596 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Select the right formative assessment technique for a specific learning moment, purpose, and age group. Use when choosing how to check understanding during, between, or after lessons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for Microsoft Foundry (aka Azure AI Foundry) development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when building Foundry agents with Azure OpenAI, AI Gateway, MCP tools, Entra auth, or BYO VNet networking, and other Microsoft Foundry related development tasks. Not for Content Safety in Foundry Control Plane (use azure-content-safety), Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools (use azure-content-understanding), Azure Speech in Foundry Tools (use azure-speech), Microsoft Foundry Classic (use microsoft-foundry-classic).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for Microsoft Foundry Local (aka Azure AI Foundry Local) development including best practices, decision making, configuration, and integrations & coding patterns. Use when compiling HF models with Olive, using Foundry Local CLI, embeddings/chat/audio APIs, or OpenAI-style integrations, and other Microsoft Foundry Local related development tasks. Not for Microsoft Foundry (use microsoft-foundry), Microsoft Foundry Classic (use microsoft-foundry-classic), Azure Local (use azure-local), Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools (use azure-content-understanding).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for Azure Speech in Foundry Tools development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when using STT/TTS, custom voice or avatars, Speech containers, Voice Live, or telephony/WebRTC streaming, and other Azure Speech in Foundry Tools related development tasks. Not for Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools (use azure-content-understanding), Azure AI Vision (use azure-ai-vision), Azure AI Video Indexer (use azure-video-indexer), Azure Translator (use azure-translator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge for Content Safety in Foundry Control Plane development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when using Content Safety APIs, Docker containers, text blocklists, media provenance, or groundedness checks, and other Content Safety in Foundry Control Plane related development tasks. Not for Azure Content Understanding in Foundry Tools (use azure-content-understanding), Azure Security (use azure-security), Azure Sentinel (use azure-sentinel), Azure Defender For Cloud (use azure-defender-for-cloud).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
把视频分析为结构化理解索引：场景检测、ASR 转写、逐场景 VLM 观察、静音窗口、融合时间线和写作 brief。 用于理解、索引或总结视频，也作为后续创作前的分析阶段。输入视频文件；输出 scenes.json、 asr_result.json、vlm_analysis.json、silence_periods.json、timeline_fusion.json、agent_narration_brief.md。 触发词：视频理解、视频分析、视频索引、video understanding、analyze video、看懂视频。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs deep AI-powered analysis and understanding of long-form videos (up to 3 hours, 10GB) using Volcengine LAS large language models. Video analysis, video comprehension, and video summarization — generates comprehensive video summaries, video recaps, chapter breakdowns, event timelines, key moments, and structured content indexing. Supports behavior detection, action detection, video annotation, video tagging, and video content recognition. Enables intelligent video question answering — ask questions about video content and get AI answers. Handles long meeting recordings, lecture videos, webinars, surveillance and security footage, movies, tutorials, and any long video that needs detailed understanding. Async processing with submit-poll workflow. Use this skill when the user wants to analyze or understand long videos (up to 3h/10GB) with LLM-based deep comprehension, summarize video content or generate recaps, extract chapters/key moments/timelines from videos, do video Q&A (ask questions about video content), detect actions/behaviors in videos, review meeting recordings/lectures/webinars, or get structured video descriptions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to determine what tax filings they need, wants to know if they must file a tax return (確定申告), asks about consumption tax obligations (消費税), or needs help understanding their filing requirements. Trigger phrases include: "確定申告が必要か", "申告の種類", "消費税の届出", "課税事業者かどうか", "何を申告すればいい", "申告要否", "税金の申告", "住民税の申告".
