「did」の検索結果

Post-mortem on what the user has already published - which posts actually worked, why, and what to stop doing. Use when the user pastes their LinkedIn analytics or past posts and asks "what's working", "why did this flop", "read my analytics", "audit my content", or wants to know what to double down on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds the root cause of a bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior before proposing any fix. Use this whenever something is broken and the cause is not yet proven — a failing test, a production error, intermittent behavior, or a symptom that appeared after a change. Also use when a fix has been attempted and did not work, or when the same bug keeps coming back.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get current chat history including user messages, your replies, and system task notifications. When user says 'check previous messages' or 'what did I just send', use this tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Summarize authored commits over a user-specified time period into a concise update

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct your recent working context from your own chat history, live state, and the shared record (user reports, prior fixes, incidents), then hand back a tight current-state brief. Use for 'recall my work on X', 'catch me up', 'what have I been working on', 'where did I leave off', before starting or resuming work, and before telling the user that something was never recorded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process CRISPR screening data to identify essential genes and hit candidates. Performs quality control, statistical analysis (RRA), and hit calling for pooled CRISPR screens including viability screens and drug resistance/sensitivity studies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts an audited medical research gap into a complete, structured, gap-traceable study design. Always use this skill whenever a user already has one or more candidate research gaps and wants to transform them into an executable biomedical research plan rather than re-run broad topic ideation. Covers six gap-to-design patterns (evidence-completion, mechanism-resolution, cell-state/context-mapping, translation-bridge, causality-upgrade, population/stage-specific) and always outputs one recommended primary protocol, a gap-to-design dependency map, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and verified design-support literature rules. Never fabricate references. Preserve claim-evidence discipline and do not replace a topic-specific gap with a generic workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete Mendelian Randomization + single-cell transcriptomics (scRNA-seq) research designs from a user-provided direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a study combining MR and single-cell data — even if phrased as "help me write a paper on X", "design a bioinformatics study for Y", or "I want to study Z using MR and scRNA". Covers five study patterns (mechanism gene-set, key-cell, candidate-gene reverse validation, exposure-disease-cell triangulation, translational biomarker) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and a strictly verified reference literature retrieval layer with real references only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a realistic, execution-aware biomedical study version under explicit constraints of samples, time, budget, data access, lab capacity, team skill, and validation resources. Always use this skill when the user has a real study idea, a candidate route, or a partially framed project but cannot assume ideal conditions. If critical feasibility inputs are missing, first clarify what resources are currently available, what resources may be obtainable, and what resources are realistically unavailable. Do not invent access, capabilities, collaborations, or validation resources. Focus first on feasibility-constrained study framing, route narrowing, dependency control, and minimum viable study design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs discovery, modeling, and validation workflows for prognostic biomarkers in biomedical and clinical research. Always use this skill when the user needs a prognostic biomarker study blueprint rather than a diagnostic test protocol, predictive biomarker design, treatment recommendation, or a completed manuscript. Focus on endpoint family, follow-up horizon, time scale, candidate marker strategy, model-building logic, risk stratification framework, and internal/external validation requirements. Do not invent cohort size, event rate, assay readiness, literature support, or validation access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete conventional single-gene oncology research designs from a user-provided cancer context, target gene, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on a fixed candidate gene and needs expression, prognosis, clinicopathologic association, functional interpretation, immune context, genomic or epigenetic context, optional drug-response hypotheses, and orthogonal validation. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete phenotype-scoring bioinformatics research designs for any disease context and any user-defined phenotype, pathway, process, signature, or molecular program. Use when a study centers on gene-set or feature-set definition, intersection with DEGs or candidate features, phenotype scoring, feature selection, diagnostic or stratification assessment, immune or cellular-resolution interpretation, network analysis, and optional orthogonal validation. Covers five study patterns (signature discovery, phenotype scoring, feature selection, immune/cellular interpretation, multi-layer validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs QTL colocalization studies that connect eQTL, pQTL, sQTL, or related molecular QTL signals with GWAS loci. