「teardown」の検索結果

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Production-ready CI/CD configurations for Playwright — GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, CircleCI, Azure DevOps, Jenkins, Docker, parallel sharding, reporting, code coverage, and global setup/teardown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic competitive analysis covering positioning, messaging hierarchy, objection handling, and CTA strategy from landing page URLs or screenshots. Use when pasting a competitor URL, uploading competitor screenshots, requesting positioning analysis, or needing to understand competitive messaging and differentiation strategies. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to analyze active ads from Meta/Facebook, Google, or LinkedIn ad libraries; tear down a competitor's messaging; extract hooks, offers, CTAs, video transcripts, landing page claims, and test ideas from public ads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to analyze a creator, influencer, founder, or brand social account and understand positioning, content pillars, outlier posts, hooks, format choices, audience reaction, and what can be copied or tested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map the category narrative", "tear down how competitors tell their story", or "find the language conventions in our market"; produces a category narrative map — the dominant stories and points of view in the category, its language conventions and framing clichés, and a per-competitor narrative teardown (arc, claimed onlyness, proof pattern) plus how each rival's messaging has shifted over time (scraped copy vs archived copy). Not for the positioning canvas itself — use positioning-mapper; not for the beachhead's beliefs and objections — use audience-belief-mapper; not for SERP keyword targeting — use keyword-research; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 品类叙事/竞争叙事拆解/语言惯例/叙事演变

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans and scripts short-form and long-form video, and designs the packaging — titles, thumbnails, and openings — that determines whether it gets watched. Use this to script a video, plan a series, fix retention or click-through problems, design thumbnail and title concepts, or turn written content into video. For a YouTube channel specifically — idea selection, retention teardowns, and channel-level strategy — use `youtube-producer`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans, packages, and scripts long-form video for retention and channel growth — idea selection, titles and thumbnails, script structure, and diagnosing why a video or channel underperforms. Use this for video ideas, packaging, scripting, a retention teardown, or channel strategy — including when someone describes a topic and wants it turned into something publishable. For short-form and cross-platform video, use `video-content`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate BATS test structure and fixtures for shell script testing with setup/teardown, assertions, and mocking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor competitor signals and surface strategic implications for your roadmap. Use when asked to monitor competitors, track the competitive landscape, produce a competitive briefing, or understand what has changed in the market this week or month. Produces a structured intelligence brief with high/medium/low priority signals, roadmap implications, and a strategic landscape summary. For a single competitor announcement use competitor-signal-tracker; for a one-off deep dive use competitor-teardown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a creator, influencer, founder, competitor, or brand social account to explain its positioning, content pillars, winning posts, hooks, formats, series, calls to action, and audience response. Use when the user wants to understand why an account works and what patterns to test without copying it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer a company's sales and marketing tech stack from public signals. Detects CRMs, cold email tools, people databases, ad pixels, email delivery services, and outbound sending domains via DNS records, website source inspection, Apify technology profiling, blacklist checks, and public spam complaint searches. Works on single companies or batches. Outputs a structured markdown report per company.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scrape competitor ads from Meta, TikTok, Google, and LinkedIn ad libraries, analyze creative patterns (hooks, formats, CTAs), reverse-engineer landing page funnels, and produce a strategic teardown with vulnerability analysis and counter-play recommendations. Use when you need to understand the competitive ad landscape, find new creative directions, or identify weaknesses in a competitor's paid strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for Amazon e-commerce research, market validation, competitor analysis, traffic diagnosis, keyword strategy, advertising review, launch evaluation, and growth optimization using the Sif MCP server and Sif's real marketplace, traffic, keyword, sales, and ad data. Trigger when users mention Sif, Sif MCP, ASIN research, Amazon product opportunity research, keyword opportunity, competitor teardown, traffic drop/root-cause diagnosis, advertising structure review, or whether a product/market is worth entering, launching, scaling, optimizing, or abandoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' 'monetization,' 'how much should I charge,' 'my pricing is wrong,' 'pricing page,' 'annual vs monthly,' 'per seat pricing,' 'should I offer a free plan,' 'pricing page teardown,' 