「socratic」の検索結果

Socratic deep interview with mathematical ambiguity gating before execution

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic ideation and idea routing — think through ideas before committing to plans

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prep for a cold-call — predict the professor's likely questions and drill them Socratically, flagging where you're shaky so you know what to re-read before class. Use when the user says "prep for class tomorrow", "cold call [case]", "what might [professor] ask on", or points at assigned reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic interview to crystallize vague requirements

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic ideation and idea routing — think through ideas before committing to plans

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic deep interview with mathematical ambiguity gating before explicit execution approval

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a request is vague, assumption-laden, or "obvious," ask the few load-bearing questions that expose hidden requirements before building or committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep business diagnosis for when things aren't working. Uses Socratic questioning, first-principles reasoning, and constraint analysis to find WHY a business is stuck — not just prescribe solutions. Use when the user says 'my business isn't working', 'I'm stuck', 'what's wrong', 'diagnose my business', 'why am I not growing', 'help me figure out the problem', or describes a specific business challenge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and configure a structured discussion protocol matched to the purpose, topic, and group readiness. Use when planning classroom discussions, Socratic seminars, or structured debate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to think through an idea before committing to a plan, e.g. /gsd-explore auth strategy. Runs a Socratic session, optionally spawns research, then routes output to notes, seeds, requirements, or new phases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mathematically rigorous Socratic interview system that drives ambiguity below 20% before any code is written. One question per message, weighted ambiguity scoring, brownfield-aware, outputs a complete PRD. Replaces discovery-interview with a stricter protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when 用户想以一对一苏格拉底导师的方式系统学习一个课题——开一门新课、推进课题的下一篇、提交学习反馈或说「我读完了」、或整理/查看学习日志。基于 Bloom 2 Sigma 的交互式学习系统。触发词：开个文件夹学X、我想学X、帮我学X、继续、下一篇、我读完了、整理学习、查看学习日志、interactive Socratic tutoring、Bloom 2 sigma learning。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experiment executor and monitor for academic research. 2-agent system covering code experiments (ML training, statistical analysis, ETL, simulation) and human studies (surveys, field studies, interviews). 4 modes: run (execute + monitor code), manage (track human studies), validate (statistical interpretation + reproducibility verification), plan (Socratic experiment design). Use when a researcher wants to run or monitor a research experiment, manage or resume a human-subject study, check the statistics or reproducibility of research results, or design an experiment or study, in English or Chinese (e.g., 跑實驗、管理研究、驗證結果、規劃實驗).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hoyeon Socratic discussion workflow for Codex. Use when the user invokes "$hoyeon-discuss", "/discuss", asks to think through an idea, challenge assumptions, clarify requirements before planning, run a deep/scored discussion, or says Korean phrases like "같이 생각해보자", "문제 정의", "이거 어떻게 생각해?", "요구사항이 불명확", or "아이디어 구체화".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convenes expert panels for problem-solving. Use when user mentions panel, experts, multiple perspectives, MECE, DMAIC, RAPID, Six Sigma, root cause analysis, strategic decisions, process improvement, or asks for philosophers/ancients (Socratic, Aristotelian, Stoic method experts).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Socratic spec-refinement front of /feature, and the planning front of /sprint. Routed to BEFORE any code — it turns a one-line idea into a concrete spec with testable criteria, ready for initial combined sprint review or explicit sequential approval. Five gated phases — frame, shape, refine, write, review-and-approve. No implementation before an approved spec; the caller retains required planning, execution and delivery ordering. Each acceptance criterion becomes one tdd Phase 1 obligation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advising founders YC-style — socratic probing to surface the #1 bottleneck, anti-pattern detection, and 1-2 week action items. Not for brainstorming (Riff) or long-term scenarios (Helm).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select and configure a structured discussion protocol matched to the purpose, topic, and group readiness. Use when planning classroom discussions, Socratic seminars, or structured debate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic tutor that teaches codebase understanding through questioning, challenges, and active recall. Invoke with /learn-codebase when onboarding to a new codebase or deepening understanding of existing code. Maintains a learning journal that tracks mastery and schedules reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the reasoning of a document or argument (memo, proposal, investment analysis, board paper, article, the user's own draft): claims, evidence, unstated assumptions, logical gaps, fallacies, and what would falsify it, each anchored to quoted text. Use whenever the user wants reasoning examined, in any language ("audit this argument", "is this analysis sound", "poke holes in this proposal", "review the logic of my draft"; Vietnamese "phản biện giúp tôi", "soi lập luận này", "tài liệu này có lỗ hổng gì", "góp ý bản nháp của tôi"), even when they never say "critical thinking". Also use when the user drops a document and asks whether to trust or act on it, or asks to see their reasoning profile. Not for company-level strategic bets (strategy-board) or learning a topic through dialogue (socratic-questor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。