1,152 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Reconcile what the numbers say with what users say, and design the study that settles it rather than restates it. Use when behavioural data and research findings point different ways. For reading the data on its own, use `behavioural-analytics`; for synthesising interviews on their own, use `affinity-diagram`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bridge THIS Claude Code or Codex session to Telegram, Discord, Feishu/Lark, QQ, or WeChat so the user can chat with Claude from their phone. Use for: setting up, starting, stopping, or diagnosing the claude-to-im bridge daemon; forwarding Claude replies to a messaging app; any phrase like "claude-to-im", "bridge", "消息推送", "消息转发", "桥接", "连上飞书", "手机上看claude", "启动后台服务", "诊断", "查看日志", "配置". Subcommands: setup, start, stop, status, logs, reconfigure, doctor. Do NOT use for: building standalone bots, webhook integrations, or coding with IM platform SDKs — those are regular programming tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Also use when the user says "openspec update change" or "opsx update". If the user means the openspec update CLI command, which refreshes generated files, run that command instead. Never edits code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a production Attio integration architecture with tenant-bound credentials, schema discovery, queued writes, verified webhooks, idempotency, reconciliation, and rollback ownership. Use when planning or reviewing a multi-workspace Attio service. Trigger with "Attio architecture", "design Attio integration", or "Attio system design".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate an Attio integration through a contract-led inventory, OpenAPI and documentation diff, shadow validation, canary rollout, reconciliation, and tested rollback. Use when endpoint assumptions, client versions, schemas, or integration architecture must change. Trigger with "upgrade Attio integration", "Attio migration", or "Attio API contract change".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and operate an Attio webhook receiver with raw-body HMAC verification, fast acknowledgement, durable queues, idempotent processing, retry awareness, and reconciliation. Use when implementing or repairing Attio event delivery. Trigger with "Attio webhooks", "Attio events", or "verify Attio signature".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate an Algolia JavaScript client integration from v4 to v5 with inventory, compatibility tests, and rollback. Use when removing initIndex, updating client methods, or reconciling mixed major versions. Trigger with "upgrade Algolia v5", "remove initIndex", or "Algolia SDK migration".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a multi-chain holdings workflow on Alchemy Portfolio APIs with explicit pagination, partial-failure, privacy, and reconciliation contracts. Use when building wallet portfolio views. Trigger with "Alchemy portfolio", "multi-chain token balances", or "wallet holdings dashboard".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and execute a multi-workload migration into or across Adobe services with contract evidence, dependency waves, dual-run reconciliation, cost controls, and rollback. Use when the task requires adobe platform migration program. Trigger with "Adobe migration plan", "move workflow to Adobe", or "Adobe platform consolidation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and design idempotency, bounded polling, per-service circuits, durable queues, DLQ/replay, degradation, and reconciliation for Adobe workloads. Use when the task requires adobe async reliability controls. Trigger with "Adobe reliability", "Firefly retry design", or "PDF job recovery".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organization-grade cloud and supply-chain attack-surface discovery: S3/GCS/Azure Blob bucket discovery via observed-name mining (CNAME/cert-SAN/Wayback) and bounded two-class permutation (6 prefixes x 15 suffixes on trusted tokens, bounded target-bound expansion on subdomain stems), existence (HEAD/GET) vs public-listing confirmation, object-key triage into 9 value tiers (database dumps, credentials, IaC state, kubeconfig, VCS dirs, config, archives, PII, logs), dangling-CNAME bucket-takeover detection, and the ownership-gated severity model that stops an unattributable public bucket from becoming a false CRITICAL; the fully offline AWS-account-ID recovery from a leaked AKIA/ASIA/AROA access key (base32 decode, runnable stdlib Python, canonical test vector, AWS-documentation-example-ID screening); dependency-confusion confirmation for npm/PyPI (internal-signal classifier -- private-registry binding vs org-namespace match -- paired with a read-only public-registry 404 check and the npm scope-claimability nuance the public search API misses); and passive cloud-native/container/Kubernetes/CI control-plane fingerprinting (Lambda URLs, API Gateway, Cloud Run, App Service, kubelet/etcd/K8s API/dashboard, Jenkins/GitLab/Argo CD) as an org-attribution and exposure surface. Passive/discovery only -- no exploitation, no credential submission, no active control-plane confirmation (a stage-6 validate_cloud active tier is described but out of scope). Use when enumerating a target's cloud storage footprint, recovering an AWS account ID from a leaked key, confirming a supply-chain dependency-confusion vector, or fingerprinting cloud-native/K8s/CI infrastructure for an authorized external recon engagement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns one-shot external recon into a continuous monitoring program. Covers the scheduled re-scan-and-diff loop (baseline snapshot -> interval sleep -> re-scan -> asset/finding delta -> threshold-gated webhook alert), the scan-to-scan diff engine (new/removed/changed assets by a tracked-attribute table, new/resolved findings by a stable cross-scan fingerprint), adversary CTI / chatter monitoring across six public feeds (ransomwatch, ransomware.live, HackerNews Algolia search, Reddit security-subreddit RSS, GitHub Gist code-search, public Telegram channel scraping) with a source-kind-aware severity engine (leak-site/forum/telegram/paste tiers, CRITICAL through INFO), literal/glob/regex watchlist pattern matching, full-corpus capture with retroactive rescan on new watchlist entries, infrastructure-tracking-over-time discipline (certificate-transparency, passive-DNS, port/service, and typosquat re-enumeration cadence, and what a genuine 'perimeter drift' event looks like in the diff output), a five-state finding-lifecycle state machine (open/triaged/risk_accepted/resolved/false_positive) with per-severity SLA and fingerprint-based cross-scan dedup and auto-resolve/reopen rules, the alert-fatigue trap where a lifecycle-unaware rule re-fires on an already-accepted finding, a durable retry/backoff alert-outbox pattern ('queued is not delivered'), and copy-paste bash-cron plus PowerShell-Scheduled-Task recipes for a re-scan+diff loop with the Slack-compatible webhook payload shape. Passive OSINT and analysis only -- no new active-intrusion technique. Use when setting up ongoing monitoring for a retainer or MSSP engagement, tuning alert thresholds to avoid fatigue, triaging a finding's lifecycle status, investigating adversary chatter about a brand, building a 'what changed on the perimeter since last week' report, or deciding whether a persisting finding should re-alert.