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to plan, scope, or structure a locus-level study asking whether a GWAS association and a molecular QTL association may reflect the same underlying causal signal. Covers locus definition, QTL/GWAS source architecture, ancestry and LD alignment, single-locus vs multi-locus strategy, candidate-gene prioritization, optional fine-mapping, linked MR/SMR follow-up, and functional annotation. Always output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, method rationale, evidence hierarchy, figure plan, minimal executable version, and strictly verified literature guidance with no fabricated references. Never equate colocalization with causality proof, mediation proof, or automatic target validation. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets, repositories, consortia, or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies whether a scientific or biomedical claim is actually supported by the cited original papers rather than by citation drift, overstatement, selective citation, or correlation-to-causation inflation. Use this skill whenever a user wants to check whether a repeated statement, slide claim, manuscript sentence, review assertion, or “people often say” scientific conclusion is truly supported by the underlying primary literature. Always separate the claim itself, the cited paper(s), what the paper actually showed, what it did not show, and whether later retellings drifted beyond the original evidence. Never fabricate references, findings, study features, or citation chains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies the real underlying study design used in a medical or biomedical paper, distinguishes primary and secondary design components when papers are hybrid, and converts the paper into an evidence-aware design label suitable for literature appraisal, evidence grading, and downstream review workflows. Always identify the actual design from what the study did, not from how the authors describe it. Never fabricate references, metadata, or study features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs complete integrated research plans for bulk transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and related omics from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a bulk multi-omics or single-omics-plus-clinical study — including disease-focused, mechanism-focused, biomarker-focused, stratification-oriented, or translational projects. It should define the research question, choose the best-fit study pattern, recommend example datasets as reference candidates only, specify the core analysis modules and method choices, propose a validation ladder, and output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, cohort availability, assay coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for any PostgreSQL database work — table design, indexing, data types, constraints, extensions (pgvector, PostGIS, TimescaleDB), search, and migrations. **Trigger when user asks to:** - Explore an existing PostgreSQL database to understand its objects and relationships - Design or modify PostgreSQL tables, schemas, or data models - Choose data types, constraints, indexes, or partitioning strategies - Work with pgvector embeddings, semantic search, or RAG - Set up full-text search, hybrid search, or BM25 ranking - Use PostGIS for spatial/geographic data - Set up TimescaleDB hypertables for time-series data - Migrate tables to hypertables or evaluate migration candidates - Plan or execute safe schema migrations with zero downtime **Keywords:** PostgreSQL, Postgres, SQL, schema, table design, indexes, constraints, pgvector, PostGIS, TimescaleDB, hypertable, semantic search, hybrid search, BM25, time-series, migration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct your recent working context from your own chat history, live state, and the shared record (user reports, prior fixes, incidents), then hand back a tight current-state brief. Use for 'recall my work on X', 'catch me up', 'what have I been working on', 'where did I leave off', before starting or resuming work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) on a draft or a block of text with factual claims. Spawns the `claim-verifier` agent in a fresh context (never a conversation fork) so it never sees the draft — then reports which claims are supported, contradicted, or unverifiable. Use when user says "verify these citations", "check the claims in X", "did I hallucinate anything", "fact-check this draft", "run CoVe on this", or after any text generation that asserts facts about papers, datasets, or numerical results. NOT for style/grammar review (use `/proofread`) or substance review (use `/review-paper`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and candidate empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset description. Use when user says "give me research ideas on X", "brainstorm questions about Y", "what could I study with this data?", "I'm looking for a paper idea on...", "generate hypotheses for...". One-shot generation, not multi-turn. For idea-refinement use `/interview-me`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review candidate learnings in Claude Code's native auto memory (`~/.claude/projects/<project>/memory/`, machine-local) and run them through a five-critic council in parallel: generality, staleness, redundancy, evidence, format. Majority vote (3+ of 5) promotes the entry to MEMORY.md. Use when user says "promote memory", "review my learnings", "what should graduate to MEMORY.md", "five-critic council", or as monthly memory maintenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stress-test a finding against the choices you did not make. Enumerates the discrete forks a competent analyst could have taken (measure definition, sample filter, control set, clustering level, weighting, functional form), runs the specification grid, and reports the distribution rather than a point estimate — then attacks the identifying assumption with named, computable sensitivity statistics. Use when the user says "is this robust", "challenge this result", "specification curve", "multiverse", "how sensitive is this", "what if I'd used a different measure", "stress-test my estimate", or before a result becomes a headline claim. NOT a reviewer of prose or code — it challenges the CLAIM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。