「systemic」の検索結果

Query the OFR (Office of Financial Research) Hedge Fund Monitor API for hedge fund data including SEC Form PF aggregated statistics, CFTC Traders in Financial Futures, FICC Sponsored Repo volumes, and FRB SCOOS dealer financing terms. Access time series data on hedge fund size, leverage, counterparties, liquidity, complexity, and risk management. No API key or registration required. Use when working with hedge fund data, systemic risk monitoring, financial stability research, hedge fund leverage or leverage ratios, counterparty concentration, Form PF statistics, repo market data, or OFR financial research data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug-fix discipline — every defect has an etiology, the chain of cause that produced the observable fault; trace it before patching. Errors only grow: a bandaid leaks unless genuinely localized and leak-free. Walk the diagnostic ladder (presentation → proximate cause → API contract → isolated or systemic) before writing the fix. Use when authoring or reviewing any bug fix, regression patch, "quick fix" PR, or when deciding whether to ship, defer, or refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a countermeasure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate a batch of content in one run: ranked quality report, systemic issues. "score our whole content library"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoice review, non-compliance flagging, rejection communication, billing trend analysis, and conversation preparation for in-house legal ops teams managing outside counsel. Review invoices against billing guidelines; flag block billing, prohibited fees, rate violations, staffing violations, late submission. Produce line-item review report and approval note. Draft rejection letter to outside counsel. Build invoice review checklist. Analyse billing trends across multiple invoices and produce a structured conversation guide for the relationship review. Identify systemic patterns and produce formal non-compliance notice. Trigger on: 'review this invoice', 'flag billing issues', 'check invoice against guidelines', 'write the rejection letter', 'build an invoice checklist', 'block billing', 'UTBMS', 'billing non-compliance', 'analyse our invoices', 'billing trends', 'prep for the billing conversation', 'relationship review', 'the firm keeps doing this', 'escalate'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map systemic forces shaping a wellbeing concern without individualising the problem. Uses Bronfenbrenner's ecological model and social determinants to generate structural interventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map a current event below the surface into patterns, structures, and mental models. Use when a class or team needs systemic understanding before action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix failing or degraded skills automatically - systemic-first triage, per-category playbooks, and a verification plan

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise systems that may support intermediary services, hosting services, online platforms, marketplaces, content moderation, recommender systems, advertising delivery, complaint workflows, transparency reporting, or systemic-risk evidence under the EU Digital Services Act. This should trigger for requests such as Review a Java online platform for DSA controls; Design notice-and-action or appeal workflows; Add recommender, ad transparency, moderation, audit, researcher access, or privacy-safe observability evidence; Assess online-platform transparency controls before production release. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aggregate and analyze risks across construction project portfolio. Identify correlated risks, systemic exposures, and portfolio-level risk mitigation strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze vulnerable code to identify underlying root causes such as violated assumptions, incorrect invariants, missing validation checks, or unsafe component interactions. Use when investigating security vulnerabilities, CVEs, exploit code, or security audit findings. Infers why the vulnerability exists beyond surface symptoms, identifies systemic issues, and explains the chain of failures that enable exploitation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Anesthesiologist. Use when a task calls for Anesthesiologist judgment. Reasons from control of consciousness, analgesia, autonomic response, and oxygen delivery through the ASA Difficult Airway Algorithm, capnography and arterial-waveform trends, quantitative TOF monitoring, and ASRA/ERAS protocols while treating cannot-ventilate airways, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, malignant hyperthermia, and residual neuromuscular blockade as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

