「each」の検索結果

Scaffold an isolated CLOUD dev box per agent (via crabbox + Daytona) for any codebase — the parallel-safe counterpart to dev-local-setup. Each agent gets its own full stack (own DB + dev server) and an in-box browser for e2e, so concurrent loops never collide on ports/state. Sets up the snapshot image, .crabbox.yaml, an idempotent setup.sh (also boots the stack locally), and a cbx.sh wrapper. Use when the user says "set up crabbox", "give each agent its own box", "add cloud testing", "make this repo testable in the cloud / on Daytona", "parallel-test this", or when setup-codebase-harness needs true per-agent isolation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-pipeline orchestrator. Runs all 7 roles (BA → TechLead → PM → BE Dev → FE Dev → Tester → QA/QC) in sequence by loading and following each per-role skill. Uses pre_write_validator.py hook enforcement and each role's self-validation. Use per-agent commands ($team-ba, $team-techlead, etc.) for manual control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a verified Salesforce research packet into a concise, role-aware learning brief with clear objectives, concept sequencing, worked examples, release caveats, checks for understanding, and citations mapped to claims. Trigger keywords: teach me Salesforce, explain Salesforce concept, create learning brief, Salesforce study guide, role-based lesson. NOT for open-ended source discovery or freshness verification — use architect/salesforce-learning-research first. NOT for generating production metadata or changing an org.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specify a FlexCard before a developer opens Card Designer: the card-state set and the condition that selects each state, the data source type behind each card (DataRaptor, Integration Procedure, Apex remote, SOQL), the action menu users get (navigate, launch OmniScript, Apex, DataRaptor), and every embedded child FlexCard or custom LWC. Produces the artifacts a BA hands to the builder. Trigger keywords: FlexCard requirements, FlexCard BA, FlexCard layout design, FlexCard data sources, FlexCard actions, FlexCard card states, OmniStudio FlexCard scoping. NOT for building the card in Card Designer, NOT for OmniScript step and branching requirements (use admin/omniscript-flow-design-requirements), NOT for standard Lightning record-page component requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up customer outreach sequences via [Lemlist](https://composio.dev/toolkits/lemlist), [Reply.io](https://composio.dev/toolkits/reply-io), or [Woodpecker](https://composio.dev/toolkits/woodpecker-co)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enrich customer/lead profiles with business data using [LeadIQ](https://composio.dev/toolkits/leadiq), [RocketReach](https://composio.dev/toolkits/rocket-reach), or [Clearout](https://composio.dev/toolkits/clearout)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adopt declscope on an existing Go codebase and drive its diagnostics to zero. Read this when introducing declscope to a repository, when choosing its configuration, when running declscope shrink for the first time, or when clearing a declscope baseline. Covers sizing each rule before enabling it, reading the diagnostics as structure, the remedy for each shape, and the measurement traps that produce false confidence. For writing new code in a repository that already runs declscope, use declscope-authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispatch an explicit, user-dictated set of edits that spans TWO OR MORE zones of the GDD — the master spec, systems, content types, and flows — in one ordered pass. Writes nothing itself: it resolves each delta to its (target, zone), orders them so a system change lands before the content or flow that depends on it, delegates each to the owning skill (/unikit-gd-spec, /unikit-gd-system, /unikit-gd-content, /unikit-gd-flow), and closes with one /unikit-gd-verify pass. Use when you already know the changes and they touch more than one part of the design, e.g. "apply these GDD changes", "update the combat system and its loot and the boss flow". It also takes a /unikit-gd-review report file (applies its apply-ready bucket), and a bare /unikit-gd-apply reads the last /unikit-gd-verify output in the session. For a single-zone change call its owner directly; to research an open question use /unikit-gd-explore first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor social platforms for security threats, vulnerability discussions, and breach intelligence using Xpoz. Use when asked to "find CVE discussions", "security threat monitoring", "OSINT social media", "vulnerability intelligence", "breach mentions", or "threat intel from Twitter/Reddit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements sub-tasks from a task list at .ai/[feature]/tasks.md strictly one at a time, stopping after each to ask the user before starting the next, and keeping the task list and Relevant Files section current. Use when the user wants to review or approve each sub-task before work continues, rather than letting the agent run the list unattended with task-orchestration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design deployment-focused distillation systems that balance model size, accuracy, calibration, and cascade escalation under real resource limits. Best for teacher-student compression, threshold design, and