'pricing page audit,' 'is my pricing page AI-readable,' or 'can AI read my pricing.' Use this whenever someone is figuring out what to charge, how to structure their plans, or wants to audit a pricing page (for humans and for the AI agents that shortlist tools). For in-app upgrade screens, see paywalls. For offer construction (bonuses, guarantees, value framing, naming) on services/courses/coaching/high-ticket B2B, see offers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when positioning needs defining or sharpening — a statement built on Promise, Proof, and Path, a differentiation matrix against competitors, category entry points, a three-level message hierarchy, and tagline directions. Trigger on 'positioning', 'positioning statement', 'what makes us different', 'USP', 'why should customers choose us over them', 'we sound the same as everyone else'. Also use when the user can list features but not a reason to pick them. Not for — competitor teardown research, see `08-competitor-research-global`; how the brand sounds in writing, see `35-brand-voice-global`; the offer and its value stack, see `31-offer-design-global`; the launch built on it, see `59-go-to-market-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to monitor what is being said about the brand, competitors, and the category — channels and keywords to track, sentiment scoring, weekly and monthly listening reports, brand health metrics, early crisis detection, and content opportunities pulled from real conversations. Trigger on 'social listening', 'brand monitoring', 'sentiment analysis', 'what are people saying about us', 'track our mentions', 'monitor competitors online'. Also use when the user spotted a bad comment thread and wants to know if it is spreading. Not for — responding to a crisis already underway, see `66-crisis-playbook-global`; competitor strategy teardown, see `08-competitor-research-global`; auditing your own posts, see `39-content-audit-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A complete marketing department in one skill. Website and landing-page audits with weighted 0-100 scores, copywriting with panel scoring and AI-slop removal, an 18-tactic ad hook engine, GEO/AEO for getting cited by ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews, paid-ads creative diagnosis and production briefs, email sequences, LinkedIn/X writing, launch playbooks, positioning and offer design, competitor teardowns, app store optimization, honest analytics and test design. Use for ANY marketing task — audit, write, rewrite, diagnose, score, plan, launch, position, price, analyze — whenever the user mentions marketing, growth, conversion, copy, ads, hooks, CPM, ROAS, SEO, GEO, email, social, landing pages, funnels, launches, competitors, brand, positioning, pricing, or app stores, or says "my landing page sucks", "nobody's converting", "why are my CPMs up", "AI doesn't recommend us", "write me 20 hooks". Route via the table inside; fan out subagents for multi-dimensional work. Not for pure engineering, legal, or finance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides file paths to language-specific reference files for the test ANALYSIS skills (assertion-quality, test-anti-patterns, test-gap-analysis, test-smell-detection, test-tagging). Read this catalog to discover available extension files (e.g., dotnet.md for .NET/MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit, python.md for pytest/unittest, typescript.md for Jest/Vitest/Mocha, java.md for JUnit/TestNG, etc.). Do not invoke this reference-only skill — its bundled files are read by the quality agent and analysis skills needing framework-specific lookup tables (test markers, assertion APIs, skip annotations, sleep patterns, mystery guest indicators, integration markers, setup/teardown, tag-support capability).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert .NET tests from NUnit 3/4 to MSTest v4 while preserving VSTest or MTP. Use for replacing NUnit/NUnit3TestAdapter packages, Test/TestCase/ TestCaseSource/Values attributes, constraint assertions, SetUp/TearDown, OneTimeSetUp, SetUpFixture, FixtureLifeCycle, TestContext, categories, retries, timeouts, and NUnit parallelization. Also use when a "convert NUnit to MSTest" request may already be migrated: inspect and report the no-op. Do not use for NUnit version upgrades, xUnit/TUnit conversion, MSTest upgrades, or runner-only VSTest-to-MTP migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use NUnit. Use when a repo uses `NUnit`, `[Test]`, `[TestCase]`, `[TestFixture]`, or NUnit3TestAdapter for VSTest or Microsoft.Testing.Platform execution. USE FOR: writing or reviewing NUnit tests; using [Test], [TestCase], [TestFixture], [SetUp], [TearDown] attributes; configuring NUnit3TestAdapter or NUnit.Analyzers. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to set up, review, or improve Java integration tests — including generating a BaseIntegrationTest.java with WireMock for HTTP stubs, detecting HTTP client infrastructure from import signals, injecting service coordinates dynamically via System.setProperty(), creating WireMock JSON mapping files with bodyFileName, isolating stubs per test method, verifying HTTP interactions, or eliminating anti-patterns such as Mockito-mocked HTTP clients or globally registered WireMock stubs. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for integration tests; Apply best practices for integration tests in Java code; Write Java integration tests with real infrastructure boundaries; Improve Testcontainers integration tests for Java code; Review integration test setup and teardown in Java projects. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。