「before」の検索結果

Establishes CPU/GPU baselines before resource-intensive operations. Use before builds, training runs, or any task that pins cores or GPUs for over a minute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence hygiene before any FIND moves to Completed or enters a report. Cookie redaction, PII black-bar, HAR sanitization, screenshot metadata strip. Run after /triage passes and before final report assembly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before showing the user any substantive GTM deliverable (positioning, value prop, homepage, launch post, pricing, sales script, the brief or roadmap), stress-test it against the standard as an independent critic, because the agent that wrote it is the worst judge of whether it is good. Use as a gate right before presenting work, or when the user asks whether something is actually strong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks for a "simulated beta read", "reader panel", "persona read", "first read before my beta readers", "how would a genre reader react", "would a reader keep going", "pre-beta read", "mock beta readers", or wants structured persona reads of a chapter range before human readers see it. NOT for real reader feedback (use feedback-triage), a paid sensitivity or authenticity read (use editorial-review), or the agent's own line edit (use line-editing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and develops specs following the spec-driven method. Asks clarifying questions before proposing structure, and builds the spec section by section. Use it when starting a large feature, before writing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converges an underspecified request into a typed IntentSpec before planning or acting. Use when the user asks to implement, add, change, refactor, fix, migrate, configure, handle, triage, sort out, look into or decide something and the request leaves decisions open (which objects, which approach, what happens on failure, which trade-off), contradicts itself, admits two readings, or rests on an approach its sources may rule out — in a codebase, a ticket queue, a research brief or a runbook — or when the user says "clarify the intent", "what do you need from me", or invokes intent-router. Looks up what its sources hold (code, history, decision records, a ticket log, an order record, the policy in force) before asking; asks only preference or irreversible questions, one at a time, with a recommended default; halts instead of guessing; checks the delivered work against the spec. Silent on a fully stated task its sources do not contradict. Not for explaining existing state ("what does X do", "why is Y slow").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a feature specification from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the design tree decision-by-decision, resolving dependencies as it goes. Use when the user wants to plan, design, scope, specify, or flesh out a new feature, capability, or system behavior before implementation. Produces a feature specification focused on system behaviors, not implementation detail. Does not plan a restructure of code that already exists — use plan-a-change. Does not refine or stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review. Does not document already-built features — use project-documentation. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not research open-ended options before there is a feature to specify — use research. Does not map the bounded contexts of existing code — use ddd-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before an agent-produced diff is committed, pushed, opened as a PR, merged, landed, or applied to user files when explicit implementation approval is missing. Trigger for review gate, review pack, approve before landing, diff first then land, human approval, merge gate, commit gate, push gate, or PR readiness. Produces a concise review pack, records risks and verification, and blocks landing until a human explicitly approves or approves with required fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design architecture foundations before implementation. Use when asked to design or refactor architecture, choose Rust/Go crate, package, module, runtime, workflow, or service boundaries, compare mature project architecture, prevent stacked one-off PRs, audit migration debt in existing repos, or produce a spec before coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform the repository's risk-tiered independent final review before implementation completion. Use only when explicitly invoked or when repository instructions require it after behavior-impacting implementation work; audit the complete task diff, supported contracts, lifecycle and security boundaries, complexity, and tests before final verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a ready-to-spec queue item into an approved plan through explicit human gates. Use when an item needs scope decided before code exists, when planning a feature, or before starting a migration. Runs interactively - not for unattended routines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Four-phase debugging framework that ensures root cause investigation before attempting fixes. Never jump to solutions. Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for test lifecycle hooks: beforeAll, afterAll, beforeEach, afterEach, fixtures, preload.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a precise, step-by-step action plan before making any code changes. Use this skill whenever the user describes a feature, bug fix, refactor, or any multi-file change. Also use when the user says "plan", "think through", "what would it take", or describes a problem without jumping to code. TRIGGER BEFORE writing any code for non-trivial changes. Do not skip planning for changes that touch more than one file or involve architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diátaxis-driven documentation for AI coding agents: write, improve, or audit tutorials, how-tos, reference, explanation, and developer docs (README, CONTRIBUTING, ADRs). Detects the docs stack; gates on the outline before writing prose; verifies every claim against the code before it ships. Triggers on "absolute docs", "write docs", "write a tutorial", "write a README", "document this", "improve this doc", "audit our docs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine the TRUE cause of a failed retort run before attributing it. Ground-truth every failure (run its tests, read its agent logs, inspect its workspace) and classify it as an infrastructure false-fail, a genuine model miss, or an environment issue — never trust the gate verdict or a log signature alone. Use whenever a run is recorded failed (test_coverage=0 / gate fail), a pass rate looks low, or you're deciding whether a "failure" is real before reporting or proceeding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide structured design thinking through 5 progressive levels before any code is written. Levels: Capabilities, Components, Interactions, Contracts, Implementation. Use when building new features, refactoring significant code, designing modules, or when the user says 'design this', 'architect this', 'let's think before coding', 'walk me through the design', or 'whiteboard this'. For simple utilities enter at Level 4 (Contracts), for single-component tasks at Level 2 — see Complexity Calibration. Do not use for quick bug patches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control and exploration of RNA-seq count matrices before differential expression. Check for outliers, batch effects, and sample relationships. Use when assessing count matrix quality before DE analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate a vague request or GitHub issue into a concrete, testable spec using five structured elements (problem, scope, acceptance criteria, edge cases, success criterion) before writing any code. Prevents scope creep, PR churn, and mid-implementation pivots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill, audit this skill, is this skill safe, vet a skill before installing, what does this skill access. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, spec validation, and security auditing of third-party skills before install.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates gate criteria before PRD lifecycle advancement by delegating to the readiness scoring pipeline (scripts/readiness.py). Returns a graduated PASS / WARN / BLOCK verdict with top blockers and their causal chain. Triggers before advancing from v0.X to v0.Y or explicit `/ghm-gate-check`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to verify their changes before pushing, or update the project's rule checklists. Phase 1: validate changed files against .hoyeon/rules/ checklists and report PASS/WARN. Phase 2 (conditional): propose rule additions when unmatched patterns are detected. Essential before git push. Trigger phrases: "check", "checklist", "verify changes", "what did I miss", "pre-push check", "cascading changes", "any more changes needed", "update checklist", "update rules", "rules update", "체크", "체크리스트", "변경 확인", "빠뜨린 거 없나", "push 전 확인", "뭐 더 건드려야 해?", "연쇄 변경 확인", "규칙 갱신".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。