「strategic」の検索結果

3-pass scope oscillation that holds a question constant while shifting zoom — narrow/tactical, wide/strategic, then synthesis — to surface design tensions, scope recommendations, and coherence assessments invisible at any single zoom level. USE WHEN aperture oscillation, oscillate scope, zoom in and out, tactical vs strategic, scope framing, design tension, system coherence check, local vs global design, wrong scope, scope negotiation. NOT FOR lens rotation across angles (use IterativeDepth).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design our change narrative", "build the old-world-to-new-game story arc", or "frame the shift our category is undergoing"; produces a Raskin-style strategic narrative arc — old world → the undeniable shift → winners vs losers under the new rules → the promised land → proof the promised land is real — derived from the positioning truth set and the belief/objection map, feeding the TALE Architecture arc sub-item. Every proof beat is labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source] and this skill never adjudicates a claim. Not for the message house hierarchy — use message-system-architect; not for the pitch deck narrative — use pitch-narrative-builder; not for claim substantiation — use offer-claims-registry. 变革叙事弧/旧世界/应许之地/战略叙事结构

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage software complexity through deep modules, information hiding, and strategic programming. Use when the user mentions "module design", "API too complex", "shallow class", "complexity budget", "strategic vs tactical", "deep module", "information leakage", "pass-through method", "this code is over-engineered", or "simplify this design". Also trigger when reviewing an interface for simplicity, evaluating whether an abstraction is pulling its weight, deciding whether a comment is worth writing, or choosing between general-purpose and special-purpose approaches. Covers deep vs shallow modules, red flags for complexity, and comments as design documentation. For code quality, see clean-code. For architecture boundaries, see clean-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures partnerships that change what the business can do — technology integrations, channel and reseller arrangements, joint ventures, and OEM relationships. Use this to evaluate or structure a strategic partnership, decide between partnering and building, negotiate commercial terms of an alliance, or diagnose a partnership that is signed but not producing. For audience-borrowing partnerships, use `marketing:partnership-marketing`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master modern business analysis with AI-powered analytics, real-time dashboards, and data-driven insights. Build comprehensive KPI frameworks, predictive models, and strategic recommendations. Use PROACTIVELY for business intelligence or strategic analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse competitor moves and translate them into strategic implications for your product roadmap. Use when a competitor announces a new feature, pricing change, partnership, or strategic shift, or when producing a periodic competitive intelligence report. Produces a categorised signal analysis with reactive-vs-proactive assessment, threat ratings, specific roadmap implications, and recommended responses with owners. For a recurring whole-market briefing use competitive-intelligence-monitor instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor competitor signals and surface strategic implications for your roadmap. Use when asked to monitor competitors, track the competitive landscape, produce a competitive briefing, or understand what has changed in the market this week or month. Produces a structured intelligence brief with high/medium/low priority signals, roadmap implications, and a strategic landscape summary. For a single competitor announcement use competitor-signal-tracker; for a one-off deep dive use competitor-teardown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze competitors and create competitive landscape documentation with feature matrices, positioning maps, and strategic recommendations. Use when asked to analyze competitors, create competitive analysis, compare features with competitors, build a competitive landscape, track competitive positioning, or prepare sales battlecard inputs. Produces structured competitor profiles, feature comparison matrix, win/loss analysis, and prioritised strategic recommendations. For a one-off teardown of