「apps」の検索結果

Hunting skill for cache poison vulnerabilities. Built from 10 public bug bounty reports including X-Forwarded-Host poisoning, X-HTTP-Method-Override / GCS cache, reflected→stored XSS via cache, classic Omer-Gil Web Cache Deception, Cloudflare Cache Deception Armor bypass, session-token cache deception, Akamai hop-by-hop smuggling → server-side edge poisoning, and Kettle's 2024 path-normalization WCD against Cloudflare/Fastly/GCP. Host/X-Forwarded-Host injection that reaches app logic (reset-link poisoning, routing SSRF, OAuth issuer) is owned by hunt-host-header; this skill owns the case where the poisoned response is CACHED and served to other users. Use when hunting cache poisoning, Web Cache Deception, CDN-fronted apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt LLM/AI feature bugs — prompt injection, indirect injection, exfiltration via tool-use/markdown, ASCII smuggling, agentic AI security (OWASP Agentic Apps 2026, ASI01-ASI10). Patterns: direct injection ('ignore previous instructions'), indirect injection via documents/web pages/email the model reads, ASCII smuggling (Unicode Tags block U+E0000-U+E007F, invisible to humans, decoded by the model), tool-use exfiltration (model has fetch/browse tool, attacker injects OOB URL, model exfils chat history/secrets), markdown-image zero-click exfil, system-prompt extraction, IDOR-via-AI (cross-tenant data). Targets: chatbots, RAG, summarizers, agentic copilots, MCP tools. Detection: any LLM-backed endpoint, doc upload triggering AI processing, autonomous agent with tools. Validate: OOB/Collaborator callback for exfil, verbatim-reproducible system-prompt leak (run twice), verifiable cross-tenant leak or RCE. Confabulation is NOT a finding. Use when hunting AI features, chatbots, RAG, agentic systems, MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end Android APK red-team pipeline — automated APK acquisition (Play Store + apkpure + apkmirror fallback), jadx decompilation, secret/URL/JWT/Firebase grep, pinned-cert extraction, exported-component enumeration, Frida runtime instrumentation templates, intent-injection probes. Built from an authorized external red-team engagement where 7 APKs were pulled manually, 4 download attempts truncated, and a hardcoded JWT + 30 internal API endpoints were recovered from one of the apps. Use when target has a mobile app catalogue (Play Store developer page), when you find an APK URL hosted on a web server, or when post-recon mentions "mobile app" in scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open and operate Agent-Native workspace apps through Dispatch MCP, with inline app surfaces, browser-session authentication, and current screen state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished design artifacts as self-contained HTML: UI mockups, interactive prototypes, wireframes, landing pages, dashboards, app screens, mobile apps, slide decks (a.k.a. PPT / PowerPoint presentations), documents and résumés, animations, 3D objects, research reports, HTML email, diagrams, fliers, and visual explorations. Use whenever the user asks to design, mock up, prototype, wireframe, visualize, explore, or make a PPT/deck for an interface, product screen, user flow, content layout, visual artifact, or pitch/deck concept, even if they do not say "design". Also use to export a deck built with this skill to PowerPoint (PPT/PPTX) — but only decks authored here (deck-stage / this skill's slide-structured HTML), NOT arbitrary HTML, so confirm the target is such a deck first. Also use for setting up, importing, or authoring reusable design systems, UI kits, brand tokens, or component libraries. Harness-agnostic for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex Agent, and similar file-capable agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect ChatGPT, Claude or another MCP client to this bb, and list or disconnect the apps that have access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

React Native and Expo best practices for building performant mobile apps. Use when building React Native components, optimizing list performance, implementing animations, or working with native modules. Triggers on tasks involving React Native, Expo, mobile performance, or native platform APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploying Expo apps to iOS App Store, Android Play Store, web hosting, and API routes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, audit, and fix @legendapp/list and LegendList usage in React, React Native, and web apps. Use for virtualization, scroll blanking, mount cost, data identity, recycling, row invalidation, measurement, chat anchoring, drawDistance, visibility, or Legend List performance regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete guide for building beautiful apps with Expo Router. Covers fundamentals, styling, components, navigation, animations, patterns, and native tabs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, refactor, or review macOS menubar apps that use Tuist and SwiftUI. Use when creating or maintaining LSUIElement menubar utilities, defining Tuist targets/manifests, implementing model-client-store-view architecture, adding script-based launch flows, or validating reliable local build/run behavior without Xcode-first workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and improve SwiftUI runtime performance from code review and architecture. Use for requests to diagnose slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU/memory usage, excessive view updates, or layout thrash in SwiftUI apps, and to provide guidance for user-run Instruments profiling when code review alone is insufficient.