1,040 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Design waiting experiences — spinners, skeletons, optimistic updates, and progressive reveal. Use when content takes time to arrive. For the latency budget itself use `doherty-threshold`; for success confirmation use `feedback-patterns`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model component behaviour as explicit states, events, and transitions. Use when a component has many interacting states that must be exhaustive. For the feel and feedback of a single interaction, use `micro-interaction-spec`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design confirmations, status updates, and notifications that tell users an action registered. Use when the system must acknowledge success or change. For waiting states use `loading-states`; for failures use `error-handling-ux`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate a structured team critique — framing, feedback rules, and actionable outcomes. Use when running a session with people in the room. For a solo expert review, use `heuristic-evaluation` (prototyping-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate workloads from Google Cloud Platform to AWS — plus AI and agentic workloads from any provider. Triggers on: migrate from GCP, GCP to AWS, move off Google Cloud, migrate Terraform to AWS, migrate Cloud SQL to RDS, migrate GKE to EKS, migrate Cloud Run to Fargate, migrate App Engine to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate from OpenAI to Bedrock, move off OpenAI, switch from ChatGPT API to AWS, migrate from Gemini to Bedrock, migrate LangChain to Bedrock, migrate LangGraph to AWS, migrate agentic workloads to AWS, move AI workloads to AWS, migrate my AI app to AWS. Runs a 6-phase process: discover GCP resources from Terraform, app code, or billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. Do not use for: Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), on-premises migrations, AWS-to-GCP reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or GCP-to-GCP refactoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate workloads from Microsoft Azure to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Azure, Azure to AWS, move off Azure, migrate AKS to EKS, migrate App Service or Azure VMs to AWS compute, migrate Azure SQL or Azure Database to RDS, migrate Cosmos DB to DynamoDB, migrate Azure OpenAI to Bedrock, move Azure AI or agentic workloads to AWS, estimate AWS costs for my Azure infrastructure, what-if workshop. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Azure resources from Terraform, the live `az` CLI, app code, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, optionally reprice scenarios, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify gates Design, Estimate, and Generate; Generate is opt-in at the post-Estimate decision gate. Bicep/ARM discovery is not yet implemented; a Bicep/ARM-only workspace halts. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Heroku migrations (see heroku-to-aws), general AWS architecture advice (see architect-for-startups), AWS-to-Azure reverse migration, or Azure-to-Azure refactoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate workloads from Heroku to AWS. Triggers on: migrate from Heroku, Heroku to AWS, move off Heroku, migrate Heroku Postgres to RDS, migrate Heroku Redis to ElastiCache, migrate Heroku Kafka to MSK, migrate dynos to Elastic Beanstalk, migrate dynos to Fargate, migrate Heroku Private Space, Heroku to ECS, leave Heroku, what-if workshop, compare migration scenarios, workshop mode. Runs a 6-phase process: discover Heroku resources live via the authenticated Heroku CLI (read-only, consent-gated) and/or from Terraform, Procfile/app.json, and billing exports, then clarify, design, estimate costs, generate artifacts, and collect feedback. Clarify must finish before Design, Estimate, or Generate. An optional post-Estimate what-if workshop reprices region/HA/compute/Graviton scenarios. Do not use for: GCP migrations (see gcp-to-aws), Azure migrations (see azure-to-aws), AWS-to-Heroku reverse migration, general AWS architecture advice without migration intent, or Heroku-to-Heroku refactoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify web frontend behavior through real GUI interactions, read-only page inspection, and screenshots. Use for frontend acceptance tests, bug reproduction, interaction feedback, and visual checks with the browser tools available in the session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build animations in React Native and Expo, making the decisions in the order that determines whether they feel right — should it animate, which thread it runs on, which properties, spring or timing, how the gesture hands off, how it degrades. Writes the implementation with Reanimated, Gesture Handler, Expo Router and expo-haptics. Use when animating anything in an Expo app, adding gestures, sheets, screen transitions, press feedback or haptics, or fixing motion that stutters on device. For web animation use `animate`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a weekly cadence of customer touchpoints using Opportunity Solution Trees, assumption mapping, and interview snapshots. Use when the user mentions "continuous discovery", "opportunity solution tree", "weekly interviews", "assumption testing", "discovery habits", "product trio", "outcome-based roadmap", "how do I talk to customers regularly", "we keep building things nobody uses", or "connect research to the roadmap". Also trigger when setting up regular customer feedback loops, prioritizing which experiments to run, or tying discovery insights to delivery work. Covers experience mapping, co-creation, and prioritizing opportunities. For interview technique, see mom-test. For team structure, see inspired-product.