Automate Benchmark Email tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
8,821 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Automate Benchmark Email tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing an XML sitemap or diagnosing indexing issues. Applies to any site where noindex meta tags or X-Robots-Tag headers may be applied to URLs also listed in the sitemap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read or triage email, clean up an inbox, draft or send messages, and check delivery. Use for the user's connected mailbox or your own email, including questions about its availability; choose the correct sender and follow the confirmation policy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to find, qualify, and build a list of prospects to reach out to, across B2B SaaS, general B2B, or local small businesses. Also use when the user mentions "prospecting," "build a prospect list," "find leads," "lead list," "outbound list," "target account list," "ICP-fit accounts," "find local businesses," "find my first customers," "design partners," "signal-based outbound," "buying signals," "intent data," "job change alerts," "waterfall enrichment," "Clay table," "lookalike accounts," "catch-all emails," "account tiering," or "research this account before I reach out." Always verify emails before they reach a sequence, and never scrape LinkedIn. Define audiences in Sales Navigator and pull contacts from licensed data. Covers list building, signals, enrichment, verification, and account research. For the outreach itself (copy, sending setup, LinkedIn, cadences, replies), see cold-email. For researching competitors, see competitor-profiling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'deal-specific ROI analysis,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' 'buyer persona card,' 'battle card,' 'battlecard,' 'competitive one-pager,' 'win-loss analysis,' 'why are we losing deals,' 'loss reasons,' 'how do I respond to this objection,' 'prospect just said,' 'help my sales team,' 'sales materials,' or 'what should I give my sales reps,' 'cold call script,' or 'voicemail script.' Use this for any document or asset that helps a sales team close deals. For public competitor comparison pages, see competitors. For running buyer interviews or churn research, see customer-research. For marketing website copy, see copywriting. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For the offer being sold (bonuses, guarantees, pricing structure), see offers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, build, or optimize SMS, MMS, or WhatsApp marketing — including welcome flows, abandoned cart texts, post-purchase, win-back, promotional sends, or transactional/auth SMS. Also use when the user mentions "SMS marketing," "text message campaigns," "SMS sequence," "SMS automation," "abandoned cart text," "post-purchase SMS," "Klaviyo SMS," "Postscript," "Attentive," "Twilio," "A2P 10DLC," "TCPA," "SMS compliance," "short code," "toll-free SMS," "MMS campaign," "should I do SMS," "SMS vs email," "WhatsApp marketing," "WhatsApp Business API," "WhatsApp templates," or "click-to-WhatsApp." For email sequences, see emails. For SMS copy framing, see copywriting. For opt-in popups that capture phone numbers, see popups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, WHY HOW WHAT papers, 3W literature scan, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 三段式文獻掃描, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題, 심층 연구, 문헌 조사, 체계적 문헌고찰, 메타분석, 사실 확인, 연구 방향을 잡아줘, 연구 주제 정하는 것을 도와줘, revisión de literatura, metaanálisis
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic stock screening and investment idea sourcing. Combines quantitative screens, thematic research, and pattern recognition to surface new long and short ideas. Use when looking for new ideas, running screens, or conducting thematic sweeps. Triggers on "idea generation", "stock screen", "find ideas", "what looks interesting", "screen for", "new ideas", or "pitch me something".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create comprehensive industry and sector landscape reports covering market dynamics, competitive positioning, key players, and thematic trends. Use for client requests, sector initiations, thematic research pieces, or internal knowledge building. Triggers on "sector overview", "industry report", "market landscape", "sector analysis", "industry deep dive", or "thematic research".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user needs ANY mailbox/email operation — checking, reading, searching, sending, replying, forwarding, organizing or deleting email, managing threads, connecting a personal mailbox, or registering a new mailbox. This skill is the single entry point for email tasks and orchestrates qwenpawmail-mcp for nine supported personal-mail domains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize the description prompts an AI agent reads to learn its built-in tools (the `.md` files under prompts/tools/). Two halves: (1) measure how much of a prompt is already inferable from the tool's JSON parameter schema + name, to prune redundancy with evidence; (2) house authoring rules for what belongs in a tool prompt vs what stays in code. Use when auditing, trimming, writing, or reviewing tool prompts, deciding what schema field descriptions already cover, or testing schema-vs-prompt overlap before deleting prompt lines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy AI and NLP-powered detection systems to identify business email compromise attacks by analyzing writing style, behavioral patterns, and contextual anomalies that evade traditional rule-based filters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement a phishing report button (Microsoft 365 built-in Report button or third-party like KnowBe4/Cofense) in email clients with a SOAR-driven automated triage workflow that classifies reported emails, extracts IOCs, takes remediation actions, and gives feedback to reporters. Use when deploying user-reported phishing intake or automating triage of the resulting reporting mailbox.