「data write」の検索結果

Write a white-labeled report for one client from tracked data. All clients → agency-dashboard. "prepare the monthly client report"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Panel health assessment, firm exit management, coverage gap analysis, and panel refresh brief for in-house legal ops teams. Produce an annual Panel Health Report synthesising scorecard data, billing compliance, and step-out patterns into per-firm recommendations — Retain, Watch, Improvement Plan, or Exit Review. Produce a firm exit pack: formal exit notice with active matter transition plan, plus an internal exit record. Identify practice area, geographic, or tier gaps and produce a structured Coverage Gap Report with remediation options. Produce a Panel Refresh Brief as a scoped input to the RFP process. Trigger on: 'review our panel', 'annual panel review', 'is our panel working', 'which firms should we exit', 'write the exit notice', 'coverage gap', 'we don't have anyone for restructuring', 'refresh the panel', 'panel rationalisation', 'too many firms', 'step-out problem', 'do we have the right firms'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first development — surround the implementation with an executable spec and a gauntlet of constraints (tests, types, coverage, mutation) so line-by-line review becomes optional. Use when the user explicitly asks for high-assurance or evidence-first work ("reliable", "TDD", "prove it works", "I won't read the code"), or when the change touches high-stakes domains (money, auth, data loss, concurrency, public API). For routine changes where the user just wants normal tests, write good tests directly instead of invoking this loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a leader evaluates a marketing TEAM MEMBER using data — a KPI scorecard by role, strengths with real examples, areas to improve stated as observable behavior, a 30 and 90 day development plan, and a 1-5 rating rubric. Trigger on 'performance review for my marketer', 'evaluate a team member', 'monthly 1:1 review', 'feedback for my content writer', 'development plan for an employee', 'is this person underperforming'. Also use when the user is unhappy with someone and cannot articulate why. Not for — evaluating a campaign rather than a person, see `63-campaign-retrospective-global`; reviewing one piece of output, see `62-marketing-review-global`; scoring an external vendor, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to WRITE a marketing report someone else will read — a one-page weekly for a CEO, a full monthly, or a quarterly strategy report with TL;DR, results versus target, insight, decisions needed, and next actions with owners. Trigger on 'marketing report', 'monthly report', 'weekly update for my boss', 'report for the client', 'quarterly summary', 'turn these numbers into a report'. Also use when the user says a stakeholder is asking how marketing is doing. Not for — diagnosing why the numbers are bad, see `03-performance-eval-global`; turning a raw export into insight, see `13-data-analysis-global`; a closed campaign retrospective, see `63-campaign-retrospective-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monthly, and on its first run it is the whole setup, launched by hand. It discovers what the member actually runs by walking their code roots and reading the registrar, the host, and the hosted database, then writes the inventory, the domains file, the starting budgets, and the opening safe fix rules, seeds the board, builds the dashboard, and registers one scheduled job per routine. It creates no account, buys nothing, and provisions nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekdays, browser only when a source refuses to be fetched. Works the single card the standup marked next: reads the shared publishing standard and the card's specification, pulls the live result set for the primary keyword, reads the pages currently ranking, writes the body, the metadata, the internal links and the outbound authority links, generates and compresses a hero, and leaves a complete draft folder with one ready line. It never opens a publishing surface, never touches a live property, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write maintainable Python with small functions, explicit boundaries, guard clauses, and readable state flow. Use when refactoring Python services, helpers, modules, or async logic for clarity—not generic test writing, tooling setup, or database transaction implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write performant Eloquent queries with eager loading, reusable scopes, and strict lazy-loading prevention in Laravel. Use when defining model relationships, creating query scopes, or processing large datasets with chunk/cursor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build dual-write notification services with database persistence and FCM push delivery in NestJS. Use when creating notification entities, sending push via FCM, or implementing in-app notification feeds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write Unit and E2E tests with Jest, mocking strategies, and database isolation in NestJS. Use when writing NestJS unit tests, E2E tests with supertest, or mock providers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write Android unit, Compose UI, and Hilt-integrated tests. Use when designing test behavior with MockK or coroutine test utilities; defer database/WorkManager-specific recipes to the owning feature skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write correct coroutine scopes, lifecycle collection, and dispatcher injection in Android production code. Use for suspend functions, coroutine scopes, and dispatcher mechanics; defer ViewModel StateFlow/LiveData architecture, Fragment lifecycle recipes, persistence/notifications, and unit-test recipes to their specific skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-skill for designing orchestrator+phases structured workflow skills. Creates SKILL.md coordinator with progressive phase loading, TodoWrite patterns, and data flow. Triggers on "design workflow skill", "create workflow skill", "workflow skill designer".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the ax CLI instead of curl + throwaway parsing scripts whenever you fetch a URL, explore an unknown web page, or extract structured data from HTML. Trigger whenever you are about to write an inline script (python3 heredoc, node -e, regex over HTML) or a bare curl for one-off web fetching, scraping, or page exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own MSBuild generated-artifact integration. USE FOR: a target that creates or should create source, Content, None, or another physical file but the artifact is missing from compilation or output; target timing; evaluation-time glob misses; $(IntermediateOutputPath) placement; and FileWrites clean tracking. The prompt may describe the generated artifact without naming the producing task. DO NOT USE when the primary defect is general Include/Remove/Update semantics, item metadata or batching, duplicate/overlapping declarations, or a generated-item identity relationship; use item-management. Exclude Roslyn source-generator internals and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use TUnit. Use when a repo uses `TUnit`, `TUnit.Playwright`, `[Test]`, `[Arguments]`, `ClassDataSource`, `SharedType.PerTestSession`, or Microsoft.Testing.Platform-based execution. Preserve TUnit's parallel-by-default model and constrain only destructive shared-state collisions. DO NOT USE FOR: xUnit projects; MSTest projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, or modernize F# code in .NET repositories with functional-first design, algebraic data types, pattern matching, pipelines, async workflows, project ordering, and C# interop. USE FOR: F# .fs/.fsproj code; discriminated unions, records, options, results, pattern matching, computation expressions, or functional domain modeling; strongly typed AI-generated .NET code. DO NOT USE FOR: C# language modernization; FSI-only exploratory scripts with no project changes. INVOKES: inspect .fsproj file order and SDK settings, edit F# source and project files, and run dotnet build/test or dotnet fsi validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Sep for high-performance separated-value parsing and writing in .NET, including delimiter inference, explicit parser/writer options, and low-allocation row/column workflows. USE FOR: delimited data needs are performance-sensitive and allocation-aware; project needs explicit control over separator inference, escaping, trimming, and header behavior;. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, run, or repair .NET tests that use MSTest. Use when a repo uses `MSTest.Sdk`, `MSTest`, `[TestClass]`, `[TestMethod]`, `DataRow`, or Microsoft.Testing.Platform-based MSTest execution. USE FOR: the repo uses MSTest; you need to add, run, debug, or repair MSTest tests; the repo is moving between VSTest and Microsoft.Testing.Platform. DO NOT USE FOR: xUnit projects; TUnit projects. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

小红书文案改写能力；当用户需要将文案改写为小红书风格时使用

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

专为小红书内容创作打造的一站式笔记生成工具，基于全网每日持续收录的2000+条爆款笔记数据，根据用户输入关键词，精准检索查询平台当下热门爆款笔记，通过AI深度复盘爆款内容的结构、开头逻辑、干货密度与互动话术，提炼核心流量密码与创作要点，严格贴合小红书内容生态与传播逻辑，生成通顺、合规、可直接发布的完整笔记文案，降低创作门槛，高效产出流量内容。仅在主Agent中执行,不派发给子Agent。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。