「baseline」の検索結果

Standard operating procedure for producing a documentation page end to end — gather source material, classify, draft against the measured corpus profile, then run the reader-level and humanizer passes and both gates. Use for any page on a documentation surface, or when rewriting a page that reads as machine-written. Orchestrates technical-writing, reader-level and humanizer in a fixed order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Contract document for the binding test verdict file at .claude/state/last_test_result. Format spec for callers (integrate, simplify, chore, the verify-tick worker) that inline the four mechanical operations. Not Skill-tool-invocable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create step-by-step technical tutorials, quickstarts, or code walkthroughs. Trigger phrases include "tutorial," "quickstart," "getting started guide," "walkthrough," "step by step," "how to guide," "hands-on guide," or "code tutorial."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 10.5 — move the slug's workflow artifacts (intake, scout, research, spec, approvals, swarm state, security reports, rendered diagrams) to docs/archive/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<slug>/. Runs before /commit so the committed tree is clean of work-in-flight files. workflow.json stays live and gets archived as the first step of /commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or revise English prose for any brief — documentation body, intake problem statements, spec context, RCA summaries, marketing copy, README sections, PR descriptions. Mandatorily invokes `Skill(humanizer)` as the final pass on every draft. Conditionally invokes `copywriting` for persuasive register, `documentation` for reference docs, `technical-tutorials` for tutorials. Used when any phase needs human-readable prose written or rewritten. Composition only — research and register-picking happen in the caller's context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only view of the execution roadmap. Lists every epic with its per-status tallies, nests the still-open rows beneath their epic, collapses wholly-finished epics into one rollup line, and closes by naming the next planned task in file order. Four verbs — `list` (the reader's view), `tasks` and `epics` (filterable row and epic queries), `next` (the first planned task). Invoke any time to see what is left to build. Not a workflow phase; never writes; never starts or commits work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose an MVP vision into a sprint manifest — a prioritized feature list where every feature carries explicit done-criteria (a done-record reference, named edge tests, and a wiring test). Produces the sprint manifest that `sprint-oracle` checks for completeness. Use when planning a sprint of parallel work (Slice A of the sprint-mode epic). Not a workflow phase; the manifest it writes is the completeness contract a sprint is held to.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 7 — Mechanical cleanup pass over the branch diff, followed by a `code-structure` review pass and a `verify` re-stamp. Shadows the global `simplify` skill at project scope; the cleanup pass is performed inline rather than via Skill self-call.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preflight a spec draft without saving. Runs the same checks as the write-boundary hooks — PlantUML syntax, required diagram presence, AC-to-sequence traceability, Design calls quality floor, and System delta row resolution — and prints a compact pass/fail table. Use while iterating so the hooks don't bite on save.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 9 — Integration and Verification. Runs the full test suite, stamps the binding verdict at .claude/state/last_test_result, optionally runs a cross-engine smoke check, and writes harness_state so the harness auto-continues or yields. No subagent delegation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to write, rewrite, or improve marketing copy for any page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, about pages, or product pages. Also use when the user says "write copy for," "improve this copy," "rewrite this page," "marketing copy," "headline help," "CTA copy," "value proposition," "tagline," "subheadline," "hero section copy," "above the fold," "this copy is weak," "make this more compelling," or "help me describe my product." Use this whenever someone is working on website text that needs to persuade or convert. For email copy, see email-sequence. For popup copy, see popup-cro. For editing existing copy, see copy-editing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 10.6 — sync the project's execution roadmap (project.json → roadmap.path, default docs/roadmap-execution-plan.md) to the just-landed work. Flips the tasks named in workflow.json → roadmap_tasks[] from ⬜ to ✅ and promotes their epic headings ⬜→🟡→✅, preserving the standup parser format contract. On the epic track it appends instead — the epic's heading plus one row per slice — and stamps roadmap_epic back into the epic state. Also hosts the ad-hoc backfill that puts every epic already on disk onto the roadmap. Fail-open: never throws, no-ops when roadmap.path is unset/absent or no task matches, and never blocks a commit. Runs after /archive and before /memory-sync on every committing track.