「the」の検索結果

Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The PRIMARY development workflow for the Archon project (remote-coding-agent). Use this skill instead of any PRP skills when working on Archon code. Routes to 10 specialized cookbooks based on what the user is trying to do: RESEARCH — "how does the orchestrator work?", "where is session state defined?", "trace the workflow execution flow", "what is IWorkflowStore?" INVESTIGATE — "should we use Drizzle or Prisma?", "what's the best way to add WebSockets?", "can we migrate to Turso?", "how do other projects handle rate limiting?" PRD — "write a PRD for dark mode", "spec out the notification feature", "product requirements for webhook retry" PLAN — "plan the auth refactor", "design the caching layer", "create an implementation plan for #42" IMPLEMENT — "implement the plan", "execute .claude/archon/plans/auth.plan.md", "build the feature from the plan", "code this up" REVIEW — "review PR #123", "review my changes", "code review the diff" DEBUG — "debug the failing test", "why is streaming broken?", "root cause analysis on the timeout issue" COMMIT — "commit these changes", "commit the auth refactor" PR — "create a PR", "open a pull request for this branch" ISSUE — "report this to gh", "create a gh issue", "log it in github", "file a bug for this", "create a feature request" This skill triggers on ANY development task: researching, investigating, planning, building, reviewing, debugging, committing, or shipping code. NOT for: Running Archon CLI workflows in worktrees (use /archon instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Works the bill pile from the AP inbox all the way to a staged payment run — reads and codes every bill, then checks the cash position before a dollar is committed, then stages the run for one-click approval and keeps the books tidy for close. Coding and paying are two separate decisions with two separate approvals, and the cash check sits between them on purpose. Runs on the ledger (MYOB, NetSuite, QuickBooks, Xero, or Zoho Books) and a mail connector (Gmail or M365), deepens with Expensify and Ramp, and works from uploaded PDFs or phone photos with the run sheet exported for manual entry. Use it when the owner says "pay the bills," "the bills are piling up," "what do I owe," "who needs to get paid this week," "can I afford to pay these," or forwards a stack of vendor invoices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to deploy and operate a CollectX (clx) based DOCA telemetry collector on a host or BlueField — wiring providers / counters into the collector, running the collection daemon, and shaping its exporters (Prometheus pull, Fluent Bit push, NetFlow, file / IPC) so the metrics actually leave the box. Trigger even when the user never says CollectX or clx — implicit phrasings: {collector emits nothing downstream}, {add a provider to the clx collector}, {turn on the Prometheus endpoint}, {ship counters to Fluent Bit from the DPU}, {daemon starts but no schema rows appear}. This skill owns the CollectX collection mechanism plus the operator's own doca-telemetry / doca-telemetry-exporter usage; it ROUTES the productized DOCA Telemetry Service (DTS) to public docs (AGENTS.md Non-goal #7), the reader API to doca-telemetry, and the publisher API to doca-telemetry-exporter. Refuse to invent clx symbols, provider names, schema fields, flags, or config paths — describe the class and route to the live source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organic story anatomy from John Truby's The Anatomy of Story (有机结构/设计原则/22步骤/道德议题/四角对立/幽灵/场景编排) — the designing principle (story process plus original execution), the seven key steps as the organic spine, all twenty-two steps with the middle-act machinery the beat sheets lack (ghost, fake-ally opponent, plan, opponent's drive, ally's