5,760 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
[Documentation] Use when (re)generating the DERIVED technical spec view over code + tests, or reporting canonical §8 TC/test-code drift. A GENERATOR — it projects code + tests into a regenerable per-component view and NEVER authors business content. Modes generate|audit|sync. Per-mode procedure lives in references/{author,sync}.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Testing] Use when you need full-site QA audit (accessibility, performance, security, SEO) with visual reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to perform a security review or audit on any scope — application code (OWASP Top 10 2025), secrets exposure, dependency/supply-chain malware, third-party repository vetting before install, infrastructure/config, CI/CD pipeline, AI-agent risks, and host/VPS compromise detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Project Management] Use when you need to enforce quality gates, verify compliance with standards, track quality metrics, and generate audit trails.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Architecture] Use when grading project architecture and scalability quality for greenfield init or brownfield audit: build/CI scalability, distributed-monolith risk, module isolation, dependency discipline, loose coupling, horizontal scaling, DRY, abstraction, clean architecture, observability, and delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Architecture] Use when auditing the ENTIRE project architecture and production readiness in one pass — bundles architecture-review + architecture-scalability-review + production-readiness-review at project or diff scope, then synthesizes one consolidated Architecture Health Report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing a repository for evidence-backed gaps between code, SPECs, architecture, and documentation — before a release, after a review, or when the user asks what is missing or divergent. Confirmed gaps become Draft SPECs via write-specs, a tracked GitHub Epic via create-issues, and orchestrated execution via orchestrator, with an explicit approval gate before any external action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Central entry point of the afonsoft agent harness. Use when starting a new project, resuming an existing one, planning features/Epics/releases, or running any multi-step agent-driven work. Validates and reconciles SPECs (SDD), audits the codebase and harness for gaps (security, architecture, performance, hygiene), proposes improvements, fragments work into GitHub Issues, delegates implementation/QA/review to specialized skills, and re-validates everything until delivery. Also use to review unapproved SPECs, reconcile open GitHub Issues with code, or run a final gap check before closing a release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing UI code for interface-guideline compliance (accessibility, forms, animation, images, performance, UX copy) and/or validating a deployed page against Lighthouse 95+ targets. Produces evidence-based findings (file:line + Lighthouse JSON) and turns confirmed pendencies into Draft SPECs via write-specs. Do NOT use to design/build UI from scratch (use design) or to fix findings inline — fixes go through the SPEC pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for QA analysis, test planning, test cases, or root-cause analysis of a defect. Also use for post-merge PR review analysis: auditing recent closed PRs for Devin/GitHub/security bot comments, verifying whether requested corrections were applied, and turning pending fixes into SPECs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffold and formally review a new Agent Skill in this marketplace repo. Covers valid SKILL.md generation, directory layout, registry entries, and spec auditing. Use when adding a skill, validating frontmatter, or checking marketplace readiness before a PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Replace with what this skill does and when to use it. Include trigger phrases users say, e.g. "audit my API", "scaffold a skill"; activation-critical routing belongs here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish or audit a structural quality contract for any agent-operated engineering repository: app, library, CLI/tool, plugin, harness, or meta repo. Use when a repo needs charter clarity, docs/decision ownership, type-native validation gates, evidence paths, safe action policy, cold-start legibility, maturity proof, repair-loop routing, consumer/producer owner-boundary routing, command surface evolution, evolutionary simplicity (see references/evolutionary-simplicity.md), or a repo ecology pass to decide what should be compressed, merged, removed, updated, created, retired, or moved to checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a Mixture of Experts (MoE) audit on any topic, plan, codebase, evidence archive, or process. Dynamically spawns specialized subagents with different critical lenses to cross-reference findings and detect flaws, overlap, retention issues, or drift. Use when designing architectures, analyzing complex code, verifying multi-step plans, classifying evidence artifacts, or looking for duplicated intent in a repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Requires durable citations when authoring or researching Agent Skills—maintain references/sources.md per skill, link external research, and record provenance in PRs. Use when creating skills, updating SKILL.md, doing web research for skills, or auditing missing sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs to update, improve, audit, or maintain documentation in a project. Covers READMEs, changelogs, API docs, inline comments, missing docs, and overall documentation quality. Works well before releases or when documentation has fallen behind the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or update this Windows computer's fixed third-party Codex helper toolchain when the user requests local helper-tool maintenance. Always show the complete registered list and obtain confirmation for each update group; exclude Codex itself and general runtimes unless explicitly added.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research-grounded typography for any text-bearing surface — web, PDF, email, documents. GENERATIVE: apply correct line length, font sizing, contrast, dark mode, mobile, and Japanese rules from the start when building any UI, page, layout, or document. REVIEW: audit existing CSS/HTML/templates for typography violations. Use this skill whenever you are writing CSS that touches font-size, line-height, max-width, color, or font-family. Use it when building any frontend component, page, or layout — even if the user doesn't mention typography. Use it when reviewing any rendered output for readability. Use it when generating PDFs, emails, or any formatted document. If text will be read by a human, this skill applies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage agent-skill lifecycles across local, global, project, Skill Hub, skills.sh, GitHub, plugin-cache, and system roots. Use when searching, recommending, installing, updating, upgrading, syncing, merging, auditing, deduplicating, cleaning, packaging, publishing, or validating skills; choosing project versus global scope; verifying upstream source, stars, or installs; or working with skill-upgrade, check_upstreams.ps1, sync-pull/push, junctions, skills-lock.json, or skill-upstreams.json. Do not use for ordinary software-package upgrades or non-skill file cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upgrade or synchronize Agent Skills, or determine a Skill's source and ownership across runtimes and roots. Use only for those lifecycle decisions. Do not use for installation, creation or editing, validation, inventory, usage statistics, general audits, cleanup, packaging, publishing, or ordinary file and package work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding, auditing, pruning, archiving, restoring, or reviewing Agent Notes in deepseek-harness; checks every new note for superseded active records, classifies implemented notes by future decision value, deletes rejected notes that no longer prevent a tempting fallacy, and applies the frozen archived/{kind} triplet and manifest rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working in the deepseek-harness repo to find non-obvious simplification candidates, write proposed Agent Notes or inline TODO/FIXME/XXX notes, audit or coalesce superseded Agent Notes, or fold worthwhile simplification ideas from another PR; especially for dead, duplicated, speculative, over-built, added-then-removed, or hand-rolled-where-a-dependency-exists surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Invoice-Downloader work involves mailbox batch tests, truth audit, regression validation, P0/P1/P2 decisions, packaged frontend acceptance, or clean reruns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, reviewing, restoring, trimming, or auditing prose in the deepseek-harness repo, including deciding where documentation or comments are required across Markdown, JSDoc, code and test comments, prompts, descriptions, diagnostics, and CLI or UI strings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。