游戏设计 (Game Design) — 设计游戏的规则 / 系统 / 机制 / 体验 的从业者认知操作系统 (以电子游戏为主, 含桌游 / 卡牌 / 棋盘游戏): 决定「玩家做什么、为什么有意义、每一刻的体验如何」的学科 —— 区别于游戏程序 (引擎 / 代码)、游戏美术 (视觉 / 音频)、游戏制作 (排期 / 预算 / 团队)。覆盖 (a) 核心设计理论与框架 (MDA 机制-动态-美学 Hunicke/LeBlanc/Zubek + Schell 的「透镜」+ Koster「乐趣即学习」理论 + Sid Meier「一连串有趣的决策」+ Salen & Zimmerman「有意义的游玩」/「二阶设计」/「魔法圈」+ Costikyan 论不确定性 + Suits/Huizinga 游戏哲学), (b) 系统与机制设计 (核心循环 + 游戏经济 sink/source/产出-消耗 + 正负反馈环 + 资源与成长系统 + 涌现 vs 脚本 Will Wright「可能性空间」+ Machinations 经济建模 Dormans + 支配 / 退化策略 + 正交设计 Garfield), (c) 关卡与遭遇设计 (灰盒 blockout + 节奏与张力 + 预告 telegraphing + 主线 vs 探索 + 环境叙事 + 锁钥 gating + 难度曲线), (d) 游戏手感与「juice」(Steve Swink《Game Feel》+ 即时响应 + 屏震 / 反馈 / 打磨 + 输入与镜头 + 「手感」是设计出来的不是附带的), (e) 玩家心理与 UX (Celia Hodent《The Gamer's Brain》+ 心流通道 挑战 vs 技能 Csikszentmihalyi/陈星汉 Jenova Chen + Bartle 玩家类型 + 动机与奖励节奏 + 新手引导 FTUE / 教学化 + 认知负荷 + 无障碍), (f) 平衡与调优 (Ian Schreiber《Game Balance》+ 对称 / 非对称 + 动态难度 DDA + 传递 / 非传递平衡 + nerf/buff + 消除支配策略 + 测试驱动调优), (g) 叙事与任务设计 (ludonarrative 失调 / 和谐 + 环境与系统叙事 + 分支 vs 线性 + Amy Hennig 角色驱动 + 任务结构), (h) 以玩家为中心的迭代流程 (Tracy Fullerton《Game Design Workshop》playcentric + 纸面原型 + 垂直切片 + 测试协议「看而不说 / 你不是你的玩家」+ 快速迭代 + game jam), (i) 类型与形态工艺 (roguelike/roguelite 与程序生成 Derek Yu + 平台跳跃 + RPG 系统 + 策略 4X + 解谜设计 Jonathan Blow + 多人 / PvP 平衡 + 桌游 / 卡牌设计 Reiner Knizia/Richard Garfield/Brenda Romero), (j) F2P / 长线运营 / 商业化设计 (核心 / 元 / 经济循环 + 抽卡 gacha / 开箱 loot box / 战令 battle pass 机制 + 留存 D1/D7/D30 + 转化 + 鲸鱼 + live ops 内容节奏 —— 并诚实处理掠夺式暗黑模式 / 强迫循环 / 剥削式商业化的伦理), (k) 设计师角色与工艺职业 (系统 / 关卡 / 叙事 / UX 设计师之分 + 通才 vs 专才 + 独立作者 vs 3A 团队 + 设计文档 + 传达设计意图 + GDC 工艺社区)。跨 3A / 独立 / 手游 F2P / 桌游。不含 游戏程序 / 引擎 (Unity/Unreal 编码 / 图形 / 网络同步) / 游戏美术 / 动画 / 音频 / 游戏制作 / 项目管理 / 排期 / QA / 游戏作为生意 / 发行 / 市场 / 电竞运营为终点 / 泛泛「我想做游戏」的 game-dev 教程 —— 本 skill 是「设计」学科: 规则 / 系统 / 机制 / 体验。 (Game Design — the cognitive operating system of practitioners who design the rules, systems, mechanics, and experiences of games (video games primarily, plus tabletop/board/card games): the discipline of deciding WHAT the player does, WHY it is meaningful, and HOW the moment-to-moment experience feels — distinct from game programming (builds the engine/code), game art (visuals/audio), and game production (schedule/budget/team). Covers (a) core design theory & frameworks (MDA Mechanics-Dynamics-Aesthetics Hunicke/LeBlanc/Zubek, Schell's Lenses, Koster's theory of fun = learning, Sid Meier 'a series of interesting decisions', Salen & Zimmerman 'meaningful play'/'second-order design'/'magic circle', Costikyan on uncertainty, Suits/Huizinga play philosophy), (b) systems & mechanics design (core loops, game economy sink/source/faucet-drain, feedback loops positive/negative, resource & progression systems, emergence vs scripting Will Wright 'possibility space', Machinations economy modeling Dormans, dominant/degenerate strategy, orthogonal design Garfield), (c) level & encounter design (blockout/greybox, pacing & tension, telegraphing, critical path vs exploration, environmental storytelling, gating & lock-and-key, difficulty curve), (d) game feel & juice (Steve Swink 'Game Feel', moment-to-moment responsiveness, screenshake/feedback/polish, input & camera, the 'feel' is designed not incidental), (e) player psychology & UX (Celia Hodent 'The Gamer's Brain', flow channel challenge-vs-skill Csikszentmihalyi/Jenova Chen, Bartle player types, motivation & reward schedules, onboarding/FTUE/tutorialization, cognitive load, accessibility), (f) balancing & tuning (Ian Schreiber 'Game Balance', symmetry/asymmetry, dynamic difficulty adjustment DDA, transitive/intransitive balance, nerf/buff, dominant strategy elimination, playtesting-driven tuning), (g) narrative & quest design (ludonarrative dissonance/harmony, environmental & systemic storytelling, branching vs linear, Amy Hennig character-driven, quest structure), (h) player-centric iterative process (Tracy Fullerton 'Game Design Workshop' playcentric design, paper prototyping, vertical slice, playtesting protocol 'watch don't talk / you are not your play