attack, fake defeat, three revelation-and-decision pairs, audience revelation, visit to death, moral decision), four-corner opposition, the moral-argument chain with the hero-opponent power-balance rule, scene weave with structure-step tags and storyline numbers, and the accordion rule (never fewer than seven steps). Kept side by side with the Field/Snyder page maps. Use when the middle act sags into unconnected episodes, when the premise works but the story feels mechanical, when one antagonist cannot carry the theme, when the theme stays stated instead of acted, or when a BS2 board needs an organic second pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

摄影 (摄影 (Photography) — 以静态影像为产出的视觉创作 + 服务行业：从看见 → 用光 → 构图 → 拍摄 → 后期 → 交付的认知操作系统，覆盖商业摄影 (commercial: 产品/广告/电商/美食)、人像摄影 (portrait: 影楼/写真/婚礼/时尚/环境人像)、纪实与街头摄影 (documentary/photojournalism/street)，以及与之贯通的风光、新闻、艺术摄影。面向职业摄影师 / 助理 / 修图师 / 想转职业的资深爱好者 / 服务这行的人 (器材厂商、图库、后期外包、影楼运营)。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — **光 (light is the craft — 看光、控光、塑光：硬光/柔光、方向、色温、光比、布光是摄影第一性) ⇄ 器材 (gear — 相机/镜头/灯具迷信, 'GAS' gear-acquisition-syndrome, 'the best camera is the one you have with you' — 器材不是摄影)**; **决定性瞬间/抓取 (decisive moment, Cartier-Bresson, 等待与预判, 纪实/街头不可重来) ⇄ 构建/导演 (constructed/directed, 商业与人像是布光摆姿造光的'制造'而非'捕获')**; **前期/拍对 (get it right in camera, 曝光/白平衡/构图当场拍对) ⇄ 后期/暗房 (post/darkroom, Ansel Adams 'negative is the score, print is the performance' — RAW 冲洗/调色/修图是创作一半)**; **作者性/艺术表达 (vision, personal voice, 'photograph what you feel not what you see') ⇄ 服务性/商业交付 (client brief, 影楼标准化出片, 'shoot the brief not your ego', 摄影是生意)**; **真实/未操纵 (truth, photojournalism ethics, 不过度 PS, 新闻摄影伦理) ⇄ 修饰/理想化 (retouch, 商业人像液化磨皮, 广告的'谎言')**; **决定性技术参数 (曝光三角 aperture/shutter/ISO, 景深, 互易律) ⇄ 看见/眼力 (seeing, 'photography is about seeing not cameras', 构图/光感是 tacit 眼力)**; **胶片/慢/不可见 (film, 慢工, 不可即时回看, 暗房) ⇄ 数码/即时/海量 (digital, chimping, 连拍, 后期无限)**; AI 对摄影的冲击 ('是不是摄影'、生成式填充/换天/AI 修图、真实性危机); (b) 核心工作流 / pipeline (最标准、最易蒸高质量+CLI 化) — 通用链: 看光选光 → 曝光三角决策 (光圈定景深/快门定动静/ISO 兜底) → 测光与曝光 (评价/点测光, 向右曝光 ETTR, 直方图, 区域系统) → 构图 (三分法/引导线/框架/负空间/前景) → 对焦 → 拍摄 → 选片 culling → RAW 后期 (Lightroom/Capture One: 曝光/白平衡/色调曲线/HSL/局部) → 精修 retouch (Photoshop: 频率分离/液化/D&B) → 调色 grading → 输出交付 (色彩管理/sRGB/打印/图库上传); 子流派 SOP: 影棚商业布光 (主光/辅光/轮廓光/背景光, 三点布光, 光质修饰器 softbox/beauty-dish/grid)、婚礼/纪实一天流程、街头扫街、产品/电商台面、人像引导摆姿 posing & direction; (c) 工具栈 — 相机系统 (无反主导: Sony A 系 / Canon R / Nikon Z / 富士 X&GFX / 徕卡 M; 中画幅 Phase One/Hasselblad/GFX 商业; 残幅 vs 全幅 vs 中幅)、镜头 (大三元, 定焦 vs 变焦, 35/50/85 人像三剑客, 微距, 移轴)、灯具 (机顶闪 Godox/Profoto, 影室灯, 常亮 LED, 持续光 vs 闪光)、修饰器 (柔光箱/反光伞/束光筒/雷达罩/旗板)、测光/附件 (测光表, 灰卡, 三脚架, 滤镜 ND/CPL/渐变)、后期软件 (Adobe Lightroom Classic/CC 主导, Capture One 商业/影室, Photoshop 精修, DxO PhotoLab/PureRAW 降噪, Capture One vs Lightroom 之争, 国产: 醒图/泼辣 Polarr/Snapseed 移动端, RawTherapee/Darktable 开源, AI: Lightroom 生成式/Photoshop Generative Fill/Topaz Photo AI/Gigapixel/Luminar Neo)、色彩管理 (X-Rite/Calibrite 校色仪, ICC, 显示器)、图库/交付 (Pixieset/图虫/500px/视觉中国/Getty/Adobe Stock, 客片在线选片); (d) 知识正典 — Ansel Adams 'The Camera / The Negative / The Print' 三部曲 + 区域系统 (Zone System)、Henri Cartier-Bresson 'The Decisive Moment'、Michael Freeman 'The Photographer's Eye' (构图) 'The Photographer's Mind'、Bryan Peterson 'Understanding Exposure' (曝光入门圣经)、Scott Kelby 'Digital Photography Book' 系列 + Lightroom/Photoshop 书、Joe McNally 'The Hot Shoe Diaries / Sketching Light' (闪光灯)、Light Science & Magic (布光科学经典教材)、Roland Barthes 'Camera Lucida' (摄影哲学)、Susan Sontag 'On Photography'、John Szarkowski 'The Photographer's Eye'、National Geographic 摄影指南、Robert Capa / Sebastião Salgado / Steve McCurry (纪实)、Annie Leibovitz / Richard Avedon / Peter Lindbergh (人像/时尚)、Galen Rowell / Ansel Adams (风光); (e) figures/流派 — 风光/系统派 (Ansel Adams 区域系统奠基、Galen Rowell 探险风光、Marc Adamus); 决定性瞬间/纪实街头派 (Henri Cartier-Bresson 奠基、Robert Capa 战地、Sebastião Salgado 社会纪实、Steve