Use when user asks to analyze an image, describe image contents, or answer questions about a picture. iFlytek Image Understanding (图片理解) — analyze and answer questions about images using Spark Vision model. WebSocket API, pure Python stdlib, no pip dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in understanding and navigating legacy codebases. Covers code archaeology techniques, finding hidden knowledge, mapping dependencies, and extracting understanding from code without documentation. Knows how to read the stories that old code tells. Use when "legacy code, old codebase, understand this code, archaeology, what does this do, no documentation, ancient code, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive patterns for AI-powered document understanding including PDF parsing, OCR, invoice/receipt extraction, table extraction, multimodal RAG with vision models, and structured data output. Use when "document parsing, PDF extraction, OCR, invoice processing, receipt extraction, document understanding, LlamaParse, Unstructured, vision document, table extraction, structured output from PDF, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select the right formative assessment technique for a specific learning moment, purpose, and age group. Use when choosing how to check understanding during, between, or after lessons.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Win #1 Product of the Day on Product Hunt. Completely reverse-engineered from 30x daily winner and 3x weekly winner campaigns — ranking algorithm decoded, launch timing optimized, hunter selection guide, community engagement approach, and post-launch momentum playbook. Use this if you're: (1) already read PH launch guides but still can't break into Top 5 and need algorithm-level deep optimization, (2) targeting Daily #1 and 5,000+ sign-ups with a proven 30+ case validated approach, or (3) an investor/accelerator coaching portfolio companies on PH launches. What's inside: PH ranking algorithm decoded: weighted factors for first 3 hours, 24 hours, and weekly ranking · Pre-launch preparation: gallery optimization, product URL selection, tagline refinement (≤60 chars) · Launch timing optimization: exact PST launch windows + scheduling guide · Community engagement KPIs: upvote targets, comment response time, maker comment strategy · Platform compliance guide: understanding PH's quality signals and organic growth · Post-launch 72-hour plan: maintaining momentum, conditions for Weekly #1 · Case studies: 3 different categories (AI Tool, App, SaaS) dissected Expected outcomes: Product Hunt Daily #1 ranking · strong community engagement on launch day · 3,000–10,000+ sign-ups (depending on product-market fit) 🇨🇳 Product Hunt 打榜完整攻略 | 🇯🇵 Product Hunt ローンチガイド | 🇰🇷 Product Hunt 런칭 가이드 Keywords: Product Hunt #1, Product Hunt launch strategy, PH ranking algorithm, PH #1 daily winner, Product Hunt tips, product launch, startup launch, ranking optimization, PH gallery optimization, Community engagement strategy, maker community engagement, product strategy, launch tactics, how to win Product Hunt, product hunt best practices
🇺🇸 Your dev team ships features nobody asked for while user-reported bugs pile up for months. Operations blames engineering for ignoring users; engineering blames operations for not understanding technical constraints. This gives you the complete Product × Engineering × Operations alignment SOP — from unified backlog to 10-day sprint cadence to veto power rules. What's inside: • Dual-layer Kanban system (master backlog + sprint board with unified tagging) • 10-day sprint standard process (Day 1 dev → Day 6 testable build → Day 10 ship) • Issue template with reproducibility requirements (3x reported = auto-severe) • Tri-party alignment meetings (daily standup / sprint planning / sprint review) • Operations veto power on releases (P0 bug = block shipping) • User feedback → product iteration closed loop (beta testing + interview SOP) • Core metrics framework (acquisition → activation → retention → monetization → referral) • Technical debt management (20-30% sprint capacity reserved) • Ready-to-use templates: Bug Report, Sprint Planning, Responsibility Matrix Built from: Real product strategy meetings + beta testing frameworks. References Supabase sprint model, Manus/DeepSeek commercialization alignment. By @WeiYipei. 🇨🇳 你的研发团队在做没人要的新功能，用户反馈的 Bug 堆了三个月没人动。运营觉得研发不听用户，研发觉得运营不懂技术。这份 SOP 给你从统一看板到 10 天迭代节奏到一票否决权的完整产研运协同框架。 🇯🇵 開発チームは誰も求めていない機能を作り、ユーザーから報告されたバグは何ヶ月も放置。このSOPは、統一バックログから10日スプリント、リリース拒否権まで、プロダクト×エンジニアリング×オペレーションの完全な連携フレームワークを提供します。 🇰🇷 개발팀은 아무도 요청하지 않은 기능을 만들고, 사용자가 보고한 버그는 몇 달째 방치됩니다. 이 SOP는 통합 백로그부터 10일 스프린트, 릴리스 거부권까지 제품×개발×운영 완전 협업 프레임워크를 제공합니다. Triggers: "product ops" | "engineering operations" | "product development SOP" | "sprint planning" | "iteration management" | "cross-functional alignment" | "product engineering ops" | "dev ops collaboration" | "产研运协同" | "迭代管理" | "产品研发运营" | "プロダクト開発運営" | "제품개발운영"
