「theory」の検索結果

Expert-level discrete mathematics knowledge. Use when working with logic, set theory, combinatorics, graph theory, relations, functions, induction, recursion, boolean algebra, or discrete probability. Also use when the user mentions 'combinatorics', 'permutations', 'combinations', 'pigeonhole principle', 'inclusion-exclusion', 'generating functions', 'recurrence relations', 'graph theory', 'trees', 'logic', 'propositional calculus', or 'boolean algebra'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level number theory knowledge. Use when working with divisibility, prime numbers, modular arithmetic, congruences, Diophantine equations, cryptography, quadratic residues, or analytic number theory. Also use when the user mentions 'prime', 'divisibility', 'modular arithmetic', 'congruence', 'GCD', 'Euler totient', 'Fermat little theorem', 'Chinese remainder theorem', 'quadratic residue', 'Diophantine equation', 'RSA', or 'prime factorization'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level graph theory knowledge. Use when working with graph algorithms, network flows, matching, graph coloring, planar graphs, spectral graph theory, random graphs, or graph applications in computer science and networks. Also use when the user mentions 'shortest path', 'minimum spanning tree', 'network flow', 'bipartite matching', 'graph coloring', 'clique', 'independent set', 'vertex cover', 'planarity', 'graph isomorphism', 'adjacency matrix', or 'Laplacian'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures and derives research formulas when the user wants to 推导公式, build a theory line, organize assumptions, turn scattered equations into a coherent derivation, or rewrite theory notes into a paper-ready formula document. Use when the derivation target is not yet fully fixed, the main object still needs to be chosen, or the user needs a coherent derivation package rather than a finished theorem proof.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a brief section in house style, consistent with the case theory — every fact cited, every case checked, every argument tied to the theory. Use when the user says "draft the [section]", "write the statement of facts", "argument section on [issue]", or needs a first draft of a brief section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Qualitative Design Consultant with Ethnography & Action Research Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids overused phenomenology, proposes context-optimal qualitative strategies Absorbed H1 (Ethnographic Research Advisor) and H2 (Action Research Facilitator) capabilities Use when: selecting qualitative research design, planning phenomenology/grounded theory/case study/ethnography/action research Triggers: phenomenology, 현상학, grounded theory, 근거이론, case study, 사례연구, narrative inquiry, ethnography, 민족지, action research, 실행연구, qualitative design

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E1-Quantitative Analysis Guide with Code Generation & Sensitivity Analysis VS-Enhanced with Full 5-Phase process: Avoids obvious analyses, explores innovative methodologies Expanded to include qualitative analysis (thematic, grounded theory, content, narrative) Absorbed E4 (Analysis Code Generator) and E5 (Sensitivity Analysis - Primary Study) capabilities Use when: selecting statistical/qualitative methods, interpreting results, checking assumptions, generating code, sensitivity analysis Triggers: statistical analysis, ANOVA, regression, t-test, power analysis, assumption checking, effect size, thematic analysis, grounded theory, content analysis, narrative analysis, NVivo, ATLAS.ti, coding, qualitative data, R code, Python code, SPSS syntax, sensitivity analysis, robustness check

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Problem-solving strategies for operator theory in functional analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Problem-solving strategies for proof theory in mathematical logic

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provide number theory algorithm implementations and guidance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the question is what makes the result tight or what the data identify for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — covering both (a) structural/empirical-IO and experimental identification and (b) for pure theory, which assumptions drive the result and how robust the mechanism is. Stress-tests credibility; it does not build the model (see aejmic-theory-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when presenting results for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — propositions, numerical examples, schematic theory figures, and empirical/experimental tables. Builds exhibits to AEA house norms; it does not derive the results (see aejmic-theory-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the model setup, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneck for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — the central skill for a theory-first paper. Builds the model to the AEJ: Micro bar (clean, general, well-motivated result); it does not check whether your theorem is correct.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when extensions, edge cases, or applied robustness checks are missing for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — covering theory extensions (relaxed assumptions, alternative concepts, perturbations) and applied/experimental robustness. Decides which extensions earn their place; it does not prove the main result (see aejmic-theory-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the contribution of an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript is fuzzy or oversold relative to the closest existing results. Stakes the theorem-relative delta against the nearest theory; it does not build the model (see aejmic-theory-model) or frame the prose (see aejmic-writing-style).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a model — a full theory paper's argument or the structural/conceptual scaffolding behind an empirical AER: Insights short-format manuscript — needs to be made minimal, so it carries the single insight in a few pages. Keeps only what the insight requires; it does not develop a general framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when prose buries the result or the abstract/intro do not land for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript. Applies AEA house style and the theory-paper intro arc; it does not produce the result (see aejmic-theory-model) or build exhibits (see aejmic-tables-figures).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting the response letter and revision plan after an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) R&R. Structures the reply to theory referees (correctness, generality, exposition) and editor; it does not re-derive the result (see aejmic-theory-model).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript needs a model to interpret, discipline, or structure its empirical estimates — not to lead the paper. Calibrates how much theory belongs in an empirical-first journal and where it goes; it does not design the identification (aeja-identification) or build a standalone structural estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see asq-methods).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when situating an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript within organization-theory conversations and sharpening the gap/tension it addresses. Positions the argument; it does not develop the core theory or write the methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the theoretical puzzle is the bottleneck for an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript — deciding whether an idea is theory-worthy and AMR-fit before any theorizing begins. Frames the puzzle; it does NOT build constructs (that is amr-theory-development) or design any empirical study (AMR has none).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing or sharpening a research question for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — testing whether the question genuinely concerns the social, organizational, behavioral or institutional life of accounting, and picking the intellectual tradition the question demands. Screens fit; it does not build the theory (aos-theory-development).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you must identify which theoretical conversation an Academy of Management Review (AMR) manuscript enters and how it "challenges and extends" that conversation. Positions the argument within a literature; it does NOT summarize the field (AMR punishes review-essays) and does NOT build the new theory (that is amr-theory-development).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。