579 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generates audit-grade, hallucination-free documentation from codebase features with full traceability. Use when documenting features, creating technical specs, or generating verified documentation with code references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Azure Verified Modules (AVM) requirements and best practices for developing certified Azure Terraform modules. Use when creating or reviewing Azure modules that need AVM certification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides which named technologies a company actually runs on its website, verified against the live site. Triggers on "find companies using Shopify", "they're on HubSpot", "tech stack targeting", "technographics", "who uses Klaviyo", "companies running WordPress". Outputs a per-domain verdict (tech_confirmed plus the verified stack and its evidence); the copy-ready clause is OFF by default and runs only when the operator asks for one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify a claim with fresh local evidence: restate it falsifiably, capture baseline and treatment, compare artifacts, and return VERIFIED, NOT VERIFIED, or INCONCLUSIVE.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
🇺🇸 Hardware + SaaS GTM Playbook — End-to-end go-to-market for consumer hardware products with software subscription models. Covers crowdfunding engineering (Kickstarter/Indiegogo/Makuake), KOL matrix for physical products, hardware PMF validation metrics, device-as-funnel subscription design, localization entry timing, and community flywheel mechanics. Built from verified Plaud, Insta360, and DJI case data. 🇨🇳 硬件+软件订阅 GTM 实操手册 — 面向消费硬件产品的完整出海及增长打法。覆盖众筹超额工程（KS/IGG/Makuake）、硬件 KOL 矩阵策略、硬件 PMF 验证、设备即漏斗订阅设计、本地化进入时机判断、社区飞轮构建。基于 Plaud/Insta360/大疆真实案例数据撰写。 🇯🇵 ハードウェア＋SaaS GTMプレイブック — クラウドファンディング（Kickstarter/IGG/Makuake）を起点とした消費者向けハードウェア製品のGTM戦略。KOLマトリクス、PMF検証、デバイスをファネルとするサブスクリプション設計、ローカライゼーション進入タイミング、コミュニティフライホイールまで網羅。Plaud・Insta360・DJIの実例データに基づく。 🇰🇷 하드웨어+SaaS GTM 플레이북 — 크라우드펀딩(Kickstarter/IGG/Makuake) 기반 소비자 하드웨어 제품의 엔드투엔드 GTM 전략. KOL 매트릭스, PMF 검증, 디바이스-as-퍼널 구독 설계, 현지화 진입 타이밍, 커뮤니티 플라이휠 포함. Plaud·Insta360·DJI 실제 사례 데이터 기반. Triggers: "hardware GTM" | "crowdfunding strategy" | "hardware+SaaS" | "Kickstarter launch" | "hardware KOL" | "hardware PMF" | "device subscription" | "hardware product launch" | "consumer hardware growth" | "Makuake" | "众筹策略" | "硬件出海" | "硬件+订阅" | "硬件GTM" | "KS众筹" | "硬件PMF" | "设备订阅" | "硬件冷启动" | "ハードウェアGTM" | "クラファン" | "하드웨어 GTM" | "크라우드펀딩"
カスタムクレーム（Custom Claims）機能の開発・修正を行う際に使用。claims: scopeマッピング、verified_claims: マッピング実装時に役立つ。
Research a specific technology, library, system, protocol, or tool to answer a concrete technical question with source-traceable evidence. Use when current implementation details, version behavior, configuration, compatibility, or authoritative technical facts must be verified rather than recalled. Also use when explicitly asked to incorporate verified findings into an existing skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify multiple factual claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content. Extracts discrete claims, delegates each to the canonical factual-verification process, and aggregates VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE results. Use for "fact check", "verify claims", or a set of unverified factual assertions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content against primary sources using web lookups. Spawns parallel verification agents that must use WebFetch/WebSearch/gh — training data recall is explicitly rejected as evidence. Produces VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE verdicts with citations. Use when items are marked UNVERIFIED or when verifying tool API claims, CLI flags, or documented software behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a verified non-trivial fix lands or existing solution docs need refresh. Not for unverified fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Close out a review/meta branch that lands an evidence-ingest / curation batch: create the named nodes, ingest verified evidence, appraise Trust Magnitude, calibrate stars, wire suites, correct upstream naming, stage ONLY the intended artifacts (dropping CRLF churn and blocking leaks), validate, and open the PR. Use when a curation/ingest batch is verified and ready to land, or when the user says "close the review/meta branch", "land the ingest batch", "wrap up the intake PR", "/gaia-review-meta-close". Wraps the deterministic hygiene in scripts/review_meta_close.py and gates the judgment calls (calibration, Origin, suite promotion, naming, merge) behind explicit human checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to verify an AI agent before interacting, find an agent's A2A endpoint, or check reputation before hiring. Retrieves live A2A agent cards for 40,000+ verified agents by ID. The only registry with verified identity AND live A2A endpoints at scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cite-or-Block 架构的基石原子 skill。