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bring documentation prose down to a high-school reading level without losing precision. Runs after the content is written and before humanizer. Targets grade 9 on four measures — sentence length, vocabulary, clause load and jargon density — and carries the rewriting moves that actually shift them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture what someone actually said without contaminating it with your own inference. Invoke when eliciting intent in conversation (design discussion, requirement interview, decision surfacing) and when turning a conversation into a durable record (ADR, decision node, memory entry, spec `## Decisions` row). Enforces quote-before-critique, keeps illustration separate from commitment, and holds interpretation subordinate to verbatim. Prevents the failure where unspecified space is filled by the recorder and then evaluated as if the speaker had specified it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and maintain technical documentation. Trigger with "write docs for", "document this", "create a README", "write a runbook", "onboarding guide", or when the user needs help with any form of technical writing — API docs, architecture docs, or operational runbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the production code that makes a pre-decided set of failing tests pass, within an explicit write_set, following an explicit behavior contract. Used by `/tdd` Step 3 and by `/swarm-dispatch` workers. The caller has already decided architecture, naming, file layout, and abstraction boundaries — this skill executes that recipe with code-structure discipline and a 5-iteration RALPH loop. No scope expansion, no design decisions, no test edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a codebase and recommend Claude Code automations (hooks, subagents, skills, plugins, MCP servers). Use when user asks for automation recommendations, wants to optimize their Claude Code setup, mentions improving Claude Code workflows, asks how to first set up Claude Code for a project, or wants to know what Claude Code features they should use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from text. Use when editing or reviewing text to make it sound more natural and human-written. Based on Wikipedia's comprehensive "Signs of AI writing" guide. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, em dash overuse, rule of three, AI vocabulary words, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases. Credits: Original skill by @blader - https://github.com/blader/humanizer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cycle-end retrospective converting recurring judgment failures into durable enforcement. Reviews the cycle's friction — repeated user corrections, guard trips, RCA themes, integrate failures — and turns each recurring one into a landmines.md entry, then proposes graduation candidates up the enforcement funnel (landmine → advisory hook → hard gate). Pairs with standup: standup says what shipped and what's next; retrospective says what kept going wrong and how to stop it structurally. Writes only memory entries and a report — graduation proposals are advisory and require the normal seed.md amendment path to become enforcement. Invoke at the end of a release cycle, an epic, or any stretch of work with repeated friction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow Phase 3 — Research and Solution Exploration. Surfaces 2–4 candidate solution approaches with concrete tradeoffs, grounded in current library docs (fetched through the provider named in `.claude/docs-provider.json`) — never in training-data recall. Output lives at `docs/research/<slug>.md`. Candidate ranking and the memo execute in main context; doc/source gathering MAY be delegated to read-only advisory subagents (seed.md §4.2-A).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The primary tool for code-navigation questions in ANY language (frontend or backend) — walk the structural graph from an entry point (page, route, handler, command, `main`) down through imports to the IO boundary (network call, query, file read). Use this skill, in preference to the Explore agent or global grep, whenever the user asks "where does X come from?", "what API/data populates Y?", "what renders or wraps the Z panel?", "which file for feature F?", "how is this wired up?", or any code-navigation question mapping a UI element, route, or feature concept to source files. Also reverse queries ("what uses /api/foo?", "who consumes this service?"). Keyword search routinely picks up unrelated flows sharing a domain word and produces wrong answers; the walk follows the actual graph. The JS/TS `walk.mjs`/`discover.mjs` are an optional accelerator, not required — the walk is language-agnostic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-consistency review of a drafted spec's diagrams. Verifies that C4 components appear in the dependency graph, class-diagram changes have matching DDL, every AC resolves to a concrete sequence, and the dependency graph is acyclic. Read-only. Run after `/spec-lint` passes and before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EXPERIMENTAL. Join or leave an org-team coordination channel as a session peer. `/companion on <channel_id> [peer_id]` registers this Claude Code session as a `pclass:"session"` peer and works the claim → execute → signal loop, escalating un-decidable forks to the lead (never deciding). `/companion off` deregisters. `/companion status` reports the current peer. Part of org mode (Article X), which is opt-in via `velocity.org_mode.enabled` and OFF by default. Use when a human launches a second session to act as a peer alongside a lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。