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design native iOS interfaces following Apple Human Interface Guidelines. Use when the user mentions "iPhone app", "iPad layout", "SwiftUI", "UIKit", "Dynamic Island", "safe areas", "HIG compliance", "SF Symbols", "haptic feedback", "iOS accessibility", "make my app feel native", or "follow Apple design guidelines". Also trigger when building tab bars, navigation stacks, sheets, or modals for iOS, implementing dark mode, or adapting layouts across screen sizes. Covers navigation patterns, accessibility, SF Symbols, and platform conventions. For general UI polish, see refactoring-ui. For affordance design, see design-everyday-things.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models. Use when the user mentions "why is this confusing", "affordance", "error prevention", "discoverability", "human-centered design", "mental model", "mapping", "seven stages of action", "users keep making mistakes", "this is unintuitive", or "people cant figure out how to use it". Also trigger when reducing product complexity or feature creep. Covers the gulfs of execution and evaluation. For usability scoring, see ux-heuristics. For iOS-specific patterns, see ios-hig-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when designing, generating an MVP blueprint for, auditing, troubleshooting, refactoring, or explaining an agentic harness for any domain. Covers provider-neutral agent architecture for OpenAI, Anthropic, and OpenAI-compatible APIs: agent loops, tool design, record provenance, interactive presentation, user-memory lifecycles, environment-adaptive tools, speculative tool execution, late-bound capabilities, permissions, system prompts, planning, goals, always-on agents and durable runtime, adaptive agent teams, context compaction, memory, skills, MCP/external connectors, public-board communications, hardware agents and board deployment, self-refining recursive harnesses, programmable context, continual refinement, observability, evals, prompt caching, agent-legible environments, feedback loops, and safety.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide a workshop attendee through committing their starter-agent decomposition and opening a PR with their solution + workshop feedback. Invoke when the user says "submit", "I'm done", "open a PR", or asks how to share their solution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Angular 17+, Svelte 5, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Java 8, PHP, Ruby, Rails, Python, Django, FastAPI, Go, C#/.NET, Kotlin, Swift, Dart, Flutter, NestJS, C/C++, Zig, CSS/Less/Sass, Qt, and more. Covers architecture review, performance review, security audit, code quality anti-patterns, and common bugs across all ecosystems. Use when: reviewing pull requests, conducting PR reviews, code review, reviewing code changes, establishing review standards, mentoring developers, architecture reviews, security audits, performance reviews, checking code quality, finding bugs, giving feedback on code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a website, app, onboarding flow, or design for usability, conversion, and product problems, tying every finding to a business outcome and a severity. Use this to review an interface, diagnose low conversion or activation, find where users drop off, get structured product feedback, or decide which UX fixes to ship first. For raising visual quality rather than finding problems, use `interface-craft`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Owns the customer's experience after the sale — support, success, escalation, and the feedback loop back into product. Use this for a decision spanning support and product, when service quality and cost are in tension, when deciding what to staff or automate, when a customer relationship is at risk above the account-manager level, or when nobody owns a recurring customer problem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes for correctness, security, and maintainability. Supports local git diffs (staged or working tree) and remote Pull Requests (by ID or URL). Use when the user asks to review code, check a PR, audit changes, or wants feedback on code quality before merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Helps organize reviewer comments and generate a standardized Word (.docx) response letter that maps each change to its exact location (page/paragraph/line). Use when revising a manuscript, replying to peer-review feedback, or preparing internal review responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Address actionable GitHub pull request review comments for xquic. Use when asked to handle PR review feedback, requested changes, unresolved inline threads, or reviewer comments while preserving unrelated edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when evaluating macro dislocations, reflexive feedback loops, policy shifts, positioning squeezes, and asymmetric bets in a George Soros style.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate user demand research reports from real user feedback. Scrape and analyze feature requests, complaints, and questions from Reddit, X, GitHub, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Amazon. Use when user wants to do demand research, find feature requests, analyze user demand, or run RequestHunt queries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create logos using AI image generation. Discuss style/ratio, generate variations, iterate with user feedback, crop, remove background, and export as SVG. Use when user wants to create a logo, icon, favicon, brand mark, mascot, emblem, or design a logo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create banners using AI image generation. Discuss format/style, generate variations, iterate with user feedback, crop to target ratio. Use when user wants to create a banner, header, hero image, cover image, GitHub banner, Twitter header, or readme banner.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。