「termine」の検索結果

Use when creating or modifying a Handsontable cell validator - async callback-based validation functions that determine if cell values are valid

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrates Android applications from the old, legacy Google Mobile Ads (GMA) SDK (com.google.android.gms:play-services-ads) to the new GMA Next-Gen SDK (com.google.android.libraries.ads.mobile.sdk:ads-mobile-sdk). Provides comprehensive mapping tables for imports, classes, and method signatures to help determine migration steps. Use when migrating an existing Android codebase from the old, legacy GMA SDK to GMA Next-Gen SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a working artifact from a plain "implement X for me" request: a running end-to-end spine first, then one feature per rung, with every under-determined decision written to an assumption ledger BEFORE the code that depends on it and a sweep for the ones that slipped through undeclared (same-family provisional in the base Codex mirror). Use when user says "给我实现", "implement X", "帮我做一个能跑的", "先搭个原型再加功能", "build this feature", "prototype then extend", or hands over a capability description rather than an experiment plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a working artifact from a plain "implement X for me" request: a running end-to-end spine first, then one feature per rung, with every under-determined decision written to an assumption ledger BEFORE the code that depends on it and a cross-model sweep for the ones that slipped through undeclared. Use when user says "给我实现", "implement X", "帮我做一个能跑的", "先搭个原型再加功能", "build this feature", "prototype then extend", or hands over a capability description rather than an experiment plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes rigorous mathematical proofs for ML/AI theory. Use when asked to prove a theorem, lemma, proposition, or corollary, fill in missing proof steps, formalize a proof sketch, 补全证明, 写证明, 证明某个命题, or determine whether a claimed proof can actually be completed under the stated assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI crawler access analysis. Checks robots.txt, meta tags, and HTTP headers to determine which AI crawlers can access the site. Provides a complete access map and recommendations for maximizing AI visibility while maintaining appropriate control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI citability scoring and optimization. Analyzes web page content to determine how likely AI systems (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) are to cite or quote passages from the page. Provides a citability score (0-100) with specific rewrite suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quickly determine whether a processing activity needs a PIA, a mandatory GDPR DPIA, or can proceed — surfaces privacy policy conflicts and routes to the right next step. Use when the user asks "does this need a PIA", "triage this feature", "privacy check on X", "is this okay from a privacy perspective", or describes a new data processing activity, product feature, or vendor relationship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "triage a vulnerability report", "assess a CVE", "evaluate a bug bounty submission", "decide if a finding is valid", "review a security finding", "dismiss a vulnerability", "should we fix this CVE", "prioritize a vulnerability report", or needs to determine whether an incoming vulnerability report warrants investigation. Applies 7 brocards (rules of thumb) to systematically accept, dismiss, or request more information on vulnerability reports, or needs to filter raw findings from agentic vulnerability discovery pipelines before human review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive coach that asks 4-5 questions to determine whether you need an agent, command, skill, hook, or rule, then generates a ready-to-use template. Usage: /scaffold (no arguments needed, starts the coaching session)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a team", "spawn agents", "assign tasks", "coordinate multiple agents", "check team status", "view kanban board", "send messages between agents", "manage team tasks", "monitor team progress", or mentions "clawteam", legacy "oh", "multi-agent coordination", "team collaboration", "agent inbox", "task board", "spawn worker". This skill should also be triggered when the current task is complex enough to benefit from splitting into subtasks and delegating to multiple agents — for example when the user asks to "build a full-stack app", "refactor the entire codebase", "implement multiple features in parallel", or when the agent determines that the work scope exceeds what a single agent can efficiently handle alone. Provides comprehensive guidance for using the ClawTeam CLI to orchestrate multi-agent teams with task management, messaging, monitoring, runtime profiles, git context, and recovery tooling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determines which LLM model to use for each agent spawn

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes your conversion lag data to determine the optimal retargeting window for each audience segment. Tells you whether your 30-day retargeting window should actually be 7 days, 14 days, or 60 days based on when people actually convert after their first visit. Platform: Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover, connect, and verify NotFair paid-ad integrations and their actual capabilities. Use when asked to connect an ad account, configure an ads MCP, check available tools, troubleshoot access, or determine whether NotFair can read or change a platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry point for new work. Determines the best action path or work decomposition (update existing spec, create new spec, mixed decomposition, or no spec needed) and refines ideas through structured dialogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute QA test plans on Holoscan Sensor Bridge hardware. Reads a user-provided test document, filters tests by the user's setup, determines which tests can run automatically, executes them with pass/fail evaluation, and produces a structured test results report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solves CTF challenges by performing first-pass triage, identifying the dominant category, and routing execution to the right specialized ctf-* skill. Use when the user gives you a challenge bundle, a remote service, a suspicious file, or only a vague challenge description and you must determine where to start. Do not use it when the category is already clear and a specialized skill can be invoked directly; this is the dispatcher and recon entrypoint, not the deepest reference for category-specific techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you want to search for or download experimentally-determined 3D structures for biomolecules (proteins, nucleic acids, bound ligands). Supports searching by sequence similarity, structure similarity, chemical and other attributes. Also use to get metadata about biomolecular structure experiments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "calculate TAM", "determine SAM", "estimate SOM", "size the market", "calculate market opportunity", "what's the total addressable market", or requests market sizing analysis for a startup or business opportunity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating business model viability, analyzing profitability per customer/product/transaction, validating startup metrics (CAC, LTV, payback period), making pricing decisions, assessing scalability, comparing business models, or when user mentions unit economics, CAC/LTV ratio, contribution margin, customer profitability, break-even analysis, or needs to determine if a business can be profitable at scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze finance text sentiment using FinBERT or LLM. Use when the user needs to determine the sentiment (positive/negative/neutral) and score of financial text markets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。