「its」の検索結果

Use when asked 帮我做述职 PPT, 述职 PPT 大纲, 年终述职怎么讲, 10 分钟述职讲稿, 述职 PPT 每页写什么, or turn a written year-end review into a 述职 presentation. Produces a slide-by-slide 述职 PPT outline with a conclusion-first headline per slide (结论先行), the chart or visual for each, a timed speaking script (讲稿) that fits the slot, a one-slide version for a short slot, and a rehearsal and Q&A checklist. For writing the review itself use cn-year-end-review; for a promotion to the next level use cn-promotion-defence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode a mainland China labour contract (劳动合同) before signing: probation, pay and its structure, working hours, social insurance, non-compete and confidentiality, termination terms and anything that conflicts with the Labour Contract Law. Use when asked 帮我看看劳动合同, 劳动合同有什么坑, 试用期合法吗, 竞业限制条款, or review my Chinese employment contract. Produces a clause-by-clause decode with red, amber and green flags, the statutory limits each clause must respect, the questions to ask HR, and suggested wording for changes. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare childcare options — nursery/daycare, childminder, nanny, family, or a mix — for your family's real needs, budget, and values. Use when asked to compare childcare options, nursery vs nanny, how to choose childcare, or find the right childcare. Produces a needs-and-values profile, a side-by-side of the realistic options on cost/flexibility/socialization/control, the questions to ask and red flags to check on visits, a total-cost read (including subsidies), and a decision that fits your priorities — not a generic ranking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick the chart the data and the point actually need — the question-to-chart mapping (comparison, trend, composition, distribution, relationship), the honesty rules (axes, baselines, dual-axis traps), and the one-chart-one-point discipline. Use when asked what chart should I use, make this data visual, why does this chart feel misleading, or fix this graph for the deck. Produces the chart verdict with its reasoning, the honesty checklist applied, and the labeling that lets the chart travel without its author.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think clearly about whether bankruptcy is the right move, or whether another path fits better — without shame and without a sales pitch. Use when asked should I file for bankruptcy, is bankruptcy my best option, alternatives to bankruptcy, or what happens if I file. Produces an honest read on whether your situation is the kind bankruptcy actually helps, the main types and what each does (and doesn't) discharge, the real trade-offs (what you keep, the credit impact and its recovery, what's not dischargeable), the alternatives to weigh first (negotiation, debt management, doing nothing on time-barred debt), and a strong push to consult a bankruptcy attorney. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the band agreement before the money or the breakup arrives — who owns the songs, how money splits (writing vs performing distinguished), who owns the name, what happens when someone quits, and the decision rules for offers — decided while everyone still shares a van. Use when a band asks 'how should we split money', 'who owns our songs', 'our drummer quit, what happens', or is about to record/release/sign anything. Produces a plain-language band agreement and the meeting script to agree it. Not legal advice — it's the conversation that makes the lawyer cheap later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up and keep a job application tracker: one master CV, every tailored version, where each was sent, its status, next action and follow-up date, plus a weekly review of what is working. Use when asked to track my job applications, organise my job search, which CV did I send to which company, or what should I follow up on this week. Produces a tracker table (markdown or CSV) with one row per application, a version log linking each to its tailored CV, this week's actions, and a short weekly review of response rates by source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Offboard an AI agent the way you'd offboard an employee — inventory what it knew and touched, export then purge its memory, revoke every credential and access grant, and write the handover for its successor (human or agent). Use when decommissioning an agent or bot, switching agent vendors, ending an AI pilot, or when someone asks 'what did this thing have access to?'. Produces a severance checklist, an access-revocation table, a memory disposition record, and a successor handover.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manages Git workflows including branching, commits, and pull requests. Use when working with Git, creating commits, opening PRs, managing branches, resolving conflicts, or when asked about version control best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guardrails for Codex coding work based on common user complaints. Use when Codex is asked to implement, modify, debug, review, test, or operate on a codebase and should avoid unsafe scope expansion, stale edits, fake completion, brittle edits, shallow debugging, superficial patch-on fixes, one-off special-case code, short-term design choices that hurt maintainability, blindly following incorrect user assumptions, poor dependency choices, generic product or UI output, over-mocked tests, noisy approvals, verbose status reports, or leaking internal reasoning into project artifacts or user-facing UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only Ramp corporate spend: transactions, cards and card limits, users, departments. No spend actions by design. Trigger phrases: ramp, corporate spend, expense transactions, card spend limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the choices an implementing agent made, not its diff — a pure decision audit that traces the session's history into a choices ledger, changes no code, and never blocks an unsupervised run. Working code still embeds architecture the user never chose; surface it because future work inherits it. Use when the user wants to review the decisions the AI made on their behalf, before merging or committing AI-implemented work, when integrating a delegated subagent's pass, or when a fix "works" but might be a point fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get the current market value of a vehicle from its VIN using the CarsXE API. Use this when a user asks how much a car is worth, wants to know its value, or is thinking about buying/selling a vehicle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Agiflow Planning tasks for readiness, prioritize approved work, group related tasks into work units, and promote ready tasks to Todo. Use when grooming a backlog, organizing planned tasks, creating work units, or deciding what should be executed next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold an isolated CLOUD dev box per agent (via crabbox + Daytona) for any codebase — the parallel-safe counterpart to dev-local-setup. Each agent gets its own full stack (own DB + dev server) and an in-box browser for e2e, so concurrent loops never collide on ports/state. Sets up the snapshot image, .crabbox.yaml, an idempotent setup.sh (also boots the stack locally), and a cbx.sh wrapper. Use when the user says "set up crabbox", "give each agent its own box", "add cloud testing", "make this repo testable in the cloud / on Daytona", "parallel-test this", or when setup-codebase-harness needs true per-agent isolation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kotlin Multiplatform structure and language traps: module splits, expect/actual, Koin and ViewModel scoping, layers, version catalogs, erased overloads, Char and string-resource formatting limits. Use when shaping modules or DI, when a format specifier renders verbatim, or code misbehaves on one platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building exhibits for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript — photographs, maps, site plans, artifact images, kinship diagrams, transcripts, evidence tables, and multimodal media — so they are self-contained, accessible (alt text), ethically cleared (consent, permissions), and count toward the word budget. Designs exhibits; it does not run analysis or clear permissions for you.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when deciding whether a project fits AEJ: Economic Policy rather than J. Public Economics, AEJ: Applied, or AER, and when sharpening the policy question and its welfare stake for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript. Frames fit and the policy-question-first contribution; it does not design the identification or run estimation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the credibility of the causal evaluation of a policy is the bottleneck for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript — DID/event study, IV, RDD/bunching, or RCT of a program. Stress-tests the quasi-experimental policy-evaluation design to the AEJ: Policy bar before exhibits are finalized; it does not build the welfare mapping or write exhibits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or revising exhibits for an AEJ: Economic Policy manuscript so they meet AEA house style and carry the policy message — no significance asterisks, a self-contained headline exhibit, and figures that show the policy effect with uncertainty. Designs exhibits; it does not run the estimation or write the surrounding prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building and refining exhibits for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative data structures and data-to-theory tables, process models, and quantitative tables. Designs exhibits; it does not run the analysis behind them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or revising the exhibits of an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript so the main causal result is legible in one table or figure and respects AEA house presentation norms. Formats exhibits; it does not establish the result (aeja-identification / aeja-robustness) or write the surrounding prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。