McCurry、Vivian Maier、Daido Moriyama、森山大道/荒木经惟 日本派、Vivian Maier); 人像/时尚派 (Richard Avedon、Annie Leibovitz、Peter Lindbergh、Platon、Joey L、Lindsay Adler 时尚布光); 布光/教育派 (Joe McNally、Zack Arias 'one light'、Profoto/strobist David Hobby 'Strobist' 闪光灯启蒙博客、Karl Taylor 商业布光教学); 商业/广告派 (Chase Jarvis 'CreativeLive'创办+'best camera'、Joel Grimes、Tim Wallace 汽车); 后期/修图派 (Pratik Naik、Aaron Nace 'Phlearn'); 街头当代派 (Eric Kim 街头博客、Joel Meyerowitz、Saul Leiter 色彩街头); 中文圈 (李涛 'photoshop教学'、宁思潇潇 器材评测、thomas 'Thomas看看世界' 风光后期、阿刘 风光、668 人像); 哲学/批评 (Susan Sontag、Roland Barthes、John Szarkowski MoMA); (f) 行业话术/黑话 — 曝光三角 exposure triangle / 光圈 aperture f-stop / 快门 shutter speed / 感光度 ISO / 景深 DoF depth of field / 焦段 focal length / 等效 / 全画幅 full-frame vs 残幅 crop / 大三元 / 定焦 prime / 互易律 reciprocity / 向右曝光 ETTR / 直方图 histogram / 高光溢出 clipping / 动态范围 dynamic range / 宽容度 / 白平衡 WB

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the oncall handoff for a rotation window — the whole handoff, not just a document: build the summary (what the incoming oncall needs first, what's still open, incidents with impact numbers, alert and page counts, hygiene suggestions, every number traceable to a source), post it for the outgoing oncall to correct, walk the incoming oncall through the open items in the thread, update the list as they respond, and note when they acknowledge. Runs mainly in the team's standing oncall / monitoring channel, normally as a scheduled routine firing at rotation change so the report is waiting when the shift turns over; can also be run by hand and works from an incident channel. Use when a handoff routine fires, or on "handoff", "hand over", "oncall summary", "weekly oncall report", "what happened this shift / this week". Re-running for the same window updates the report rather than duplicating it. Unattended runs carry a run-summary block and at least one chart.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before committing any non-trivial change, dispatch the diff to a reviewer runtime via ATO (`ato dispatch <reviewer> --session <id>`), parse the numbered/severity-tagged findings, apply or defer each one with a recorded justification, then commit. Fights the "build passes therefore ship it" failure mode — what Garry Tan calls the AI agent complexity ratchet. Place in the v2.16 stack: this skill is the LAST gate. `ato-warroom` decides the design; `ato-mission` runs the multi-step work and produces the diff; `ato-review` checks the diff before commit. When the review is part of a Mission, dispatch the review with `--require-tools read_file,grep,git_diff,git_log` so the reviewer can walk the source itself instead of reasoning from a paraphrase (PR-1.5 tool surface). Receipts land in `execution_logs` and the Mission narrative. Fires automatically before commits touching public surface (CLI subcommands, Tauri commands, MCP tools, schema migrations, security boundaries) or whenever a diff exceeds ~50 LOC of behavior change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author and own one flow's design document (the FLOW.md objective flow) at .unikit/gamedesign/flows/FLOW-<slug>.md — the dynamics layer of the GDD (what the player does over time). Create the skeleton and walk the collaborative section-cycle to write its objectives, pacing, dependencies, and funnel events ("design the first-session flow", "map the onboarding sequence", "write the FLOW for the boss encounter"), AND revise it after approval under the delta discipline ("retune the pacing", "add a branch", "change a GOAL", "rework the onboarding") — a cue/number change is Tuning, a small step change a Tweak, restructuring a Rework; each bumps the version and logs the delta. Selects the wiring mode (linear | conditional | emergent) and re-renders the ## Flow Map [gen] / ## Funnel [gen] blocks in GAME.md. To add or detail a system