5,673 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Static application security testing (SAST) for changed source files — Vulnetix's built-in rule set plus optional Semgrep augmentation when `.semgrep` config is present. Use when reviewing a PR for code-level vulnerabilities, scanning a feature branch before merge, gating CI on critical findings, or running rule-specific checks for a known weakness class.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
技術図・概念図・比較図・データ図の情報設計、生成、掲載サイズでの画像レビュー、修正を行う。図解・構成図の作成、図の可読性改善、既存図のレビューに使う。UI画面設計や装飾イラストは対象外。
Refactor code to remove dead code, useless comments, unused variables, and unused imports. Use when asked to declutter a class, clean up noisy code, remove cruft, or run `/refactor:declutter`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write acceptance criteria for a Jira story using Given/When/Then scenarios. Use this skill when the user asks to write AC, acceptance criteria, write scenarios, improve a story, add AC to a ticket, or mentions a Jira ticket and wants better requirements. Also triggers on "write better AC", "this story needs AC", "add scenarios to this ticket", or when reviewing a Jira story for completeness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor duplicated code by extracting helpers, shared abstractions, or clearer reusable structure. Use when asked to apply DRY, remove duplication, consolidate repeated logic, or run `/refactor:dry`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up and manage a UI redesign experiment with three git worktree branches for modern minimal, bold creative, and classic refined design directions. Use when asked to run a UI redesign experiment, compare design approaches, or prototype multiple visual directions in parallel branches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor Swift code toward declarative functional programming with immutability, value types, pure functions, transformations, and closure-based APIs. Use when asked for functional refactoring or `/refactor:functional`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor long methods or large code blocks by extracting small, focused helper methods with clear names and narrow responsibilities. Use when asked to extract methods or run `/refactor:methods`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Heuristic-first software surgery for proof-backed, minimal-diff implementation: Contract to Invariants to Cut Rationale to inevitable incision to Proof. Use when users say "run /tw-tk", "patch-first", "keep the diff small", "state contract + invariants", "one clear incision", "fix it with a validation signal", or orchestration cues like "workers use /tw-tk" / "internally use /tw-tk".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor a class toward the Single Responsibility Principle by identifying responsibilities, grouping cohesive behavior, and extracting focused classes. Use when the user says `/srp`, asks for SRP refactoring, or runs `/refactor:srp`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze code for primitive obsession and plan value object extractions around domain concepts, validation, and grouped primitive fields. Use when the user says `/value-objects`, asks for value object refactoring, or runs `/refactor:value-objects`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refine an existing skill in place with minimal diffs. Trigger when asked to improve a skill's trigger description/frontmatter, workflow text, metadata, scripts/references/assets; also for requests to iterate, refactor, rename, or fix a skill using usage/session-mining evidence (for example from /tw-seq).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor code by renaming variables, methods, classes, and concepts for clearer intent. Use when asked to improve names, clarify naming, perform a naming pass, or run `/refactor:names`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a class or module for code smells and produce a prioritized refactoring plan. Use when the user asks for code smell analysis, says `/smells`, or runs `/refactor:smells`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compress review pressure into the right next action instead of more code by default. Classify findings, reject non-liabilities, and choose proof-only vs minimal-fix vs refactor-kernel, preventing one-patch-per-comment churn. Use after a code review — PR comments, reviewer suggestions, or audit findings — and especially when you are about to reflexively patch every comment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mine a codebase for breakthrough, evidence-backed opportunities — features, additions, refactors, simplifications, DX, UX, reliability, performance, or architecture cleanup. Researches project reality first, then forces two escalation gates (reject the merely-adequate idea; expand ambition 10x then collapse to the smallest proof-bearing artifact). Outputs ranked opportunities, an escalation ledger, and one plan seed. Does not implement or create tickets.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clarify ambiguous or conflicting requests by researching first, then asking only judgment calls. Use when prompts say "grill me", ask hard questions, request relentless interrogation, pressure-test assumptions, clarify scope/requirements, define success criteria, or request system-design/optimization decisions before implementation; stop before implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Mutation testing patterns for verifying test effectiveness. Use when analyzing branch code to find weak or missing tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct a Marty-Cagan-style opportunity assessment interview and produce a ~2-page Opportunity Brief in Confluence. Covers business objective, customer, problem, success metric, current alternatives, assumptions/risks, and what we don't know yet. Triggers on "opportunity brief", "opportunity assessment", "discovery brief", "who is this for", "why are we building this", "validate this idea", "product discovery", or any request to frame a feature before implementation. One question at a time. Records accepted research gaps as structured Confluence Decision pages with bidirectional links.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-launch review of a shipped PRD against the brief's success metrics. Did we move the metric? What did the data actually show? Which assumptions held, which broke? Which accepted-gap decisions resolved (confirmed vs. invalidated)? What would we do differently? Triggers on "outcome review", "did it work", "post-launch review", "did we move the metric", "retro the feature", "was it worth it". Produces a Confluence outcome-review page and updates the brief + linked decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rebuilds session context after a clear by reading git history, plans, and beads state. Triggers on 'catch up'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a Product Requirements Document (PRD) for a new feature. Use when planning a feature, starting a new project, or when asked to create a PRD. Triggers on: create a prd, write prd for, plan this feature, requirements for, spec out.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a bullet-point summary of branch changes for a PR description. Triggers on "changelog", "pr summary", "summarize branch", or "/changelog".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。