「error」の検索結果

Use production telemetry as INPUT to design new tests. Covers OpenTelemetry integration with tests, trace-based assertions, log-informed test creation, production-error analysis for coverage gaps, and telemetry-driven test prioritization. Use when: "trace-based testing," "design tests from logs," "OpenTelemetry assertions," "production errors point to test gaps," "telemetry-driven testing." Not for: safe rollout techniques (flags, canary) during release — use testing-in-production. Not for: scheduled post-deploy probes — use synthetic-monitoring. Not for: triaging CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: testing-in-production, synthetic-monitoring, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compile the TMDb package AND all test targets (without running the tests) to catch test-code compile errors. Use after changing tests or shared code to check everything still builds — delegates to the tooling-runner agent (Haiku) and returns a concise pass/fail + errors-as-file:line summary. Differs from /build, which compiles only the library; to run the tests, use /test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert at making systems observable and debuggable. Covers structured logging, metrics collection, distributed tracing, error tracking, and alerting. Knows how to find the needle in the haystack when production breaks at 3 AM. Use when "observability, logging, metrics, tracing, monitoring, error tracking, Sentry, Datadog, OpenTelemetry, debugging production, observability, logging, metrics, tracing, monitoring, sentry, prometheus, opentelemetry" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert at building robust form experiences. Covers React Hook Form, Zod validation, server actions, progressive enhancement, error handling, and accessible form patterns. Use when "form, react-hook-form, zod, validation, form validation, useForm, form errors, server action form, forms, validation, react-hook-form, zod, server-actions, accessibility" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert at designing clean, consistent, and developer-friendly APIs. Covers RESTful conventions, versioning strategies, error handling, pagination, rate limiting, and OpenAPI documentation. Designs APIs that are intuitive to use and easy to evolve. Use when "API design, REST API, RESTful, API versioning, API documentation, OpenAPI, Swagger, API error handling, pagination, rate limiting, api, rest, http, versioning, pagination, openapi, swagger" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Endpoint Builder workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Builds production-ready REST API endpoints with validation, error handling, authentication, and documentation. Follows best practices for security and scalability and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Angular UI Patterns workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Modern Angular UI patterns for loading states, error handling, and data display. Use when building UI components, handling async data, or managing component states and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is debugging a bug, tracing an error, or asking why something fails. Examples: "Why is X failing?", "Where does this error come from?", "Trace this bug"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

亚马逊管理之道 (亚马逊管理之道 (The Amazon Way — Amazon 自身的领导力与运营操作系统) — 这个 master skill 蒸馏的不是『在亚马逊平台上开店卖货』(那是跨境电商运营,已由 cross-border-ecommerce 另蒸),也不是 AWS 云技术架构;而是亚马逊这家公司『怎么运营自己、怎么做决策、怎么招人、怎么创新、怎么规划』的一整套可迁移的管理机制(mechanisms)与心智操作系统。面向想在自己团队/公司引入亚马逊式机制的创始人/CEO/高管/运营负责人(COO)、产品经理与技术产品经理(PM/PMT)、组织与流程设计者(chief of staff / ops)、以及在亚马逊工作或准备面试亚马逊(著名的 LP 行为面试 + Bar Raiser)的人。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 亚马逊 OS 的核心世界观分歧: **机制 > 良好意图(Good intentions don't work, mechanisms do:问题不能靠『下次更努力』修复,要装一个带检查闭环的自我强化流程) ⇄ 可控输入指标 vs 滞后输出指标(管你能控制的 input 如选品/价格/在库/配送速度,而非 revenue/股价这类滞后又不可控的 output) ⇄ 长期主义 vs 季度业绩(Day 1、willing to be misunderstood、用现金流+飞轮长期投入,宁可牺牲短期利润) ⇄ 客户执念 vs 竞争对手执念(working backwards 从客户倒推,而非从竞品或『我们能造什么』正推) ⇄ 叙事备忘录 vs PPT(6-pager + 开会前静默阅读、动手前先写 PR/FAQ;写作逼出清晰思考,禁 PowerPoint) ⇄ 单线程负责人/两个披萨团队 vs 协调税(separable、autonomous、one owner per initiative,砍掉跨团队依赖) ⇄ 高标准可学习可传递 vs 与生俱来(insist on the highest standards + Bar Raiser 招聘门,标准是 domain-specific 且能教的) ⇄ 节俭催生创造力 vs 血汗文化(frugality/约束驱动发明 —— 但 frugality + 高压 bar + URA 强制淘汰 = 文化阴暗面批判) ⇄ 两类决策(Type 1 不可逆/单向门 慎重 vs Type 2 可逆/双向门 