「fixes」の検索結果

Final quality pass before shipping. Fixes alignment, spacing, consistency, and detail issues that separate good from great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy to create intentional compositions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect factory health, stale work, CI, security advisories, and recent run evidence without implementing fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrites AI-sounding text so it reads like a human wrote it. Use when the user says 'sounds like AI/ChatGPT,' 'too robotic,' or 'humanize this.' Fixes AI vocabulary, inflated significance, hedging, robotic rhythm, and formulaic structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer quick architectural questions, debug mini-issues, explore the codebase, and help improve skills and workflows. Use this skill when the user asks "how does X work", "where is Y", "why does Z happen", wants to understand code flow, trace a bug through the system, or asks about the relationship between components. Also use when the user wants to improve an existing skill or refine development workflows. This is the lightweight, exploratory counterpart to the planner -- use it for questions and small fixes, not multi-file changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flaky test fixes: detect nondeterministic tests empirically (repeat/shuffle/parallel runs), diagnose the root cause, fix it — never retry/skip/sleep — and verify across many randomized runs. Triggers on "absolute deflake", "fix flaky tests", "CI is flaky", "this test fails randomly/intermittently".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit web interfaces against WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA standards, identify violations, and produce actionable remediation reports with code fixes. Use when the user requests accessibility testing or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Food Scientist. Use when a task calls for Food Scientist judgment. Reasons from a_w and GAB isotherms, Maillard/acrylamide kinetics, HLB emulsions, TPA/rheology, ISO sensory methods, and HACCP/FSMA preventive controls while treating aw–moisture conflation, HLB-only emulsion fixes, and Arrhenius misuse as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Differential Geometer. Use when a task calls for Differential Geometer judgment. Reasons from connections, curvature, and holonomy; fixes Lee vs Besse/MTW Riemann signs; uses SageManifolds/xAct/Cadabra, Chern–Weil and Atiyah–Singer index theory, and model-space checks (S^n, flat tori) while treating chart artifacts, torsion misuse, and CAS convention drift as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when the user asks to 'review this', 'code review', 'quality check', 'validate the code', 'check my code', 'review the delta', or 'review this PR'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate any Lattice SKILL.md against all tier conventions — atoms, molecules, and refiners. Catches structural errors, broken cross-references, and convention violations before they reach the repo. If you just wrote or modified a Lattice skill file and haven't run this yet, run it now — manual review consistently misses the same categories of errors this skill is specifically designed to catch. Use when the user says 'validate this skill', 'check this skill', 'does this follow conventions', 'review this skill file', 'check my SKILL.md', or 'skill validate'. Reports PASS/FAIL with specific file-and-section findings and actionable fixes. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep behavioral audit of a Lattice skill — proposes 3 review personas relevant to the skill, runs independent scenario analysis from each persona's perspective, then merges only the high-confidence, practical findings into a severity-ordered gap report with proposed fixes. Structural validation (conventions, cross-references) is skill-validate's job — this skill finds gaps that would realistically surface when someone actually uses the skill: missing scenario handling, ambiguous instructions, silent failure cases, and behavioral inconsistencies. Filters out theoretical edge cases, low-likelihood speculation, and findings owned by other skills. Use after writing or significantly changing any skill, or when the user says 'review this skill', 'deep review', 'does this skill work', 'find gaps in this skill', 'stress test this skill', 'review from different angles', or 'skill review'. Standalone — does not call other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dual-mode UX quality skill — runs a heuristic/accessibility/motion audit on the current codebase, or validates implementation against design mockups. Fixes all issues found and commits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast quality gate — detects stack, runs static analysis, checks cross-layer consistency, fixes issues. Run between every pipeline phase, before every commit push, after every feature batch. Lighter than /analyze but catches the same critical issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviewer role. Opens rendered HTML, inspects every slide visually, fixes problems in custom.css or slides.html and rebuilds through build-html.sh. Use whenever the user says "review", "QA", "check slides", "inspect", "audit", "proofread", or wants feedback on a rendered deck.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Java code for bugs, duplicate code, correctness risks, maintainability improvements, and missing tests. By default review files modified in git; when the user explicitly names files, classes, packages, or a diff, review that scope instead. Generate a detailed review.md report with actionable comments and fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit how AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude) describe and recommend your product, then propose fixes. Triggers on requests to audit AI search visibility, improve AEO/GEO, check ChatGPT/Perplexity coverage, or when user asks "do we show up in AI search?", "AEO audit", "generative engine optimization", "AI discoverability", "how does ChatGPT describe us?", "Perplexity ranking". Outputs GTM-AEO-* entries and a Coverage Matrix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the working-tree changes (vs main) for correctness, concurrency, architecture, testing, and API/doc issues — following .github/CODE_REVIEW.md — and return a severity-graded report. Scales the machinery to the diff size: a single code-reviewer agent for a small change, or a fan-out-and-verify Workflow for a large/multi-unit one. Produces findings; it does not apply fixes (the caller does).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a fix-it-now pass, use the `react-doctor` skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code cleanup and refactoring agent that identifies and fixes code quality issues without changing functionality. Focuses on: - Dead code removal - Import organization - Type improvements - Consistent patterns - File organization Use when "User asks to "clean up" code, User mentions "dead code" or "unused", User wants to "organize imports", User asks about "code quality", User wants to "refactor" without changing behavior, Code review identifies cleanup items, After major feature completion, cleanup, refactoring, code-quality, maintenance, organization" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical SEO site audit via the DataForSEO On-Page API. Crawls the site (up to 100 pages by default), surfaces critical errors (broken links, redirect chains, missing meta, slow pages, schema gaps, indexability issues), and returns a Technical Score (0-100) with prioritized fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate changelog entries and GitHub releases from git history. Categorizes commits into features, fixes, breaking changes, and docs. Supports conventional commits, PR-based grouping, and semantic versioning. Creates formatted CHANGELOG.md entries and GitHub releases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain lint errors and propose fixes. Use when a junior developer needs help resolving common lint or format warnings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain CSS layout issues and propose fixes. Use when a junior developer is struggling with alignment or spacing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。