「boot」の検索結果

Java coding standards for Spring Boot services: naming, immutability, Optional usage, streams, exceptions, generics, and project layout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JPA/Hibernate patterns for entity design, relationships, query optimization, transactions, auditing, indexing, pagination, and pooling in Spring Boot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieves up-to-date documentation, API references, and code examples for any developer technology. Use this skill whenever the user asks about a specific library, framework, SDK, CLI tool, or cloud service — even for well-known ones like React, Next.js, Prisma, Express, Tailwind, Django, or Spring Boot. Your training data may not reflect recent API changes or version updates. Always use for: API syntax questions, configuration options, version migration issues, "how do I" questions mentioning a library name, debugging that involves library-specific behavior, setup instructions, and CLI tool usage. Use even when you think you know the answer — do not rely on training data for API details, signatures, or configuration options as they are frequently outdated. Always verify against current docs. Prefer this over web search for library documentation and API details.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides creation and validation of custom dotnet new templates from existing projects. Generates a .template.config/template.json that preserves the source project's conventions. USE FOR: creating a reusable dotnet new template from an existing project, bootstrapping .template.config/template.json with correct identity, shortName, parameters, and post-actions, adding parameters or conditional content to a template you are authoring, validating the template.json you are authoring before publishing, packaging templates as NuGet packages for distribution. DO NOT USE FOR: validating an existing template.json as a standalone task (use template-validation), finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery and template-instantiation), MSBuild project file issues unrelated to template authoring, NuGet package publishing (only template packaging structure).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic OpenAPI 3.x guidance — spec structure, metadata and versioning, paths and operations, reusable schemas, security schemes, examples, documentation quality, contract validation (e.g. Spectral), breaking-change awareness, and handoffs to codegen — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Review an OpenAPI; Improve an OpenAPI; Improve API contract; Improve API schema design. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic WireMock guidance — stub design, JSON or programmatic mappings, precise request matching, response bodies and faults, classpath fixtures, isolation and reset between tests, verification of calls, dynamic ports and base URLs, and avoiding flaky stubs — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Design or review WireMock stubs (JSON mappings or Java DSL); Improve request matching, isolation, or reset strategy for HTTP mocks; Add or fix verification of outbound HTTP calls to a WireMock server; Debug flaky tests involving WireMock or unmatched request journals. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic SQL guidance — schema naming, relational table design, query readability, indexes, transactions, database security, migrations, testing, and monitoring — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Review SQL schema or migrations; Improve SQL query performance and readability; Design relational tables and indexes; Review database transaction, security, or monitoring practices. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need framework-agnostic MongoDB and non-relational database query guidance — document schema design, collection modeling, JSON Schema validation, indexes, aggregation pipelines, query performance, consistency trade-offs, transactions, and operational safety — without choosing Spring Boot, Quarkus, or Micronaut. This should trigger for requests such as Design MongoDB document schemas; Review MongoDB queries and indexes; Improve aggregation pipeline performance; Model non-relational data access patterns; Review NoSQL consistency and transaction trade-offs. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to create a new Maven-based Quarkus 3.x project using SDKMAN-managed Java and Quarkus CLI tooling. This should trigger for requests such as Create a Quarkus Maven project; Bootstrap Quarkus project with SDKMAN; Generate a new Quarkus service; Create Quarkus 3 Maven project; Scaffold Quarkus service with Java 25. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to create a new Maven-based Micronaut 4.x project using SDKMAN-managed Java and Micronaut CLI tooling. This should trigger for requests such as Create a Micronaut Maven project; Bootstrap Micronaut project with SDKMAN; Generate a new Micronaut service; Create Micronaut 4 Maven project; Scaffold Micronaut service with Java 25. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or reviewing Micronaut applications — Micronaut.run bootstrap, @Singleton/@Prototype, @Factory beans, @ConfigurationProperties, environments, @Requires, @Controller vs services, @Scheduled, graceful shutdown, @ExecuteOn for blocking work, and Jakarta-consistent APIs. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Micronaut application structure and beans; Apply best practices for Micronaut configuration, @Requires, and factories; Improve scheduling, shutdown, or threading in Micronaut services. ; Review Micronaut dependency injection scopes and factories; Configure Micronaut @Requires conditions for environments. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for framework-agnostic Java (no Spring Boot, Quarkus, Micronaut) — confirming @acceptance scenarios before coding, happy path with RestAssured, DB/Kafka test fixtures, WireMock for external REST only, and *AT classes run by Failsafe. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for acceptance tests; Apply best practices for acceptance tests in Java code; Implement acceptance tests from Gherkin scenarios in Java; Map feature files to Java step definitions; Review Cucumber acceptance tests for Java services. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operating SOP for DSPy (Stanford NLP) — the declarative framework for "programming, not prompting" language models. Activate when the user says any of: "use DSPy", "compile a prompt", "optimize prompts/programs", "MIPRO/MIPROv2", "BootstrapFewShot", "GEPA", "Signatures + Modules", "teleprompter", "auto-tune prompts for a different LM", or whenever a brittle hand-crafted prompt pipeline needs to be turned into a *compiled*, measurable, swappable program. Do NOT activate for one-shot prompt tweaks, no-metric exploratory work, or pipelines where prompts must remain human-authored verbatim — use raw prompting or LangChain templates instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operating-system distillation of LlamaIndex — the leading RAG / document-agent framework. Activate when the calling agent must build, debug, harden, or evaluate a Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline over unstructured/private data, decide between RAG primitives (Index types, retrievers, query engines, routers, agents), or pick LlamaIndex vs LangChain / Haystack / raw vector store for a coding task. Encodes the 5-layer mental model (Documents → Nodes → Indices → Retrievers → Query Engines / Response Synthesizers), the canonical RAG bootstrap SOP from baseline `VectorStoreIndex` through hybrid + reranker + eval-loop hardening, the official 13-failure-mode checklist, and 5 dilemma cases distilled from docs, GitHub issues, and 2025 production post-mortems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lifecycle SOP for **per-model prompt artifacts** — the compiled prompts, instructions, few-shot demos, edit-format pins, and embedding-bound indices that change behavior when the underlying LM, dataset, or framework version changes. Activate when adopting compiled prompts (DSPy, GEPA, BootstrapFewShot output), when supporting multiple LMs in production, when a provider deprecates a model snapshot, or when a framework deprecates a config surface (LlamaIndex `ServiceContext` → `Settings`, Aider edit-format defaults). Do NOT activate for one-off raw prompt edits or for truly model-agnostic system prompts that have been swap-tested. Search keywords: prompt portability, model swap, recompile prompt, model deprecation, prompt per model, prompt breaks on new model, version compiled prompts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The compile-readiness gate for prompt auto-optimization. Decide whether you have earned the right to run an optimizer (DSPy MIPROv2 / GEPA / BootstrapFewShot) before spending compute. Two preconditions only — a real metric, and enough examples for the optimizer you picked. Garbage metric in, garbage prompt out. Pick the optimizer by data scale; GEPA inverts the scale assumption (~10 examples + textual feedback).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reverse-engineering a binary or firmware — static triage + decompilation (Ghidra/IDA/Binary Ninja), dynamic instrumentation (GDB/Frida 17/angr), anti-reversing & packer bypass, OLLVM/VM deobfuscation, UEFI/BIOS RE & Secure Boot research, patch-diffing for n-days