高判断力个人快速决策,别用重流程拖慢))**; (b) 核心机制(mechanisms,本行的『工具栈』其实是一套运营机制而非软件) — Leadership Principles(14 条→2021 增至 16 条,是一套运营语言和决策仲裁器)、Working Backwards(从客户倒推:动手前先写新闻稿+常见问答 PR/FAQ)、叙事备忘录(6-pager narrative / 1-pager + silent reading 静默阅读、禁 PPT)、Weekly Business Review(WBR + metrics deck 指标看板)、input/output metrics(可控输入指标体系、DMAIC 式指标选择)、年度规划(OP1/OP2 + S-Team goals)、Bar Raiser(招聘机制,独立于用人经理的抬杠者拥有一票否决)、Two-Pizza Team / Single-Threaded Leader STL / separable teams、Correction of Errors(COE 事故复盘 + 5 Whys 五问法)、Andon Cord(安灯绳,借自丰田,一线可拉停)、Flywheel(飞轮:低价→更多客户→更多卖家→更多选品→更低成本结构→更低价)、Type 1/Type 2(单向门/双向门决策分级)、Regret Minimization Framework(遗憾最小化,贝索斯创业决策法); (c) 心智模型层 — customer obsession(客户执念是所有 LP 之首)、long-term thinking / Day 1(第二天就是停滞衰亡)、invent and simplify、ownership(主人翁,不说 that's not my job)、bias for action(可逆决策就快,speed matters)、disagree and commit(充分反对后即便不同意也全力执行)、frugality、dive deep(深入细节、不靠代理指标脱离一线)、think big、are right a lot(用强判断力和证伪自己的能力多做对的判断)、earn trust、deliver results; (d) 工作流/SOP — 用亚马逊方式发起一个新产品/业务(先写 PR/FAQ→评审→倒推着造)、如何跑一场 WBR、如何写和评审一份 6-pager(叙事流程 + 静默阅读)、Bar Raiser 招聘 loop、年度规划(OP1/OP2→S-Team goals→输入指标追踪)、事故后的 Correction of Errors; (e) 知识正典(en-primary,极其丰富且可取一手) — 贝索斯致股东信 1997-2021(1997 首封是奠基文本,每年附在信末;Day 1、遗憾最小化、long term)、《Working Backwards》Colin Bryar & Bill Carr(2021,运营机制圣经)、《The Everything Store》Brad Stone(2013,公司史)、《Amazon Unbound》Brad Stone(2021,权力与阴暗面续作)、《Invent and Wander》贝索斯文集(2020)、《The Amazon Way》/《Think Like Amazon》John Rossman(前亚马逊高管)、Amazon 官方 Leadership Principles 页(amazon.jobs,一手)、HBR『The Institutional Yes』(2007 贝索斯访谈); (f) 行业大佬/figures — Jeff Bezos(创始人,源头教义)、Andy Jassy(现任 CEO,OS 超越创始人的证据 + AWS 缔造者)、Colin Bryar(前贝索斯影子/TPM,《Working Backwards》作者)、Bill Carr(前数字媒体 VP,《Working Backwards》作者)、Jeff Wilke(前全球消费者 CEO,运营架构师)、John Rossman(前亚马逊、机制布道者/顾问)、Brad Stone(记者/编年史作者,批判性外部视角); (g) 争议/批判(必须保留,不能洗白) — 文化阴暗面(NYT 2015『Inside Amazon: Wrestling Big Ideas in a Bruising Workplace』揭露高压职场)、仓储与一线劳工争议、URA(unregretted attrition 强制淘汰)与 stack-ranking 的残酷、frugality + 高 bar = 燃尽(burnout);机制能否迁出亚马逊(cargo-culting:在初创或非科技公司照搬 PR/FAQ/输入指标/Bar Raiser 常失败);是贝索斯个人天才(personality)还是制度化机制(institution)—— OS 在贝索斯卸任后于 Jassy 治下延续,是机制派的证据; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — **信徒/机制布道派(Bryar & Carr《Working Backwards》+ 前亚马逊 operator 顾问圈,信 mechanisms 可移植、任何公司可安装)** vs **批判派(Brad Stone《Amazon Unbound》+ NYT + 劳工视角,认为 OS 与高淘汰的残酷机器不可分割,不该被浪漫化)** vs **情境/规模怀疑派(机制之所以有效是因为亚马逊特定的规模/现金流/创始人权力,照搬到小公司=cargo cult)** vs **创始人中心 vs 制度中心之争(是贝索斯个人 vs 可传承的机制)**。不含: 在亚马逊开店卖货/选品/PPC/FBA 的卖家运营(=cross-border-ecommerce)、AWS 云技术架构与运维、通用 MBA 管理理论泛泛而谈、把普通商业常识包装成『亚马逊独家秘诀』。) Master OS — automated mastery of 亚马逊管理之道 (The Amazon Way — Amazon 自身的领导力与运营操作系统) — 这个 master skill 蒸馏的不是『在亚马逊平台上开店卖货』(那是跨境电商运营,已由 cross-border-ecommerce 另蒸),也不是 AWS 云技术架构;而是亚马逊这家公司『怎么运营自己、怎么做决策、怎么招人、怎么创新、怎么规划』的一整套可迁移的管理机制(mechanisms)与心智操作系统。面向想在自己团队/公司引入亚马逊式机制的创始人/CEO/高管/运营负责人(COO)、产品经理与技术产品经理(PM/PMT)、组织与流程设计者(chief of staff / ops)、以及在亚马逊工作或准备面试亚马逊(著名的 LP 行为面试 + Bar Raiser)的人。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 亚马逊 OS 的核心世界观分歧: **机制 >

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mandatory pre-code gate and definition-of-done for ANY Odoo change (add field, override method, inherit view/xpath, OWL/JS patch, wizard, cron, controller, report, security, migration, bug fix, refactor, "optimize", "clean code", "stick to base"), Odoo 16-19. Also when the user pastes an Odoo traceback or install/upgrade error (ParseError "cannot be located in parent view", "Field ... does not exist", missing xmlid) or asks where an Odoo model, field, method, view or xmlid is defined. Run BEFORE brainstorming or planning: Odoo design questions are answered by tracing the real source into a Context Brief (file:line), not by open-ended Q&A or memory. Resolves the Odoo runtime and version, loads the matching odoo-<major> pack, and closes with install, test, upgrade, i18n, security and hygiene checks before commit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design error prevention, detection, and recovery experiences.