1,395 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Comprehensive diagnostic analysis of time series data. Use when users provide CSV time series data and want to understand its characteristics before forecasting - stationarity, seasonality, trend, forecastability, and transform recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users understand the core mechanics of marketplace businesses, from solving the cold start problem to maintaining quality and preventing platform leakage at scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect insecure JWT (JSON Web Token) implementations in a codebase using a two-phase approach: first map all JWT issuance and verification sites to understand the token lifecycle and signing configuration, then check each verification site for exploitable weaknesses such as algorithm confusion, missing signature verification, weak secrets, header injection, and missing claim validation. Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first). Outputs findings to sast/jwt-results.md. If no JWT usage is found in Phase 1, Phase 2 is skipped. Use when asked to find JWT, token forgery, or authentication bypass bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the codebase or domain is unfamiliar, the user will "know it when they see it", a reference implementation must be understood before porting, mid-build deviations from the plan need capturing, or a finished change needs buy-in or verified understanding before merge. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) — walk the quadrants to burn off fog before slicing, and feed the finished map into the spec.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user explicitly cannot review the output in the current domain, says they do not understand it or will copy-paste without checking, or requests clueless mode. Examples: "I know nothing about this", "не разбираюсь", "сделай за меня". Brevity, "make it nice", and delegation alone do not establish a knowledge gap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture architectural decisions made during Claude Code sessions as structured ADRs. Auto-detects decision moments, records context, alternatives considered, and rationale. Maintains an ADR log so future developers understand why the codebase is shaped the way it is.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze KiCad projects and PDF schematics: schematics, PCB layouts, Gerbers, footprints, symbols, netlists, and design rules. Reviews designs for bugs, traces nets, cross-references schematic to PCB, extracts BOM data, checks DRC/ERC, DFM, power trees, and regulator circuits. Every finding carries a confidence label and evidence source with trust_summary rollup. Analyzes PDF schematics from dev boards, reference designs, eval kits, and datasheets. Supports KiCad 5–10. Use whenever the user mentions .kicad_sch, .kicad_pcb, .kicad_pro, PCB design review, schematic analysis, PDF schematics, reference designs, Gerber files, DRC/ERC, netlist issues, BOM extraction, signal tracing, power budget, DFM, or wants to understand, debug, compare, or review any hardware design. Also for "check my board", "review before fab", "what's wrong with my schematic", "is this ready to order", "check my power supply", "verify this circuit", OSHWA certification readiness, or any electronics/PCB design question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks what to do next, what is left, or what is blocked - "what's next", "what now", "what should we work on", "anything I can do" - in any language. This skill picks the next piece of work; when the user asks HOW to do a thing or says they do not understand what to do, that is os-step-by-step. Reads the last report, local changes, open pull requests and always the backlog. First finishes what is finished: verified-ready pull requests merge in the same pass. Then sorts the rest into doable-alone and needs-you, ending with one recommended next task in plain words - what it closes or unblocks. Never invents tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS invoke this skill when you need the user to act - run a command, paste a secret, click, approve - and whenever they ask how to do something or say they do not know what to do: "step by step", "walk me through it", "what do I do", "what should I do", "I don't understand what to do", "explain what I need to do", in any language. Picking which task comes next is os-whats-next; this skill is for doing the thing in front of you. First earn the ask: try it yourself, find another route, shrink it to the part only they can do. Then one action per step, commands labelled by what they touch, no jargon. Commands are single lines that prompt for any value - typing hidden for secrets - and confirm in plain words. Afterwards verify their step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to understand how American Anthropologist (AA) evaluates a manuscript — editorial screening, anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, the four-field editorial board, decision categories, and how section choice shapes the path. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to understand how Agricultural Systems (AgSy) evaluates a manuscript — single-anonymized peer review with a minimum of two reviewers and an editor decision, desk screening for fit and systems content, what reviewers weigh, and the rapid-review track for Perspectives. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive review; it does not contact editors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when understanding and navigating Administrative Science Quarterly's (ASQ) developmental, multi-round review process — decision types, reviewer/editor roles, and what each stage expects. Explains the process; it does not draft the response letter (see asq-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to understand how Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) evaluates a manuscript — triage by the joint Editors-in-Chief, double-anonymized review by interdisciplinary referees, the meaning of each decision type, and how to read the editor's letter. Explains the process; it does not draft the revision response (aos-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when articulating what an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript contributes — converting findings into a claim that changes how the field understands accounting's social, organizational, behavioral or institutional operation. Frames the payoff; it does not produce new analysis (aos-data-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to understand the Academy of Management Review (AMR) developmental, multi-round review and interpret a decision letter focused on theoretical novelty and logical soundness. Explains the process and decision types; it does NOT draft the response document (that is amr-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to understand or set expectations for the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) editorial and peer-review process — desk review, the developmental multi-round R&R culture, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response letter (amj-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a creator, influencer, founder, competitor, or brand social account to explain its positioning, content pillars, winning posts, hooks, formats, series, calls to action, and audience response. Use when the user wants to understand why an account works and what patterns to test without copying it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research a company's ideal customer profiles and build detailed synthetic buyer personas. Identifies 4-6 distinct buyer segments through web research, then creates rich, realistic personas with demographics, motivations, skepticism profiles, decision criteria, and language patterns. Use when you need to understand who your buyers are at a deep level — their motivations, objections, and how they evaluate solutions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find warm leads by searching LinkedIn for pain-language posts — the frustrations, complaints, and operational struggles your ICP talks about publicly. Asks clarifying questions to understand your product, ICP, and their pain points, then generates pain-language search keywords, scrapes LinkedIn for posts and engagers, enriches profiles, and ICP-filters the results. Use when someone wants to "find leads who are complaining about X" or "find people discussing problems we solve" or "LinkedIn pain-based prospecting."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lead qualification engine with conversational intake. Asks structured questions to understand your qualification criteria, generates a reusable qualification prompt, then batch-enriches leads via Apify LinkedIn scraping and scores them with parallel processing. Outputs qualified/disqualified verdicts with confidence scores and reasoning to CSV or whatever output format the user prefers. Supports calibration mode for prompt refinement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrape competitor ads from Meta, TikTok, Google, and LinkedIn ad libraries, analyze creative patterns (hooks, formats, CTAs), reverse-engineer landing page funnels, and produce a strategic teardown with vulnerability analysis and counter-play recommendations. Use when you need to understand the competitive ad landscape, find new creative directions, or identify weaknesses in a competitor's paid strategy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Normalize read-depth copy-ratio profiles and segment them into copy-number regions using circular binary segmentation (CBS, DNAcopy), hidden Markov models, HaarSeg, and fused-lasso methods. Covers GC-content, mappability, and replication-timing (wave-artifact) bias correction, panel-of-normals/PCA denoising, diploid-baseline centering, and algorithm selection by sequencing depth and event size. Use when choosing a segmentation algorithm, correcting depth bias, diagnosing oversegmentation or a mis-centered baseline, tuning CBS or HMM parameters, or understanding why a downstream CNV caller produced fragmented or shifted segments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。