「can」の検索結果

Provisional sector-specific Plain Language standard for document design (based on ISO/WD 24495-5, under development). Applied when structuring complex documents so readers can find and navigate content through layout, visual hierarchy, and navigation aids.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a whole regression suite and prune/restructure it with evidence: per-test coverage fingerprinting, AST near-duplicate clustering, CI-history mining for never-failing and flaky tests, prune decision rules (redundant/obsolete/low-value/keep), smoke/core/extended tiering by risk and defect-detection history, and a defensible "what we deleted and why" record. Deletion is destructive — quarantine and human sign-off are mandatory. Use when: "audit the test suite," "prune redundant tests," "find duplicate tests," "which tests can we delete," "restructure into smoke/core/extended," "is this test pulling its weight," "shrink the regression suite." Not for: Judging whether an individual test is WELL-WRITTEN (smells, assertions) — that is ai-qa-review. Healing one flaky test at runtime — that is test-reliability. Bulk selector regeneration after a UI refactor — that is selector-drift-recovery. Related: ai-qa-review, coverage-analysis, test-reliability, risk-based-testing, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate system resilience through controlled fault injection. Covers hypothesis-driven chaos experiments, failure injection types (network, service, infrastructure, dependency), LitmusChaos/Chaos Mesh/AWS FIS/Gremlin/toxiproxy tooling, automated abort gating, game day planning, and progressive chaos adoption. Use when: "chaos engineering," "fault injection," "resilience test," "game day," "failure recovery," "system reliability," "blast radius." Not for: safe rollout flags/canary/dark launch during a release — use testing-in-production; designing new tests from production telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: testing-in-production, observability-driven-testing, performance-testing, release-readiness, test-environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a vague bug report into a VERIFIED minimal reproduction and then a failing regression test, agent-driven end to end. Covers extracting the implicit repro from a thin report (env, build, steps, data), the reproduce-minimize-isolate-capture loop, git bisect to find the introducing commit, building a deterministic minimal repro (fixed seeds, frozen time, stubbed network), writing the failing regression test BEFORE the fix (red) and confirming the fix flips it green, and writing repro evidence back into the ticket. Distinguishes flaky-not-reproducible from environment-specific. Use when: "reproduce this bug," "minimal reproduction," "repro steps," "find the commit that broke it," "git bisect," "make the repro deterministic," "write a failing test for this bug," "regression test for a defect," "can't reproduce this bug." Not for: Classifying/deduplicating/severity-routing existing failures without reproducing them — that is ai-bug-triage. Generating tests from specs rather than from a defect — that is ai-test-generation. Related: ai-bug-triage, ai-test-generation, test-reliability, systematic-debugging, qa-project-context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test for regulatory compliance: GDPR/CMP consent verification, Google Consent Mode v2, Global Privacy Control (GPC), CCPA/US state opt-out, EU AI Act Article 50 transparency, Better Ads Standards, and cookie-inventory auditing. Covers automated consent-flow testing, third-party script blocking before consent, and cookie drift detection. Use when: "GDPR test," "compliance," "CMP test," "cookie consent," "consent mode," "CCPA," "GPC," "AI Act," "Better Ads," "privacy banner." Not for: WCAG/axe-core test authoring — use accessibility-testing. Not for: OWASP/vuln scanning — use security-testing. Not for: evaluating your LLM feature's quality or safety — use ai-system-testing. Related: accessibility-testing, security-testing, ai-system-testing, ci-cd-integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use production telemetry as INPUT to design new tests. Covers OpenTelemetry integration with tests, trace-based assertions, log-informed test creation, production-error analysis for coverage gaps, and telemetry-driven test prioritization. Use when: "trace-based testing," "design tests from logs," "OpenTelemetry assertions," "production errors point to test gaps," "telemetry-driven testing." Not for: safe rollout techniques (flags, canary) during release — use testing-in-production. Not for: scheduled post-deploy probes — use synthetic-monitoring. Not for: triaging CI failures — use ai-bug-triage. Related: testing-in-production, synthetic-monitoring, qa-metrics, ai-bug-triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up HOL Guard, protecting local AI harnesses, reviewing Guard approvals or receipts, or scanning agent plugins, skills, MCP servers, and marketplace packages before use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the changes from all open Renovate bot pull requests of a GitHub repository into the local working tree. Use this skill when asked to apply, merge locally, consolidate, batch, or try out Renovate/dependabot-style dependency update PRs so the combined upgrade can be built and tested in one go. This skill only modifies local files; it never commits, pushes, merges, or closes anything on GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Commercial