「section」の検索結果

Designs complete single-cell research plans from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a single-cell study — including disease-focused, mechanism-focused, biomarker-focused, translational, perturbation-inspired, or validation-aware projects. It should define the research question, choose the best-fit study pattern, recommend sample grouping logic, suggest reference datasets as examples only, specify the core analysis modules, propose a validation ladder, and output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, sample metadata, accession numbers, cohort availability, cell-type labels, external validation resources, or literature references. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete dual-disease shared-transcriptome biomarker and hub-gene research designs from a user-provided disease pair and shared-biology direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a non-oncology two-disease transcriptome study centered on per-disease differential expression, shared-signal intersection or concordance, PPI-based hub-gene prioritization, diagnostic evaluation across both diseases, immune infiltration context, pathway interpretation, and optional orthogonal validation. Covers five study patterns (shared-DEG-first workflow, hub-gene-first shared-biomarker workflow, hybrid shared-biomarker compression workflow, immune-context shared-biomarker workflow, orthogonal validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs complete integrated research plans for bulk transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and related omics from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a bulk multi-omics or single-omics-plus-clinical study — including disease-focused, mechanism-focused, biomarker-focused, stratification-oriented, or translational projects. It should define the research question, choose the best-fit study pattern, recommend example datasets as reference candidates only, specify the core analysis modules and method choices, propose a validation ladder, and output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, cohort availability, assay coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineers the methods section of a biomedical paper into a structured, reproducible workflow. Use this skill when a user wants to understand how a study was actually executed, extract data sources, inclusion/exclusion logic, preprocessing, analytical sequence, software/tools, validation path, and critical parameters, or build a replication checklist from a paper, abstract, DOI, PMID, title, screenshot, or partial methods text. Do not treat this as generic summarization. Focus on reconstructing the operational method pipeline, surfacing missing reproducibility details, and distinguishing explicitly reported steps from inferred or unresolved ones. Never fabricate references, methods details, identifiers, software versions, parameters, datasets, or validation steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Acknowledges limitations in sample, design, measurement, and validation in a professional way that improves credibility without undermining the whole paper. Use when writing the limitations paragraph of a Discussion section, preparing a grant risk assessment, responding to reviewers about study weaknesses, or framing scope boundaries for a paper. Also triggers on "write my limitations", "how should I address the limitation of", "reviewer said my sample is too small", or "help me word this limitation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Composes a Discussion around key findings, mechanisms, clinical relevance, and limitations. Use when writing or improving a Discussion section for any biomedical manuscript — including interpreting results, connecting to prior literature, addressing unexpected findings, framing limitations, and writing the conclusion. Also triggers on "write my discussion", "help me discuss my findings", "how do I compare to prior studies", "write the limitations paragraph", or "draft a discussion for my paper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Condenses a full study into conference-submission abstract format. Use when adapting a manuscript abstract or study summary to meet a specific conference's word limit, structured format (Background/Methods/Results/Conclusion), character limits, or required section headings. Also triggers on "adapt my abstract for [conference]", "shorten my abstract to 250 words", "reformat for ASCO/ASGCT/SfN/AACR", "I need a conference abstract", or "cut my abstract to fit the word limit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redesign GitHub README homepages or create project-native pure SVG, hybrid SVG-composed PNG/WebP, and opt-in animated GIF assets. Use when a user asks to beautify, redesign, rebrand, visually upgrade, simplify, or audit a GitHub README; create only a hero, section headers, diagrams, badges, motion graphics, showcase modules, or other README assets; or turn a repository homepage into a cohesive visual story. If whole-README work versus asset-only work is unclear, ask which scope the user wants. For hero-like assets where pure SVG and generated raster material are both viable, explain the tradeoffs and confirm the implementation before creating the asset.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate formatted help text with examples, descriptions, sections, and consistent styling for CLI applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured debugging methodology using hypothesis-driven investigation, log analysis, and bisection to isolate and resolve defects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect pauses and silence in audio using local dynamic thresholds. Use when you need to find natural pauses in lectures, board-writing silences, or breaks between sections. Uses local context comparison to avoid false positives from volume variation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete, GDPR/CCPA-compliant Terms of Service for a website or SaaS product, with plain English summaries for each section

