「standard」の検索結果

Apply production-grade design standards when building or reviewing pages, components, or UI. Use this skill whenever the user asks to build a page, design a component, lay out a section, review the UI, fix the layout, or check design quality. Triggers on build a page, create a component, design a section, hero, card, CTA, layout, review the UI, fix the design, design system, design tokens, spacing, typography scale, button standards, mobile design. Also triggers for any production design decision where contrast, accessibility, spacing, or visual hierarchy matters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about CSRD, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), double materiality assessment, sustainability reporting obligations, ESG disclosure, CSRD scope and thresholds, value chain reporting, XBRL digital tagging, third-party assurance, CSRD gap assessments, CSRD implementation timelines, ESRS E1–E5 environmental standards, ESRS S1–S4 social standards, ESRS G1 governance, CSRD vs GRI/TCFD/SASB alignment, or any EU corporate sustainability reporting question. Trigger even if the user only mentions "ESG reporting Europe", "sustainability disclosure EU", or "non-financial reporting".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unpack a broad standard or competency descriptor into specific, assessable success criteria and sub-skills. Use when interpreting curriculum standards or writing learning objectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement Global Exception Filters and standard error formats in NestJS. Use when implementing global exception filters or standardizing error responses in NestJS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create standardized API response envelopes, paginated endpoints, and error interceptors in NestJS. Use when implementing response wrappers, pagination DTOs, or global error formats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-cutting standards for error design, response shapes, error codes, and boundary placement across API, domain, and infrastructure layers. Use when defining error hierarchies, wrapping exceptions, building standardized error responses, or placing error boundaries in layered architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a Check for Understanding (CFU) for a math topic or standard: 1–3 targeted formative items whose distractors come from documented student misconceptions, plus a teacher guide routing each likely response to a specific next instructional step. Load BEFORE asking any clarifying question about grade, standard, or topic. This skill is for math; for other subjects, help as you normally would and don't mention the skill to the user. Triggers on asks to create, write, generate, or design a check for understanding, formative check, quick check, or exit ticket for a math concept or standard, and on implicit signals like "I need to see who got it before I move on." Not a quiz, test, or practice set — a CFU is read for what it reveals, not scored, so a numbered quiz or a bare answer key is a different job. Does not create a lesson (k12-lesson-plan-creation, which brings its own exit ticket), tier one (k12-lesson-differentiation), or prepare a teacher to teach one (k12-lesson-prep).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check data compliance with construction standards. Validate data against ISO 19650, IFC, COBie, UniFormat standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides implementation of EU Standard Contractual Clauses under Commission Decision 2021/914 across all four modules (C2C, C2P, P2P, P2C). Covers clause-by-clause completion, Annex I-III drafting, and SCC module selection. Keywords: SCCs, standard contractual clauses, module selection, data transfers, Annex completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surfaces Han's shared Human-Readable Output Standard — the readability rule and the writing-voice profile — into the calling skill's own context, so the caller drafts in voice and runs its self-check against the current standard sourced from one canonical copy. Use when a prose-producing skill needs the shared readability standard available in context before it drafts. Governs the shape of a written deliverable, where explanation-guidance governs what a run says to a person in a turn. Runs in the caller's context and hands control straight back; it does not produce a deliverable of its own, rewrite anything, or judge the caller's work. Does not run the adversarial rewrite pass — dispatch the readability-editor agent for that, or use edit-for-readability to rewrite an existing target. Does not cover explaining technical work to a reader who will not implement it — use explanation-guidance for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recommend relevant Isabelle/HOL or Coq standard library theories, lemmas, and tactics based on proof goals. Use when: (1) Users need library lemmas for their proof, (2) Proof goals match standard library patterns, (3) Users ask what libraries to import, (4) Specific lemmas are needed for list/set/arithmetic operations, (5) Users are stuck and need to know what library support exists, or (6) Guidance on find_theorems/Search commands is needed. Supports both Isabelle/HOL and Coq standard libraries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate a structured conversation to define clean code principles for a repository. Produces a formal clean-code.md document that the clean-code atom will use as its override. Use when setting up coding standards, defining code quality rules, or when the user says 'setup clean code', 'define coding standards', 'code quality principles', 'coding guidelines', or 'help me define my code standards'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards, and building cultureUse when "code review, PR review, pull request, merge request, review comments, LGTM, review feedback, approve PR, request changes, review checklist, code quality, review standards, code-review, pull-request, PR, quality, standards, feedback, collaboration, mentoring" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unpack a broad standard or competency descriptor into specific, assessable success criteria and sub-skills. Use when interpreting curriculum standards or writing learning objectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Copilot Studio Standard エージェントを承認付き private API で初回プロビジョニングし、設定・外部トリガー追加・ニュース配信エージェント等を構築する。生成オーケストレーション（Generative Orchestration）モード一択。