a single rival use competitor-teardown; for a recurring market briefing use competitive-intelligence-monitor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Allocate a finite budget or headcount across competing initiatives by return and strategic fit. Use when asked to allocate budget, decide where to invest, build a funding/portfolio plan, or make trade-offs across initiatives under a cap. Produces a capital-allocation plan — initiatives scored by expected return × strategic fit per dollar, a funded/unfunded split against the cap, the cut line, and the reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep strategic research engine — decomposes questions into parallel research threads, spawns multiple agents, and synthesizes into actionable strategic analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic product leadership toolkit for Head of Product including OKR cascade generation, market analysis, vision setting, and team scaling. Use for strategic planning, goal alignment, competitive analysis, and organizational design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design strategic partnerships — technology, channel, co-marketing — and the programs that scale them. Use when evaluating a partner, picking a partnership type, designing a partner program, structuring a deal, or modeling ROI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a list of potential strategic and financial acquirers for A-share sell-side M&A mandates. Adapted from the original buyer-list skill for Chinese market acquirer universe. Triggers on "A股买方名单", "潜在收购方", "buyer list China", "strategic buyers China", "who would buy this A-share company", or "build buyer universe".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic DDD — bounded context discovery, context mapping patterns, subdomain classification, ubiquitous language, and organizational alignment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic product leadership toolkit for Head of Product including OKR cascade generation, market analysis, vision setting, and team scaling. Use for strategic planning, goal alignment, competitive analysis, and organizational design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview-based strategic planning for complex software tasks. Conducts structured requirements gathering, gap analysis, and generates detailed work plans before implementation begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for competitive landscape analysis across any industry. Use when creating competitor analysis, market positioning assessments, investment memos, strategic reviews, or any analysis requiring systematic evaluation of competitive dynamics. Triggers include requests for competitive landscape decks, peer comparisons, market structure analysis, strategic positioning assessments, and investment recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define and prioritize features with strategic traceability during PRD v0.3 Commercial Model. Triggers on requests to define features, prioritize capabilities, scope MVP, map features to pricing tiers, identify parity vs. delta features, or when user asks "what features do we build?", "what's in MVP?", "which features matter?", "feature priority", "parity features", "what's our delta?". Consumes KPI- (Outcome Definition), BR- (Pricing Model, Moat), and CFD- (Market Moat Analysis) from v0.3. Outputs FEA- entries with strategic traceability and BR-FEA- governance rules. Feeds v0.4 User Journeys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

B2B 大客户销售 (B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄ 资格审查纪律 (MEDDIC/MEDDPICC: 先严格 qualify/disqualify, 「no deal 好过 bad deal」)**; 三派不是非此即彼, 资深人混用, 但底层世界观分歧真实(问 vs 教 vs 筛); 更深层张力 — 「过程/方法论纪律 (process rigor: 预测准确、deal inspection、qualify) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship: champion 培养、高管关系、人情)」, 「卖结果/业务价值 (business outcome/ROI、卖给经济决策人) ⇄ 卖产品/功能 (feature selling)」, 「多线程触达买方委员会 (multithreading buying committee) ⇄ 单一 champion 依赖」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — MEDDIC/MEDDPICC (Metrics 量化指标/Economic buyer 经济决策人/Decision Criteria 决策标准/Decision Process 决策流程/Identify Pain 痛点/Champion 内部拥护者 + Paper process 签约流程/Competition 竞争), SPIN (Situation/Problem/Implication/Need-payoff 提问序列), Challenger (商业洞见 commercial insight + reframe + 建设性张力 constructive tension + Mobilizer 调动者), Solution Selling (痛点链 pain chain/愿景创建/buying vision), Sandler (前置合约 up-front contract/痛苦漏斗 pain funnel/潜艇七步), Command of the Message (Force Management: 