Property Analysis — NOI, cap rate, expense ratio, tenant mix, vacancy, debt coverage, replacement cost, and lease analysis with Commercial Score (0-100)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a huge chunk of work (more than one agent session can hold) as a shared map of decision tickets on your issue tracker, and resolve them one at a time until the way to the destination is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a report — HTML on request — then grill through whichever one you pick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Let AKA autonomously add, run, inspect, and revise intra-kernel timeline probes for standalone CUDA/inline PTX or CuTe DSL when ordinary benchmark, NSYS, or NCU evidence cannot answer a specific kernel-internal timing question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovery, download, and configuration hub for the entire aelf agent skill ecosystem. Use when the user wants to: (1) explore or list available aelf skills, (2) install/bootstrap aelf skills into Cursor, Claude Desktop, OpenClaw, Codex, or Claude Code, (3) route an aelf-related intent to the correct skill, (4) check health or audit installed skills, (5) onboard a new skill into the aelf ecosystem. Covers domains: Portkey CA wallet, Portkey EOA wallet, Awaken DEX, eForest NFT marketplace, AelfScan explorer, TomorrowDAO governance, aelf node interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess competitor defensibility and define our own moat strategy during PRD v0.3 Commercial Model. Triggers on requests to analyze competitor moats, define our defensibility, assess switching costs, identify vulnerabilities, find wedge opportunities, or when user asks "what's our moat?", "how defensible are they?", "where can we compete?", "switching costs?", "defensibility", "who to target". Consumes Competitive Landscape (v0.2) CFD- entries. Outputs CFD- entries for competitor moats and BR- entries for targeting rules and our defensibility strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Seed a fresh (greenfield) repository with the PRD-Driven Context Engineering scaffold — PRD.md, SoT/ knowledge files, EPIC templates, domain-profile config, and agent MEMORY starters. Invoked as /prd-ce:init when the plugin is installed. The framework itself (skills, agents, hooks, scripts) ships LIVE in the plugin; this skill only plants the consumer-owned files the plugin cannot carry as behavior. Triggers on "/prd-ce:init", "set up PRD lifecycle here", "scaffold a new PRD-CE project", "initialize the methodology". Outputs a seeded scaffold + a verification report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish baseline → snapshot → compare → history monitoring for any KPI, config, or metric that can drift during PRD v0.8 Deployment & Ops. Triggers on requests to monitor drift, baseline a value for later comparison, or when user asks "how do we track if X changes?", "baseline this", "config drift", "performance regression", "metric drift", "compare to last week", "is this getting worse?". Outputs MON-DRIFT-* entries with baseline + comparison rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working on the Bolt repository and you need to configure or compile code correctly and efficiently. This skill defines the canonical Bolt build workflow, including when and how to run `make`, `cmake --build ...`, and when build reconfiguration is necessary due to added files and test or build target changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在 rove 仓库内跑 auto-motion——把 transcription.srt 拆成多段 MG 动画镜头并拼接成竖屏视频(storyboard 分镜 + theme.md 全片主题 + 逐镜头 claude -p 子进程 + ffmpeg 拼接)。本 skill 是薄 wrapper:解析 auto-motion 模板根,继承 rove 品牌 theme,执行逻辑以 auto-motion 仓库的 canonical SKILL.md 为准。当用户说"跑 auto-motion"、"把这个字幕稿/口播稿做成视频"、"给 rove 做一条 MG 宣传片"时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a short, design-led motion graphic where motion is the message: kinetic typography, stat or number count-up, chart/data-viz hit, logo sting, brand lockup, lower-third, callout, social overlay, animated headline/tweet/news item, motion poster, or quick captured-page highlight. Usually under 10s and up to ~30s, with no live-action subject. Can render to MP4 or transparent overlay. Not for longer, multi-scene, or brand-reel pieces (use general-video), topic explainers (faceless-explainer), PR videos (pr-to-video), or captions on existing footage (embedded-captions). When unsure whether it's a quick motion-first piece or a longer treatment, see /hyperframes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply to any non-trivial work, not just bulk work: edits, migrations, analyses, checks. Build the tool that does it or proves it (codemod, script, generator, or a skill your subagents follow) instead of working by hand. The tool is the artifact a reviewer can rerun.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which package owns this", "is this the right layer"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding mental models. Can critique architecture. Use why for motivation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey a whole React codebase as a senior React engineer, using React Doctor's scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "improve the React code", "audit this codebase", "make this app faster / more robust", or wants a roadmap of fixes rather than a review of a single diff. For a regression check or a fix-it-now pass, use the `react-doctor` skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。