875 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
End-of-session closure. Records what changed into the project's own handoff and log files, separating verified from attempted work, and reports what is uncommitted. Use when wrapping up a session. Twin of sitrep.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and format publication-quality tables. Use for column order, row grouping, notes, statistical precision, accessibility, and reproducibility.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes or reviews a pre-analysis plan before data collection: registry choice (OSF, AEA, AsPredicted, registered reports), locked models and decision rules, code run on simulated data, contingencies, and deviation records. Use when drafting or auditing a pre-registration or PAP, choosing a registry, or handling a deviation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Typeset a working paper or journal submission in house-style LaTeX from Markdown, Word, TeX, ODT, RTF, or HTML. Use to convert drafts, build PDFs, or prepare journal-specific spacing, limits, anonymization, disclosures, and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a methods section against a 45-item checklist drawn from the APSA Experimental Section rubric, JARS-Quant, CONSORT, and DA-RT. Use before submission or archiving, or to document a pre-analysis-plan deviation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a model's own uncertainty from token log-probabilities: collecting and aggregating label logprobs, confidence tiers and margins for triage, calibration against human labels (ECE, Brier, reliability diagrams), downstream use, and reproducibility. Use for per-item classifier confidence or routing low-confidence cases to human review; codebook and validation design go to text-classification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds or audits a literature review: evidence map, closest prior work, gap verdict, and synthesis plan. Use to check whether a contribution is novel, map what a literature establishes, or organize a review; systematic reviews get a protocol scaffold.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and format publication-quality figures. Use for chart choice, color, scales, legends, captions, accessibility, and reproducible figure workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs survey instruments: question wording, scales and index reliability, flow and treatment placement, pretesting, attention and speeding rules, and sensitive questions. Use when writing or revising survey questions, choosing scales, ordering blocks, or planning a pilot.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and diagnoses list experiments (the item count technique): whether indirect measurement is warranted, control-list construction, design variants, estimators and assumption tests in the list package, and power. Use when measuring a sensitive item or debugging an implausible prevalence estimate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit fielded survey response data for registered elements, data quality, bot and AI-automation screening, and sample integrity, and emit an appendix-ready quality report. Use at soft launch or after fielding, before outcomes are analyzed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates 3-5 conceptually distinct approaches labeled Novel, Surprising, Diverse, or Conventional, and holds for the user's selection before implementing. The --codex mode runs the brainstorm on GPT-6 Astra via codex exec, then has Codex implement the selected approach. Use before committing to an approach when a creative, architectural, or analytical task has more than one non-obvious solution; use --codex when another model family should widen the range.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a whole deliverable against its manifest without rewriting it — deterministic gate, per-section finders, a whole-work pass, and adjudicated findings.json and report.md with honest coverage. Use before shipping a deliverable or for the night shift.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews an existing conjoint study for threats to inference and returns severity-ranked findings on design integrity, estimation, measurement error, external validity, and interpretation, including the guardrail against reading an AMCE as majority preference. Use when the user asks whether a conjoint design or analysis holds up, has referee comments on a conjoint, or wants a second opinion on estimation or interpretation. New designs go to conjoint-design, reshaping to conjoint-cleaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Start-of-session report on where a repository stands. Reads the project's own handoff and log files, checks live git state, and reports objective, verified baseline, open tasks, blockers, and next actions. Use when resuming work. Twin of finished.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerics, references, writing, figures, methods, preregistration, and replication readiness. Add --codex for a cross-model pass in which Codex and Claude review independently and verify each other's findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans a research project as a durable decision map, resolving one design decision per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation holds, or when planning keeps restarting. Not for running analyses or writing the paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold or audit a research-project repository organized around its source library (PDFs, Markdown conversions, bibliography, intake pipeline) plus the analysis, manuscript, and review folders it needs. Use when starting or auditing a research repo. Not for one-PDF intake or publication replication packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-stage QA for a finished figure and table set (callouts, numbering, cross-references, text-to-exhibit consistency, captions and notes, accessibility, SI and replication linkage). Use when preparing a submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interviews a researcher in rounds (idea, design, or defend stage) until no decision in a research idea, design, or draft is left assumed, recommending an answer to each question and writing settled decisions to a file. Use for 'grill me', stress-testing a design, or an idea not yet a design; --plan for software or process plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs conjoint and factorial-vignette experiments, covering attribute architecture and randomization restrictions, effective-N power, treatment realism, the choice among AMCE, marginal-mean, and AMIE estimands, forced-choice versus rating designs, and PAP tiers. Use when the user is planning a conjoint, drafting or critiquing an attribute table, asking how many respondents or tasks are needed, whether to report AMCEs or marginal means, or how to test interactions. Reviewing an existing design goes to conjoint-diagnostics, cleaning the export to conjoint-cleaning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a raw Qualtrics conjoint export into an analysis-ready long-format dataset, covering export settings, identifying the implementation, package or manual wide-to-long reshaping, choice-profile alignment, ratings, reference categories, pilot exclusion, and subgroup merges. Use when the user has a conjoint CSV to clean, reshape, or debug, cannot align choices with profiles, or asks what the data must look like before AMCE estimation. Design goes to conjoint-design, validity review to conjoint-diagnostics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a manuscript's citations for fabricated or nonexistent sources, DOIs that resolve to a different work, mismatches between in-text citations and the reference list, APA 7 or journal style, and whether each source supports the claim it is attached to. Checks entries against Crossref, OpenAlex, and DataCite and labels anything it could not verify NOT CHECKED. Use to check citations, references, a .bib file, or DOIs, or when a source may be AI-invented. Figures and tables go to figure-table-audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs multi-country survey experiments, covering case selection with a stated comparative logic, instrument localization and TRAPD translation, stimulus calibration, per-country power, and pooled versus per-country analysis with measurement-equivalence checks. Use when the user fields the same experiment in several countries, asks which countries to include, how to adapt an instrument without breaking comparability, whether to pool, or how large each country sample must be. Question wording goes to survey-design, reporting to methods-reporting, the study plan to pre-registration-writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。