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and optimize React component performance issues (slow renders, re-render thrash, laggy lists, expensive computations). Use when asked to profile or improve a React component, reduce re-renders, or speed up UI updates in React apps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffold, build, and package SwiftPM-based macOS apps without an Xcode project. Use when you need a from-scratch macOS app layout, SwiftPM targets/resources, a custom .app bundle assembly script, or signing/notarization/appcast steps outside Xcode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, validate, publish, update, inspect, query, roll back, or archive a dynamic Marina applet. Use for Artifact+-style web apps that should run behind Marina authentication, carry small bundled assets or data, use an applet-owned Postgres schema, or add a trusted Python ASGI backend without a Marina image deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or evolve a complex agent-enabled Tutti workspace app repository. Use for Tutti apps with web/server/shared monorepos, @tutti-os/agent-acp-kit local agent runtimes, kit-owned TUTTI_CLI agent/composer discovery, dynamic agent catalogs, run-scoped MCP tool gateways, app-owned package builders, web-first debugging, i18n harnesses, and production package validation. For simple package creation or repair, use tutti-workspace-app-factory instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs and needs up-to-date official documentation with citations (for example: Codex, Responses API, Chat Completions, Apps SDK, Agents SDK, Realtime, model capabilities or limits); prioritize OpenAI docs MCP tools and restrict any fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DNAnexus cloud genomics platform. Build apps/applets, manage data (upload/download), dxpy Python SDK, run workflows, FASTQ/BAM/VCF, for genomics pipeline development and execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Upload files directly to Google Drive via a deployed Google Apps Script web app. Trigger on: upload to Drive, save to Drive, send to Drive, put this in Drive. Also Hebrew: "תעלה לדרייב", "שמור בדרייב", "העלה לגוגל דרייב". Use proactively when a workflow produces a file the user might want in Drive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and run Holoscan Sensor Bridge example applications on a connected devkit. Filters available apps by the user's platform, HSB software version, board type, and sensors. Supports timed execution, failure analysis, code-edit suggestions, and iterative re-runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on DOCA Comch work on a host + BlueField pair — bringing up host ↔ DPU PCIe control-plane messaging, picking server (DPU) vs client (host) roles, choosing slow-path send-task / recv-callback vs fast-path producer / consumer, querying max-msg-size or max-clients capabilities, registering connection callbacks, or debugging DOCA_ERROR_* returns from the Comch API. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "DOCA Comch" or "Comm Channel" (renamed in DOCA 2.5) — typical implicit phrasings include "send a control message from host to BlueField over PCIe", "DPU can't see the host representor", "DOCA_ERROR_NOT_PERMITTED on server_create", "DOCA_ERROR_AGAIN on task_send submit", "connect callback never fires", or "stream bulk data from a host driver to a DPU agent". Refuse and route elsewhere for installing DOCA itself, BFB / firmware bring-up, non-Comch DOCA libraries, or deploying Comch apps at scale — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is operating the DOCA Firefly Service container on BlueField — picking the four PTP configuration axes (role / profile / domain / interface), wiring the BlueField PHC + host follower + consumer workload pairing, deciding whether PTP-grade time is even needed (vs. chrony / NTP), or debugging a Firefly deployment where PTP isn't syncing or the host clock isn't following. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "DOCA Firefly" or "PTP" — typical implicit phrasings include "container green but PTP never advances past LISTENING", "Firefly says synced but the host clock still drifts", "sync acquired but offset is tens of microseconds", "my Rivermax SMPTE workload needs PTP", or "is chrony good enough". Refuse and route elsewhere for installing DOCA, host-side chrony / ptp4l config bodies, PTP topology / boundary-clock design, building DOCA apps that read the disciplined PHC, or other DOCA services (DMS, Flow-Inspector, HBN) — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。