1,766 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Help users build a professional eye for quality, articulate the reasoning behind successful product paradigms, and develop the conviction to make high-stakes decisions before data is available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users convert massive volumes of qualitative and quantitative feedback into high-confidence product decisions through rigorous synthesis and internal immersion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help users navigate complex product decisions by weighing competing priorities and calculating long-term value. This skill covers build-vs-buy logic, technical debt evaluation, and communicating tradeoffs to senior leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to create, write, update, amend, supersede, or evaluate an ADR, architecture decision record, durable architecture decision, decision log, or baseline sync after architecture-changing work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked for first-principles or Occam's-razor review, or when high-risk decisions involve competing constraints, fallback growth, duplicate owners, or architecture direction risk. Ordinary bug fixes stay on the fast path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define or review a visual system, DESIGN.md, or redesign direction. Use for typography, layout, color, motion, and interaction design decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate system boundaries and architectural tradeoffs. Use for architecture decisions, design reviews, and ADRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the choices an implementing agent made, not its diff — a pure decision audit that traces the session's history into a choices ledger, changes no code, and never blocks an unsupervised run. Working code still embeds architecture the user never chose; surface it because future work inherits it. Use when the user wants to review the decisions the AI made on their behalf, before merging or committing AI-implemented work, when integrating a delegated subagent's pass, or when a fix "works" but might be a point fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Capture architectural decisions made during Claude Code sessions as structured ADRs. Auto-detects decision moments, records context, alternatives considered, and rationale. Maintains an ADR log so future developers understand why the codebase is shaped the way it is.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shape a request into one end-to-end slice with observable behavior; review write scope and reversible decisions. Use when: planning, breaking down or scoping a change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Save provenance, decisions, phases, context policy, and next steps as kernel.handoff/v1. Triggers: handoff, save, pause, context, continue later.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The pre-merge review of a branch in a project that records its specs, decisions, and rules in .archcore/. Run this first for 'review my branch', 'review the changes before merge', or 'review before merge': it checks the changed code against the project's recorded canon and the changed documents against the code, and reports which side is wrong — spec-wrong or code-wrong; with no diff, it reports project health. A bug-hunting code review complements this review and does not replace it. Also use for 'show status', 'documentation gaps', 'check if docs match code', 'close out the feature', 'ship the feature and close it out', or after a staleness warning. Modes, named as the first word: drift for staleness detection, deep for a full documentation audit, closeout to close a finished feature, experience to capture a repeated pattern. Not for creating docs — use /archcore:document; not for planning — use /archcore:plan; not for a single-file edit with no branch review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Waggle automatically as portable, local project memory during meaningful coding work; retrieve prior decisions and constraints, then store only durable outcomes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checkpoint durable decisions, fixes, constraints, results, and open next steps from the current Codex task into scoped Waggle project memory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process meeting recordings and notes into structured decisions, action items, and team dynamics with intelligent noise filtering
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right way to represent a dataset so a reader gets the finding in three seconds — a catalog of 20+ chart and diagram forms with when-to-use and failure modes, plus the encoding decisions that make any of them readable (takeaway headline, direct labels, kill the axis, highlight-and-mute, show the caveat). Style-agnostic — use with whatever palette or design system the destination already has. Use when charting survey results, benchmark data, usage metrics, or research findings for a post, brief, deck, or report, and whenever the default bar chart feels like it's burying the point.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when calibrating expectations for the fast, decisive American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) review process — conditional-accept-or-reject decisions, the single-round model, and pre-empting the objections a short paper cannot afford. Explains the process and stress-tests the paper; it does not write the response letter (see aeri-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning an ACL project calendar across ACL Rolling Review cycles, covering cycle selection against conference commitment windows, backward planning from an ARR deadline, the review-response-meta-review timeline, commitment decisions, resubmission loops to later cycles, and camera-ready through ACL Anthology publication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — Editorial Manager files (anonymized manuscript, separate title page, declarations), Elsevier policies (competing interests, AI, ethics), and open-access decisions. Checks readiness to submit; it does not handle the post-decision response (aos-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to understand or set expectations for the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) editorial and peer-review process — desk review, the developmental multi-round R&R culture, and reading a decision letter. Explains the process and how to read decisions; it does not draft the response letter (amj-rebuttal).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining or planning around AAMAS peer review, covering OpenReview review release, the double-blind rebuttal on preliminary reviews, area-chair discussion, the mixed game-theory, MARL, and systems reviewer pool, the public posting of reviews and decisions, and how acceptance criteria weigh the interaction contribution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when explaining or planning around AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review pilot, author feedback, SPC/AC discussion, and final decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts and assigns COSMIC v3.4 mutational signatures (86 SBS / 11 DBS / 18 ID / 21 CN / 16 SV) from somatic VCFs using SigProfilerSuite, MutationalPatterns, MuSiCal mvNMF, SigNet, or HRDetect. Use when characterizing DNA-damage etiology (BRCA1/2 HRD, MMR-D, POLE, APOBEC3A, UV, tobacco, aflatoxin, 5-FU/SBS17b, platinum, colibactin SBS88), routing PARP inhibitor decisions, or auditing de novo extraction vs refit choice for cohort size.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when making visual or interaction design decisions for an Apple app — HIG patterns, Liquid Glass, SF Symbols, typography, app entry-point and auth-flow structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。