「drafting」の検索結果

OpenClaw-native SIEGER-aligned customer intelligence. Use a structured evidence bundle to produce a bilingual report with claim-level evidence, decision gates, industry-specific analysis, and proposed sales angles that require explicit approval before email drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build bilingual, evidence-backed, SIEGER v2 customer intelligence reports for foreign-trade leads. Use when OpenClaw or a sales operator needs claim-level citations, decision gates, an industry-specific analysis lens, a non-fabricated verdict card, and sales angles that require approval before downstream outreach drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this Canvas-owned clean-room skill to guide collaborative writing for documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision records, PRDs, RFCs, operating guides, and structured memos. Trigger when the user wants help drafting, organizing, refining, reviewing, or testing a document before sharing it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate, rewrite, and select WeChat Official Account article titles for open rate, depth, reader promise, and account tone. Use when drafting, reviewing, publishing, or revising公众号文章标题, especially when titles may be generic, stale, clickbait, AI-flavored, or misaligned with the article's commercial/editorial intent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project-level WeChat article drafting workflow for turning source materials, repo intakes, product notes, screenshots, or existing markdown into a publishable Chinese公众号 draft. Use for writing, rewriting, evidence-gating, title options, platform adaptation, and image planning before optional publishing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WeChat article creator with Fu Sheng's writing style - conversational, story-driven, opinionated. Use this skill whenever the user mentions writing a WeChat article, drafting public account content, crafting a viral headline, creating article covers, writing in Fu Sheng's style, or any request involving 公众号, 微信文章, 爆款标题, or 傅盛风格 — even if they don't explicitly say "skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or refine IDD-ready GitHub issues, roadmap issues, and sub-issues before the normal IDD execution loop begins. Use when a request is too large or ambiguous for one reviewable change, when work needs decomposition or dependency encoding, or when the user asks for issue drafting, roadmap planning, or parallelizable task breakdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when drafting, reviewing, or revising Xiaohongshu/Douyin/social-platform Chinese text so it has real internet-native judgment instead of README tone, technical-briefing tone, or mechanical meme-word stuffing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when splitting content work between a raw drafting model/window, an editor-in-chief, and the user's final taste review. It keeps prompts loose enough for judgment while preserving facts, account boundaries, and publish gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rules, conventions, and constraints for formatting git commit messages and committing at logical boundaries. Trigger when: - Drafting, revising, or validating git commit messages. - Pausing at commit boundaries under the CORE or CONTINUE workflows. - Evaluating whether a changeset should be split into multiple commits. - Prompt contains keywords: commit message, git commit, conventional commits, commit hygiene, commit guidelines, logical boundary, spaghetti diff, atomic commit, commit boundary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, revise, and validate publication-ready academic paper figures and tables. Use for LaTeX tables, related-work comparison tables, result tables, notation/dataset/taxonomy tables, precise source-data-driven experiment plots from CSV/JSON/logs, generated conceptual figures such as system overviews/pipelines/architectures/threat models, captions, artifact specs, source-data traceability, and paper-ready PDF/SVG/PNG/LaTeX exports. Do not use for prose-only paper writing, self-review, reviewer response, rebuttal drafting, or external literature-management workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve, validate, and audit manuscript integrity and applicable requirements for academic manuscripts and paper artifacts. Use when Codex needs to determine active paper rules from manuscript state, paper type, venue, submission stage, or workflow mode; lint a LaTeX paper project; assess submission readiness; create or update a paper policy profile; explain why a rule is active; or validate the paper-policy registries. Do not use as the primary skill for prose drafting, peer review, rebuttal writing, citation discovery, or figure/table creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quick one-shot lookup over Ahmad's OpenMark bookmark knowledge graph (15k+ items from Edge, LinkedIn, YouTube, Raindrop). Use whenever Ahmad asks "find my bookmarks on X", "what did I save about X", "anything in OpenMark about X", or any single-topic search where he wants results in under 10 seconds. NOT for newsletter drafting or deep research — for those use openmark-deep-research or openmark-newsletter. Triggers on "find my", "what did I save", "openmark", "my bookmarks", "search bookmarks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing anything the fleet produces for a person to read: a README, a changelog, a commit message, a review note, a task file, a docblock, a user-facing string. Carries the WordPress Documentation Style Guide rules in `references/`. Use before drafting or rewriting prose, then run the pass that takes the machine out: `humanizer` for English, `humaniseur-fr` for French.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start a working doc — a drafting space where spec-level and implementation thinking co-exist before splitting into specs, plan, and test cases

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workshop the shape of this project — audience, components, ambiguities — before drafting the PRD

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating, designing, drafting, revising, stress-testing, or preparing academic articles, empirical research reports, literature reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, journal submissions, reviewer responses, research methods, sampling, measurement, analysis, publication readiness, or citation/source audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Product-discovery coach for Fishbowl engineers — inspired by Marty Cagan's work (never impersonates him). Stage-routes between opportunity brief, research, PRD, ticket drafting, and outcome review. Triggers on "product coach", "help me with product", "I need to write a PRD", "I want to do discovery", "opportunity assessment", "who is this for", "why are we building this", or when an engineer is starting, resuming, or post-mortem-ing product-adjacent work. Invoke with a short description of what you want to do, or invoke bare to be surveyed and routed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks a master document register extract for gaps and returns a DRAFT question list for document control: missing or out-of-sequence revisions, overdue or slipping deliverables, numbering that breaks the project convention, duplicates and incomplete rows, each with row, test and quoted evidence. Never edits the register, re-baselines a date or marks a deliverable complete. Use when the user asks to "check the MDR", "find the gaps in the deliverables list" or "prepare questions on the drawing register". Do not use for drafting a transmittal from a document list, use transmittal-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesises a batch of customer feedback (survey answers, reviews, ticket and chat comments) into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim quotes cited to record codes, contradictions and unverified claims, and the follow-up questions to answer next. Produces no sentiment score or percentage positive as fact; ratings appear only as distributions with n. Use when the user asks to "theme this feedback", "what are customers saying", "summarise these survey answers", "analyse these reviews", "find the top complaints in these comments" or "code this voice of the customer data". Do not use for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis instead; for sorting a live queue and drafting replies, use ticket-triage-pack; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check, search or digest Gmail across several mailboxes over the owner's own OAuth connector, with no browser and near-zero tokens for the raw pull. Read-only by default: drafting and sending go through the outbound approval gate. Triggers: "/gmail", "check mail", "any important emails", "find the email about <X>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。