「ngs」の検索結果

Queries and retrieves active security findings, external exposures, toxic combinations, vulnerabilities, threats, and sensitive data risks from Google Cloud Security Command Center. Use when retrieving details for a security finding by its name, validating finding scope (e.g., verifying findingClass is TOXIC_COMBINATION, VULNERABILITY, EXTERNAL_EXPOSURE, or THREAT), or fetching finding details for triage. Don't use to draft remediations, apply patches, or execute configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a Gemini LiveAPI client service class in the user's chosen programming language. Use when the user wants to build, scaffold, or integrate a client that connects to the Gemini Enterprise LiveAPI websocket endpoint, handles session setup/resumption, bearer token refresh, and sending/receiving `ClientMessage`/`ServerMessage` protos. Don't use for general (non-live, non-bidirectional) Gemini API usage such as one-shot `generateContent`, embeddings, image/video generation, or fine-tuning — use the `gemini-api` skill for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates valid PromQL queries from Cloud Monitoring metric descriptors and resource parameters. Use when asked to create, generate, write, or format PromQL queries, PromQL strings, or PromQL aggregations for Cloud Monitoring metrics and resources. Don't use for raw metric discovery or metric selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show real token usage and estimated savings for the current session. Reads directly from the Claude Code session log — no AI estimation. Triggers on /caveman-stats. Output is injected by the mode-tracker hook; the model itself does not compute the numbers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Caveman Cloud evidence read-only: costs, Cave Score, Cave Plan, workflows, traces, latency, errors, compression, routing, and verified savings. Use when the user asks what Caveman found, where LLM spend goes, why cost or quality changed, which workflows need attention, or asks for a trace or analytics review. Prefer Caveman MCP tools; fall back to CLI JSON.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rename Pharo methods safely through Genie's `rename_method` MCP refactoring tool. Use when a selector should be renamed while preserving behavior, updating senders and symbol references across the live image, including as one step in larger refactorings such as clarify API names, split responsibilities, or move behavior behind better messages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standalone testing skill — owns writing and running tests, verifying behavior, and two-pass TDD orchestration. Default mode analyzes changed scope and runs the relevant tests; `--unit`/`--integration`/`--e2e`/`--all` scope by test type; `--verify` reruns exactly the prior failures; `--all-phases <plan>` sweeps every completed phase for regression. `--tdd --prepare`/`--tdd --verify` bracket `ck:cook` for red-green TDD. Never edits production code, and blocks until a phase's `ck:quality` gate is APPROVED (except `--tdd --prepare`, which runs before any implementation exists).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PM (Project Manager / Scrum Master) agent. Reads BA and TechLead artifacts and produces sprint plan, task breakdown, and story point estimates. Creates one tracked todo/checklist item per sprint task for live pipeline tracking (FR-42). Part of the Virtual Team Skill pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a machine-readable phased JSON plan bundle from a spec or feature description. Produces a compact master manifest plus per-phase step files for resumable ck:cook execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-pipeline orchestrator. Runs all 7 roles (BA → TechLead → PM → BE Dev → FE Dev → Tester → QA/QC) in sequence by loading and following each per-role skill. Uses pre_write_validator.py hook enforcement and each role's self-validation. Use per-agent commands ($team-ba, $team-techlead, etc.) for manual control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate IEEE 830 SRS from raw requirements. Use when the user says "write SRS", "generate requirements doc", "analyze requirements", "I have raw requirements from a client", or pastes a client email/chat/PRD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full SRS workflow: Brainstorm → Spec → Plan (per-section files) → User Review → SRS Generation → Validation → Improvement Report → Context Save. Use when user provides a project topic and wants a complete requirements pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 1 of the SRS workflow. User gives a project topic → AI runs a deep, categorized brainstorm (5 mandatory rounds) to fully understand actors, features, scope boundary, tech constraints, and business rules before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispatch to the right problem-solving technique based on how you're stuck

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flip core assumptions to reveal hidden constraints and alternative approaches - "what if the opposite were true?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 9 of the SRS workflow. Saves all project context to _context/ files so future Claude sessions can resume without re-reading the full SRS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 9 of the SRS workflow. Saves all project context to _context/ files so future sessions can resume without re-reading the full SRS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create diagrams and visualizations using Mermaid.js v11 syntax. Use when generating flowcharts, sequence diagrams, class diagrams, state diagrams, ER diagrams, Gantt charts, user journeys, timelines, architecture diagrams, or any of 24+ diagram types. Supports JavaScript API integration, CLI rendering to SVG/PNG/PDF, theming, configuration, and accessibility features. Essential for documentation, technical diagrams, project planning, system architecture, and visual communication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full SRS workflow: Brainstorm → Spec → Plan (per-section files) → User Review → SRS Generation → Validation → Improvement Report → Context Save. Use when user provides a project topic and wants a complete requirements pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。