Activates Standard of Excellence enforcement for the current session. Load before starting any task to apply completion standards: finish the whole thing, fix the root cause, ship the complete working result. Blocks partial solutions, workarounds, deferred threads, and invented content limits when the permanent solve is within reach. Triggers: 'do the whole thing', 'boil the ocean', 'standard of excellence', 'finish it completely', before starting any implementation, refactoring, or multi-step task where partial output is a risk. Does NOT apply to: read-only queries, one-line typo fixes, pure knowledge questions, or single-output summarize requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a new SKILL.md file following the Agent Skills open standard (agentskills.io). Covers frontmatter schema, section structure, writing effective procedures with Expected/On failure pairs, validation checklists, cross-referencing, and registry integration. Use when codifying a repeatable procedure for agents, adding a new capability to the skills library, converting a guide or runbook into agent-consumable format, or standardizing a workflow across projects or teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pythonic wrapper around RDKit with a simplified interface and sensible defaults. Preferred for standard drug discovery work — SMILES/SELFIES/InChI conversion, molecule standardization and sanitization, descriptors, ECFP and other fingerprints, Tanimoto distance matrices, Butina clustering and diverse subset picking, Bemis-Murcko scaffolds and scaffold splits, BRICS/RECAP fragmentation, 3D conformer generation, SDF/CSV/Excel and cloud I/O, and parallel processing via n_jobs. Returns native rdkit.Chem.Mol objects, so it composes with RDKit throughout. Also trigger on datamol, `import datamol as dm`, dm.to_mol, dm.standardize_mol, dm.cluster_mols, or dm.pick_diverse. For advanced control or custom parameters, use the rdkit skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update Claude Code skills following Anthropic's official skill standard. Use when user says "create a skill", "new skill", "write a skill", "update a skill", "skill standard", or any time a new SKILL.md file needs to be created. Also use when reviewing existing skills for standards compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance on non-obvious runtime behaviors of Salesforce standard objects — polymorphic lookups, lead conversion field loss, PersonAccount dual-nature, CaseComment trigger isolation, and Activity date fields. Also covers which trigger actually fires for a person account, the either/or Event duration contract, the Closed status category behind Task.CompletedDateTime, the 3-record merge cap and its single delete + single update trigger events, and the CaseComment post-insert write lock. Trigger keywords: person account trigger not firing, Contact trigger person account, Event required field EndDateTime, DurationInMinutes, CompletedDateTime null, merge MasterRecordId, CaseComment cannot be edited, IsNotificationSelected null, lead conversion triggers disabled. NOT for the Activity object model — use admin/activity-and-task-patterns. NOT for writing TYPEOF queries — use apex/apex-polymorphic-soql.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or refactoring modern C# with maintainability and performance standards. Keywords: coding standards, C# best practices, refactor C#, records, pattern matching, async best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

標準原価差異分析スキル。標準原価（予定原価）と実際原価の差異を価格差異・数量差異に分解し、 材料費・労務費・製造間接費のカテゴリ別に集計・分析する。差異の有利/不利判定、 責任部門の特定、根本原因の仮説提示を行う。CSVデータのアップロードによる自動分析に対応。 Use when: 製造原価の差異分析を行いたいとき。標準原価計算制度の運用、 月次原価差異レポート作成、原価低減活動の効果測定に使用。 Triggers: "標準原価", "原価差異", "価格差異", "数量差異", "standard cost", "cost variance", "price variance", "quantity variance", "予定原価", "操業度差異", "原価管理"

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8729.1A — NASA's R&M (Reliability and Maintainability) standard covering spaceflight and support systems (Revision A, 2017-06-13). Use for NASA's objectives-driven R&M framework — the R&M objectives hierarchy (one Top Objective decomposed into four sub-objectives, paired with tailorable strategies), how R&M requirements are established inside the SMA Plan required by NPR 7120.5, the SMA Technical Authority concurrence/independent-evaluation governance, milestone vs. readiness review gates, the reliability/maintainability/availability vocabulary (Ai vs. Ao, the failure causal chain, risk as a triplet), and the R&M Evidentiary Methods catalogue (FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBDA, RCM, LORA, plus the space-environment and parts-pedigree analyses). Scoped to NASA spaceflight and support systems and to assurance planning: it is an objectives-and-strategies standard, so it deliberately does NOT prescribe step-by-step analysis procedures (those live in the referenced NASA Preferred Reliability Practices) and is thin on facility R&M, detailed math/derivations, and non-NASA or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a draft controls and gap pack from a requirement, regulation, standard or policy and the organisation's control descriptions: obligations broken out of the source text, the controls that appear to address each, apparent coverage, gaps, questions for control owners and actions to assess. Never concludes compliance or that a control is effective; owners and audit assess. Use when the user asks to "map this regulation to our controls", "run a controls gap analysis", "break this standard into obligations" or "where is our control coverage thin". Do not use for comparing a policy document against a standard, use policy-gap-review instead; to draft evidence requests from the mapped controls, use control-evidence-request-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。