「systematic」の検索結果

Systematically identify whether a GPU kernel is compute-bound, memory-bound, or latency-bound using roofline analysis, occupancy calculations, compute/load ratio per tile, and SASS instruction inspection. Produces a decision matrix for optimization strategy selection (cp.async, warp interleaving, tiling, double-buffering, or CuAssembler hand-tuning).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for achieving 100% backward dataflow reachability in a new language. Create gauntlet fixture, write trace, diagnose gaps, fix analyzer/algorithm, iterate to 100%. Language-agnostic process. Use when: (1) adding a new language to Grafema, (2) auditing dataflow coverage for existing language, (3) user says "/dataflow-gauntlet".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging with root cause investigation. Four phases: investigate, analyze, hypothesize, implement. Iron Law: no fixes without root cause.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find the root cause of a bug before writing any fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only for user-provided academic text, explicit scholarly claims, existing citations, or known bibliographies needing citations added, verified, replaced, extracted, or formatted. Supports claim-to-source matching, citation-support checks, replacements, and common academic citation formats. Do not use for general fact-checking, legal/journalistic citation work, open-ended 'find literature about X', topic-level exhaustive discovery, systematic-review corpus construction, PRISMA searches, or creating new research claims. Chinese: 为已有段落补参考文献、核验已有引用、替换错误引用、提取需引文论断、GB/T 7714 格式化.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit web pages and components against RAWeb 1.1 (Luxembourg Web Accessibility Framework). Use when reviewing existing code for accessibility compliance, generating audit reports, checking conformance levels, or preparing for Luxembourg accessibility certification. Covers all 17 themes with systematic test procedures. Default target: Level AA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterative measurement-driven improvement loop. Measure, profile, mutate, re-measure, commit. Works for performance, bundle size, complexity, test coverage — anything quantifiable. Use when the user wants to systematically improve a metric through repeated cycles of profiling and targeted changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate a professional LinkedIn presence end-to-end using Claude: daily posting with pillar calendar, engagement with anti-detection rules, DM triage, reporting, and growth tracking. Use when the user wants to automate LinkedIn, manage a profile with AI, create a content strategy, or set up engagement automation. Triggers on: "automate my LinkedIn", "LinkedIn automation", "automated LinkedIn", "LinkedIn bot", "LinkedIn scheduling", "LinkedIn AI management", "LinkedIn content calendar", "LinkedIn engagement strategy", "build a LinkedIn presence", "can Claude manage my LinkedIn", "how do I automate my LinkedIn", or any request involving systematic LinkedIn content creation, audience growth, or profile management. Covers: identity/TOV setup, pillar calendar, post creation, engagement rules, anti-detection, scheduled task creation, and weekly reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inventory all founder resources across 8 categories for a one-person company. Use when Codex needs to systematically confirm what resources the founder has — experience, network, skills, relationships, channels, assets, time/money constraints, hard limits — by first doing a broad scan of each category, then drilling into specifics (distribution, usable portions, how to use, cost of use), and producing a confirmed detailed resource inventory written to `opc-doc/`. Does NOT analyze directions, preferences, suitability, or risk tolerance — those belong to downstream skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-demand journal peer review simulation expert — supports 7 research paradigms (experimental/computational/empirical_survey/interpretive/mixed_methods/systematic_review/interdisciplinary) with 6-step review workflow, outputting targeted revision suggestions based on journal-specific review standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep root cause analysis using the 5 Whys and Fishbone techniques. Use when systematic debugging hasn't found the cause, or for complex systemic issues. Keywords: root cause, why, underlying, fundamental, systemic, deep, origin

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive 4-phase debugging methodology for complex bugs. Use for bugs that aren't immediately obvious or have resisted quick fixes. Keywords: bug, error, fix, debug, broken, crash, fail, exception

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when complex problems require systematic step-by-step reasoning with ability to revise thoughts, branch into alternative approaches, or dynamically adjust scope. Ideal for multi-stage analysis, design planning, problem decomposition, or tasks with initially unclear scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Agentic Coding framework providing mission briefs, guardrails, and integration hints for complex tasks. This skill ensures high-quality output through disciplined automation and systematic workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When reviewing, optimizing, or inheriting an LLM agent, systematically identify what's actually load-bearing vs. cruft. Instruments usage, ablates components, and strips the agent to minimum viable form. Answers: "What can we remove without degrading quality?" The goal is the leanest agent that still works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically investigate and fix build errors, TypeScript errors, or test failures with minimal diffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically remove malware, backdoors, and attacker persistence mechanisms from infected systems while ensuring complete eradication and preventing re-infection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。