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end external OSINT engagement autopilot. Run the FULL osint-methodology pipeline to completion in ONE go for an authorized domain — engagement folder, Stages 1-5 (seed, expansion, enrichment, exposure, convergence), multi-agent per-host content+JS fan-out, headline verification, auto-generated findings, and a consolidated multi-tab .xlsx deliverable. Stops ONLY for Stage 6 (active exploitation) arming and out-of-scope sibling assets. Use whenever asked to "run OSINT / recon / attack-surface" on a target — do NOT deliver a thin passive first pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FAIR-aligned exposure quantification: turns a pile of recon findings into a defensible 0-100 + A-F org risk score (Likelihood x Impact, three ownership-aware factors: exposure/threat/impact), an ownership + proof demotion cap so unproven or weakly-owned findings can't inflate the number, a $-denominated FAIR loss-magnitude estimate (IBM/Ponemon per-record cost bands, cross-source record dedup, threat-factor annualization), attack-path amplification (curated red-team chain catalog + generic graph-walk engine, with a kill-chain vs shared-fate honesty gate), and a board-ready one-pager deliverable (hero $ + letter grade + top-3 findings + top attack path + the ask). Extends osint-methodology's severity rubric and client deliverable templates with quantification. Passive analysis only -- operates on findings already collected, no target traffic, no API keys. Use when asked to score risk, quantify exposure, estimate breach cost, build a board report, translate technical findings to dollars, or explain why a grade or dollar figure came out the way it did.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and recover failing or stuck Hugging Face Space deployments for OpenEnv environments. Use when deploying envs from `envs/` to the Hub (`openenv` namespace with version suffixes), when Spaces are in `BUILDING`/`APP_STARTING`/`RUNTIME_ERROR`, or when release collections need to be reconciled after targeted redeploys.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rebuilds an app screen by screen from the recon map: app shell first, then the core flow as a vertical slice, then every screen with all its states, ticking off the feature matrix as it goes. Writes every line fresh, never the original's code, assets or copy. Use when the user says "build the clone", "build screen S07", "start building", "rebuild this screen", "implement the booking page", or after /replica-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clicks through every flow of an app clone and tests it for bugs: a test plan generated from the recon flows with happy paths and edge cases, Playwright end-to-end tests where possible, a browser click-through where not, and bug reports in a fixed format with severity, steps and evidence. Use when the user says "test my clone", "find bugs", "QA this", "click through everything", "write e2e tests", "does it work", or after /replica-build or /replica-backend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Format and structurally validate local treatment-plan documentation after clinical decisions have already been supplied and verified by authorized licensed professionals. Use for source traceability, clinician-authored intervention records, goals and checkpoints, shared-decision records, reconciliation handoffs, and release gates—not for clinical decision-making.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build evidence-traceable market research reports and assumption-driven market sizing or forecast scenarios. Use for market definition, industry and customer evidence, competitive landscapes, TAM/SAM/SOM reconciliation, forecast sensitivity, and auditable report scaffolds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Memory forensics playbook using Volatility 2/3. Use when analyzing memory dumps for malware analysis, credential extraction, process investigation, code injection detection, and incident response timeline reconstruction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Source control and artifact exposure (.git, .svn, .hg, backups, .env). Use when recon finds VCS paths, 403 on hidden dirs, or backup/config leaks during authorized testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry P0 primary router and operating doctrine for HackSkills. Use when the task involves web application testing, API security assessment, recon, vulnerability triage, exploit path planning, authorized pentest, code audit, source-leak mining, middleware audit, SOC triage, detection engineering, incident response, or choosing the right next category skill before any deep topic skill. Also use when the user mentions 安全工程师, 渗透测试, 红队, 蓝队, 代码审计, 源码泄露, SRC. Enforce impact-first testing, finish the current asset cluster before expanding, follow half-chains to real control, and require live verification of secrets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry P1 category router for API security. Use when choosing between API recon, authorization, token abuse, and hidden-parameter workflows before any deeper API topic skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draw a testable attack surface from one authorized target URL or one application. Use when the user says 攻击面, 供给面, 画攻击面, map the surface, application recon, find the business host, JS inventory, or when the only visible page is login. Derive hosts, APIs, keys, and the object graph from what the app already exposes. Do not open with directory brute or payload spray. Use when the user runs /attack-surface-mapping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。