「tests」の検索結果

Runs tests and handles failures. Triggered when: test execution, verification, test failures, CI checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the user asks to "review my code", "full code review", "review my changes", "check for bugs", "scan for bugs", "review correctness", "security audit", "find vulnerabilities", "review security", "check API usage", "verify against docs", "check for cross-file duplication", "review consistency", "check for code reuse", "review simplicity", "find untested code", "find redundant tests", or "review test coverage".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing patterns for PHPUnit and Playwright E2E tests. Use when writing tests, debugging test failures, setting up test coverage, or implementing test patterns for ActivityPub features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gate new or changed Enterprise tests and audit existing tests for observable behavior, credible regressions, duplicate coverage, and test-only production seams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Current Playwright (1.64) patterns for writing, debugging, and scaling reliable test suites. Use for any Playwright task, even ones you think you know, because the guides cover APIs and CLI flags newer than most training data. Covers writing or fixing tests, locators, a failing or flaky test, a trace.zip or error message, playwright.config and projects, network mocking, auth, visual and accessibility testing, Docker and CI sharding, playwright-cli browser automation, Playwright Test Agents, page objects, migrating from Cypress or Selenium, and QA work: test case design, bug reports from failures, automating manual test cases, and reviewing tests. TypeScript and JavaScript.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Playwright smoke tests, debug failures, and verify fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing Playwright tests, fixing flaky tests, debugging failures, implementing Page Object Model, configuring CI/CD, optimizing performance, mocking APIs, handling authentication or OAuth, testing accessibility (axe-core), file uploads/downloads, date/time mocking, WebSockets, geolocation, permissions, multi-tab/popup flows, mobile/responsive layouts, touch gestures, GraphQL, error handling, offline mode, multi-user collaboration, third-party services (payments, email verification), console error monitoring, global setup/teardown, test annotations (skip, fixme, slow), test tags (@smoke, @fast, @critical, filtering with --grep), project dependencies, security testing (XSS, CSRF, auth), performance budgets (Web Vitals, Lighthouse), iframes, component testing, canvas/WebGL, service workers/PWA, test coverage, i18n/localization, Electron apps, or browser extension testing. Covers E2E, component, API, visual, accessibility, security, Electron, and extension testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing Spring Cache annotations (@Cacheable, @CachePut, @CacheEvict). Generates test code that mocks cache managers, verifies cache hit/miss behavior, tests cache key generation with SpEL expressions, validates eviction strategies, and checks conditional caching scenarios. Triggers: caching tests, test Spring cache, mock cache, Spring Boot caching, cache hit/miss verification, @Cacheable testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides unit test, integration test, and mock AI patterns for LangChain4j applications. Creates mock LLM responses, tests retrieval chains, validates RAG workflows, and implements Testcontainers-based integration tests for Java AI services. Use when unit testing AI services, integration testing LangChain4j components, mocking AI models, or testing LLM-based Java applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides patterns for unit testing Spring application events. Validates event publishing with ApplicationEventPublisher, tests @EventListener annotation behavior, and verifies async event handling. Use when writing tests for event listeners, mocking application events, or verifying events were published in your Spring Boot services.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Canonical rules for writing, rewriting, or reviewing Shift desktop Playwright E2E tests and visual goldens under `apps/desktop/e2e/`. Use whenever you add or change a `.spec.ts`, a fixture, `EditorDriver`, a screenshot baseline, or Playwright project membership, and whenever you investigate a flaky or failing E2E test. Covers waits, oracles, goldens, fixtures, projects, and flake verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze test coverage gaps and generate tests to improve coverage. Use when improving test coverage, finding untested code, or writing missing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Swift Testing patterns — structs over classes, async confirmations, parameterized tests, exit tests, attachments, common agent mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or migrating Swift Testing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

POS (Point of Sale) architecture and patterns. Use when writing, editing, exploring, debugging, fixing bugs, implementing features, or reviewing WooPos-prefixed classes or files under ui/woopos/. POS uses a different architecture than the main app — plain ViewModel (not ScopedViewModel), pure Compose (no Fragments), Compose Navigation (no nav graphs), parent-child SharedFlow event bus. Loading this skill prevents applying main-app patterns that would be wrong for POS. For analytics use `pos-analytics`, for tests use `pos-tests`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a plain-language manual test plan from the context supplied to it — an executive summary, a high-level list of named tests, and a detail section per test with the steps a person follows by hand and the outcomes they should expect. Use when you want to create, draft, generate, or outline a manual test plan, manual QA steps, hands-on verification steps, or an acceptance walkthrough for a feature, change, branch, plan, or PR. When the plan holds more than five tests and at least two natural categories emerge, both the test list and the detail sections are organized under plain-language categories. When nothing in the supplied context can be manually tested, it says so and asks for more context instead of producing a document. Does not analyze code for automated test coverage gaps — use automated-test-planning. Does not write test code — use tdd. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not stress-test an existing plan — use iterative-plan-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before removing code that looks redundant, wasteful, or "wrong" based on log observations or code review instinct, grep the test suite for tests whose names describe the exact behavior you're about to remove. A test whose title literally describes the "weird" thing (e.g. "calls play() even when player reports playing", "retries even when first call succeeded", "skips cache even when fresh") is a load-bearing workaround, and the production log you're reacting to is probably the workaround working as designed — not a bug. Use when: (1) Tempted to remove a function call that "looks redundant" based on a production log, (2) About to "simplify" a conditional that seems to always take the same branch, (3) Reviewing code and thinking "why would anyone write this?", (4) A log line shows a state that seems impossible or contradictory (e.g. playing=true but positionMs=0 for seconds), (5) CI surfaces a failing test whose name describes exactly what your fix removed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run and debug Flutter E2E integration tests that exercise the real app against a local Docker backend (no mocks). Use when running E2E tests, debugging failures, or working on the local harness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive test case documentation from test code, test framework output, existing test docs, and source code context. Use when documenting test suites, creating test specifications, generating test coverage reports, onboarding developers to testing practices, or preparing QA documentation. Analyzes test functions (pytest, unittest) to extract test names, docstrings, assertions, and organization, then produces structured markdown with both overview-level summaries and detailed test case specifications including purpose, preconditions, steps, expected results, and test data. Triggers when users ask to document tests, generate test specifications, create test reports, summarize test coverage, or explain what tests do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze failing tests to detect functional bugs in code. Takes repository and failing test output as input, analyzes execution behavior, assertions, and stack traces to identify suspicious code regions and root causes. Use when debugging test failures, investigating regression bugs, or understanding why tests fail. Explains the bug mechanism, identifies affected code, and suggests fixes based on test expectations vs actual behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether a new version of a repository preserves the behavior observed by tests on the old version. Use this skill when comparing two versions of code to detect regressions, verify refactoring safety, validate bug fixes don't break existing functionality, or ensure backward compatibility. Detects differences in function outputs, exceptions, observable states, and performance between versions. Generates reports highlighting potential regressions (critical, high, medium, low severity), improvements, and areas requiring verification. Triggers when users ask to check for regressions between versions, compare test behavior across versions, verify behavior preservation, or validate that changes don't break existing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。