Track ML experiments with automatic logging, visualize training in real-time, optimize hyperparameters with sweeps, and manage model registry with W&B - collaborative MLOps platform
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
650 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Track ML experiments with automatic logging, visualize training in real-time, optimize hyperparameters with sweeps, and manage model registry with W&B - collaborative MLOps platform
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selecting WHO handles work is the Routing table; selecting HOW they handle it (Direct, Lightweight, Standard, Full) is Response Mode. This skill contains the complete decision table, exemplar prompts for each mode, the Lightweight spawn template, and the upgrade rules. Squad coordinator loads this on demand once routing has identified the agent — to pick the right ceremony level for the task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + eventstudyinteract + sdid + rdrobust + rddensity + synth + synth_runner + psmatch2 + teffects + ebalance + coefplot + esttab + asdoc + binscatter. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step Stata pipeline an applied economist runs on every paper — (1) data import & cleaning (use/import, destring, misstable, duplicates, merge assert), (2) variable construction (gen/egen/winsor2/xtile/xtset with L./F./D.), (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1 (tabstat/balancetable/asdoc), (4) classical diagnostic tests (sktest/swilk/hettest/imtest/xtserial/xttest3/vif/dfuller/kpss/hausman/estat overid), (5) baseline modeling (reg/xtreg/reghdfe/ivreg2/ivregress/csdid/did_imputation/eventstudyinteract/sdid/rdrobust/synth/psmatch2/teffects/heckman/qreg/ppmlhdfe), (6) robustness battery (bacondecomp/honestdid/rwolf/ritest/wildbootstrap/oster), (7) further analysis (subgroup/triple-diff/interactions/medsem/marginsplot/binscatter by group), (8) publication-ready tables & figures (esttab/outreg2/estout/coefplot/marginsplot/rdplot/twoway combined). **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `teffects ipw` / `teffects ipwra` / `teffects aipw` / `eltmle`, Mendelian randomization via `mrrobust` (IVW / Egger / weighted median) and `mregger` / `mrpresso`, KM / Cox / AFT / RMST survival via `sts` / `stcox` / `streg` / `strmst2`, E-value sensitivity via `evalue` (Linden-Mathur), principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `ddml` / `pdslasso`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `crforest` and `ddml interactive`, causal forest via `crforest` / `cforest`, BART/BCF via `bart` / `bartCause`-style externals, CATE distribution + policy tree via `crforest`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal externals, fairness audit, DAG learning via `pcalg` / external Python callouts). Use when the user asks for a complete Stata empirical analysis, wants a reproducible .do-file pipeline, needs a Stata counterpart to the Python StatsPAI / Full-empirical-analysis-skill, or names a specific Stata step in isolation ("run reghdfe with two-way clustering", "csdid event study", "winsor2 at 1%", "esttab to LaTeX", "coefplot with CI", "ivreg2 weak-IV test", "synth_runner placebos", "teffects psmatch balance check"). Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation Stata", "teffects ipw aipw", "eltmle", "mrrobust", "mregger weighted median", "stcox AFT survival", "strmst2", "evalue Stata", "STROBE Stata", "公共健康 Stata", "流行病学 Stata". Mode B triggers on "ddml Stata", "pdslasso", "crforest causal forest Stata", "policy tree Stata", "因果机器学习 Stata".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track ML experiments with automatic logging, visualize training in real-time, optimize hyperparameters with sweeps, and manage model registry with W&B - collaborative MLOps platform
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding a heavyweight browser dependency (diagram/chart renderers like mermaid, code editors, big wasm-adjacent libs) to a lightweight DSH Web plugin that must stay small, when wiring a lazy-loaded chunk through a host route, when the lazy import intermittently fails or falls back, or when rendering untrusted markup (SVG/HTML) produced by such a dependency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Loads, converts, and manipulates Hi-C contact matrices in cooler format (.cool/.mcool/.scool) and Juicer .hic, using cooler (Python + CLI), hic2cool, and hictk. Covers the single-resolution mcool URI (file.mcool::/resolutions/<bp>), the load-bearing divisive-vs-multiplicative weight-naming