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master network protocol reverse engineering including packet analysis, protocol dissection, and custom protocol documentation. Use when analyzing network traffic, understanding proprietary protocols, or debugging network communication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

House style for user-facing documentation — voice, scope, structure, and what to leave out. Use this skill whenever writing, editing, or reviewing anything a user reads to learn how to use a tool — help center articles, getting-started guides, tutorials, feature docs, README usage sections, in-app help, release notes, or FAQ entries. Trigger it even when the request is phrased plainly — "document this feature", "write docs for X", "explain this to users", "write a README for this library", "turn these notes into a guide" — and even when no style guidelines are mentioned. Also use it to review existing docs for tone, bloat, or leaked implementation detail. Do not use it for internal engineering docs, architecture write-ups, RFCs, or code comments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a graded problem set with sections, problems, worked solutions, and short "why this matters" explainers across analytical, empirical, and coding types. Use when user says "make a problem set on X", "scaffold exercises for this lecture", "create practice problems", "generate homework with a solution key", "build a graded assignment on topic Y". Emits a clean student set plus a separate solution key — NOT for grading submissions or auto-checking student answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a live article URL into a press clip that looks like the real coverage — the publication's own logo, fonts, photos and layout kept intact, the ads and clutter removed, and (for a roundup) just the client's section. Renders to PDF. You inspect each site and tailor the removal; the bundled script carries no site-specific logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes `npm run validate` and `npm run evals` on the first try — generates skills/{name}/SKILL.md (with the mandatory "Do NOT trigger for:" clause and a Process section citing guide step ranges) plus skills/{name}/{name}-guide.md (sequentially numbered steps), then appends paired eval scenarios. Triggers when the maintainer asks to "add a new skill", "scaffold a skill", or "create a brooks-lint mode". Do NOT trigger for: editing an existing skill's content, adding a single eval to an existing skill, or authoring skills for some other plugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authoring conventions for exploratory data analysis notebooks and analytical dashboards, covering section sequence, visualization selection, scale thresholds, caching and state, and dashboard validation budgets. Use when composing or reviewing an EDA notebook, an analytical dashboard, or a dashboard test pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run all reference benchmarks under benchmarks/eval/ and refresh the reference-table cells in benchmark_*.py. Auto-detects host hardware (H200/H100/H800/...). For each row's matching hw entry: replace cells in place. For new hardware or a new workload tag: append a new row to the section's table. Local-Pipeline-Result tables are skipped. One slash command runs everything end-to-end and auto-commits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a bounded task plan (and the agent prompt for it) that runs the 5-layer profiling methodology in .claude/skills/model-profiling/METHODOLOGY.md against one model, stops for human confirmation before any GPU work starts, then delegates the actual run to a background agent, verifies its completion claim, and routes findings into a gitignored .profiling-runs/<model>/ directory — durably tracked as a sub-issue under the tracking issue named in SKILL.md's "Result tracking" section — plus the methodology doc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run /sync as the last step after a change is complete, around merge, to keep durable knowledge current. Updates root and nested AGENTS.md, reconciles the scope from repo evidence, and flags specs the change made stale. Surgical edits only: it adds lines, and rewrites single lines it owns. Never a whole section, never curated prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimizes or restructures CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md with progressive disclosure and zero information loss. Use when the user asks to optimize, audit, 精简/瘦身/重构, or split instruction files, asks for their best practices (最佳实践), sees Memory files taking a large share of /context, reports rules in instruction files being ignored, or a task starts moving instruction sections. Not for generic task drift unless instruction files are in scope; not for moving memory entries into docs (use claude-code-ops-router).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。