「ngs」の検索結果

"Apply ethnographic methods including prolonged engagement, participant observation, thick description, and netnography to study cultures and communities. Use this skill when the user needs to design fieldwork with immersive observation, interpret cultural practices through thick description, study online communities via netnography, or when they ask 'how do I study a culture or community', 'what is participant observation', or 'how do I apply ethnography to online settings'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Granovetter's embeddedness theory to analyze how economic behavior is embedded in ongoing social relations, avoiding both over-socialized and under-socialized accounts. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why market transactions deviate from pure economic rationality, analyze how trust and social ties shape business dealings, evaluate structural vs relational embeddedness in inter-firm networks, or when they ask 'why do firms prefer existing partners over cheaper alternatives', 'how do social relationships shape economic outcomes', or 'is this market truly arms-length'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Design and conduct mixed methods research using convergent, explanatory sequential, or exploratory sequential strategies with genuine integration of qualitative and quantitative strands. Use this skill when the user needs to choose a mixed methods design, integrate qualitative and quantitative data at design, methods, or interpretation levels, justify mixing on pragmatist grounds, or when they ask 'which mixed methods design should I use', 'how do I integrate qual and quant findings', or 'is running both qual and quant enough to be mixed methods'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start your day with a prioritized sales briefing. Works standalone when you tell me your meetings and priorities, supercharged when you connect your calendar, CRM, and email. Trigger with "morning briefing", "daily brief", "what's on my plate today", "prep my day", or "start my day".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Interpret the three core financial statements (income statement, balance sheet, cash flow statement) to assess business health and performance. Use this skill when the user needs to read financial statements, understand profitability vs cash flow, evaluate a company's financial position, or prepare for investor/board meetings — even if they say 'explain these financials', 'are we making money', 'read this annual report', or 'what do these numbers mean'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Customize a Claude Code plugin for a specific organization's tools and workflows. Use when: customize plugin, set up plugin, configure plugin, tailor plugin, adjust plugin settings, customize plugin connectors, customize plugin skill, tweak plugin, modify plugin configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) for better search rankings and user experience. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose page speed issues, improve Largest Contentful Paint, reduce layout shift, or pass Google's page experience signals — even if they say 'my site is slow', 'Core Web Vitals failing', or 'page speed optimization'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Execute content SEO strategy from keyword research through content planning, writing, and on-page optimization. Use this skill when the user needs to create SEO-optimized content, perform keyword research, identify content gaps, or improve existing content rankings — even if they say 'content strategy', 'keyword research', or 'how to rank for this topic'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Calculate Wilson Score confidence intervals for ranking items by positive proportion with sample size correction. Use this skill when the user needs to rank products by ratings, sort content by approval rate, or build a 'best rated' list that accounts for sample size — even if they say 'rank by star rating', 'best rated with few reviews', or 'confidence-adjusted rating'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Bayesian averaging to rank items by combining observed ratings with prior expectations. Use this skill when the user needs to rank items with varying review counts, build a 'top rated' list that handles low-sample items fairly, or implement IMDB-style weighted rating — even if they say 'weighted average rating', 'IMDB formula', or 'ranking with prior'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Implement collaborative filtering for recommendations based on user behavior patterns. Use this skill when the user needs to build a recommendation engine from user-item interaction data, find similar users or items, or predict ratings — even if they say 'users who bought this also bought', 'similar users', or 'recommend based on behavior'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess identified vulnerabilities for exploitability, impact, and risk. Provide CVSS scoring and remediation strategies. Use when analyzing security findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forensic scan for npm/PyPI supply-chain compromise (Shai-Hulud/TeamPCP campaigns) — checks persistence, hook injection, compromised packages, IOC strings, C2, dead-man switches. Use when auditing a machine or repo for malicious dependencies. Trigger on "supply chain audit", "check for compromised packages", "Shai-Hulud", "scan for malicious deps".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze an existing codebase in parallel via 7 specialized mapper subagents. Outputs structured findings to docs/codebase/ for persistent cross-session context. Use when onboarding to a brownfield project or when reactive on-demand file reading is too slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design data models with Pydantic schemas, comprehensive validation rules, type annotations, and relationship mappings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch Claude Code documentation and help update configuration. Use /claude-code-guide <topic> where topic is: memory, skills, hooks, agents, settings, mcp, plugins, cli, overview, all

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits whether a machine-readable regelrecht law model is faithful to the LETTER of the wettekst — and strictly separates the wettekst (leading) from the toelichting (Nota/Memorie van Toelichting; explanatory, not a norm). Runs in critical passes per article/lid and detects four deviation classes: toelichting-bleed (a modeled criterion that the letter only states as an open norm, or not at all), missing verbatim elements (a word/condition such as a "tenzij" or a qualifier dropped from the model), wrong legal_basis anchoring (an endpoint hung on a "kapstok"-article while the operative norm lives elsewhere), and verbatim-drift in text: (an ingetrokken/older redaction). Also detects positief-lid vs uitsluitings-lid conflicts and checks the chapeau for an explicit derogation rule ("zo nodig in afwijking van het eerste lid") before judging precedence. Classifies every finding as modelfout (fix), wettekst-gevolg (report, do not fix), or letter-vs-toelichting-question (jurist decides what is leading + revision signal). Use when the user wants to know if a model is "dicht bij de letter", mentions letter vs toelichting/bedoeling, fidelity, "natuurgetrouw", or before trusting feature outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Front-door router voor het werken aan een regelrecht-dossier. Gebruik dit aan het begin van een dossier, of bij twijfel over waar te beginnen — het triageert de situatie en routeert naar de juiste skill (regelrecht-stelselanalyse voor desk-review/corpus-completion, regelrecht-audit-products voor live expert-validatie) en de juiste volgorde. Bevat het routeringsprincipe: feitelijke defecten routeren naar de desk, oordeels-/praktijkvragen naar de workshop. Dossier-agnostisch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bouwt de audit- en workshop-producten waarmee juridische experts een machine-leesbare (regelrecht-YAML) vertaling van wet- en regelgeving valideren in een live sessie. Gebruik dit bij het voorbereiden van een expert-workshop of validatie-sessie over een dossier, het maken van een scope-/stelselanalyse, per-artikel audit-checklists, facilitator-materiaal, testcase-scenario's, of sessie-verslagen (intern + extern). Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode (YAML, formules, untranslatables, source/override, legal_basis, engine-trace) is de vaste taal. Voor analytische desk-review van een corpus zonder live sessie (wetgevings-/stelselfouten, coverage, multi-agent review): zie de zusterskill regelrecht-stelselanalyse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or revise audience-ready HTML paper presentations for lab meetings and journal clubs. Use when Codex needs source-grounded figures and tables, a fluent live-talk narrative, verified quotations, varied explanatory diagrams, presenter-paced reveals, or browser QA for evidence fidelity, interaction, responsive layout, and print.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read every application.yaml in the workspace and report the state of the search — the ranked queue, what is waiting on you, what has gone quiet, and the regression of the pipeline's own predictions against actual outcomes. Writes the calibration findings back into job_search.md and preferences.yaml.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。