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security hardening and best practices for robotic systems, covering SROS2 DDS security, network segmentation, secrets management, secure boot, and the physical-cyber safety intersection. Use this skill when securing ROS2 communications, configuring DDS encryption and access control, hardening robot onboard computers, managing certificates and credentials, setting up network segmentation for robot fleets, or addressing the unique security challenges where cyber vulnerabilities become physical safety risks. Trigger whenever the user mentions SROS2, DDS security, robot security, robot hardening, ROS2 encryption, ROS2 access control, robot network security, secure robot deployment, robot certificates, keystore generation, robot firewall, e-stop security, safety controller isolation, or IEC 62443 for robotics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and boot an iOS simulator. Use before any command that needs a simulator UDID.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install dependencies and build tools for WooCommerce iOS

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing Spring Cache annotations (@Cacheable, @CachePut, @CacheEvict). Generates test code that mocks cache managers, verifies cache hit/miss behavior, tests cache key generation with SpEL expressions, validates eviction strategies, and checks conditional caching scenarios. Triggers: caching tests, test Spring cache, mock cache, Spring Boot caching, cache hit/miss verification, @Cacheable testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing `@ExceptionHandler` and `@ControllerAdvice` in Spring Boot applications. Validates error response formatting, mocks exceptions, verifies HTTP status codes, tests field-level validation errors, and asserts custom error payloads. Use when writing Spring exception handler tests, REST API error tests, or mocking controller advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing JSON serialization/deserialization with Jackson and `@JsonTest`. Validates JSON mapping, custom serializers, date formats, and polymorphic types. Use when testing JSON serialization, validating custom serializers, or writing JSON unit tests in Spring Boot applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing `@ConfigurationProperties` classes with `@ConfigurationPropertiesTest`. Validates property binding, tests validation constraints, verifies default values, checks type conversions, and mocks property sources for Spring Boot configuration properties. Use when testing application configuration binding, validating YAML or application.properties files, verifying environment-specific settings, or testing nested property structures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。