use /unikit-gd-system; to edit GAME.md content use /unikit-gd-spec; to apply a multi-zone edit use /unikit-gd-apply; for a new game concept use /unikit-gd-brainstorm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Change one thing in an image you already have and leave the rest of the picture alone — swap the background, recolour a part, remove or add an object, clean up a photo — from a local jpeg/png/webp file. Delegates to ofox-image-core's `edit` subcommand (POST /v1/images/edits, one synchronous request), prices the job with --dry-run before spending, and reports the real token cost including the uploaded picture, which is billed. Use when a user hands over an image and asks for a change to it, e.g. "change the background of this photo to a beach and keep the person unchanged", "make this button green", "remove the car in the background", or "put this product on a plain white background". Do not use to draw a new image from a text description with no input picture (that is ofox-image-core's `generate`), to produce a set of several images to choose between (see product-image), or to turn a photo into video (see seedance-product-video or seedance-ad-creative). Editing the content of an existing video — "change the background of my clip, keep the product" — has no route here and none in the video API either (measured; the mode field an edit would use is accepted and silently ignored, so nothing errors); this skill edits a single still, and routing such a request to a video skill generates brand-new footage instead of changing theirs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the current diff, or a PR number/branch/path target, for correctness bugs (plus reuse/simplification/efficiency cleanups where the model's review recipe covers them) at the given effort level (low|medium|high|xhigh|max: from few high-confidence findings up to many, some of them uncertain; ultra: deep multi-agent review in the cloud); with no level given, it reuses the level you typed last. Pass --comment to post findings as inline PR comments, or --fix to apply the findings to the working tree after the review. Pass --max-findings <n> to report up to n findings, or --max-findings all for every finding. The choice stays until you pass --max-findings default. For ultra on a GitHub.com PR target, --post asks to post the finished review’s findings to the PR as a single comment from the user’s GitHub account (not a review; the launch dialog still confirms in interactive sessions, while non-interactive mode posts on the flag alone) and --no-post hides that option.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide the user through an independent iFixAi audit of their own agent, checking whether it does the job it is supposed to do given their business rules and org structure. Prefer pointing it at the user's REAL deployed agent over its HTTP endpoint (its actual tools, retrieval, and governance) with `--provider http --endpoint <url>`; only when no endpoint is reachable, fall back to replicating the model beneath as a bare stand-in (Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Azure, Bedrock, etc.). Graded by the judge(s) of their choice (the same model, one independent judge, or a cross-vendor panel). You are the operator who walks them through it and explains the scorecard, running the SAME `ifixai run` engine as the guided CLI. Use when the user asks to run iFixAi or to audit an agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a company event — the launch party, the customer day, the team celebration — as the operation it is: the goal that shapes every choice, the budget with its forgotten lines, the vendor and venue coordination, the run-of-show with owners, and the day-of roles that keep hosts hosting. Use when asked plan the company event, organize our customer day/holiday party/launch event, what am I forgetting for this event, or be the run-of-show for Thursday. Produces the goal-shaped plan, the budget with the forgotten lines, the run-of-show, and the day-of role card.