failure-aware deployment. Activate on "model compression", "teacher- student", "distillation score", "cascade model", "edge deployment", or "model calibration". NOT for generic deep-learning overviews, prompt optimization, or training work without a concrete distillation objective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply practical DAG decomposition, transitive-edge reduction, and reachability indexing to dense dependency graphs. Use when low width and repeated queries justify preprocessing. NOT for cyclic graphs, one-off graph checks, or exact-minimum-chain requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Deep comparison of A2A protocol, MCP, OpenAI function calling, and LangChain message types. Teaches when to use rigid schemas vs free-form with validation, typed vs untyped, streaming vs batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversation patterns and interaction protocols for multi-agent systems. Covers request/response, pub/sub, blackboard, delegation chains, debate, critique, consensus, fan-out/fan-in, supervisor-worker, and peer negotiation. Deep analysis of AutoGen conversation patterns, CrewAI delegation, LangGraph state passing, and FIPA-ACL performatives. Teaches how to design what agents say to each other and in what order. Activate on: "agent conversation", "agent protocol", "multi-agent debate", "agent delegation", "supervisor worker pattern", "agent voting", "consensus protocol", "fan-out fan-in", "agent negotiation", "blackboard pattern", "agent dialogue", "conversation topology", "agent handoff". NOT for: wire format or serialization (use agent-interchange-formats), orchestration infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), single agent behavior (use agentic-patterns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Observe the user's screen via screenpipe, detect repeated research workflows, match them against existing scientific-agent-skills, and draft new skills (or composition recipes that chain existing ones) for the patterns not yet covered. Use when the user asks to analyze their recent work and propose skills based on what they actually do. Requires the screenpipe daemon (https://github.com/screenpipe/screenpipe) running locally on port 3030 — the skill has no other data source and will refuse to run if screenpipe is unreachable. All detection runs locally; only redacted cluster summaries reach the LLM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute a swarm plan wave by wave with filesystem isolation via git worktrees. For each wave, main context decides the scenario recipe + implementation contract for every task, then spawns one swarm-worker per task in parallel. Each worker executes its recipe and reports JSON status. Worktree merge-audit verifies write-set discipline before changes land on main. Aborts remaining waves on any audit or task failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose an approved spec into a dependency-ordered swarm plan — one task per component, each with an explicit write_set. Produces `.claude/state/swarm/<slug>.json` with tasks + waves. The wave scheduler guarantees pairwise-disjoint write_sets within each wave so parallel dispatch is provably conflict-free.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an org-team workflow — a flat pod of up to four peer Claude Code sessions claims lane-tagged slices of an approved spec over the baseline MCP channel and implements them concurrently, each in its own git worktree. Each peer DECIDES its own in-lane implementation choices in its own main context (Article X); only un-decidable or cross-lane forks escalate peer→lead→human (yield_fork for task-bound forks, ask_lead for free-form queries). Opt-in and OFF by default (velocity.org_mode.enabled). Graduates the retired sprint-dispatch prototype into the constitutionally-sanctioned org-team model (Article X — Multi-session coordinated workflows). Requires git.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate conservative, editable English outreach drafts for foreign-trade sales from structured lead inputs and customer-intel signals. Use when an operator needs a first-touch or follow-up email draft that calls confirmed recent/customer-market signals from the customer-intel Skill, with subject options, review notes, and explicit reminders not to present unconfirmed facts as facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClaw-native version of the foreign-trade outreach email skill. Use structured operator input plus customer-intel source context to generate conservative first-touch or follow-up email drafts without overstating inferred facts or inventing recent customer events.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds the "Report Sources" child page for a finished Weekly Community Signal report — an evidence-backed defense of WHY every item landed in the column/section/rank it did. The agent argues each placement like a lawyer (claim → evidence → rule → rebuttal) but is under oath: it CANNOT invent, spin, or overstate — every claim ties to a verifiable fact (issue #, label, PR type, quoted comment, npm output, the front-door test). Not CYA — it's so Nathan can defend the report with facts and see the exact reasoning behind each call. Runs after the report (invoked by weekly-report, last steps) and on "report sources", "defend the report", "why is this here".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。