把报告里的 citation 锚点 (例如 [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) 解析为源文件片段,并核对事实声明里的关键词是否在引用源原文里出现。 Foundation atomic skill for the Cite-or-Block architecture. Resolves citation anchors (e.g. [guideline:CSCO-2024-NSCLC:§5.5.2] / [pmid:12345678:abstract]) to raw source text fragments, and verifies whether claim keywords actually appear in the cited source. 使用场景 / Use when: 1. 报告生成后要做 fact-check (resolve_citation + verify_claim_against_source) 2. content-verification-layer 要扫全报告锚点 (parse_citations_in_text) 3. drug-citation-verifier / 任何 cross-check skill 需要"锚点 → 源原文" P0 守护:本 skill **绝不维护任何已知字典**。源里没有 = verified=False, 无例外、无 fallback、无"已知答案兜底"。 P0 guard: this skill **never maintains any built-in dictionary**. Not in source = verified=False. No fallback, no built-in answers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search academic references for a manuscript and export them to a verified refs CSV, then optionally hand off to cec-sheet. Uses Codex CLI as the search driver, but Codex calls a bundled deterministic PubMed tool (scripts/pubmed_search.py) instead of writing its own E-utilities code — bibliography is fetched live from PubMed so PMIDs are never fabricated. Triggers: "論文検索", "文献検索", "文脈検索", "コンテキスト検索", "原稿の引用を探して", "refs.csv", "codex-refs", "/codex-refs".
Use when a PR or git range needs a visual recap page for a reviewer, with a changed-files tree, per-file notes, a Verified vs Not verified table, risks, and optional before/after images. Local and informational; never posts to GitHub.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces and audits externally published marketing copy where factual claims must survive scrutiny — landing pages, product pages, launch emails, one-pagers, search/social metadata. Every statistic, competitor comparison, capability description, and proof point is traced to a fetched source or the project's own documents, labeled, and adversarially verified before it ships. Use when writing or rewriting high-stakes marketing copy; when copy must pass legal, compliance, brand, or claims review; when the audience is skeptical technical or executive buyers; when the company has little or no customer proof yet (pre-launch, zero customers); or when auditing existing copy for unsupported claims, invented capabilities, unverified statistics, or AI-slop language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hand off a task with only the context needed to continue in a fresh session. Use for "handoff", "引き継ぎ", "別セッションへ渡す", or "別マシンで続ける". The orca subcommand launches an independent Orca workspace or terminal tab; without it, produce a paste-ready prompt backed by a verified remote branch or PR. Do not launch sessions for capability questions or design requests.
検査器（linter / ガード / CI ゲート / バリデータ / フィルタ）そのものの検出力が差分で静かに落ちていないか、また新設した検査が実際に検出できることが実証されているかを diff-time で検出する。Check 1 unverified detection reduction（検査器の検出ロジック（正規表現・除外パターン・解決集合・allowlist・baseline）を変更して検出件数が減ったのに、減った 1 件ずつが誤検出であった根拠が示されないまま「誤検出を潰した」「N → M 件に減少」と改善として主張している）、Check 2 unproven guard detection power（新しい検査ロジック・CI ゲート・バリデーションを追加・変更したのに、検出すべき入力を注入して検出されること／検出すべきでない入力で黙ることを示す変異注入の証跡が無く、「追加した」「CI が緑」を検出力の証拠として扱っている）、の 2 Check を対象とする report-only。テスト自身のアサーションが実質何も検証していない構造は test-assertion-effectiveness、レビュー基準・品質ゲートの明示的な弱体化（ルールの削除・閾値の引き下げ・suppression entry 追加・lint ルールの無効化）は review-criteria-integrity、リファクタ完了主張一般の検証は refactor-claim-audit、workflow の permissions と action pin は gha-workflow-security、設定ファイルの構文・型の妥当性は config-json へ委譲する
Review and verify unverified wiki pages — "review unverified pages", "verify wiki content", verification pass, after a major ingest cycle, before content release. The gate that turns AI-generated knowledge into trusted knowledge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when sources must stay traceable across sessions and years, when each reference needs a passport recording where it was found, how it was verified, and where it is cited, or when a draft needs a cited-but-unverified sweep before submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClawの複数のIssueやPRについて、担当を分けて原因調査と修正、検証を進め、許可された範囲でマージや解決済み案件のクローズまで管理するスキル。
OpenClawのプラグインを公開前に検証し、導入・削除、設定修復、起動、SDK互換性や配布パッケージの動作を確認して、結果と未検証項目を整理するスキル。
OpenClaw全体の品質検証を継続し、不具合の再現から根本原因の修正、レビュー、反映確認まで進めます。実環境や負荷の検証結果を、再開可能な報告書に記録します。