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create the release notes and upgrade guide for a mariadb-operator release. Given the release PR whose body lists every PR included in the release, it gathers each PR, groups the changes by relevance, and produces `docs/releases/RELEASE_<version>_HEADER.md.gotmpl` and `docs/releases/UPGRADE_<version>.md` in the format the previous releases use, then opens a PR targeting `release-<version>`. If no release PR is provided it asks for the new version and infers the changes from git history since the last tag. Use whenever the user wants release notes, an upgrade/update guide, or docs for a new mariadb-operator version — "create the release notes for 26.10.0", "write the upgrade guide", "document this release", "prepare the release PR docs" — even if they don't mention a release PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a one-line description of a repetitive task into a reusable, self-guarding slash command. loop-forge diagnoses the task into one of 5 loop shapes (Batch / Pipeline / Refine / Watch / Explore), interviews for the blanks, and auto-injects two safety devices the user didn't know they needed — an independent verifier (maker ≠ checker) and a hardstop (a budget/count/cooldown ceiling) — then previews the result and stamps it as a `/command` they can run forever. Use when the user says "/loop", "/loop-forge", "/make-it-loop", "automate this", "make this repeatable", "turn this into a command", "do this for all 100 items", "do X every time Y happens", "generate several and pick the best", or otherwise wants to capture a recurring task as a reusable slash command instead of re-typing the prompt by hand. Works in any language: it interviews the user and writes the stamped command in the user's own language. Non-goal — it does not schedule unattended runs (launchd/cron) or publish externally on its own; it stamps the reusable command and stops there.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your business planner. Compiles everything the other founder skills wrote (the board's verdict, the competitors, the buyer panel, pricing, the offer, the CFO's numbers, marketing, brand, operations and the launch plan) into one business plan with a verdict at the top that is computed from the numbers, never written by hand: Profitable, Not yet (with the failing numbers) or Incomplete. Adds an executive summary and a one-page version for a partner, lender or investor. Use when the user says "write my business plan", "put it all together", "is it profitable", "give me the plan", or at the end of the founder pack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn any still image into a professional motion graphic through the Novoads API on Seedance 2.5. Covers how to read a reference image, motion vocabulary for any image type — UI, marketing hero, flat-lay, key art, collage, product, character — the prompt clauses that control camera, timing, frozen regions and text fidelity, and the upload mechanics. Use whenever the user supplies an image and wants it animated, moving, or turned into video — including "animate this", "turn this into a motion graphic", "make this move", "この画像動かして", "モーショングラフィックにして", "I want the cards to pop in", "I want the bars to slide up", or when they describe motion beats for a static image. Also use when asked to write a Seedance prompt for an existing image. Do NOT use for text-to-video with no source image, restyling existing footage (this skill takes no video input), cloning a reference video (use clone-video-ad), or a product photo that should seed a new scene rather than move as-is (use novoads-api).

