serialized component payloads, client JS and CSS chunks, static data routes, public files) against a private tier that always applies and a draft tier that applies in production. Gates work-in-progress so it shows in preview and is absent from production, and keeps sign-off in a ledger only the human writes. Use when a site or app publishes content that agents drafted or that came from private sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sign-off report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete launch readiness validation covering every department: code, content, store, marketing, community, infrastructure, legal, and go/no-go sign-offs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a QA test plan for a sprint or feature. Reads GDDs and story files, classifies stories by test type (Logic/Integration/Visual/UI), and produces a structured test plan covering automated tests required, manual test cases, smoke test scope, and playtest sign-off requirements. Run before sprint begins or when starting a major feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA validation and fix loop workflow — validates implementation completeness then iterates fix cycles until all acceptance criteria pass and quality gates clear
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process and act on code review feedback. Use when receiving review results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a local talking-head / 口播 video into metadata, transcript, and an AI-composed card-based video where the agent composes cards by cloning styled templates and filling them (designing bespoke only when content needs it), then renders to MP4. Ships with the Interflow AI club sign-off ("Interflow AI 出品"). Use when the user asks for interflow-video-cut, 口播成片, talking-head repurposing, video takeaways, transcript cleanup, or turning a spoken video into a captioned card video.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare policies, procedures, onboarding files, or operating evidence against a named compliance framework such as AML/KYC, privacy, internal controls, or audit readiness. Use when a team needs a gap matrix, control checklist, remediation priorities, or evidence request list. Do not use when no target framework is specified or when formal legal or regulatory sign-off is required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze budget-versus-actual or forecast-versus-actual performance and turn finance data into a management-ready narrative using variance logic, drivers, cash impact, and forward actions. Use when finance, FP&A, or business leaders need commentary, management accounts, or performance explanation. Do not use for bookkeeping entries, tax filing preparation, or legal accounting sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review commercial contracts, NDAs, MSAs, SOWs, and vendor agreements for obligation clarity, risk allocation, termination, data handling, and negotiation red flags. Use when a user needs a structured contract summary, red flag list, fallback positions, or clause-by-clause review. Do not use as jurisdiction-specific legal advice, litigation strategy, or final legal sign-off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft commercial contracts from scratch by contract type — NDAs, service agreements, vendor contracts, employment agreements, and licensing deals. Follow a clause library approach with risk-balanced terms. Use when creating new contracts. Do not replace legal counsel sign-off on finalized agreements. For reviewing existing contracts, use contract-risk-review instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle. Coordinates qa-lead (strategy + test plan) and qa-tester (test case writing + bug reporting) to produce a complete QA package for a sprint or feature. Covers: test plan generation, test case writing, smoke check gate, manual QA execution, and sign-off report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a QA test plan for a sprint or feature. Reads GDDs and story files, classifies stories by test type (Logic/Integration/Visual/UI), and produces a structured test plan covering automated tests required, manual test cases, smoke test scope, and playtest sign-off requirements. Run before sprint begins or when starting a major feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete launch readiness validation covering every department: code, content, store, marketing, community, infrastructure, legal, and go/no-go sign-offs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run, document, or review a structured month-end close process. Use when an accountant says "help me with month-end close", "close checklist", "end of month tasks", "what do I need to do to close the books", "journal entries for close", "reconciliation checklist", "accruals and prepaids", "intercompany eliminations", "trial balance review", "close sign-off", or anything related to closing a financial period. Also trigger when someone is preparing for a quarterly or year-end close and needs a structured approach - even if they don't say "month-end close" explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a clear, reviewable audit workpaper documenting procedures, evidence, and conclusions. Use when an auditor says "write a workpaper", "document this audit procedure", "tick and tie this", "I need to document my testing", "substantive testing workpaper", "controls testing documentation", "audit evidence memo", "prepare the workpaper for this balance", "document the audit steps I performed", or needs to capture any audit work in a format that supports review and sign-off. Also trigger when someone has completed audit testing and needs to write it up even if they don't use the word "workpaper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Media Technical Director/Manager — calling a live broadcast switcher and owning the technical readiness sign-off, designing router/path redundancy and PTP failover for an IP production, resolving a timecode or loudness compliance defect found in rehearsal, or running the post-incident review after an on-air technical failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。