「citation」の検索結果

Normalize cross-skill JSONL interfaces (ids + titles + citation key formats) so downstream skills do not rely on best-effort joins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

为中文毕业论文补强并核验引用：找出必须有引文支撑的句子，扩展候选文献，检查引用与论断是否匹配，并回写参考文献与正文引用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Normalize terminology across a draft (canonical terms + synonym policy) without changing citations or meaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deterministically compact final H3 bodies to the active delivery profile's paragraph budget without deleting prose or changing citation-block order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove repeated boilerplate across sections (methodology disclaimers, generic transitions, repeated summaries) while preserving citations and meaning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

De-slot and harmonize paper voice across `sections/*.md` without changing meaning or citation keys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fill `outline/tables_index.md` from `outline/table_schema.md` + evidence packs (NO PROSE in cells; citation-backed rows).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Polish a single H3 unit file under `sections/` into survey-grade prose (de-template + contrast/eval/limitation), without changing citation keys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit/regression checks for the evidence-first survey pipeline: citation health, per-section coverage, placeholder leakage, and template repetition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile a LaTeX project and run basic QA (missing refs, bib errors, broken citations), producing `latex/main.pdf` and a build report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create per-subsection evidence packs (NO PROSE): claim candidates, concrete comparisons, evaluation protocol, limitations, plus citation-backed evidence snippets with provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the survey's front matter files (Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Discussion, Conclusion) in paper voice, with high citation density and a single evidence-policy paragraph.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curate reader-facing survey tables for the Appendix (clean layout + high information density), using only in-scope evidence and existing citation keys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit-style editing pass for `output/DRAFT.md`: remove template boilerplate, improve coherence, and enforce citation anchoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Global consistency review for survey drafts: terminology, cross-section coherence, and scope/citation hygiene.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured requirements elicitation for analysis requests. Use when scoping new analysis projects, clarifying ambiguous business questions, or documenting analysis acceptance criteria with stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-process LaTeX project prose to improve readability through varied sentence and paragraph lengths. Removes filler phrases and unnecessary transitions while preserving all citations and semantic meaning. Use after drafting is complete, when sections read as monotonous or blocky.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when user asks about 印光大师, 净土, 念佛, 持名念佛, 十念法, 摄耳谛听, 老实念佛, 信愿行, 带业往生, 仗佛慈力, 自力他力, 竖出横超, 往生, 极乐, 阿弥陀佛, 净土三经, 敦伦尽分, 闲邪存诚, 因果报应, 文钞, 一函遍复, or wants teaching in 印光大师 Yinguang's voice. Triggers include "印光"、"文钞"、"老实念佛"、"信愿行"、"带业往生"、"仗佛慈力"、"横超竖出"、"都摄六根"、"净念相继"、"敦伦尽分"、"闲邪存诚"、"因果"、"十念法"、"摄耳谛听"、"一函遍复"、"净土三经"、"往生" — invoke whenever user's question touches Pure Land practice, Amitabha recitation, or faith-vow-practice, even without explicit request.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement-overlay SOP for adding sparse (BM25 / keyword) retrieval alongside dense (embedding) retrieval. Activate when a calling agent is building, reviewing, or debugging a retrieval pipeline whose corpus contains exact-match tokens — identifiers, error codes, SKUs, API/function names, proper nouns, citations, rare jargon — that pure dense embedding silently misses. Encodes the single decision rule (**hybrid is traffic-driven, not theoretical: add sparse only when the query share that depends on exact tokens is non-trivial**), the wiring of QueryFusionRetriever-style fusion (RRF vs alpha-weighted), and per-query-type alpha tuning. Frame the work as recovering lexical identity that dense pooling destroys, not as "add keyword search for completeness". Cross-links [[llamaindex]].

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs multi-source research with citation tracking, evidence persistence, and structured report generation. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger for: Other Transaction or OT should-cost, cost estimate, cost-share analysis, milestone pricing, funding profile, proposed-price comparison, prototype price analysis, research OT budget, production follow-on OT estimate, or OT price-reasonableness support under 10 U.S.C. 4021 or 4022. Build auditable milestone-based .xlsx workbooks using BLS OEWS wages, CALC+ positioning, GSA Per Diem, materials, cost sharing, and agreement-specific fees. Use for pre-solicitation budgets and proposal comparisons. Do NOT use for FAR-based IGCEs, OT project descriptions, grants, or an Agreements Officer's determination. Requires the bls-oews, gsa-calc, and, when travel applies, gsa-perdiem MCP servers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check a mathematical-modeling paper's in-text citations, bibliography, appendix length and content, code, supporting files, reproducibility, consistency, and anonymity. Use when the user provides a paper or related materials and wants one consolidated P0-P3 audit; do not generate or invent missing sources or programs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a question across a corpus of contract documents with verified citations. Use when the user asks what a contract says, which contracts have a clause, what changed between amendments, or any question that needs reading and citing across a set of contract files. The corpus must be on the local filesystem (see README).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to verify paper claims against code or data, audit numerical accuracy, check formula-code alignment, or validate citation accuracy. Triggers on phrases like "verify claims", "check numbers", "do the numbers match", "formula vs code", "audit the paper", or "cross-check results".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。