The measurement surface for ALL Pulp DSP and audio-pipeline work — read it BEFORE writing or gating DSP, not only when something already sounds wrong. Covers the C++ harness (signal generators, metrics, assertions, RenderScenario, contracts), the offline Audio Doctor (magnitude/frequency response, THD/THD+N, phase/group delay), and their Python sibling the Audio Quality Lab (tools/audio/quality-lab — null residual + alignment, LTAS log-spectral distance, spectral flux/centroid, HNR, Theil-Sen drift slope, Kaiser-sinc resampling, license-guarded corpus, regression-net ratchet). TRIGGER on AUTHORING work — "build/design an oscillator/filter/synth/effect", "add a DSP module", "what should the acceptance gate be", "how do I measure aliasing / anti-aliasing / alias floor", "null against a reference", "is this DSP correct", "choose a tolerance", "golden/regression corpus for audio", "measure drift or jitter", "A/B two renders" — AND on DEBUGGING work — "is there sound / no audio / I hear nothing", "does this filter/compressor/synth/delay produce the right signal", "prove the DSP / prove the contract", "measure the frequency response", "what's the THD / is it distorting", "what's the group delay / phase response / measured latency", "magnitude response curve", "render a test tone and assert", "audio regression", "64-frame works but 128 is silent", "sample-rate change pitch-shifted it", "describe what's in this buffer", "audio doctor", "compare before/after a DSP refactor". Reach for this BEFORE hand-rolling any FFT, null test, alias measurement, pitch tracker, or golden-render script — most of it already exists in one of the two lanes. Test/tool layer over HeadlessHost — deterministic, no audio device, no speakers. Off the realtime thread entirely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA Systems Engineering Manual (SEM) v1.0.1. Use for civil-agency systems engineering as the FAA practices it inside the Acquisition Management System (AMS) and the National Airspace System (NAS): the five-phase AMS lifecycle and its decision points; operational concept development and implementation-free functional analysis (ConOps, FFBD/N², CMLs); requirements analysis and architectural design synthesis (PRS→MRS, the PRD ratchet pPRD→iPRD→fPRD, RAM, ISEF/DoDAF views, CPRs); the seven technical management disciplines (Integrated Technical Management/SEMP, Interface Management/IRD-ICD, Risk-Issue-Opportunity, Configuration Management, SE Information Management, Decision Analysis, Verification & Validation); and the specialty disciplines (RMA via Service Threads/STLSC, Life Cycle Engineering, E3/Spectrum, Human Factors, Information Security via the NIST RMF, System Safety via the SMS, and Hazardous Materials/Environmental/EOSH). Scope limits: this is FAA-specific guidance, not policy — it is a tailorable menu that points outward to companion handbooks (FAA-HDBK-006A for RMA, the SMS Manual, the NIST 800-series) rather than restating generic SE theory; it is thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting/FAR law, software-development methodology, named anti-pattern catalogues, and any non-FAA or non-civil-aviation lifecycle. Source has no page numbers in the extracted text (~360 pp.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds DRAFT user personas from the research notes, interview summaries, survey free text and support themes the user provides: for each persona the goals, pains, jobs to be done, context of use, quotes exactly as supplied with their participant codes, and the evidence count behind every attribute, with names, demographics and any detail no participant stated left UNKNOWN rather than invented. Use when the user asks to "build personas from these interviews", "who are our users based on this research", "draft user personas", "turn these research notes into personas" or "update our personas with the new interviews". Do not use for theming a batch of customer feedback into counts, use customer-feedback-theme-synthesis instead; for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis; for the requirements those personas imply, use product-requirements-draft. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT data incident impact brief from the incident notes and data inventory the user provides: the timeline as stated, systems involved matched to the inventory, data categories held and evidenced as involved, people and record counts potentially affected with the source and method behind every figure, third parties, notification questions for legal and the data protection officer, and every UNKNOWN with the evidence that would settle it. No legal determination: it never states whether the incident is a reportable breach, whether notice is due, to whom or by when. Use when the user asks to "prepare the impact brief for this incident", "what data was involved", "how many people are affected", "map the incident to our data inventory" or "pull together what legal needs on the incident". Do not use for the blameless postmortem or root-cause timeline, use incident-postmortem-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a schedule extract (milestone list or planning tool export) and the period's status notes into a DRAFT plain-language slip explanation: which milestones and activities slipped and by how many working days, arithmetic shown, why per the notes as verbatim fragments with source and date, what each slip pushes next per the extract, and the decision each slip needs framed as a question with the options the notes propose and the owner the governance documents name, every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "explain the schedule slip", "what slipped this month and why", "write the schedule commentary for the steering pack", "put the delay in plain language for the sponsor" or "what decisions do these slips need". Do not use for the weekly status report, use project-status-tracker instead; for cost variances, use budget-variance-explainer; for one sprint's carry-over, use sprint-review-summary. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。