rule (KR/VC/VC_SQRT auto-divisive vs cooler's multiplicative weight), what survives .hic<->.cool conversion (FRAG matrices and norm vectors do not), raw-vs-balanced coarsening, the .pairs upper-triangle/chromsize-order contract, and chrom-naming/bin-table provenance. Use when loading a cooler, converting .hic to .mcool, selecting a resolution, building a cooler from pairs or a matrix, coarsening/zoomifying, importing Juicer norm vectors, or debugging all-NaN balanced matrices and chr1-vs-1 empty fetches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Balances Hi-C contact matrices (ICE via cooler.balance_cooler, KR/SCALE/VC context), computes distance-decay expected with cooltools (expected_cis per-diagonal P(s), expected_trans scalar), builds observed/expected (O/E) matrices, and diagnoses polymer state from the P(s) log-derivative. Covers the within-matrix-vs-cross-sample distinction (balancing is NOT a normalizer), the equal-visibility assumption that CNV/aneuploidy violates (use raw counts for copy-number), cis-only balancing, mad_max/blacklist masking before balancing, multiplicative cooler weights vs divisive juicer weights, and the resolution-vs-depth budget. Use when balancing a .cool/.mcool, computing expected or P(s), making O/E matrices for compartments/loops, deciding ICE vs KR vs SCALE, choosing a resolution for a given depth, or troubleshooting NaN/all-NaN balanced matrices; route cross-sample comparison to hic-differential.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "dev-plan", "実装計画を作成", "要件からタスク分解", "create implementation plan", "plan tasks", "タスクを分割", "設計してタスクにする", "詳細要件定義", "full-spec plan", "EARS要件". ユーザーの要件をインターフェースファースト設計とテスト可能なタスクに分解し、Plan単位でdocs/dev/plans/に保存する。Lightweight(素早い計画)とFull-spec(EARS要件定義付き)の2モードに対応。
Collecting and synthesizing user feedback across channels (support tickets, NPS, in-app feedback, sales calls, social mentions, customer councils) into a continuous signal that informs product decisions. The triage discipline that distinguishes loudest-voice (whoever complains most wins) from averaged-noise (every signal weighted equally) from triaged-synthesis (signal weighted by source quality, frequency, and decision relevance). Triggers on user feedback, customer feedback aggregation, NPS, support ticket analysis, customer councils, feedback synthesis, voice of customer, feedback triage, in-app feedback. Also triggers when feedback channels overflow with volume that does not produce decisions, when the loudest-voice problem is steering roadmap, or when continuous feedback streams need synthesis discipline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RFP creation, distribution, evaluation, and shortlisting for in-house legal teams selecting outside counsel. Draft a new legal services RFP from scratch, evaluate firm responses against weighted criteria, produce a shortlist recommendation with selection rationale for GC sign-off, or design the end-to-end RFP process from scratch. Trigger on: 'draft an RFP', 'run an RFP process', 'evaluate firm responses', 'score the RFP submissions', 'which firms should we shortlist', 'selection recommendation', 'how do we run a panel RFP', 'RFP for legal services', 'pitch process', 'firm selection process', 'compare the proposals', 'we're reviewing our panel', 'panel refresh RFP', 'we need to go to market', 'request for proposal', 'evaluate the pitches', 'which firm won the RFP', 'write a legal RFP', 'RFP evaluation criteria', 'design the RFP process', 'how do we weight the criteria'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement Minimal APIs in ASP.NET Core using handler-first endpoints, route groups, filters, and lightweight composition suited to modern .NET services. USE FOR: building new HTTP APIs in ASP.NET Core; creating lightweight microservices; choosing between Minimal APIs and controllers. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend the right agents and skills for any task. Covers both heavyweight agents (Task tool) and lightweight skills (Skill tool). Triggers on: which agent, which skill, what tool should I use, help me choose, recommend agent, find the right tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score and filter topics for X content creation using weighted criteria. Use when user wants to evaluate collected materials, filter topics by score, or mentions "filter topics", "score materials", "x-filter", "选题筛选". Applies 10-point scoring system with customizable weights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract exactly 8 context-sensitive keywords from