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Email has the highest ROI of any marketing channel. $36 for every $1 spent. Yet most startups treat it as an afterthought - bulk blasts, no personalization, landing in spam folders. This skill covers transactional email that works, marketing automation that converts, deliverability that reaches inboxes, and the infrastructure decisions that scale. Use when: keywords, file_patterns, code_patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a reply to your newest Gmail email that knows what you discussed in your Granola meetings, what you promised the sender, and how you write, using cognee memory. Use when someone asks to answer or reply to their latest email in their own tone. Runs locally; reads Gmail read-only; the draft is printed, never sent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Filing gate for ALL brain writes. Consulted before creating any new brain page to determine the correct path. Reads the ACTIVE schema pack via `gbrain schema show --json` — no hardcoded directory table. Also runs periodic taxonomy drift detection via `gbrain schema review-orphans`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a personalized outreach email or multi-touch sequence to a prospect, create it as an email draft for review, and add the contact to a sequence in your sales engagement tool when asked. Use when the user asks to "draft outreach to [person/company]", "write a cold email to [prospect]", "re-engage [prospect]", "draft a 3-touch sequence", or "reach out to [person]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Batch-process unread customer emails - classify, prioritize, and draft replies. Use when the user asks "sweep my inbox", "what customer emails need a reply", "draft replies to my customer emails", or "what needs a response".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates demand generation campaigns, optimizes paid ad spend across LinkedIn, Google, and Meta, develops SEO strategies, and structures partnership programs. Use when planning demand gen strategy, growth marketing, advertising campaigns, PPC optimization, lead generation, pipeline generation, or marketing budgets. Covers multi-channel acquisition (Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Meta Ads), CAC analysis, MQL/SQL workflows, attribution modeling, technical SEO, and co-marketing partnerships. Default calibration profile is a Series A+ B2B SaaS scaling internationally (EU/US/Canada, hybrid PLG/Sales-Led) — adapt benchmarks for other stages and motions rather than skipping the skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to audit, redesign, or plan their website's structure, URL hierarchy, navigation design, or internal linking strategy. Use when the user mentions 'site architecture,' 'URL structure,' 'internal links,' 'site navigation,' 'breadcrumbs,' 'topic clusters,' 'hub pages,' 'orphan pages,' 'silo structure,' 'information architecture,' or 'website reorganization.' Also use when someone has SEO problems and the root cause is structural (not content or schema). NOT for content strategy decisions about what to write (use content-strategy) or for schema markup (use schema-markup).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to create ERD diagrams, normalize database schemas, design table relationships, or plan schema migrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write JavaScript or Python for the n8n Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode) — the AI-agent-callable tool, NOT the workflow Code node. Use when building a Code Tool attached to an AI Agent, writing code that an LLM will invoke, parsing the `query` input, returning a string result, defining an input schema for structured arguments (specifyInputSchema, jsonSchemaExample, DynamicStructuredTool), or troubleshooting errors like "Wrong output type returned", "No execution data available", "The response property should be a string, but it is an object", "Cannot assign to read only property 'name'", or an AI agent that refuses to call the tool. Covers the critical differences between Code node and Code Tool: return format (string vs `[{json:{...}}]`), unavailability of `$fromAI`/`$input`/`$helpers` in the Code Tool sandbox, naming rules for AI invocation, and when to use `toolWorkflow`/HTTP Request Tool instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides data-retrieval best practices, tool selection guidance, and performant SQL query syntax for BigQuery telemetry across INFORMATION_SCHEMA, Cloud Monitoring, and the REST API. Use when the telemetry to fetch is already known, selecting telemetry tools, writing performant INFORMATION_SCHEMA queries, retrieving telemetry for diagnosing single-job performance bottlenecks, investigating slot contention, job concurrency and queue latency, analyzing reservation capacity, utilization and autoscaling saturation, or auditing capacity-based and on-demand compute and storage resource billable usage. Don't use for root-cause diagnosis or symptom troubleshooting when the cause is unknown (use bigquery-troubleshooting first), or for writing or optimizing business logic SQL (use bigquery-optimization).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Augment a Wren project with business context that DB schema cannot carry — enum value meanings, units (USD vs cents, ms vs sec), NULL semantics, magic sentinels (-1 = unknown), soft-delete default filters, business synonyms, time-grain / TZ conventions, cross-system identifiers, currency rules, canonical-table preferences, AND named aggregation metrics (ARR, churn, DAU, WAU, NRR) proposed as cubes. Runs in one of two modes selected at session start: `grill` (one question at a time, user-driven) or `auto-pilot` (agent infers and applies, escalates only on conflicts and high-blast-radius additions like new cubes / views / relationships). Reads everything under <project>/raw/ (PDFs, glossaries, handbooks, code, data dictionaries) and optionally samples low-cardinality columns from the live DB (grill mode), compares against the current MDL / cubes / knowledge (rules + NL→SQL pairs), then fills gaps via the ten-category gap catalog and the cube proposal flow. Confirmed findings are written back to the right sink. Use when: user says 'enrich context', 'augment my project', 'grill me on this project', 'auto-fill my context', 'agent doesn't understand our docs / enum values / units / null meanings', 'business context is missing', 'what does status=A mean', 'is this amount in USD or cents', 'we keep getting wrong aggregations', 'add cubes for ARR / DAU / churn', 'we have a handbook / glossary / data dictionary the agent should know'; or after generating an MDL and noticing the agent lacks business semantics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。