业务价值框架/before-after/decision criteria), Gap Selling (Keenan: 现状 current state → 期望 future state → 差距 the gap/问题中心), Miller Heiman Strategic Selling (蓝表 blue sheet/buying influences: 经济/用户/技术买家 + coach), Value Selling, BANT (老式资格框架, 多被 MEDDIC 取代); (c) 行业结构与角色 — SDR/BDR (开发/约见) → AE/客户经理 (成交) → SE/售前/Solutions Engineer (技术验证/POC/demo) → CSM (客户成功/续约扩张) → Sales Manager/VP Sales/CRO; RevOps (收入运营), Sales Enablement (赋能); land and expand (先落地再扩张)、量化指标 quota/OTE(目标总收入)/配额达成率/pipeline coverage(管道覆盖率 ~3x 业内经验法则)/win rate(赢率)/sales velocity(销售速度)/ramp time(爬坡期)/ACV·ARR·NRR(年合同额/年经常性收入/净收入留存); (d) 销售周期 (the deal/opportunity lifecycle) — prospecting 开发 → discovery 需求挖掘 → qualification 资格审查(MEDDIC) → demo/technical validation/POC 技术验证 → business case/value 业务价值与 ROI → proposal 提案 → negotiation 谈判(procurement 采购/法务/security review) → close 成交 → onboarding/expansion 交付与扩张; 干系人: champion 拥护者 vs coach 线人 vs economic buyer 经济决策人 vs blocker 阻碍者; mutual action plan/close plan(双向行动计划/成交计划); (e) 产出物与节奏 — discovery call(需求电话)、demo、business case、proposal/SOW、MAP(mutual action plan)、forecast(预测: commit/best case/pipeline 类别)、pipeline review/deal review/QBR(季度业务回顾)/account plan(客户计划); (f) 职业/招聘/薪酬 — quota/OTE/comp plan(底薪+提成)/accelerator(加速器)/SPIFF/clawback、ramp、President's Club(顶尖销售俱乐部)、SDR→AE→管理 晋升路径、rep turnover(销售流失率高); (g) 争议/批判 — Challenger 是否过誉(CEB 原始数据被质疑、insight selling 批评)、MEDDIC 沦为填表剧场(box-checking theater, 填字段不真 qualify)、活动指标 vs 质量(spray-and-pray 群发/冷电话存废之争)、AI SDR/自动化淹没收件箱(2024-2025 AI BDR 泡沫 + 邮件送达率崩溃 backlash)、SDR 军团模式是否将死(Winning by Design/signal-based GTM 取代)、配额虚高与销售 burnout、季末打折促单、销售方法论的「宗教化」与培训-认证产业链、最大竞争对手其实是「no decision/维持现状」而非对手; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 提问诊断派(Rackham SPIN/Bosworth&Eades Solution Selling/Keenan Gap Selling) vs 挑战教学派(Dixon&Adamson Challenger/Force Management Command of the Message) vs 资格纪律派(MEDDIC: Napoli&Dunkel 起源/John McMahon/MEDDICC Andy Whyte) vs 关系战略派(Miller Heiman Strategic/Large Account) vs SaaS 现代收入架构派(Aaron Ross Predictable Revenue/Mark Roberge Sales Acceleration Formula/Jacco van der Kooij Winning by Design bowtie/David Skok 指标) vs 开发-心态派(Jeb Blount Fanatical Prospecting/Sales EQ、Anthony Iannarino、Josh Braun) vs 谈判(Chris Voss Never Split the Difference 战术同理心)。不含: B2C/零售/电商导购销售、纯电话客服/客户支持、纯渠道/分销管理(channel 虽相关但聚焦直销复杂销售)、纯 marketing/需求生成(demand gen 虽上游但本 skill 聚焦销售执行)、纯 CSM 客户成功(虽相关但聚焦 new logo + expansion 的销售动作)。) Master OS — automated mastery of B2B 大客户销售 / 企业级复杂销售 (Enterprise B2B Sales / Complex Selling) — 面向企业客户的高价值、长周期、多干系人复杂销售的职业认知操作系统，从业者(AE/客户经理/SE 售前/销售负责人 VP Sales/CRO)、想入行者、以及服务这行(销售咨询/enablement/RevOps)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 三大方法论流派之争: **买方主导的诊断式提问 (consultative/discovery-led: SPIN 提问 → 痛点 → 方案, 「像医生先诊断再开方」) ⇄ 卖方主导的教学式挑战 (Challenger: Teach-Tailor-Take control, 用商业洞见 reframe 客户认知, 「像老师挑战客户的既有想法」) ⇄

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A C-level strategy advisory board, run as a team of named specialist agents, that takes an executive from a raw strategic question to a defended, board-ready recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user faces a significant business decision or wants strategic analysis — market entry, build-vs-buy, M&A, digital transformation, annual planning, portfolio prioritization, pricing, a big investment, a competitive threat, a turnaround. Trigger on requests like "should we invest in / build / buy / enter…", "develop a strategy for…", "evaluate this opportunity", "make the business case", "stress-test this plan", "run a pre-mortem", or "prepare a board presentation" — in any language, even when the user doesn't say the word "strategy". Also trigger when the user names a board member (Drucker, Porter, Christensen, Graham, Grove, Wack, Taleb, Minto) or asks to convene the board / open a boardroom session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic context reconnaissance — read existing roadmaps, OKRs, competitive docs, and briefs to establish context before planning. Use when asked to "understand our strategy", "what's the current roadmap", "what OKRs do we have", "strategic context", or before starting any prioritization or roadmap work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic narrative — write a standalone strategy memo that frames product direction, bets, and rationale for a planning horizon. Use when asked to "write a strategy doc", "product vision", "strategic narrative", "company strategy memo", "planning memo", or "explain our product direction".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。