Chinese, English, or mixed text and turn them into a distributed weighted Graph View with no center goal node. Use when Codex needs keyword extraction, blacklist filtering, co-occurrence edges, node definitions/notes, weighted graph JSON, or an online Graph View tool for text analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce speech and clone voices with Fish Audio — its hosted TTS API (S2.1-Pro / S2-Pro / S1 model lineup, REST + WebSocket streaming, instant and persistent voice cloning) and its open-weight OpenAudio S1-mini / Fish-Speech models for self-hosting. Use this skill when an agent must generate narration or dialogue through Fish Audio, choose between Fish Audio's hosted models and open weights, clone a voice from reference audio, author emotion/tone/special markers for expressive delivery, estimate cost from UTF-8 bytes, wire real-time streaming for a voice agent, decide whether self-hosting beats the API, or review Fish Audio TTS output for production. Do not use it to pick a different provider — it covers Fish Audio specifically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an expert in Chi, the lightweight, idiomatic Go HTTP router built on `net/http`. You help developers build composable HTTP services using Chi's middleware stack, route groups, URL parameters, sub-routers, and context-based request scoping — providing Express-like ergonomics while staying 100% compatible with Go's standard library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Alpine.js is a lightweight JavaScript framework for adding interactivity to HTML markup. It provides reactive data, event handling, and DOM manipulation through HTML attributes — like a modern jQuery replacement with declarative syntax.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM critique. Two fresh cross-model codex threads: an attack writes the ~200-word rejection paragraph (every accusation tagged to an existing claim_id/finding_id), a defense decomposes it and rules each point against the anchored evidence. MEMO-ONLY: emits adversarial-case-builder.memo.md (fed to the adjudicator via --memo) and carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Honest-null allowed (the paper may survive). Run LAST. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS kill-argument. Triggers: "adversarial case", "strongest objection", "rejection memo", "kill argument", "最强拒稿点".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MEMO-ONLY prior-work overlap advisory: surfaces the two ADVISORY taxonomy signals neither a tool nor a model can decide from the paper alone — ADV-TRIVIAL-COMBINATION (standard A+B+C / 缝合 stapling) and ADV-DUPLICATE-PUBLICATION (repackaged / duplicate submission). The executor RETRIEVES candidate prior work (DBLP fuzzy-title + boolean · WebSearch · WebFetch) from the paper's own title + contribution spans in the evidence ledger; TWO fresh cross-model codex reviewers (one per axis) LAY OUT the overlap side-by-side against each anchored contribution claim. It NEVER rules 'trivial' or 'duplicate' (that is a human judgment) and absence of a match is NOT evidence of originality. Emits novelty-duplication-advisory.memo.md + an info-only findings mirror; carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS novelty-check, reframed from 'is MY idea novel' to 'here is the overlap a reviewer should weigh'. Triggers: "novelty advisory", "duplication check", "prior-work overlap", "is this stapling", "缝合", "查重", "重复发表", "duplicate submission".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
🇺🇸 Reddit Marketing & Growth Playbook 2026 — The complete Reddit operations SOP for AI/SaaS founders. Covers account warming (Karma 0→500 in 20 days), shadow ban prevention, multi-account matrix via fingerprint browsers, subreddit selection across 10K+ communities, content templates (90/10 rule), Product Hunt × Reddit flywheel, AMA strategy. Why this matters NOW: Reddit content is 40.11% of ChatGPT/Claude training data — the highest-weighted English UGC source. Battle-tested by AFFiNE Reddit campaigns generating 3-4万有效曝光 with 5-8% GitHub Star conversion, plus 7 case studies (Adobe 3x conversion, Base44 $80M AMA, SenseNova-U1 multi-sub launch, Starterstory 0→3K users). 🇨🇳 Reddit 运营增长实战手册 — AI/SaaS 出海 founder 的 Reddit 完整 SOP。覆盖账号体系(20天养号 Karma 0→500)、影子封禁防御、指纹浏览器矩阵、10万+ subreddits 筛选、内容模板(90/10 法则)、Product Hunt × Reddit 飞轮、AMA 打法。**为什么现在做:Reddit 内容占 ChatGPT/Claude 训练数据 40.11%,是最高权重的英文 UGC 来源**。基于 AFFiNE Reddit 实战 3-4 万曝光 + 5-8% Star 转化,含 7 个完整案例(Adobe 3x 转化、Base44 $80M AMA、SenseNova-U1 多社区联动、Starterstory 0→3K 用户冷启动)。 