Explanation documentation patterns for understanding-oriented content - conceptual guides that explain why things work the way they do. Use when writing an explanation doc, conceptual guide, understanding/background doc, design rationale, or architecture explanation, or when asked how/why something works. Builds on the docs-style core writing principles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Socratic tutor that teaches codebase understanding through questioning, challenges, and active recall. Invoke with /learn-codebase when onboarding to a new codebase or deepening understanding of existing code. Maintains a learning journal that tracks mastery and schedules reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert knowledge of Behandlingsresultat (treatment result) domain in melosys-api. Use when: (1) Understanding result types and their meaning (FASTSATT_LOVVALGSLAND, MEDLEM_I_FOLKETRYGDEN, etc.), (2) Working with periods - Lovvalgsperiode, Medlemskapsperiode, Anmodningsperiode, Utpekingsperiode, (3) Debugging vedtak/decision metadata, criteria evaluation, or social insurance charges, (4) Understanding EU/EEA coordination logic and Article 16 exception handling, (5) Working with trygdeavgift (social insurance charge) calculations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pragmatics and communicative competence across languages -- speech acts (Austin/Searle), Grice's conversational maxims and implicature, politeness theory (Brown & Levinson), face-threatening acts, discourse structure, turn-taking, repair strategies, register and formality, cross-cultural communication, communicative strategies (circumlocution, approximation, appeal for assistance), and the gap between grammatical competence and communicative performance. Use when teaching communication skills, analyzing cross-cultural misunderstandings, building conversational fluency, or understanding why grammatically correct sentences can be pragmatically inappropriate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided codebase exploration for understanding a repo's architecture, patterns, and domain language before contributing. Not issue-specific. builds general understanding. Use when exploring a new repo, wanting to understand how a project works, or preparing to become a regular contributor. Not for learning a framework or language you have never used. Use oss-learn-stack for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep receptive attention to extract intent beyond literal words. Maps active listening from counseling psychology to AI reasoning: clearing assumptions, attending to full signal, parsing multiple layers (literal, procedural, emotional, contextual, constraint, meta), reflecting understanding, noticing what is unsaid, and integrating the whole picture. Use when a user's request feels ambiguous, when context suggests something different from the literal words, when previous responses have missed the mark, or before beginning a large task where misunderstanding intent would waste significant effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI systematic knowledge acquisition from unfamiliar territory — deliberate model-building with feedback loops. Maps spaced repetition principles to AI reasoning: survey the territory, hypothesize structure, explore with probes, integrate findings, verify understanding, and consolidate for future retrieval. Use when encountering an unfamiliar codebase or domain, when a user asks about a topic requiring genuine investigation rather than recall, when multiple conflicting sources require building a coherent model, or when preparing to teach a topic and deep understanding is required first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a person in developing active listening skills. AI coaches receptive mindset preparation, full-presence attending, reflective paraphrasing, clarifying questioning, synthesis of understanding, and integration of insights into communication practice. Use when a person wants to improve communication, when someone keeps misunderstanding others or feels misunderstood, when preparing for a difficult conversation such as a feedback session or conflict resolution, or when a person notices they talk more than they listen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Communicate an integrated insight in a way that is accessible, actionable, and preserves the multi-domain nature of the understanding. Integrated insights are multi-dimensional — linearizing them risks losing the relationships that make them valuable. This skill provides a structured procedure for choosing the right form, expressing the gestalt with honest attribution, and inviting productive challenge. Use after integrate-gestalt has formed a cross-domain understanding that needs to be communicated to an audience — domain specialists, generalists, or decision-makers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Appraise gemstone value using the four Cs (color, clarity, cut, carat), origin assessment, treatment detection, and market factor analysis. Advisory educational guidance only — not a certified appraisal. Use when understanding factors that determine a gemstone's value, pre-screening stones before a professional appraisal, evaluating whether a seller's asking price is reasonable, learning gemstone grading methodology, or understanding how treatment status affects value.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。