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive status reports for git repositories. Analyzes commits, codebase structure, type errors, branch health, dependency status, GitHub PRs/issues/CI, working tree changes, and optionally integrates with `td` (task management CLI) if a `.todos` folder is present. **TRIGGERS - Use this skill when:** - User asks for the status of a git project or repo - User asks "what's going on in [project]" or "give me an overview of [repo]" - User wants a project summary, progress report, or codebase overview - User asks about recent commits, code structure, or project health - User says "check my project" or "project status" **Output:** A rich, structured text report covering overview, branches, commit history, codebase breakdown, GitHub activity, dependency health, issues/errors, working tree changes, task management, and summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix bugs and broken behavior when there is enough evidence to act on a repair path. Use for errors, crashes, incorrect results, API failures (500, 404, 403), CORS problems, database exceptions, broken rendering, duplicated or wrong data, off-by-one mistakes, timezone/date bugs, broken forms, config-caused runtime failures, and regressions. Trigger when the user wants the bug repaired and the conversation already contains a clear failing area, a reproducible failing test, a concrete error path, or a prior diagnosis to implement. Do NOT use for new features, pure explanation, architecture discussion, broad research, or bug reports where the main need is figuring out why the behavior happens — use diagnose for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you design or change an endpoint's errors, status codes, pagination, idempotency or concurrency behaviour — one error shape, the status-code table, bounded lists, safe retries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review common AI slops of defensive programming patterns, avoid silent errors. TRIGGER when reviewing code for defensive anti-patterns, writing fail-fast code, or auditing error handling quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide user through errors they see. Translate error messages to human language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compact reference for the Hyperliquid API as the desk uses it - endpoints and envelopes, every /info request type, every /exchange action with its signing scheme, order and status vocabularies, asset ids, tick and lot rules, rate limits, WebSocket subscription list, error strings, and where the official docs are. Use to look up an exact field, request type or limit before writing a call, and to map an error string to its cause.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user is debugging a bug, tracing an error, or asking why something fails. Examples: "Why is X failing?", "Where does this error come from?", "Trace this bug"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, something that worked yesterday broke, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need to figure out what broke and why — a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and fix mini-program failures through reproducible, evidence-driven root-cause analysis across source, state, asynchronous timing, caches, mock data, build versions, platform behavior, devices, cloud calls, and external services. Use when users report white screens, crashes, stale or jumping values, missing data, intermittent behavior, permission failures, performance stalls, device-only defects, API or cloud-function errors, source-versus-build mismatches, or regressions whose cause is not yet established. Freezes the observation environment, ranks competing hypotheses, runs discriminating checks, creates a failing regression test before repair, covers analogous states, and never hides a known failure with longer waits, swallowed errors, forced success, or cosmetic patches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews Rust code for ownership, borrowing, lifetime, error handling, trait design, unsafe usage, and common mistakes. Use when reviewing .rs files, checking borrow checker issues, error handling patterns, or trait implementations. Covers Rust 2024 edition patterns and modern idioms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews URLSession networking code for iOS/macOS. Covers async/await patterns, request building, error handling, caching, and background sessions. Use when reviewing code that uses URLSession, URLRequest, URLCache, or URLError, or any iOS networking path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write UX copy for a feature, flow, or component — buttons, errors, empty states, tooltips. Use when asked to "write the copy for this flow", "word this error message", or "write empty state copy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。