「consistency」の検索結果

Audit and repair a kohya-style LoRA dataset before training. Use when the user asks to check, validate, inspect, fix, clean, 体检, or 修 a dataset, captions, or tags. Inspect image count, repeats and step budget, resolution and aspect buckets, duplicates, corrupt or non-RGB images, missing or empty captions, trigger consistency, and tag-frequency hygiene. Return a structural PASS, WARN, or FAIL report and apply only confirmed fix_dataset.py actions, dry-run first with displaced originals quarantined.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, debugging, or improving TBQ3/TB language code for trading correctness, Bar strategy behavior, order direction, position state, sizing, costs, backtest realism, event timing, multi-symbol logic, or function documentation consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Verify whether an image or video is authentic, original and correctly captioned — provenance checks, error level analysis, noise and JPEG compression analysis, clone and copy-move detection, lighting and shadow consistency, C2PA… Use when fact-checking a photo or video, checking for a deepfake or AI-generated image, spotting manipulation, or testing whether footage is recycled or miscaptioned

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits WordPress plugin or theme PHP code for internationalization (i18n) correctness — text-domain consistency, use of escaped translation helpers (esc_html__, esc_attr__, esc_html_e), correct placeholder helpers (sprintf with translator comments, _n for plurals, _x for context), no variable text-domains, no concatenation inside __() calls, presence of load_plugin_textdomain or load_theme_textdomain, and matching declared Text Domain in the plugin/theme header. Use before plugin/theme release, when reviewing contributor PRs, when adding new strings, when migrating to a new text domain, or when a translator reports issues with the .pot file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "check if our surfaces have drifted from the canon", "watch for competitor repositioning", or "define when we should reposition"; produces a drift report — self-drift per flagship surface vs the narrative-registry canon over time (via wayback.py, change history Measured with as-of dates), competitor-repositioning alerts, an explicit repositioning-trigger condition set, and a D1/W1/M1 message-shift retro (intended vs actual pull-through, evidence-labeled) — feeding the TALE L drift-audit sub-items and the narrative-whiplash guardrail fact base. Not for the first-time consistency check before a surface ships — use narrative-cascade-planner; not for computing the TALE profile result or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for echo-rate / AI-answer resonance measurement — use narrative-resonance-monitor. 自漂移监测/竞品重定位告警/重定位触发/叙事漂移复盘

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit our brand narrative" or "is this message on-canon"; runs separate typed TALE truth, system, or effectiveness profiles and never averages them into one composite. Checks differentiation, canon, landing consistency, and evidence integrity. Not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for social operations — use social-quality-auditor. 品牌叙事分层审计/发布前一致性放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan how our narrative lands on every surface", "write per-surface message-match specs", or "brief each creative builder from the canon"; maps the narrative-registry canon onto every flagship surface (homepage, pricing, store listing, sales deck, social bio, docs, email) as a per-surface message-match spec — what claim, pillar, proof, and objection reframe each surface must carry — and cuts a handoff brief to each discipline's creative builder (content-writer, ad-creative-builder, email-creative-builder, social-creative-builder, message-house-builder), so the same story lands consistently everywhere. Not for writing the finished surface copy — use each discipline creative builder; not for the tier-scoped launch asset manifest — use launch-asset-packager; not for scoring cross-surface consistency — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 叙事落地/逐面消息一致/创意交接简报/画布传导

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end SEO operations for B2B SaaS organic visibility. Use this skill when you need keyword research, technical SEO audits, content optimization, link building strategy, international expansion, AI/AEO optimization, schema markup, Core Web Vitals improvements, and organic traffic growth planning. Also triggers on: SEO, keyword research, technical SEO, link building, content optimization, international SEO, hreflang, x-default, multilingual site, translated pages not ranking, our German site gets no traffic, language switcher, auto-redirect by country, machine translation SEO, content parity, ccTLD vs subfolder, AI search, AEO, GEO, Core Web Vitals, schema markup, organic traffic, G2 listing, Capterra, TrustRadius, review-platform category page, best software roundup, listicle placement, directory submissions, do we need a Google Business Profile in [country], local SEO with no office, Google Business Profile eligibility, virtual office address SEO, coworking address business profile, business profile suspended, NAP consistency, local citations for SaaS, LocalBusiness schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure architecture docs define RPO/RTO, failover paths, data consistency, and DR drillability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure designs define data flow, state ownership, consistency boundaries, and cross-boundary writes to prevent drift and incidents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review whether the PR description is review-ready and consistent with the diff (Why/What, impact, tests, linked issues).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure design changes stay consistent across ADRs, diagrams, and specs; decisions are traceable; and drift is explicitly managed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

同一ファイル/隣接ファイル内で「規則Xを守れ」と宣言した直後にXを破っている、宣言と実装の乖離を検出する

Detects domain terms drifting between code identifiers and the established ubiquitous language (same concept under different names, or different concepts sharing a name).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure API design follows RESTful naming and consistent conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

指摘対応の反復（レビューコメント→修正→再レビュー）で、個別には正しい修正の蓄積が当初スコープを逸脱した（scope creep）、または成立済みの前提（"動いていた"状態）を破壊した（premise break）連鎖を diff-time で検出する。技術的正しさとスコープ整合性を別軸で評価し、report-only で finding/question のみ出力する。1コメント単位のトリアージ・構造変更後の caller 残骸・plan 前提解消は隣接 skill へ委譲する

新実装が、同種の先行実装（同レイヤ・同責務・同概念）に在る防御 / バリデーション / エラー処理 / 規約 / 共通化ロジック / 概念定義を、欠落・重複・食い違いなく継承しているかを grep で先行特定して確認する

Evidence-driven application audit protocol for security, authorization, privacy, concurrency, state integrity, reliability, performance, accessibility, visual consistency, responsive behavior, and release readiness. Use for incremental checks, pre-merge review, pre-launch audits, high-stakes deep audits, AI-generated code review, hardening, or release-gate design. Prefer this protocol over ad-hoc review when the user asks whether software is safe or ready to ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan downstream specs for contradictions with locked decisions and apply approved fixes with consistency checks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Present and apply contradiction fixes one-by-one, flag assumptions, run consistency checks, and write propagation record

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate sequencing and cross-layer readiness before phase slicing, including coverage and consistency hard gates

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cascade approved evolution changes through downstream layers, assess impact, run consistency checks, and write evolution audit record

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Azure Cosmos Db — azure Cosmos DB throughput analysis, partition key distribution, consistency levels, metrics monitoring, and database management via Azure CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Article illustrations: type × style × palette consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。