6,350 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audit an existing Quarkus + LangChain4j project against this stack's agentic conventions — a read-only conformance or gap-analysis review. Use when the user asks to audit, review, check, assess, or validate a Quarkus project against the LangChain4j agentic conventions, or wants to know whether an existing project conforms to (or is ready to adopt) this stack. User-invoked only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a measured semantic core for a brand through official keyword APIs (Yandex Wordstat for RU, Google Ads Keyword Planner / Bing Webmaster worldwide, autocomplete everywhere), commit it as core.json plus a questions.csv, and hand that straight to an open-geo visibility run. Use when the user wants demand research, a semantic core, keyword volume, or "collect the questions and then measure visibility" — no browser and no manual keyword tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write cold outreach messages that actually get replies, on LinkedIn, in email, or in X (Twitter) DMs. Use this skill whenever the user wants to reach out cold to someone they don't know or barely know, including phrases like "write a cold DM," "cold email," "LinkedIn message to," "reach out to," "pitch [person]," "how do I get [person] to reply," "DM this investor/recruit/partner/podcast host," "email a founder/company I want to work for," "cold email for a job," "land a job at [company]," "reach out about a role," "follow up with someone who ghosted," or any request to draft a first-touch message to a stranger or near-stranger for fundraising, hiring, partnerships/BD, press/podcasts/speaking, or job-seeking. Trigger this even when the user just pastes a name, a role, and "help me reach out," and even when they don't say the word "cold."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants to update their project's CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md, verify their Claude Code setup, or check for improvements to their project configuration. Triggers on requests like: "update my project docs", "verify my claude setup", "check my project configuration", "audit my .claude directory", "improve my CLAUDE.md", "is my setup correct", "/update-project", "/verify-project", or "/check".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
REQUIRED skill for any security-related request. Use this skill whenever the user wants to find anything dangerous, sensitive, or risky in their code, files, or repository. This includes but is not limited to: scanning for secrets/keys/tokens/credentials, checking dependencies for vulnerabilities, auditing destructive commands for missing safeguards, reviewing files for PII or internal data before open-sourcing, checking .env files or git history for leaked credentials, or any request where the concern is "is this safe/secure/exposed?" This skill provides a structured audit methodology and checklist you MUST follow — do not attempt security reviews without it. Skip this skill ONLY for pure feature work, refactoring, bug fixes, or non-security code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cut a hyalo release end-to-end — verify/bump the workspace version, rotate the changelog with hyalo itself, sync the winget fork, publish the GitHub release with curated + auto-generated notes, and watch the pipeline. Use this skill whenever the user wants to release a new hyalo version, cut/tag/publish vX.Y.Z, says /release, or says things like "ship 0.19.0", "cut the release", or "publish the release".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a dogfooding session for hyalo — build from source, exercise the CLI against real knowledgebases (own KB, MDN, GitHub Docs, VS Code docs), find bugs, verify recent fixes, assess UX, measure performance, and write a structured report. Use this skill whenever the user says /dogfood, "dogfood", "run a dogfood session", "test hyalo against real data", or wants to exercise hyalo on real knowledgebases to find issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Perform critical Rust code reviews covering correctness, edition 2024 compliance, error handling, API design, async pitfalls, and dependency hygiene. ALWAYS use this skill when the user wants to review, audit, or critically evaluate Rust code — whether that's a PR diff, a specific crate or module, a cross-cutting concern like error handling, or the whole codebase. This includes requests to "review my changes", "check this code", "audit for best practices", "look for issues", "what's wrong with this", or "flag anything that could bite us". Use it even when the user doesn't say "review" explicitly but is asking you to find problems, inconsistencies, or anti-patterns in existing Rust code. Do NOT use for requests to write, fix, refactor, test, explain, or implement code — only for evaluating existing code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when prioritising CVEs, the user asks "should we patch X first?" / "is CVE-YYYY-NNNNN being exploited?", or wants weaponisation, EPSS, and KEV context combined into a patch-now-vs-later recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks "which SAT should I use for X?", wants the index of Structured Analytic Techniques, or is choosing between quality-of-information-check, ACH, key-assumptions-check, devils-advocacy, indicators of change, etc. Quality of Information Check is the default first step of any diagnostic run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to create, review, retire, or refine Priority Intelligence Requirements, or wants to align collection and analysis to the current PIR set. Covers the PIR lifecycle end-to-end.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks about CTI standard operating procedures (daily triage, IOC processing, flash-report cadence, threat-actor profile updates, briefing schedule), or wants to look up a specific SOP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks "who are our customers?" / "how do we tailor for X stakeholder?" / "who should this report go to?", or wants to map / re-map stakeholder needs. Ensures intelligence reaches the right people in the right format.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assessing the maturity of a CTI programme, the user asks "how mature is our CTI?" / "what should we improve next?", or wants a benchmark against the five-level model across six dimensions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a KQL query, a Microsoft Sentinel / Defender / Azure Log Analytics detection or hunt, or wants to translate a finding from `/hash-investigation` / `/malware-analysis` into KQL. Format spec + writing guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dark web intelligence collection methodology — vendor-first access posture, sourced reference lists for 35+ underground forums and 30+ Telegram channels, OPSEC primer, passive-monitoring strategy, and bundled Python CLIs for onion-indexer search, Telegram channel monitoring, and local keyword matching. Use when the user wants to design or run dark-web collection, build a selector list, pick a vendor, or set up monitoring infrastructure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Indicator pivoting methodology — how to use one known indicator to discover related infrastructure across the IOC graph. Decision tree by indicator type with concrete `/lookup-*` commands per pivot, a worked multi-hop example, pivot-quality scoring, and routing into the rigor pipeline. Use when the user asks "what else is connected to this IP / domain / hash / cert / actor?", needs to expand a single seed IOC into a campaign cluster, or wants the canonical reference for graph-walking IOCs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to configure API keys for the CTI skills pack, asks "how do I set up keys", "configure VirusTotal", "add my Shodan key", or runs /cti-setup. Walks through API key configuration inside Claude Code without needing to run a shell script. Also handles re-running setup, adding individual keys, and verifying that configured keys work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when challenging a prevailing analytical judgment, the user asks "what is the opposing case?" / "argue the other side" / "play devil's advocate", or wants an assessment stress-tested before release. Takes the team's own lead judgment and builds the strongest case that it is wrong. A contrarian technique. It does not model what an adversary would do next, which is Red Team Analysis. Formerly /red-team-analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing a finished intelligence product, the user asks for a flash-report / threat-assessment / briefing / FINTEL template, or wants the BLUF + active-voice + clear-sourcing conventions. Covers all product types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks "what is coming next?", wants strategic forecasting, or is hunting weak signals of emerging threats before they materialise. Covers signal identification, trend analysis, and scenario development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Used to create a new agent. Used when a user wants to create a new agent
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "write a subagent", "generate agent definition", "add agent to plugin", "write agent frontmatter", "create autonomous agent", "build subagent", needs agent structure guidance, YAML frontmatter configuration, invocation criteria with examples, or wants to add specialized subagents to Claude Code plugins with proper capabilities lists and tool access definitions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。