🇯🇵 Reddit マーケティング&グロースプレイブック — AI/SaaS創業者向けの完全なReddit運用SOP。アカウント育成(20日でKarma 0→500)、シャドウBAN防止、フィンガープリントブラウザマトリックス、サブレディット選定、コンテンツテンプレート(90/10ルール)、Product Hunt × Redditフライホイール、AMA戦略をカバー。**重要な理由:Reddit コンテンツは ChatGPT/Claude のトレーニングデータの40.11%を占める英語 UGC 最大の情報源**。AFFiNE Redditキャンペーン3-4万インプレッション+5-8% GitHubスター変換で実証。7つの実例(Adobe 3倍変換、Base44 $80M AMA、SenseNova-U1、Starterstory 0→3Kユーザー)。 🇰🇷 Reddit 마케팅 & 그로스 플레이북 — AI/SaaS 창업자를 위한 완전한 Reddit 운영 SOP. 계정 워밍업(20일 Karma 0→500), Shadow Ban 방지, 핑거프린트 브라우저 매트릭스, 서브레딧 선정, 콘텐츠 템플릿(90/10 룰), Product Hunt × Reddit 플라이휠, AMA 전략을 다룹니다. **지금 해야 하는 이유: Reddit 콘텐츠는 ChatGPT/Claude 학습 데이터의 40.11%를 차지하는 최대 영어 UGC 소스**. AFFiNE Reddit 캠페인 3-4만 노출 + 5-8% GitHub Star 전환으로 검증. 7가지 사례 연구(Adobe 3배 전환, Base44 $80M AMA, SenseNova-U1, Starterstory 0→3K 사용자). Triggers: "reddit marketing" | "reddit growth" | "reddit ads" | "reddit advertising" | "reddit strategy" | "reddit promotion" | "subreddit marketing" | "reddit playbook" | "reddit SOP" | "reddit shadow ban" | "shadow ban prevention" | "reddit karma" | "reddit AMA" | "reddit product launch" | "reddit AI training data" | "reddit GEO" | "AFFiNE reddit case" | "Base44 AMA" | "SenseNova Reddit" | "subreddit selection" | "r/SaaS posting" | "r/MachineLearning self-promotion" | "fingerprint browser matrix" | "AdsPower reddit" | "reddit account farming" | "reddit 90/10 rule" | "reddit content strategy" | "reddit indie founder" | "reddit cold start" | "Reddit 运营" | "Reddit 营销" | "Reddit 防封" | "Reddit 矩阵号" | "Reddit 出海" | "Reddit 引流" | "Reddit 冷启动" | "影子封禁" | "Reddit Karma" | "Reddit 养号" | "Reddit AMA" | "Reddit マーケティング" | "Reddit グロース" | "Reddit 마케팅" | "Reddit 그로스"
Win #1 Product of the Day on Product Hunt. Completely reverse-engineered from 30x daily winner and 3x weekly winner campaigns — ranking algorithm decoded, launch timing optimized, hunter selection guide, community engagement approach, and post-launch momentum playbook. Use this if you're: (1) already read PH launch guides but still can't break into Top 5 and need algorithm-level deep optimization, (2) targeting Daily #1 and 5,000+ sign-ups with a proven 30+ case validated approach, or (3) an investor/accelerator coaching portfolio companies on PH launches. What's inside: PH ranking algorithm decoded: weighted factors for first 3 hours, 24 hours, and weekly ranking · Pre-launch preparation: gallery optimization, product URL selection, tagline refinement (≤60 chars) · Launch timing optimization: exact PST launch windows + scheduling guide · Community engagement KPIs: upvote targets, comment response time, maker comment strategy · Platform compliance guide: understanding PH's quality signals and organic growth · Post-launch 72-hour plan: maintaining momentum, conditions for Weekly #1 · Case studies: 3 different categories (AI Tool, App, SaaS) dissected Expected outcomes: Product Hunt Daily #1 ranking · strong community engagement on launch day · 3,000–10,000+ sign-ups (depending on product-market fit) 🇨🇳 Product Hunt 打榜完整攻略 | 🇯🇵 Product Hunt ローンチガイド | 🇰🇷 Product Hunt 런칭 가이드 Keywords: Product Hunt #1, Product Hunt launch strategy, PH ranking algorithm, PH #1 daily winner, Product Hunt tips, product launch, startup launch, ranking optimization, PH gallery optimization, Community engagement strategy, maker community engagement, product strategy, launch tactics, how to win Product Hunt, product hunt best practices
Builds probability-weighted valuation models with multiple exit scenarios, timing assumptions, and risk-adjusted returns. Use when building growth equity valuations, modeling scenario-weighted outcomes, or analyzing risk-adjusted returns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive primary skill for agents working with Weights & Biases. Covers both the W&B SDK (training runs, metrics, artifacts, sweeps) and the Weave SDK (GenAI traces, evaluations, scorers). Includes helper libraries, gotcha tables, and data analysis patterns. Use this skill whenever the user asks about W&B runs, Weave traces, evaluations, training metrics, loss curves, model comparisons, or any Weights & Biases data — even if they don't say "W&B" explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply Bayesian averaging to rank items by combining observed ratings with prior expectations. Use this skill when the user needs to rank items with varying review counts, build a 'top rated' list that handles low-sample items fairly, or implement IMDB-style weighted rating — even if they say 'weighted average rating', 'IMDB formula', or 'ranking with prior'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。