「bugs」の検索結果

Build, modify, audit, repair, optimize, debug, and deploy agents with Agentforce Agent Script. TRIGGER when: user creates, reviews, or changes .agent files or aiAuthoringBundle metadata; asks to fix AgentScript, audit an existing agent, run an AgentScript health check, common-pitfall review, or baseline-versus-candidate repair loop; changes a response, action, subagent, route, state flow, or Agent Spec; previews, debugs, deploys, publishes, or tests agents; uses sf agent generate/preview/publish/test; or manages Agentforce MCP servers, tools, assets, or authentication. DO NOT TRIGGER when: Apex, Flow, Prompt Template, Experience Cloud, or general Salesforce CLI work is unrelated to Agent Script; or the primary input is a production session or trace ID rather than an agent artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill on every programming task — writing code, fixing bugs, refactoring, explaining code, running tools, or answering technical questions. Apply token-saving and quality-preserving practices throughout. Activate even when the user doesn't explicitly ask for efficiency — this skill is always relevant for software development work. Do not skip this skill for "simple" tasks; the rules apply at every scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test-driven development with red-green-refactor loop. Use when user wants to build features or fix bugs using TDD, mentions "red-green-refactor", wants integration tests, or asks for test-first development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run real browser QA with Playwright. Use when testing a frontend feature, verifying UI before PR, smoke testing after deploy, or investigating reported visual bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematically explore and test a web application to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to "dogfood", "QA", "exploratory test", "find issues", "bug hunt", "test this app/site/platform", or review the quality of a web application. Produces a structured report with full reproduction evidence -- step-by-step screenshots, repro videos, and detailed repro steps for every issue -- so findings can be handed directly to the responsible teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-fix bugs. Observe symptom, find root cause, apply minimal fix, verify, explain in human terms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your habits, imprinted on AI. Learns how you work from conversation, builds a portable profile, and applies judgment that adapts to you: when to act, when to check with you, when to follow the project's rules over your own defaults. Use this skill whenever the user starts a new session, opens a project, writes or reviews code, debugs, plans, or writes commits. If .dna.md does not exist yet, start the onboarding conversation before doing anything else. Active in almost every working session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests a real web user flow with a browser by asserting semantic behavior, network and loading states, keyboard access, responsive layouts, and stable visual evidence. Use for browser bugs, end-to-end UI behavior, responsive or accessibility checks, and screenshot baselines. Not for static source review without a browser or for backend-only tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and debugs Playwright E2E suites. Use when authoring browser tests, fixing flakes, or hardening Playwright CI and locator strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when diagnosing PlainTab bugs, broken UI behavior, failing extension/web-mode flows, storage or wallpaper regressions, startup issues, or performance regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude adapter for diagnosing PlainTab bugs, broken flows, startup issues, storage or wallpaper regressions, and performance regressions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain the slopus/happy open source project. Triage issues, manage the GitHub project board, draft closing comments, find duplicates, check if bugs are fixed on main, and engage with community contributors. NEVER posts comments or closes issues without showing exact text and getting approval first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Static code review of the active diff: trace changed paths and report concrete P1/P2/P3 correctness, security, or spec bugs with file:line evidence. Use for code review or bug checks. Not runtime QA.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map test coverage to GDD critical paths, identify fixed bugs without regression tests, flag coverage drift from new features, and maintain tests/regression-suite.md. Run after implementing a bug fix or before a release gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates a structured bug report from a description, or analyzes code to identify potential bugs. Ensures every bug report has full reproduction steps, severity assessment, and context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for every task that plans, writes, edits, debugs, tests, refactors, reviews, or maintains code. Apply to professional repositories, scripts, apps, services, prototypes, beginner work, vibe coding, and bounded code changes inside large systems. Choose the fewest clear lines, files, paths, states, and abstractions that correctly implement the requested behavior. Do not invent fallbacks, compatibility paths, defensive layers, or future scale without evidence. Do not use for ordinary conversation, emotional support, prose, translation, summarization, social-media content, or general research or technical discussion that is not part of planning, changing, or reviewing code. Never weaken real security, integrity, concurrency, compatibility, privacy, accessibility, legal, or regulatory requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactoring code: variable naming, function extraction, magic number constants, dead code removal. Does not change behavior. Not for bugs/security (Judge), tests (Radar), or features (Builder).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantifying priority by scoring competing items with ICE/RICE/WSJF/MoSCoW/Cost of Delay/Kano. No code. Use to prioritize features/bugs/initiatives or arbitrate Must vs Should at MVP scoping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review source files changed during a phase for bugs, security issues, and code quality problems

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage tickets — initiatives, epics, stories, bugs. Use when the user says "create a new initiative", "slice this initiative", "split this epic up", "break this into stories", "incept this epic", "make a ticket", "refine this ticket", "what's ready", "status of a story", "publish ticket changes", "validate these tickets", "set up the ticket store".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a plan or concrete work prompt end-to-end. Use when implementing from docs/plans, a spec path, or a clear build request; use ce-debug for open-ended bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured code review for bugs, regressions, tests, and standards. Use before PRs or when asked for review; interactive mode can fix locally, while mode:agent reports only for pipeline callers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Simplify recently changed code for clarity, reuse, quality, and efficiency while preserving behavior. Use for tidy/refactor passes; use ce-debug for bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Python solution against a markdown spec, run it, and report bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。