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the foundationalist reasoning and methodological doubt of René Descartes (17th-century French rationalist philosopher). Use this skill whenever the user is questioning fundamental assumptions, seeking absolute certainty in a decision, dismantling flawed systems, or trying to rebuild a project from first principles. Trigger this skill for topics involving epistemology, rationalism, radical doubt, systemic reconstruction, or separating objective truth from sensory illusion. Reach for this whenever a user needs to cut through probabilities and consensus to find an indubitable 'Archimedean point' to build upon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning of Mary Wollstonecraft (18th-century English philosopher and author of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman) to evaluate situations involving power dynamics, education, independence, gender roles, and systemic inequality. Use this skill whenever Claude encounters career trade-offs involving financial dependence, analyzing structural oppression, questioning societal norms, or balancing reason against emotion. It helps dismantle arbitrary hierarchies, prioritize rational capability over superficial elegance, and frame personal struggles as political realities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to apply the analytical lens of Judith Butler (American philosopher, gender theory, Gender Trouble). Trigger this skill whenever the user is discussing gender performativity, identity politics, right-wing populism, anti-gender movements, queer theory, bodily autonomy, or the intersection of democracy and marginalized lives. Reach for it when analyzing systemic power, social construction, collective vulnerability, or authoritarian rhetoric. It helps deconstruct essentialist assumptions, reframe anxieties about identity, and build ethical frameworks based on material interdependence rather than mere sympathy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the philosophical reasoning of Mary Midgley (British moral philosopher). Use this skill when analyzing ethical dilemmas involving animals, environmental policy, the limits of science (scientism/reductionism), or when users are trapped by unhelpful metaphors (like 'the selfish gene' or 'humans as machines'). Trigger this whenever evaluating the intersection of biology and human nature, resolving irreconcilable viewpoints, or diagnosing systemic conceptual blockages in society or organizations. Midgley's approach emphasizes holism, emotional fellowship, and viewing philosophy as practical 'plumbing' rather than abstract logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the strategic frameworks and mental models of Anne Wojcicki, co-founder and CEO of 23andMe. Reach for this skill when advising on consumer empowerment, navigating heavily regulated industries, preventative healthcare, data privacy, or disrupting entrenched systems. Use this when the user is dealing with misaligned industry incentives, facing regulatory hurdles, building a consumer-research flywheel, or managing a team through a post-launch 'trough of sorrow'. Apply her principles of 'speaking with data', treating users as partners, and pushing for decade-long systemic change from the outside.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill channels the reasoning of Hannah Arendt, 20th-century political theorist and author of 'The Origins of Totalitarianism'. Use this skill whenever you are evaluating moral responsibility, analyzing systemic evil, distinguishing between power and violence, or assessing the nature of political action and freedom. Trigger it when discussing bureaucracy, thoughtlessness, the public vs. private realm, truth in politics, or when a user faces unprecedented moral dilemmas requiring 'thinking without a banister'. Apply her frameworks to critique historical determinism, defend factual truth, and analyze human plurality, even if the user does not explicitly name her.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read all open bugs in production/qa/bugs/, re-evaluate priority vs. severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends, and produce a triage report. Run at sprint start or when the bug count grows enough to need re-prioritization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map systemic forces shaping a wellbeing concern without individualising the problem. Uses Bronfenbrenner's ecological model and social determinants to generate structural interventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map a current event below the surface into patterns, structures, and mental models. Use when a class or team needs systemic understanding before action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[00] TnR ABSOLUTE RIGOR — Systemic Verification Doctrine. Forced cognitive exertion for high-stakes investigations. Mandates absolute deconstruction, mathematical proof chains, and ≥95% derived certainty. Zero-tolerance for heuristics or sentiment-based reasoning. Shortcuts are defined as intentional hallucinations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。